I am really enjoying reading your blog. If you want to buy villa in Noida Extension then call on the given number-8375000707 as we give you the best offers for buying villa in Noida Extension. https://www.villasinnoida.com/villas-in-noida-extension.php
I am really enjoying reading your blog. If you want to buy villa in Noida Extension then call on the given number-8375000707 as we give you the best offers for buying villa in Noida Extension. https://www.villasinnoida.com/villas-in-noida-extension.php
Hillary Clinton wrote an op-ed in The Atlantic where she describes a "war on empathy" at the heart of the MAGA movement, as she directly called out Christian conservative writer Allie Beth Stuckey.
Today Allie addresses Hillary Rodham Clinton's recent hit piece titled "MAGA'S War on Empathy" published in the Atlantic. Allie passionately responds to the misrepresentations made in this article about her and highlights Clinton's hypocrisy on several issues, including abortion, immigration, and transgenderism. Hillary tries to call for more, not less, empathy and for Christians to ignore conservatives' voices. Why is she attacking Allie and others right now? Democrats are trying to sway the Christian vote. Tune in for Allie's biblical and logical response as she navigates the lies portrayed of her in this article.
Buy Allie's book "Toxic Empathy: How Progressives Exploit Christian Compassion": https://www.toxicempathy.com
Background: Empathy is a core component of effective physician-patient communication and is associated with improved clinical relationships and patient experience. As generative artificial intelligence (AI) models such as ChatGPT (OpenAI, San Francisco, California, United States) are increasingly explored for clinical documentation support, it is important to understand whether these systems can produce language that reflects empathic communication.
Objective: This study evaluated empathic communication in ChatGPT-generated clinical notes through two distinct approaches: (i) quantitative measurement of linguistic markers using established communication frameworks, and (ii) qualitative characterization of empathic styles and patterns.
Empathy has become a baseline expectation of modern leadership, but practiced without judgment it can backfire, leaving leaders depleted and employees feeling misunderstood.
Effective leadership requires a more discerning approach: wise empathy, which recognizes that different emotional moments call for different responses. Sharing in employees’ negative emotions can accelerate burnout, while responding to those with compassion and support can protect both leaders and teams.
The opposite is often true for positive emotions, which benefit from shared celebration. If leaders take five steps designed to guide them in the practice of wise empathy, they can strengthen relationships, improve engagement and retention, and support others without losing their own footing.
Previous studies have shown that those who score high in social dominance orientation also have favorable views towards authoritarianism, sexism, racism, and xenophobia—to name a few—and less favorable views of traits like empathy. Indeed, empathy is an increasingly important societal topic and has even entered mainstream political discourse. For example, Charlie Kirk, an American conservative figure, once famously argued that “empathy is a made-up, New Age term that does a lot of damage.”
What is the relationship between these practices, traits, and orientations? Previous studies have routinely found that mindfulness and self-compassion appeared to be positively related to empathy. It seems intuitive that these intrapersonal practices could broaden to interpersonal attitudes. Could contemplative practices such as mindfulness or self-compassion not only affect empathy, but also broader social orientations?
As new footage allegedly shows Alex Pretti violently attacking law enforcement just one week before he was fatally shot, the political left continues to lean hard into emotional narratives to pressure the Trump administration on deportations.
But is this empathy honest…or toxic?
From celebrity tears to moments of silence at NBA games, the “toxic empathy” around Minnesota ICE enforcement ignores the root of the problem—and, minute by minute, it’s reshaping public trust in law enforcement and how America interprets justice.
Our speaker for this week is Dr. C. Daryl Cameron, Associate Professor in the Department of Psychology at Penn State University
Description Given the proliferation of AI chatbot platforms, would and should people choose to receive empathetic expressions from chatbots? To advance this interdisciplinary debate, I will outline a motivated empathy framework on empathic AI, which outlines the importance of taking the recipient-focused perspective seriously, and directly assessing people’s preferences to understand what they want and why. I will summarize our empirical work on choices to receive empathy from AI expressers, emphasizing how choice methodologies can enhance our understanding of this debate. I will also discuss some of our ongoing work which explores how different modalities may matter for reception of AI. Broadening back out, I will discuss how human-AI interactions can be a useful lens through which to reconsider how we define our constructs in psychological science to be participatory and inclusive, and what this may imply for theory development about empathic AI.
Why Empathetic AI Matters For customers, this shift could change the emotional equation from “I hope my insurer helps me” to “My insurer is already helping me.” In my experience, customer confidence typically grows when the amount of effort required decreases.
For insurers, empathy and automation can drive measurable value. Efficiency can improve as AI handles coordination and documentation, allowing adjusters to focus on complex decisions. Customer satisfaction and retention can rise when people feel cared for, not processed. Our company sees this daily as our AI agents manage repetitive tasks while reacting to tone, context and timing, empowering our teams to focus on emotional moments. When automation becomes empathetic, it can amplify your team's humanity rather than replacing it.
In 2012, autistic scholar Damian Milton introduced the term double empathy problem (DEP) to describe the mutual misunderstandings that can occur between autistic and non-autistic people (Milton, 2012). He challenged the long-held view that social and communication differences in autism were signs of a deficit within autistic people themselves. Instead, he suggested that these moments of disconnection arise between people, from mismatched expectations, worldviews, and communication styles.
In this framing, empathy is not something one person has and another lacks. It is a relational space that can falter when two ways of being and communicating collide. What we call social difficulty may, in truth, be a two way struggle to translate experience across different perceptual and cultural worlds. This links in to the dialectical misattunement hypothesis (DMH) which proposed that various psychiatric and developmental conditions are not a disordered function of individual brains but a mismatch of interpersonal dynamics (Bolis, Balsters, Wenderoth, Becchio, & Schilbach, 2017).
La empatía es una de las virtudes más necesarias en la sociedad, nos acerca a los demás y nos muestra cómo somos y qué somos. Nos hace sentir a los demás y conocernos un poco más eso es lo que nos hace ser humanos.
La empatía es por tanto, una capacidad cognitiva y emocional que nos hace comprender y compartir los sentimientos, las emociones y puntos de vista distintos a nosotros, lo que llamamos "ponernos en los zapatos de otros", es por tanto, un componente clave de la inteligencia emocional produciendo conductas altruistas y valorando la validación de las emociones ajenas, en definitiva, nos hace comprendernos mejor. Porque la empatía nos hace que conectemos emocionalmente mejor, el wifi de las emociones.
Hay una idea muy extendida en nuestra cultura: cuando la comunicación no funciona, alguien ha fallado. Durante décadas, esa responsabilidad ha recaído casi siempre en las personas neurodivergentes, a quienes se ha descrito como carentes de habilidades sociales o empatía. Sin embargo, investigaciones recientes invitan a replantear esta narrativa y a entender los malentendidos no como un déficit individual, sino como un fenómeno relacional. La psicóloga Sue Fletcher-Watson (2019) sostiene que la comunicación es un proceso bidireccional que depende del contexto, de las expectativas compartidas y de los marcos culturales de quienes participan en ella. Desde esta perspectiva, no resulta sorprendente que personas con experiencias neurológicas similares se comprendan con mayor facilidad entre sí, mientras que las dificultades surgen con más fuerza en entornos donde conviven distintos estilos comunicativos. Esta idea conecta con el llamado problema de la doble empatía, que plantea que las rupturas comunicativas entre personas neurodivergentes y neurotípicas se producen porque ambas interpretan el mundo desde marcos distintos. No se trata de que unas personas “no sepan” empatizar, sino de que la empatía se construye —o se pierde— en el encuentro entre dos formas diferentes de percibir y expresar la realidad (Chown et al., 2017). Desde este enfoque, la incomodidad, el silencio o la sensación de “no encajar” dejan de ser signos de incapacidad y pasan a entenderse como señales de desajuste relacional. Algo similar ocurre dentro de las propias personas. El modelo de Internal Family Systems, desarrollado por Richard Schwartz (1995), propone que la mente está compuesta por partes con funciones, lenguajes y ritmos distintos. Cuando estas partes no se escuchan entre sí, aparecen tensiones internas muy parecidas a las que surgen en la comunicación entre personas de diferentes neurotipos. Así, una parte que necesita proteger puede entrar en conflicto con otra que busca expresarse libremente; una parte verbal puede no comprender a otra que se comunica a través del cuerpo, la imagen o el silencio. De nuevo, no se trata de un fallo, sino de una falta de traducción entre lenguajes internos distintos. Mirar la comunicación desde esta óptica supone un cambio profundo. Implica dejar de exigir adaptación unilateral y comenzar a crear espacios donde la diferencia no sea corregida, sino reconocida. Como señalan Fletcher-Watson y Happé (2019), el reto no es enseñar a unas personas a parecerse más a otras, sino ampliar nuestra comprensión de lo que cuenta como comunicación válida. En un mundo cada vez más diverso, aprender a sostener la incomodidad del no entender del todo puede ser una de las formas más honestas de construir conexión. Tanto hacia fuera como hacia dentro.
Referencias:
Chown, N., et al. (2017). Improving research about us, with us: A draft framework for inclusive autism research. Disability & Society, 32(5), 720–734.
Fletcher-Watson, S. (2019). Autism and empathy: What are the real links? Autism, 23(1), 3–5.
Fletcher-Watson, S., & Happé, F. (2019). Autism: A new introduction to psychological theory and current debate.
Routledge. Schwartz, R. C. (1995). Internal Family Systems Therapy. Guilford Press.
Every president I’ve ever covered gets more full of himself the longer he remains in office, and when you start out with Trump-level self-regard, the effect is grandiosity, entitlement, lack of empathy and ferocious overreaction to perceived slights.
Bel Jacobs and The Empathy Project team would like to invite you to the first screening of The Empathy Project film, a documentary about change and compassion in animal activism.
Commissioned by The Empathy Project, directed by Tristan Copley-Smith, the new film explores and uplifts public concern for animals, normalising advocacy by platforming a wide variety of voices from the movement.
Today Allie addresses Hillary Rodham Clinton's recent hit piece titled "MAGA'S War on Empathy" published in the Atlantic. Allie passionately responds to the misrepresentations made in this article about her and highlights Clinton's hypocrisy on several issues, including abortion, immigration, and transgenderism.
Hillary tries to call for more, not less, empathy and for Christians to ignore conservatives' voices. Why is she attacking Allie and others right now? Democrats are trying to sway the Christian vote. Tune in for Allie's biblical and logical response as she navigates the lies portrayed of her in this article.
Today Hillary Clinton published a piece in the Atlantic on her Christian faith, the United States.
“How can a person of conscience justify the lack of compassion and empathy for the victims in Minnesota, and for the families torn apart or hiding in fear, for the children separated from their parents or afraid to go to school?”
In her piece, she wrestles with the question of how we—those who think of themselves as compassionate in a Christian or secular key—can possibly respond with empathy for those who clearly lack it. She includes among those who lack empathy the men who killed Renee Good and Alex Pretti.
Explore and experience an Empathy Circle on the topic The Power of Self-Empathy. No experience necessary. All are welcome.
Empathy Circles are a great way to enhance your communication skills, whilst connecting with other people -- around the world!It is very easy to learn, in a chill environment. You will be really glad that you gave it a try because it is not only enjoyable, but also relaxing. And, a great way to spend an evening that is new and rewarding.
Empathy is having a moment. Scientific research has indicated empathy works against selfishness and indifference, strengthening societies. But there’s a growing number of mostly conservative voices — in the U.S. and in Canada — who strongly disagree. Their argument is that empathy can be dangerous — driving irrational thinking and behaviour in public life. The result is a growing battle over empathy in a world that has never seemed to need it more.
Empathic Leadership During the 90’s and noughties it felt to me that some progress had been made. People started to openly talk about caring and listening to their teams. Even mindfulness became a bit of a buzzword. However in the last decade we seem to have reached a new plateau with corporate messaging about welfare and wellbeing being ubiquitous, whilst the pressure on teams, in particular leaders, has increased.
Many organisations claim that they are only as good as their people. If that is true and if your organisation relies on the people in it to thrive, make money and grow it is vital to understand and be aware of what your people are going through.
Dan’s experience reveals the power of empathy in healing. Research by Kitzmüller et al. (2019) backs it up by showing that empathic care and listening to people’s stories led to improved recovery and a greater sense of meaning and manageability. Yet, what happens when the healing power of empathy backfires and leads to burnout?
Empathy is having a moment. Scientific research has indicated empathy works against selfishness and indifference, strengthening societies. But there’s a growing number of mostly conservative voices — in the U.S. and in Canada — who strongly disagree. Their argument is that empathy can be dangerous — driving irrational thinking and behaviour in public life. The result is a growing battle over empathy in a world that has never seemed to need it more.
Empathy is under attack with claims that it can be toxic and dangerous to society.
That’s despite the fact a number of scientific studies have found empathy to be highly beneficial to society and likely innate. The ability to feel what someone else is feeling, can be the impetus for compassion and altruism — an important social glue.
But a growing chorus of mostly conservative writers, podcasters and influencers — mainly in the U.S. but also in Canada — argue empathy is too easily manipulated. They say it’s being hijacked by progressives to justify equity, diversity, abortion, immigration and other progressive causes.
Gad Saad is one of those voices critical of empathy as a given common good. He is an author, a popular podcaster and commentator. His upcoming book is called Suicidal Empathy: Dying To Be Kind, an examination of “the descent to madness by highlighting the inability to implement optimal decisions when our emotional system is tricked."
Empathy is having a moment. Scientific research has indicated empathy works against selfishness and indifference, strengthening societies. But there’s a growing number of mostly conservative voices — in the U.S. and in Canada — who strongly disagree. Their argument is that empathy can be dangerous — driving irrational thinking and behaviour in public life. The result is a growing battle over empathy in a world that has never seemed to need it more.
Cognitive empathy: understanding the story behind the feeling Cognitive empathy is less about feeling and more about insight. It is the mental ability to grasp what someone else might be thinking or experiencing, even if you do not feel it yourself.
A manager using cognitive empathy might not personally share an employee’s panic about a deadline, yet still understand the pressure they feel, the fear of failure, and the backstory that makes this project so sensitive.
Previously, I wrote an essay called ‘Empathy is Overrated’. A clickbaity title, I know. I wanted to overwrite that essay, since I felt a lot of it was outdated and poorly phrased…but an acquaintance of mine recommended that I instead make it a separate essay, keeping the original.
Dark empathy allows you to recognize what someone is feeling without emotionally merging with them. You can identify distress, insecurity, or manipulation while staying internally regulated. This emotional distance keeps you from spiraling when others do. It allows you to act strategically instead of reactively.
A 2025 analysis by the Personality Research Institute found that individuals high in cognitive empathy but low in emotional contagion were overrepresented in leadership roles. Researchers noted this group could remain calm under pressure without becoming detached or cruel. This balance helped them make decisions others avoided. Emotional clarity, not emotional intensity, drove effectiveness.
To get content containing either thought or leadership enter:
To get content containing both thought and leadership enter:
To get content containing the expression thought leadership enter:
You can enter several keywords and you can refine them whenever you want. Our suggestion engine uses more signals but entering a few keywords here will rapidly give you great content to curate.
I am really enjoying reading your blog. If you want to buy villa in Noida Extension then call on the given number-8375000707 as we give you the best offers for buying villa in Noida Extension. https://www.villasinnoida.com/villas-in-noida-extension.php
I am really enjoying reading your blog. If you want to buy Plots in Meerut then call on the given number-7289000808 as we give you the best offers for buying Plots inMeerut. https://www.meerutrealty.in/shree-kunj-greens-shamli-road-meerut.php
I am really enjoying reading your blog. If you want to buy plots in Noida Expressway then call on the given number 7289000808 as we give you the best offers for buying plots in Noida Expressway. https://www.plotsinnoida.com/residential-plots-in-noida-expressway.php