 Your new post is loading...
 Your new post is loading...
Rold Derpsch, Dirk Lange, Georg Birbaumer, Ken Moriya. 2015. Why do medium and large-scale farmers succeed practicing CA and small-scale farmers often do not?- Experiences from Paraguay. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability. 13 pages. Published on-line 02 Nov 2015 doi:10.1080/14735903.2015.1095974
Sustainable Intensification Revisited
Seth Cook, Laura Silici, Barbara Adolph and Sarah Walker. 2015. Sustainable Intensification Revisited. International Institute for Environment and Development, Natural Resources Group. Available at: http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/14651IIED.pdf
Vinod K. Singh, Yadvinder-Singh, Brahma S. Dwivedi, Susheel K. Singh, Kaushik Majumdar, Mangi Lal Jat, Rajendra P. Mishra and Meenu Rani. 2016. Soil physical properties, yield trends and economics after five years of conservation agriculture based rice-maize system in north-western India. Soil and Tillage Research. 155: 133-148. doi:10.1016/j.still.2015.08.001
Jean-Francois Rochecouste, Paul Dargusch, Donald Cameron and Carl Smith. 2015. An analysis of the socio-economic factors influencing the adoption of conservation agriculture as a climate change mitigation activity in Australian drylands grain production. Agricultural Systems. 135: 20-30. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2014.12.002
Hambulo Ngoma, Nicole, M. Mason and Nicholas J. Sitko. 2015. Does minimum tillage with planting basins or ripping raise maize yields? Mesa-Panel data evidence from Zambia. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 212: 21-29. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2015.06.021
Md. A. Matin, John M. Fielke, and Jacky M.A. Desbiolles. 2014. Furrow parameters in rotary strip-tillage: Effect of blade geometry and rotary speed. Biosystems Engineering. 118: 7-15. doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2013.10.015
Lal, Rattan. A system approach to conservation agriculture. 2015. Journal of Soil and water Conservation. 70 (4): 82A-88A. doi:10.2489/jswc.70.4.82A
Lyda Hok, Joao Carlos de Moraes Sa, Stephane Boulakia, Manuel Reyes, Vira Leng, Rada Kong, Florent Elie Tivet, Clever Briedis, Daiani Hartman, Lucimara Aparecida Ferrerira, Tomas Magno and Sovuthy Pheav. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 214: 54-67. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2015.08.013
K.P. Devkota, G. Hoogenboom, K.J. Boote, U. Singh, J.P.A. Lamers, M. Devkota, and P.L.G. Vlek. 2015. Simulating the impact of water saving irrigation and conservation agriculture practices for rice-wheat systems in the irrigated semi-arid drylands of Central Asia. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 214-215: 266-280. doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.08.264
Baudron, Frederic, Sylvestre Delmotte, Marc Corbeels, Juan M. Herrera, and Pablo Tittonell. 2014. Multi-scale trade-off analysis of cereal residue use for livestock feeding vs. soil mulching in the Mid-Zambezi Valley, Zimbabwe. Agricultural Systems. 134:97-106. doi:10.10.1016/j.agsy.2014.03.002
Thierfelder, C., M. Mutenje, A. Mujeyi, W. Mupangwa. 2015. Where is the limit? lessons learned from long-term conservation agriculture research in Zimuto Communal Area, Zimbabwe. Food Security. 7:15-31. doi:10.1007/s12571-014-0404-y
This paper presents results of long-term on-farm trials in Zimbabwe to explain the reasons for dwindling maize yields and test the feasibility of CA under low fertility and erratic rainfall. Systems based on animal traction more than doubled maize and improved legume yields with CA. Water infiltration and soil carbon also improved with CA. CA systems were also more economically viable. Weeds were highlighted as problems by farmers. Results are promising even in areas with low soil fertility and risk of drought. However, the adoption of CA was low amongst members of the rural farming community due to the perceived risk of crop failure, lack of appropriate and accessible inputs and markets for farm produce, and lack of appropriate information and knowledge about alternative agricultural methods.
Piggin, Colin, Atef Haddad, Yaseen Khalil, Stephen Loss, Mustafa Pala. 2015. Effects of tillage and time of sowing on bread wheat, chickpea, barely and lentil grown in rotation in rainfed systems in Syria. Field Crops Research. 173: 57-67. doi:/10.1016/j.fcr.2014.12.014.
This paper looks at dryland areas of West Asia where soil erosion and degradation limit yields. The data is from long-term field experiments under rainfed conditions at ICARDA and compares conventional tillage with zero-tillage (ZT) in combination with early and late planting of various dryland crops.Results were variable with tillage and date of planting showing no differences in some years but improved yields for ZT and early planting in others. The increased grain yields achieved in this study, in combination with lower costs and greater profits, suggest ZT plus early sowing should be evaluated and promoted more widely as an attractive cropping technology for farmers in the Middle East.
Pedzisa, T., L. Rugube, A. Winter-Nelson, K. Baylis, and K. Mazvimavi. 2015. Abandonment of conservation agriculture by smallholder farmers in Zimbabwe. Journal of Sustainable Development. 8: 69-82. doi:10.5539/jsd.v8n1p69
The analysis uses four rounds of a balanced panel from a survey aimed at monitoring CA adoption among farmers who participated in CA promotion projects. Findings indicate that a large share of farmers who had adopted CA during the period of active promotion eventually abandoned the practice in the absence of support from non-governmental organizations (NGOs). Households with more farming experience, bigger household sizes and a greater number of cultivated plots were less likely to stop using CA. In turn, wealthy households and farmers in the drier areas were more likely to stop using CA. The finding that persistent adoption is more prevalent among the poor, supports claims that CA is a pro-poor technology. The paper suggests that improved support institutions are necessary to ensure that farmers continue to use CA as a productivity-boosting and sustainable farming method.
|
T.K. Das, K.K. Bandyopadhyay, Ranjan Bhattacharyya, S. Sudhishri, A.R. Sharma, U.K. Behera, Y.S. Saharawat, P.K. Sahoo, H. Pathak, A.K. Vyas, L.M. Bhar, H.S. Gupta, R.K. Gupta, M.L. Jat. 2016. Effects of conservation agriculture on crop productivity and water-use efficiency under an irrigated pigeonpea-wheat cropping system in the western Indo-Gangetic Plains. The Journal of Agriculture Science. 16 pages. Published on-line 19 January 2016. doi: 10.1017/S0021859615001264
Leonard Rusinamhodzi, Mark T.van Wijk, Marc Corbeels, Mariana C. Rufino and Ken E. Giller. 2015. Maize crop residue uses and trade-offs on smallholder crop-livestock farms in Zimbabwe: Economic implications of intensification. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 214: 31-45. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2015.08.012
Dan TerAvest, Lynne Carpenter-Boggs, Christian Thierfelder and John p. Reganold. 2015. Crop production and soil water management in conservation agriculture, no-till, and conventional tillage systems in Malawi. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 212: 285-296. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2015.07.011
Virginia Nichols, Nele Verhulst, Rachael Cox and Bram Govaerts. 2015. Weed dynamics and conservation agriculture principles: A review. Field Crops Research. 183: 56-68. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2015.07.012
A.N. Micheni, F. Kanampiu, O. Kitonyo, D.M. Mburu, E.N. Mugai, D. Makumbi and M. Kassie. 2016. On-farm experimentation on conservation agriculture maize-legume based cropping systems in Kenya: Water use efficiency and economic impacts. Experimental Agriculture. 52 (1): 51-68. doi:10.1017/S0014479714000556
Lundy Mark E., Pittelkow, Cameron N., Linquist, Bruce A., Liang Xinqiang, van Groenigen, Kees Jan, Lee Juhwan, Six Johan, Venterea Rodney T., and van Kessels, Chris. 2015. Nitrogen fertilization reduces yield declines following no-till adoption. Field Crops Research. 183: 204-210. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2015.07.023
Adam M. Komarek, Ling Ling Li and William D. Bellotti. 2015. Whole-farm economic and risk effects of conservation agriculture in a crop-livestock system in western China. Agricultural Systems. 137: 220-226. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2014.10.013
Farooq, Muhammad & Siddique, Kadambot (Eds). 2015. Conservation Agriculture. Springer International Publishing. Switzerland. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-11620-4
Inmaculada Carmona, Daniel M. Griffith, Maria-Auxiliadora Soriano, Jose Manuel Murillo, Engracia Madejon and Helena Gomez-Macpherson. 2015. What do farmers mean when they say they practice conservation agriculture? A comprehensive case study from southern Spain. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 213: 164-177. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2015.07.028
Araya,Tesfay, Jan Nyssen, Bram Govaerts, Jozef Deckers, and Wim M. Cornelis. 2015. Impacts of conservation agriculture-based farming systems on optimizing seasonal rainfall partitioning and productivity on vertisols in the Ethiopian drylands. Soil and Tillage Research.148: 1-13 doi: 10.1016/j.still.2014.11.009
Field water conservation practices are a way to build resilience against drought by increasing productive green water through reducing runoff and evaporation and thereby boosting crop yield.This study was managed on rainfed plots to compare CA systems with conventional in terms of soil moisture, runoff, water loss (drainage and evapotranspiration together), water productivity and crop yield. The paper concludes that field water conservation tillage practices that incorporate CA principles are effectively increasing green water in the root zone available for crops and thus, improve crop productivity and yields substantially on vertisols in drylands without other inputs.
Ramirez-Villanueva, Daniel A., Juan Manuel Bello-López, Yendi E. Navarro-Noya, Marco Luna-Guido, Nele Verhulst, Bram Govaerts, and Luc Dendooven. 2015. Bacterial community structure in maize residue amended soil with contrasting management practices. Applied Soil Ecology. 90: 49-59. doi:/10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.01.010.
An interesting paper that looks at the affect agricultural practices -- flat and bed planting, with tillage and without (CA) on soil bacterial populations. Soil from these four treatments was amended in the laboratory with maize residue (Zea mays L.) or its neutral detergent fibre (NDF) fraction, mostly consisting of (hemi) cellulose, and incubated aerobically for 14 days. It was found that application of organic material favored the same bacterial groups that were more abundant in the soil cultivated conventionally while it reduced those that were favored in conservation agriculture.
Pelosi, Céline, Michel Bertrand, Jodie Thénard, and Christian Mougin. 2015. Earthworms in a 15 years agriculture trail. Applied Soil Ecology. 88: 1-8. doi:/10.1016/j.apsoil.2014.12.004.
This study looks at the effect of alternative cropping systems on soil biodiversity -- in this case earthworms, indicators of soil health. It compares conventional, organic and CA based systems and samples earthworm incidence in a wheat crop in France. While earthworm abundance and biomass increased slightly in the conventional system between the two periods, they at least tripled in the other two systems but earthworm species differed in the organic and CA systems. After at least 14 years, organic and living mulch cropping systems contained between 1.5 and 2.3 times more earthworms than the conventional system.
|
Many medium and large scale farmers with tractor-based farming have moved to CA and no-tillage technologies in Paraguay, Brazil and Argentina. Few wish to return to a conventional system. The same is not true with smaller farms with animal traction or manual farming. This is discussed in this paper. Suggest two reasons for this. One is the inability of small-scale farmers to cope with factors related to CA and the other with extension approaches and strategies to promote this knowledge and learning intensive management system. They suggest adoption of adaptable and long term approaches to CA with smallholders.