Genetic editing holds promise to treat incurable diseases, but the most popular method - CRISPR - sometimes does more harm than good.
|
|
Scooped by
BigField GEG Tech
onto Genetic Engineering in the Press by GEG November 6, 8:18 AM
|
Your new post is loading...
A team at UC San Diego and Yale has developed a novel RNA editing approach using small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) that promises greater precision and reduced risk compared to classical CRISPR-based methods. Unlike CRISPR, which permanently changes DNA and can lead to off-target mutations or immunogenic reactions, the snRNA-based system makes temporary, highly specific edits to RNA transcripts. This system can convert adenine → inosine (A-to-I) or uracil → pseudouridine (U → Ψ), and it handles complex or non–protein-coding RNAs better than existing editors. In a cystic fibrosis model, it corrected faulty transcripts more effectively, with far fewer off-target changes. Because RNA is transient, interventions are less likely to create permanent unintended consequences. This work advances RNA editing tools by offering a more efficient, safer, and versatile platform, ideal for treating diseases caused by premature stop codons or splicing defects, without altering genomic DNA.