Earlier this week, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg revealed that the company is working on a way for users to express dislike for a post without leaving a comment. If these patents hint anything about what’s in store, expect to see something very Slack-like.
Facebook has its own set of emoji art, but based on the patent illustration, it may limit users to a handful of emoticons to avoid cluttering the post. The mockups below show that user icons may also appear next to the emoji reactions to display exactly who ‘liked’ or ’empathized’ with a post.
Leading with empathy requires us to have humility in complex situations—seeking to understand and be strategic instead of using assumptions and quick reactions.
That’s why I teach people to be consciously curious. It’s the practice of slowing down our judgments, letting go of the need for instant certainty, and asking better questions to explore. Assumptions might work fast, but we need more than speed. Here’s how to do it.
When an American college professor’s TED Talk on empathy goes viral, he meets an Iraqi man who becomes a fixture in his virtual classroom. But when the brutality of the U.S.-led invasion hits the Iraqi man directly, the professor is forced to explore “the kindred connection from a place of deep knowing that opens your spirit to the pain of another as they perceive it.” (Isabel Wilkerson) A true story.
In a world of negative events and suffering, empathy can mean expanding sorrow to those who care. Does empathy make it more difficult to nurture those in need?
"Recent research suggests that while psychology has focused primarily on empathy with suffering, it is important to explore also how empathizing with positive emotions can provide benefits for the well-being of the empathizer. Empathy with positive emotion has been shown to be protective against depression. When you share another’s joy, they can celebrate it again with you, to your mutual benefit and the strengthening of the relationship. Empathizing with another’s happiness, together with compassion—care or concern for the other—has been referred to as appreciative joy."
In our hyperconnected age, everyone has something to say—on social media, in meetings, at home, and in the constant stream of texts and notifications. We are awash in words.
Yet more than ever, people are desperate for something rarer and more precious than information: to be truly heard.
Listening is an act of generosity, attention, and care. It’s the foundation of strong relationships, effective leadership, creative collaboration, and social healing. But real listening—listening that goes beyond “waiting to talk”—is surprisingly hard, and getting harder.
Why does listening matter so much? What gets in the way? And how can you reclaim the art of listening for a richer, more meaningful life?
Empathy and (or vs?) AI In an age increasingly shaped by artificial intelligence, Stein’s insights carry both beauty and warning.
Today’s AI systems can produce what appear to be empathic responses. Chatbots can offer words of comfort, algorithms can detect sadness in a voice or hesitation in a text. These responses may sound convincingly human. But what they lack, Stein would insist, is presence.
The emotional language of AI, no matter how polished, is not rooted in a real lived engagement with another’s experience. It is imitation without consciousness.
That said, artificial intelligence can still serve, not substitute, empathy. AI tools can suggest gentler ways to phrase difficult truths, helping real people communicate with more compassion. When used this way — as an assistant rather than a replacement — AI can amplify and even fine-tune our capacity for attentiveness and care.
Empathetic leadership tip: Block a day or two in your quarterly roadmap for rest and reflection. Subsidize or sponsor self-care. Dedicate time to community care: a 30- to 60-minute session each quarter to check in on stressors and wins. This reflection time goes a long way toward building a culture of trust and connection. Make it actionable by committing to one small, measurable shift (e.g., enforcing a no-email hour, swapping a seated meeting for a walk-and-talk).
By Dev Patnaik That insight ultimately grew into my first book, Wired to Care. The book’s premise is fairly straightforward: a business has a greater chance of success when every person in the company has a gut-level intuition for the people they serve—the folks beyond their walls. That widespread intuition needs to be more than just a market research activity. It needs to be the result of culture.
When Wired to Care was published, most people weren’t using the word empathy in business. Empathy, after all, is seen as something soft. Something weak. And business—American business, anyway—is a culture steeped in the language of war. Companies have targets and beachheads. They assign chiefs of staff and war rooms. They launch ad campaigns and price wars. Within that context, empathy seemed out of place. I may have been better off choosing a word like intelligence or intuition. The irony isn’t lost on me that using the term empathy may have demonstrated a lack of empathy for my audience. But empathy captured something deeper, more instinctive, than intelligence ever could. And so, empathy it had to be…
Tech billionaire Elon Musk on Tuesday reflected on his decision to wield a chain saw on stage in February to tout government spending cuts, saying the move “lacked empathy.”
Musk’s remark came in response to criticism from a social media user who pushed back on Musk’s claim that “Hitting the debt ceiling is the only thing that will actually force the government to cut waste and fraud.”
A new study finds that people value empathy more when they believe it comes from a human—even if the actual response was generated by AI. Across nine studies involving over 6,000 participants, the research reveals that human-attributed responses are perceived as more supportive, more emotionally resonant, and more caring than identical AI-generated responses.
A new international study led by Prof Anat Perry from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and her PhD student – Matan Rubin, in collaboration with Prof. Amit Goldenberg researchers from Harvard University and Prof. Desmond C. Ong from the University of Texas, finds that people place greater emotional value on empathy they believe comes from humans—even when the exact same response is generated by artificial intelligence.
This study investigates the development of empathic connection in school counseling practices among junior high school counselors in Semarang Regency, Indonesia. Empathic connection plays a crucial role in fostering supportive relationships between counselors and students.
However, little is known about how this dynamic unfolds in real educational settings. Using a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design, this study integrates quantitative data from 30 counselors selected through proportionate stratified random sampling and qualitative data from in-depth interviews and a focus group discussion.
The findings reveal that empathic connection is established through active listening, mutual respect, and the counselor’s ability to understand students’ cognitive and emotional states. Disconnection may occur due to factors such as limited time, inadequate facilities, and overlapping responsibilities. In such cases, counselors employ reconnection strategies including asking open-ended questions, rescheduling sessions, and understanding students’ psychosocial backgrounds.
Both internal factors (e.g., emotional strain, fear of failure) and external factors (e.g., workload, environment) affect empathy continuity. These findings suggest that empathy in school counseling is not static but requires continuous adaptation and regulation. Institutional support and empathy-focused training are therefore essential to help school counselors maintain effective engagement and promote student well-being.
Our next Empathy Circle Facilitation Training starts July 12th! The Empathy Circle Facilitation Training offers a powerful toolkit for personal growth, enhanced communication, and community building. By learning to guide structured dialogues, you will be able to cultivate a deeper understanding of yourself and others, leading to more meaningful and constructive relationships in all facets of life. We find deep listening in the Empathy Circle is a core practice of the Empathy Movement.
Five years ago, Elon Musk told Joe Rogan during a podcast taping that “the fundamental weakness of Western civilization is empathy, the empathy exploit.” By that time, the idea that people in the West are too concerned with the pain of others to adequately advocate for their own best interests was already a well-established conservative idea.
Instead of thinking and acting rationally, the theory goes, they’re moved to make emotional decisions that compromise their well-being and that of their home country. In this line of thought, empathetic approaches to politics favor liberal beliefs. An apparent opposition between thought and feeling has long vexed conservatives, leading the right-wing commentator Ben Shapiro to famously declare that “facts don’t care about your feelings.”
In this powerful debut solo episode, Dr. Payal Beri explores a growing crisis that’s often ignored: the quiet unraveling of empathy in our modern world. From casual disengagement to emotional burnout, she unpacks how societal apathy and hyper-individualism are not just dividing us — they’re dismantling the very fabric of human connection.
Through deeply personal stories and thought-provoking insights, Dr. Beri challenges us to reflect on how avoidance, fear, and overload have made empathy feel optional. She asks the question: What happens when we stop caring? And more importantly, what can we do to reclaim our shared humanity?
One of the most powerful qualities to possess in one’s character is the ability to practice true empathy. Not some form of surface-level compassion, but radical, immersive empathy — the kind that doesn’t just acknowledge someone’s pain or joy but fully inhabits it. To feel what they feel, to see the world through their eyes and to let that perspective transform the way you think, speak, build and lead without judgment.
By empathy we mean the ability to understand the emotions and point of view of another person and use this understanding to guide future action. This process involves the activation of complex functions on many levels, although neuroscience have taught us that it is part of the genetic equipment of our species and is probably one of the most powerful engines of evolution.
What is Emotional Empathy? Emotional empathy is about creating a deeper connection with others by understanding and sharing their feelings. It's not just about feeling sorry for someone, but rather about putting yourself in their shoes and imagining how they're feeling. This empathetic understanding helps to build trust, resolve conflicts, and foster a positive and supportive environment.
Key Aspects of Emotional Empathy It's about understanding and sharing feelings Creates a deeper connection with others Essential for building strong relationships The following mind map illustrates the key aspects of emotional empathy:
A new study from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem found that people value empathy more when they believe it comes from a human, even if the actual response was generated by AI. The research reveals that human-attributed responses are perceived as more supportive, more emotionally resonant, and more caring than identical AI-generated responses.
Why empathy matters Empathy: the act of understanding, being aware of, being sensitive to and vicariously experiencing the feelings, thoughts and experience of another.
There are two types of empathy, cognitive and affective. Cognitive empathy refers to one’s ability to logically understand how and why someone would think and feel a certain way in a certain situation. Affective empathy, on the other hand, refers to one’s ability to share the feelings of others, though they may differ from our own feelings. In the world of policing, empathy is a tool that is essential for performing your duties.
You need empathy to read a room.
You need empathy to get inside the mind of a suspect.
You need empathy to intentionally and expertly help a buddy who isn’t OK.
Most cops like to stick with cognitive empathy, and for good reason. In law
How did we become so divided? For an answer, look no further than the way that empathy has been weaponized by both the left and right.
As is evident from Trump’s crackdown on protests outside US immigration detention facilities, the present occupant of the White House has no interest in stepping into the shoes of people who do not share his world view, least of all those infected with the “woke mind virus”. Instead, in MAGA circles empathy is increasingly derided as an irrational emotion that tricks us into having compassion for the “wrong” sorts of people, whether they be Mexican immigrants, Islamist terrorists or biological women “posing” as men.'
According to Gad Saad, a Canadian professor of marketing and evolutionary psychologist, such empathy is “suicidal” because it prompts us to act compassionately towards those who might do us harm. Saad’s favourite example is Karsten Nordal Hauken, a Norwegian man who was raped by a Somalian refugee and who describes himself as a feminist and anti-racist. In Saad’s telling, Hauken is now racked with guilt because his rapist is at risk of deportation to Somalia, a notoriously homophobic country. Other examples that Saad, a Jew of Syrian and Lebanese ancestry, likes to cite are Jews who make common cause with Hamas.
Businessolver, a leader in benefits and HR technology solutions, has released findings from its latest State of Workplace Empathy study, which surveys more than 26,000 CEOs, HR professionals, and employees. This year’s findings highlight five- and ten-year trends alongside the tangible ROI of empathy in today’s workplace, including an estimated $180 billion at risk annually due to attrition at organizations perceived as unempathetic.
“Empathy isn’t just good for people—it’s good for business,” says Jon Shanahan, president and CEO at Businessolver. “Collectively, companies that fail to operationalize empathy are leaving $180 billion on the table and missing out on a high-ROI lever for long-term growth
Elon Musk admitted Tuesday that his decision to wave a chainsaw over his head onstage at the Conservative Political Action Conference in February “lacked empathy.”
Musk was responding to an X user who argued that the multibillionaire’s erratic behavior as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency detracted from its work.
A new study shows that people rate empathic responses as more supportive and emotionally satisfying when they believe they come from a human—even if the same response is AI-generated.
The researchers tested whether people perceived empathy differently depending on whether it was labeled as coming from a human or from an AI chatbot. In all cases, the responses were crafted by large language models (LLMs), yet participants consistently rated the “human” responses as more empathic, more supportive, and more emotionally satisfying than the identical “AI” responses.
by Robert Reich They’ve got it all wrong. Empathy is a necessary precondition for a society.
Without empathy, we’d be living in a social Darwinist jungle animated only by selfish individuals pursuing selfish needs, like Musk and Trump.
If everyone behaved like Musk and Trump, we’d have to assume everyone else was out to exploit us if they could. Much of our time and attention would be devoted to outwitting or protecting ourselves from other Musks and Trumps.
Without a shared sense of empathy and responsibility, we would have to assume that everyone — including legislators, judges, regulators, and police — was acting selfishly, making and enforcing laws for their own benefit.
Recognize the religious right’s strategies for creating a permission structure to dehumanize vulnerable populations in a cultural war on empathy that threatens our multicultural, multiracial democracy.
A deliberate and strategic effort to redefine and attack empathy has been underway for nearly twenty years. What might initially appear to be isolated critiques of empathy, upon closer examination reveals itself as a coordinated campaign on two fronts: right-wing evangelical and Christian nationalist sects, and libertarian, neo-Rationalist circles. This essay is about the first set of anti-empathy crusaders.
I am not so much concerned with unpacking the anti-empathy arguments and offering a counter-critique, though I do some of that. But my main goal is to reveal the playbook being used to transform empathy, from a widely valued human capacity, into something portrayed as dangerous, manipulative, and morally suspect. The hope is that once you see how this works, you will begin to recognize the tactics by which cultural warfare is being waged by these radical ideologies against our democracy.
Culture in Sports' webinar series continues with industry experts (Dr. Chris Barnhill, Dr. Amy Rundio, Dr. Peter Sear, and Cara Hawkins-Jedlicka) diving into the importance and immense impact of #empathy and creating a new generation of empathetic #leaders. This #webinar is introduced by Dr. Jeremy Piasecki.
To get content containing either thought or leadership enter:
To get content containing both thought and leadership enter:
To get content containing the expression thought leadership enter:
You can enter several keywords and you can refine them whenever you want. Our suggestion engine uses more signals but entering a few keywords here will rapidly give you great content to curate.
Your new post is loading...
