 Your new post is loading...
 Your new post is loading...
Rockström, J., Kassam, A., Friedrich, T., Reicosky, D., Dumansky, J., Goddard, T. & Peiretti, R.A. 2026. Global Sustainability. 9. Article e11, pages 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2025.10045
Schiavo, J.A., Lopes, V.R., Araújo, A.R., Macedo, M.C.M.,Oliveira, N. de S., Coêlho, R. da S., Souza, C.B. da Silva, Farias, P.G. da Silva, Panachuki, E., Couto, A.M. & Oelbermann, M. 2025. Applied and Environmental Soil Science. 2025 (1). Article 8491885. https://doi.org/10.1155/aess/8491885
Yuan, C., Ma, Z., Liu, S., Nie, H., Feng, G., Wang, S. & Luo, S. 2025. Frontiers in Microbiology. 16. Article 173092. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1730920
Nthebere, K., Prakash, T.R., Bhimireddy, P., Chandran, L.P., Gudapati, J., Admala, M. & Prasad, K. 2025 Heliyon. 11 (1) Article e41196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41196
Attia, A., Woli, P., Long, C.R., Rouquette, F.M., Smith, G.R., Datta, A., Felke, T. & Rajan, N. 2025. Journal of Environmental Management. 391. Article 126352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126352
Fagodiya, R.K., Verma, K., Sharma, G., Rai, A.K., Prajapat, K., Singh, R., Sheoran, P., Basak, N., Chandra, P., Sharma, D.P., Yadav, R.K. & Biswas, A.K. 2025. Soil and Tillage Research. 254. Article 106697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2025.106697
Madzivanzira, T., Mvumi, B.M., Nazare, R.M., Nyakudya, E., Mtambanengwe, F. & Mapfumo, P. 2025.Advances in Agriculture. 1. Article 4837619. https://doi.org/10.1155/aia/4837619
Zhou, Y., Ferdinand, M.S., van Wesemael, J., Dvorakova, K., Baret, P.V., Van Oost, K. & van Wesemael, B. 2025. Remote Sensing of Environment. 328. Article 114858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2025.114858
Kim, D.H., Wade, T., Brym, Z., Ogisma, L., Bhattarai, R., Bai, X., Bhadha, J. & Her, Y. 2025. Journal of Environmental Management. 387. Article 125833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125833
|
Hasanain, Md., Singh, V.K., Rathore, S.S., Meena, V.S., Singh, R.K., et al., (9 more). Biomass and Bioenergy. 208. Article 108864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.108864
Jia, Y., Sun, Y., Zhang, D., Yang, W., Pang, J., Siddique, K.H.. & Qu, Z. 2025. Agronomy-Basel. 15 (5) Article 1007. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15051007
Khosa, M.K., Barik, K., Aksakal, E., Jahangir, Md MR., Didenko, N.O. & Islam, K.R. 2025. Plos One. 20 (5) Article e0322891. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0322891
|
This paper from Rwanda looks at the low yields of maize, a critical staple crop in this country. The study evaluates the agronomic and economic results of CA compared to conventional systems (CT) by interviewing 222 farms in dry areas of Eastern Rwanda. They found that CA farmers incurred higher total production costs, particularly for fertilizers, seeds, weeding, and irrigation, while CT farmers had significantly higher land preparation costs. But CA achieved 40% higher net profit, 20% higher maize yields, and higher P use efficiency compared to CT. They identified irrigation frequency, seed rate, and nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer application as key determinants of maize yield using CA compared to CT.