Recent events make all of us wonder how people, especially young people, develop legitimate concern for others. Empathy is essential for a healthy society.
Empathy — the ability to understand and care about how other people feel, a fundamental aspect of humanity.
Recently, our country became aware of the devastating consequences that happen when there is a dramatic failure of empathy. Developing and maintaining empathy for others, even in the face of strong dislike or disagreement, is one of society’s most pressing concerns.
I am really enjoying reading your blog. If you want to buy villa in Noida Extension then call on the given number-8375000707 as we give you the best offers for buying villa in Noida Extension. https://www.villasinnoida.com/villas-in-noida-extension.php
What Is The Empathy Gap? Studies have shown that the American workforce has been calling for empathy and caring from higher-ups and corporate honchos. Sadly, that message hasn’t thoroughly filtered up the chain because of the empathy gap. That happens when business leaders have trouble understanding or feeling the emotional states of employees.
Businesssolver’s 2025 State of Workplace Empathy Report reveals a gap between CEOs, HR and employees as business leaders insist they’re more empathetic than workers say they are. According to the report, employees at un-empathetic companies are 1.5 times more likely to quit, the empathy gap costing as much as $180 billion annually through employee turnover, mental health issues and workplace toxicity. Still, nearly 60% of CEOs see empathy as a perk.
Is empathy a weakness? Recently The Atlantic published an opinion piece by Hillary Clinton titled “MAGA’s War on Empathy.” The Trump Administration, she writes, equates empathy and compassion with weakness and cruelty with strength. At the same time, the New York Post published an op ed on the “perils of toxic empathy.” The author of the latter, Bethany Mandel, blames empathy for the current unrest in Minneapolis. She argues that empathy is an emotion “that’s strangling any hope of reasoned debate on law enforcement and illegal immigration.” And Elon Musk really did say that ‘The fundamental weakness of Western civilization is empathy.”
When I first saw that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had called me “an extremist pastor” in The Atlantic, I immediately thought, “I should probably double my life insurance.” My next thought was “This should be fun to answer.” After all, we have very different worldviews. Probably the only two things we agree on is that 1) Empathy is central to our cultural divide, and 2) Epstein didn’t kill himself.
Clinton identifies me and Allie Beth Stuckey as part of a “cadre of hard-right Christian influencers who are waging a war on empathy.” According to Clinton, we reject “bedrock Christian values such as dignity, mercy, and compassion” and our criticisms of empathy “reveal a moral rot” and reflect “moral blindness or moral bankruptcy.”
Edwin Rutsch and Martin Golder, author of Journey to Empathy, discuss the concept of empathy, its definitions, and its practical applications. Martin, a retired architect and mediator, shares his journey from mechanical empathy to genuine empathy, emphasizing the importance of understanding and connecting with others.
They explore the definition of empathy, the role of empathy in mediation, and its impact on brain structure. Edwin introduces his model of Wholistic Empathy, which includes Basic Empathy, Self-Empathy, Imaginative Empathy, Mutual Empathy and Empathic Action. They also discuss the potential of empathy circles to bridge political divides and improve societal dynamics, advocating for empathy as a tool for better communication and conflict resolution.
Today Allie addresses Hillary Rodham Clinton's recent hit piece titled "MAGA'S War on Empathy" published in the Atlantic. Allie passionately responds to the misrepresentations made in this article about her and highlights Clinton's hypocrisy on several issues, including abortion, immigration, and transgenderism.
Hillary tries to call for more, not less, empathy and for Christians to ignore conservatives' voices. Why is she attacking Allie and others right now? Democrats are trying to sway the Christian vote. Tune in for Allie's biblical and logical response as she navigates the lies portrayed of her in this article.
Today Hillary Clinton published a piece in the Atlantic on her Christian faith, the United States.
“How can a person of conscience justify the lack of compassion and empathy for the victims in Minnesota, and for the families torn apart or hiding in fear, for the children separated from their parents or afraid to go to school?”
In her piece, she wrestles with the question of how we—those who think of themselves as compassionate in a Christian or secular key—can possibly respond with empathy for those who clearly lack it. She includes among those who lack empathy the men who killed Renee Good and Alex Pretti.
Explore and experience an Empathy Circle on the topic The Power of Self-Empathy. No experience necessary. All are welcome.
Empathy Circles are a great way to enhance your communication skills, whilst connecting with other people -- around the world!It is very easy to learn, in a chill environment. You will be really glad that you gave it a try because it is not only enjoyable, but also relaxing. And, a great way to spend an evening that is new and rewarding.
Empathy is having a moment. Scientific research has indicated empathy works against selfishness and indifference, strengthening societies. But there’s a growing number of mostly conservative voices — in the U.S. and in Canada — who strongly disagree. Their argument is that empathy can be dangerous — driving irrational thinking and behaviour in public life. The result is a growing battle over empathy in a world that has never seemed to need it more.
Empathic Leadership During the 90’s and noughties it felt to me that some progress had been made. People started to openly talk about caring and listening to their teams. Even mindfulness became a bit of a buzzword. However in the last decade we seem to have reached a new plateau with corporate messaging about welfare and wellbeing being ubiquitous, whilst the pressure on teams, in particular leaders, has increased.
Many organisations claim that they are only as good as their people. If that is true and if your organisation relies on the people in it to thrive, make money and grow it is vital to understand and be aware of what your people are going through.
Dan’s experience reveals the power of empathy in healing. Research by Kitzmüller et al. (2019) backs it up by showing that empathic care and listening to people’s stories led to improved recovery and a greater sense of meaning and manageability. Yet, what happens when the healing power of empathy backfires and leads to burnout?
Empathy is having a moment. Scientific research has indicated empathy works against selfishness and indifference, strengthening societies. But there’s a growing number of mostly conservative voices — in the U.S. and in Canada — who strongly disagree. Their argument is that empathy can be dangerous — driving irrational thinking and behaviour in public life. The result is a growing battle over empathy in a world that has never seemed to need it more.
REICHARD: Clinton called Rigney an “extremist pastor,” citing his book Leadership and the Sin of Empathy. She accused him—along with Allie Beth Stuckey—of waging what she called a “war on empathy” and rejecting Christian virtues like mercy and compassion.
EICHER: But Rigney says that charge misunderstands his argument. Here now is his response.
JOE RIGNEY: When I read an article by Hillary Clinton accusing me of being a bad Christian for waging a “war on empathy,” I realized it was an opportunity to clarify something important.
Empathy has become one of those ideas that feels almost untouchable. It’s hard to criticize without sounding cold or dismissive, and so we rarely do. In psychology, education, and public life, we’re encouraged—often rightly—to understand where people are coming from, especially when their behavior is troubling or difficult to defend. But over time, I’ve become less certain that empathy, on its own, is the moral guide we sometimes assume it to be
iAl Mohler on "The Briefing" Al Mohler doesn’t believe empathy is a real thing, but he does believe Hillary Clinton has ruined the idea of social justice.
In his Feb. 3 podcast called “The Briefing,” the president of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary joined the conservative evangelical war on empathy and responded to Clinton’s recent essay in The Atlantic titled, “MAGA’s War on Empathy.”
In that essay, the former U.S. secretary of state and senator laments conservatives’ apparent disregard for empathy for immigrant families and peaceful protesters. She draws examples from Minneapolis and the murders of Renee Good and Alex Pretti.
“Whatever you think about immigration policy, how can a person of conscience justify the lack of compassion and empathy for the victims in Minnesota, and for the families torn apart or hiding in fear, for the children separated from their parents or afraid to go to school?” she asks. “That compassion is weak and cruelty is strong has become an article of MAGA faith.”
by Sarah Cain Hillary Clinton has written an op-ed for The Atlantic that is permeated with moral indignation. She decries “MAGA’s War on Empathy” and then engages in a one-woman war on Truth. Her piece may remind readers of the older rhetoric of the political Left, which they don’t use as much anymore, wherein they proclaim that those on the Right are immoral monsters and those on the Left are heroically trying to protect the victims and institute virtuous policies.
Hillary claims that the conservative movement is morally descending. Thus, she laments the lost era of Reagan’s optimism and cheery personality, but her entire essay stands in testament to his reminder that “the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they’re ignorant; it’s just that they know so much that isn’t so.”
Every Wednesday evening Ingrid and I host an empathy circle on Zoom. We just passed the one-year mark - over 60 meetings. People show up, some very consistent, frequently new people, and something happens that still surprises me.
Something opens in a person when they feel fully heard. Not advised. Not fixed. Not redirected. Not even commented on... just received. After doing circles for over a year, it has become clear to me that listening like this is not part of our conditioning; it's new.
Hillary Clinton wrote an op-ed in The Atlantic where she describes a "war on empathy" at the heart of the MAGA movement, as she directly called out Christian conservative writer Allie Beth Stuckey.
Today Allie addresses Hillary Rodham Clinton's recent hit piece titled "MAGA'S War on Empathy" published in the Atlantic. Allie passionately responds to the misrepresentations made in this article about her and highlights Clinton's hypocrisy on several issues, including abortion, immigration, and transgenderism. Hillary tries to call for more, not less, empathy and for Christians to ignore conservatives' voices. Why is she attacking Allie and others right now? Democrats are trying to sway the Christian vote. Tune in for Allie's biblical and logical response as she navigates the lies portrayed of her in this article.
Buy Allie's book "Toxic Empathy: How Progressives Exploit Christian Compassion": https://www.toxicempathy.com
Background: Empathy is a core component of effective physician-patient communication and is associated with improved clinical relationships and patient experience. As generative artificial intelligence (AI) models such as ChatGPT (OpenAI, San Francisco, California, United States) are increasingly explored for clinical documentation support, it is important to understand whether these systems can produce language that reflects empathic communication.
Objective: This study evaluated empathic communication in ChatGPT-generated clinical notes through two distinct approaches: (i) quantitative measurement of linguistic markers using established communication frameworks, and (ii) qualitative characterization of empathic styles and patterns.
Empathy has become a baseline expectation of modern leadership, but practiced without judgment it can backfire, leaving leaders depleted and employees feeling misunderstood.
Effective leadership requires a more discerning approach: wise empathy, which recognizes that different emotional moments call for different responses. Sharing in employees’ negative emotions can accelerate burnout, while responding to those with compassion and support can protect both leaders and teams.
The opposite is often true for positive emotions, which benefit from shared celebration. If leaders take five steps designed to guide them in the practice of wise empathy, they can strengthen relationships, improve engagement and retention, and support others without losing their own footing.
Previous studies have shown that those who score high in social dominance orientation also have favorable views towards authoritarianism, sexism, racism, and xenophobia—to name a few—and less favorable views of traits like empathy. Indeed, empathy is an increasingly important societal topic and has even entered mainstream political discourse. For example, Charlie Kirk, an American conservative figure, once famously argued that “empathy is a made-up, New Age term that does a lot of damage.”
What is the relationship between these practices, traits, and orientations? Previous studies have routinely found that mindfulness and self-compassion appeared to be positively related to empathy. It seems intuitive that these intrapersonal practices could broaden to interpersonal attitudes. Could contemplative practices such as mindfulness or self-compassion not only affect empathy, but also broader social orientations?
As new footage allegedly shows Alex Pretti violently attacking law enforcement just one week before he was fatally shot, the political left continues to lean hard into emotional narratives to pressure the Trump administration on deportations.
But is this empathy honest…or toxic?
From celebrity tears to moments of silence at NBA games, the “toxic empathy” around Minnesota ICE enforcement ignores the root of the problem—and, minute by minute, it’s reshaping public trust in law enforcement and how America interprets justice.
Our speaker for this week is Dr. C. Daryl Cameron, Associate Professor in the Department of Psychology at Penn State University
Description Given the proliferation of AI chatbot platforms, would and should people choose to receive empathetic expressions from chatbots? To advance this interdisciplinary debate, I will outline a motivated empathy framework on empathic AI, which outlines the importance of taking the recipient-focused perspective seriously, and directly assessing people’s preferences to understand what they want and why. I will summarize our empirical work on choices to receive empathy from AI expressers, emphasizing how choice methodologies can enhance our understanding of this debate. I will also discuss some of our ongoing work which explores how different modalities may matter for reception of AI. Broadening back out, I will discuss how human-AI interactions can be a useful lens through which to reconsider how we define our constructs in psychological science to be participatory and inclusive, and what this may imply for theory development about empathic AI.
To get content containing either thought or leadership enter:
To get content containing both thought and leadership enter:
To get content containing the expression thought leadership enter:
You can enter several keywords and you can refine them whenever you want. Our suggestion engine uses more signals but entering a few keywords here will rapidly give you great content to curate.
Your new post is loading...
