Conservation Agriculture Research Updates - April 2026
18.0K views | +1 today
Conservation Agriculture Research Updates - April 2026
See our full research database for more CA articles at https://www.zotero.org/groups/348525/cornell_conservation_agriculture/collections/KGBFX8BX  See our CA web site at https://soilhealth.org and click the "Research" menu item and then "How to use database" so you can apply to join our Zotero CA group to better able to look at the data in our CA database.
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Scooped by Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)
February 8, 2016 6:29 PM

Why do medium- and large-scale farmers succeed practicing CA and small-scale farmers often do not? – experiences from Paraguay

Rold Derpsch, Dirk Lange, Georg Birbaumer, Ken Moriya. 2015. Why do medium and large-scale farmers succeed practicing CA and small-scale farmers often do not?- Experiences from Paraguay. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability. 13 pages. Published on-line 02 Nov 2015

 doi:10.1080/14735903.2015.1095974

Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)'s insight:

Many medium and large scale farmers  with tractor-based farming have moved to CA and no-tillage technologies in Paraguay, Brazil and Argentina. Few wish to return to a conventional system. The same is not true with smaller farms with animal traction or manual farming. This is discussed in this paper. Suggest two reasons for this. One is the inability of small-scale farmers to cope with factors related to CA and the other with extension approaches and strategies to promote this knowledge and learning intensive management system. They suggest adoption of adaptable and long term approaches to CA with smallholders.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)
February 8, 2016 6:04 PM

Sustainable Intensification Revisited

Seth Cook, Laura Silici, Barbara Adolph and Sarah Walker. 2015. Sustainable Intensification Revisited. International Institute for Environment and Development, Natural Resources Group.

Available at: http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/14651IIED.pdf 

Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)'s insight:

What does Sustainable Intensification mean? It originally meant producing a higher level of output from the same area of land while minimizing environmental impacts. The authors indicate that some NGO's are worried that SI is repackaging of intensive, high input models and using biotech as a means to achieve it. While the NGO propose agroecokogy and genetics as a way to increase productivity. Sustainability has also met with reservations since it needs to include social and economic elements such as livelihoods, equity, social justice and economic viability. Also the need to look at the farming system as a whole including livestock is needed. This paper sifts through these debates and inquires what is needed for the future of agriculture and food security

No comment yet.
Scooped by Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)
December 6, 2015 3:50 PM

Soil physical properties, yield trends and economics after five years of conservation agriculture based rice-maize system in north-western India

Vinod K. Singh, Yadvinder-Singh, Brahma S. Dwivedi, Susheel K. Singh, Kaushik Majumdar, Mangi Lal Jat, Rajendra P. Mishra and Meenu Rani. 2016. Soil physical properties, yield trends and economics after five years of conservation agriculture based rice-maize system in north-western India. Soil and Tillage Research. 155: 133-148.

doi:10.1016/j.still.2015.08.001

Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)'s insight:

This paper looks at the emerging rice-maize system in NW India as an adaption strategy foe future water scarcity. The results show that zero-till direct seeded rice followed by zero-till maize with partial residue retention from both the crops improved SOC content, soil physical properties along with gradual increase in RMS yields and profitability over conventionally tilled rice and maize.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)
December 6, 2015 3:16 PM

An analysis of the socio-economic factors influencing the adoption of conservation agriculture as a climate change mitigation activity in Australian dryland grain production

Jean-Francois Rochecouste, Paul Dargusch, Donald Cameron and Carl Smith. 2015. An analysis of the socio-economic factors influencing the adoption of conservation agriculture as a climate change mitigation activity in Australian drylands grain production. Agricultural Systems. 135: 20-30.

doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2014.12.002

Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)'s insight:

The Australian government wants to reduce agricultural emissions by changing practices. CA is reduces farm emissions and sequesters carbon. This paper presents a series of systems models that describe the process of how Australian dryland grain farmers decide to change and adopt conservation agriculture practices. Results indicate that a number of economic and social factors drive the rate of practice change, and change seems to be motivated mostly by the pursuit of productivity benefits rather than environmental benefits. They conclude that emission reduction outcomes and carbon payments would not be the primary driver for change.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)
December 6, 2015 2:36 PM

Does minimum tillage with planting basins or ripping raise maize yields? Meso-panel data evidence from Zambia

Hambulo Ngoma, Nicole, M. Mason and Nicholas J. Sitko. 2015. Does minimum tillage with planting basins or ripping raise maize yields? Mesa-Panel data evidence from Zambia. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 212: 21-29. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2015.06.021

Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)'s insight:

A paucity of empirical evidence on MT yields from Zambia encouraged this paper that applied survey data from 48,000 households over 4 years to answer the above question. The conclude that ripping and planting basins can raise maize yields if done early before the onset of the rains that results in early land preparation.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)
December 6, 2015 2:03 PM

Furrow parameters in rotary strip-tillage: Effect of blade geometry and rotary speed

Md. A. Matin, John M. Fielke, and Jacky M.A. Desbiolles. 2014. Furrow parameters in rotary strip-tillage: Effect of blade geometry and rotary speed. Biosystems Engineering. 118: 7-15. doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2013.10.015

Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)'s insight:

An interesting paper concerning blade geometry and rotary speed on two wheel tractors for use in strip tillage. 

Conventional blades resulted in a poor furrow backfill (36% at 500 rpm). Straight blades improved the furrow backfill (74% at 500 rpm). Soil tilth was affected by rotary speed, but not by blade geometry. The straight blade is a recommended alternative to the conventional blade for strip tillage.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)
December 6, 2015 12:13 PM

A system approach to conservation agriculture

Lal, Rattan. A system approach to conservation agriculture. 2015. Journal of Soil and water Conservation. 70 (4): 82A-88A. doi:10.2489/jswc.70.4.82A 

Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)'s insight:

This paper highlights the challenges facing agriculture in the future.The challenges of farming are exacerbated by a changing and uncertain climate, increase in risks of soil degradation by erosion and other processes driven by decline in soil organic carbon (SOC) concentration and pool, increase in dependence on energy-based inputs such as fertilizers and pesticides, high risks of shifts in spectrum of pests and pathogens, and decrease in availability of soil and water resources because of diversion to nonagricultural uses. Increasing adoption of CA requires prudent strategies to address limitations and uncertainties of NT. The objective of this article was therefore to deliberate on a system approach to CA for minimizing uncertainties and limitations while maximizing merits and ecological benefits. 

No comment yet.
Scooped by Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)
December 6, 2015 11:51 AM

Short-term conservation agriculture and biomass-C input impacts on soil C dynamics in a savanna ecosystem in Cambodia

Lyda Hok, Joao Carlos de Moraes Sa, Stephane Boulakia, Manuel Reyes, Vira Leng, Rada Kong, Florent Elie Tivet, Clever Briedis, Daiani Hartman, Lucimara Aparecida Ferrerira, Tomas Magno and Sovuthy Pheav. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 214: 54-67. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2015.08.013

Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)'s insight:

Interesting data from Cambodia on use of CA to increase soil organic carbon in rice, soybean and cassava cropping systems. Included conventional and no-till treatments and C was compared with an adjacent reference vegetation. On average, NT SOC stocks at 0–5 cm depth was greater than those of CT by 10%, 20% and 18% and STN stocks by 8%, 25% and 16% for RcCS, SbCS and CsCS, respectively. But sub-soil layers had less SOC in NT compared to CT. Cover crops were used for providing resides. Amount and diversity of crop residues added impacts on particulate organic C and can be an indicator of C accumulation. The results confirm the hypothesis that short-term CA associated with high biomass-C inputs (particularly bi-annual rotations) promotes SOC recovery in the topsoil layer and creates a potential to increase SOC in the subsoil layers when deep-rooting cover crops are included in crop rotations.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)
December 6, 2015 11:16 AM

Simulating the impact of water saving irrigation and conservation agriculture practices for rice–wheat systems in the irrigated semi-arid drylands of Central Asia

K.P. Devkota, G. Hoogenboom, K.J. Boote, U. Singh, J.P.A. Lamers, M. Devkota, and P.L.G. Vlek. 2015. Simulating the impact of water saving irrigation and conservation agriculture practices for rice-wheat systems in the irrigated semi-arid drylands of Central Asia. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 214-215: 266-280. doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.08.264

Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)'s insight:

This paper from Uzbekistan shows that CERES rice and wheat models can simulate water saving irrigation and CA practices. Conventional methods of rice and wheat establishment in this area are challenged by labor, water and energy scarcity. Simulated rice yield was higher under conventional than under AWD irrigation and CA-practices.But AWD and CA practices saved significant amounts of water. Under these two practices, rice yield was limited by nitrogen and not water. Substantial amounts of N losses through leaching, immobilization by residue mulch, combined with gaseous losses through volatilization and denitrification are the major causes for the lower simulated yield of rice. Deep placement of urea supergranules could help in this respect. CA uses 3 times less water compared to conventional and so CA for rice-wheat systems of Central Asia should be adapted and considered for this region.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)
August 28, 2015 3:48 PM

Multi-scale trade-off analysis of cereal residue use for livestock feeding vs. soil mulching in the Mid-Zambezi Valley, Zimbabwe

Baudron, Frederic, Sylvestre Delmotte, Marc CorbeelsJuan M. Herrera, and Pablo Tittonell. 2014. Multi-scale trade-off analysis of cereal residue use for livestock feeding vs. soil mulching in the Mid-Zambezi Valley, Zimbabwe. Agricultural Systems. 134:97-106. doi:10.10.1016/j.agsy.2014.03.002

Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)'s insight:

Cereal residues are vital to feed livestock in the dry season in Africa. Yet they can also be important as mulch if left on the soil surface. This paper uses simulation models to simulate sorghum residue allocations at three scales - the plot, farm and territory. Plot scale suggests that without nitrogen, mulch has a positive effect on cotton yields  with small amounts. Greater amounts sequester nitrogen and reduce yields without addition of nitrogen. Addition of nitrogen is needed to prevent this. At the farm scale with no animals, the use of residues as mulch give the best cotton yields. The paper then suggests optimum mulch allocations depending on number of animals owned. There is also discussion at the territory scale.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)
April 16, 2015 11:43 PM

Where is the limit? lessons learned from long-term conservation agriculture research in Zimuto Communal Area, Zimbabwe

Thierfelder, C., M. MutenjeA. MujeyiW. Mupangwa. 2015. Where is the limit? lessons learned from long-term conservation agriculture research in Zimuto Communal Area, Zimbabwe. Food Security. 7:15-31. doi:10.1007/s12571-014-0404-y


This paper presents results of long-term on-farm trials in Zimbabwe to explain the reasons for dwindling maize yields and test the feasibility of CA under low fertility and erratic rainfall. Systems based on animal traction more than doubled maize  and improved legume yields with CA. Water infiltration and soil carbon also improved with CA. CA systems were also more economically viable. Weeds were highlighted as problems by farmers. Results are promising even in areas with low soil fertility and risk of drought. However, the adoption of CA was low amongst members of the rural farming community due to the perceived risk of crop failure, lack of appropriate and accessible inputs and markets for farm produce, and lack of appropriate information and knowledge about alternative agricultural methods.

Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)'s insight:

Abstract available but for full text need subscription to journal

No comment yet.
Scooped by Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)
April 16, 2015 11:36 PM

Effects of tillage and time of sowing on bread wheat, chickpea, barley and lentil grown in rotation in rainfed systems in Syria

Piggin, Colin, Atef HaddadYaseen KhalilStephen Loss, Mustafa Pala. 2015. Effects of tillage and time of sowing on bread wheat, chickpea, barely and lentil grown in rotation in rainfed systems in Syria. Field Crops Research. 173: 57-67. doi:/10.1016/j.fcr.2014.12.014.


This paper looks at dryland areas of West Asia where soil erosion and degradation limit yields. The data is from long-term field experiments under rainfed conditions at ICARDA and compares conventional tillage with zero-tillage (ZT) in combination with early and late planting of various dryland crops.Results were variable with tillage and date of planting showing no differences in some years but improved yields for ZT and early planting in others. The increased grain yields achieved in this study, in combination with lower costs and greater profits, suggest ZT plus early sowing should be evaluated and promoted more widely as an attractive cropping technology for farmers in the Middle East.

Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)'s insight:

Abstract available but for full text need subscription to journal

No comment yet.
Scooped by Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)
April 16, 2015 11:25 PM

Abandonment of conservation agriculture by smallholder farmers in Zimbabwe

Pedzisa, T., L. Rugube, A. Winter-Nelson, K. Baylis, and K. Mazvimavi. 2015. Abandonment of conservation agriculture by smallholder farmers in Zimbabwe. Journal of Sustainable Development. 8: 69-82. doi:10.5539/jsd.v8n1p69


The analysis uses four rounds of a balanced panel from a survey aimed at monitoring CA adoption among farmers who participated in CA promotion projects. Findings indicate that a large share of farmers who had adopted CA during the period of active promotion eventually abandoned the practice in the absence of support from non-governmental organizations (NGOs). Households with more farming experience, bigger household sizes and a greater number of cultivated plots were less likely to stop using CA. In turn, wealthy households and farmers in the drier areas were more likely to stop using CA. The finding that persistent adoption is more prevalent among the poor, supports claims that CA is a pro-poor technology. The paper suggests that improved support institutions are necessary to ensure that farmers continue to use CA as a productivity-boosting and sustainable farming method.

Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)'s insight:

Freely available

No comment yet.
Scooped by Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)
February 8, 2016 6:13 PM

Effects of conservation agriculture on crop productivity and water-use efficiency under an irrigated pigeonpea–wheat cropping system in the western Indo-Ganget...

T.K. Das, K.K. Bandyopadhyay, Ranjan Bhattacharyya, S. Sudhishri, A.R. Sharma, U.K. Behera, Y.S. Saharawat, P.K. Sahoo, H. Pathak, A.K. Vyas, L.M. Bhar, H.S. Gupta, R.K. Gupta, M.L. Jat. 2016. Effects of conservation agriculture on crop productivity and water-use efficiency under an irrigated pigeonpea-wheat cropping system in the western Indo-Gangetic Plains. The Journal of Agriculture Science. 16 pages. Published on-line 19 January 2016.

doi: 10.1017/S0021859615001264 

Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)'s insight:

This 3 year study looked at pigeon pea-wheat system under CA for yield and water use efficiency in Western IGP. Conventional tillage was compared to no-till on permanent beds (PNB) with and without residue. The best PP yields were on permanent beds with residue. Wheat grain yields were similar to CT in all three years. Suggests bed planting PP-W is a useful technology in the region. 

No comment yet.
Scooped by Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)
December 6, 2015 4:01 PM

Maize crop residue uses and trade-offs on smallholder crop-livestock farms in Zimbabwe: Economic implications of intensification

Leonard Rusinamhodzi, Mark T.van Wijk, Marc Corbeels, Mariana C. Rufino and Ken E. Giller. 2015. Maize crop residue uses and trade-offs on smallholder crop-livestock farms in Zimbabwe: Economic implications of intensification. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 214: 31-45.

doi:10.1016/j.agee.2015.08.012

Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)'s insight:

Integrating crops and livestock is more profitable than crops alone for small farms and so a 12 year study of the trade-offs on maize residue use was initiated for these systems. Retaining crop residues in the field reduces livestock feed and farm income although grain yields increased. They conclude that it is logical that farmers prioritise the sustenance of cattle with crop residues over soil fertility management. 

No comment yet.
Scooped by Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)
December 6, 2015 3:24 PM

Crop production and soil water management in conservation agriculture, no-till, and conventional tillage systems in Malawi

Dan TerAvest, Lynne Carpenter-Boggs, Christian Thierfelder and John p. Reganold. 2015. Crop production and soil water management in conservation agriculture, no-till, and conventional tillage systems in Malawi. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 212: 285-296. 

doi:10.1016/j.agee.2015.07.011

Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)'s insight:

CA is being promoted in Malawi as a way to sustainably improve water-use efficiency, reduce soil erosion, and boost crop production. In this study, three cropping systems – continuous no-till maize, CA rotation, and conventional tillage rotation – were established on smallholder farms in the Nkhotakota and Dowa districts, two distinct agroecological zones in Malawi. No-till and residue cover improved soil–water relations in hot, sandy conditions. Residue retention was critical in reducing soil erosion and increasing earthworms. No-till and residue cover did not increase yields of alternative food crops. Crop rotations had a greater impact on maize yields than tillage practices.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)
December 6, 2015 2:45 PM

Weed dynamics and conservation agriculture principles: A review

Virginia Nichols, Nele Verhulst, Rachael Cox and Bram Govaerts. 2015. Weed dynamics and conservation agriculture principles: A review. Field Crops Research. 183: 56-68.

doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2015.07.012

Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)'s insight:

Adoption of CA changes weed dynamics and communities and therefore necessitates adjusting weed control methods. This paper reviews the literature on this topic. No-till systems accumulate seeds near the soil surface where they are more likely to germinate but are also exposed to greater mortality risks through weather variability and predation. Assuming no seed input into the system, germinable seedbanks under no-till decrease more rapidly than under conventional tillage. Reducing tillage may shift weed communities from annual dicots to grassy annuals and perennials. Combining no-till, crop rotation and surface residue offers superior weed control. An integrated weed management approach is recommended. 

No comment yet.
Scooped by Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)
December 6, 2015 2:26 PM

On-farm experimentation on conservation agriculture maize-legume based cropping systems in Kenya: Water use efficiency and economic impacts.

A.N. Micheni, F. Kanampiu, O. Kitonyo, D.M. Mburu, E.N. Mugai, D. Makumbi and M. Kassie. 2016. On-farm experimentation on conservation agriculture maize-legume based cropping systems in Kenya: Water use efficiency and economic impacts. Experimental Agriculture. 52 (1): 51-68. doi:10.1017/S0014479714000556 

Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)'s insight:

This research hypothesized that adopting CA system would improve system productivity and efficiency, hence resulting in higher profits. Four tillage treatments, including farmers’ practice (residues removed), conventional tillage (residues removed) and two CA practices with residue retention (zero tillage and furrow–ridge), were laid out in 22 farmers’ fields. Data was collected from 4 seasons from 2010-2012. Joint use of zero tillage and furrow–ridge provided higher WUE and yield advantage (25–34%) in the third and fourth seasons compared to the conventional practices. Weddings costs were reduced in CA but only because they used herbicides and reduced labor costs. They concluded that CA will certainly increase crop yields,WUE, generate more revenue and diversify risks during poor seasons. However, these benefits may not necessarily be earned in the first season, but will accrue in subsequent seasons.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)
December 6, 2015 1:54 PM

Nitrogen fertilization reduces yield declines following no-till adoption

Lundy Mark E., Pittelkow, Cameron N., Linquist, Bruce A., Liang Xinqiang, van Groenigen, Kees Jan, Lee Juhwan, Six Johan, Venterea Rodney T., and van Kessels, Chris. 2015. Nitrogen fertilization reduces yield declines following no-till adoption. Field Crops Research. 183: 204-210. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2015.07.023
Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)'s insight:

No-till, especially in tropical and sub-tropical areas has been shown to reduce yields in many cases. This paper suggests nitrogen fertilizer use is a major component and helps explain these yield declines. Strong NT yield declines occur when residues are removed, and when crops are not rotated. This was based on a meta-analysis of 325 studies from 1980-2013. Applications of N fertilizer at rates of up to 85 ± 12 kg N ha−1 yr−1 significantly reduced NT yield declines in these scenarios. It is important to distinguish between no-till, a component of CA and the vital role of permanent ground cover and rotations in CA. 

No comment yet.
Scooped by Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)
December 6, 2015 12:01 PM

Whole-farm economic and risk effects of conservation agriculture in a crop-livestock system in western China

Adam M. Komarek, Ling Ling Li and William D. Bellotti. 2015. Whole-farm economic and risk effects of conservation agriculture in a crop-livestock system in western China. Agricultural Systems. 137: 220-226. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2014.10.013

Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)'s insight:

A simulation study that looks at the economic and risk effects of different crop residue retention practices for a crop-livestock agricultural household in western China. Retaining minimal crop residues produced highest profits in the short term whereas full crop residue retention produced highest profits in the long term. Calls for comprehensive crop residue retention are unlikely to be attractive when farmers discount future profits, and when crop residues have significant value as a fuel and feed source. The economic benefits of crop residue retention can take numerous years to eventuate and retaining crop residues also increased simulated ground cover and this positive environmental impact extends beyond individual farm boundaries. Because of these time lags and external environmental benefits, providing financial incentives to retain crop residues during the initial transition years could be a policy option.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)
December 6, 2015 11:36 AM

Conservation Agriculture - Springer

Conservation Agriculture - Springer | Conservation Agriculture Research Updates - April 2026 | Scoop.it

Farooq, Muhammad & Siddique, Kadambot (Eds). 2015. Conservation Agriculture. Springer International Publishing. Switzerland. 

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-11620-4 

Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)'s insight:

Conservation agriculture—consisting of four components including permanent soil cover, minimum soil disturbance, diversified crop rotations and integrated weed management—is considered the principal pathway to sustainable agriculture and the conservation of natural resources and the environment. Leading researchers in the field describe the basic principles of conservation agriculture, and synthesize recent advances and developments in conservation agriculture research. This book is a ready reference on conservation agriculture and reinforces the understanding for its utilization to develop environmentally sustainable and profitable food production systems. The book describes various elements of conservation agriculture; highlights the associated breeding and modeling efforts; analyses the experiences and challenges in conservation agriculture in different regions of the world; and proposes some pragmatic options and new areas of research in this very important area of agriculture.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)
December 6, 2015 10:54 AM

What do farmers mean when they say they practice conservation agriculture? A comprehensive case study from southern Spain

Inmaculada Carmona, Daniel M. Griffith, Maria-Auxiliadora Soriano, Jose Manuel Murillo, Engracia Madejon and Helena Gomez-Macpherson. 2015. What do farmers mean when they say they practice conservation agriculture? A comprehensive case study from southern Spain. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 213: 164-177. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2015.07.028

Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)'s insight:

An interesting study that looks at obstacles to CA adoption in southern Spain. Many farmers implemented some components of CA while disregarding others as a strategy to adapt to local conditions. Most farmers equated CA with direct seeded cereals without considering residues or rotations. 50% farmers used direct seeded wheat followed by tilled sunflowers and yields did not differ much from standard practices. They conclude that to overcome the most important identified problems in CA, there is a need to collaborative research with farmers and other stakeholders to develop appropriate drill technology for spring crops, identify non-cereal crops that are better adapted to CA than sunflower, improve residue management, increase energy efficiency through better fertilizer management, and promote CA among farmer groups excluded by socioeconomic barriers.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)
April 28, 2015 4:23 PM

Impacts of conservation agriculture-based farming systems on optimizing seasonal rainfall partitioning and productivity on vertisols in the Ethiopian drylands

Araya,Tesfay, Jan Nyssen, Bram Govaerts, Jozef Deckers, and Wim M.   Cornelis. 2015. Impacts of conservation agriculture-based farming systems on optimizing seasonal rainfall partitioning and productivity on vertisols in the Ethiopian drylands. Soil and Tillage Research.148: 1-13

doi: 10.1016/j.still.2014.11.009 


Field water conservation practices are a way to build resilience against drought by increasing productive green water through reducing runoff and evaporation and thereby boosting crop yield.This study was managed on rainfed plots to compare CA systems with conventional in terms of soil moisture, runoff, water loss (drainage and evapotranspiration together), water productivity and crop yield. The paper concludes that field water conservation tillage practices that incorporate CA principles are effectively increasing green water in the root zone available for crops and thus, improve crop productivity and yields substantially on vertisols in drylands without other inputs.

Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)'s insight:

Abstract available but for full text need subscription to journal

No comment yet.
Scooped by Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)
April 16, 2015 11:39 PM

Bacterial community structure in maize residue amended soil with contrasting management practices

Ramirez-Villanueva, Daniel A.Juan Manuel Bello-LópezYendi E. Navarro-NoyaMarco Luna-GuidoNele VerhulstBram Govaerts, and Luc Dendooven. 2015. Bacterial community structure in maize residue amended soil with contrasting management practices. Applied Soil Ecology. 90: 49-59. doi:/10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.01.010.


An interesting paper that looks at the affect agricultural practices -- flat and bed planting, with tillage and without (CA) on soil bacterial populations. Soil from these four treatments was amended in the laboratory with maize residue (Zea mays L.) or its neutral detergent fibre (NDF) fraction, mostly consisting of (hemi) cellulose, and incubated aerobically for 14 days. It was found that application of organic material favored the same bacterial groups that were more abundant in the soil cultivated conventionally while it reduced those that were favored in conservation agriculture.

Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)'s insight:

Abstract available but for full text need subscription to journal

No comment yet.
Scooped by Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)
April 16, 2015 11:32 PM

Earthworms in a 15 years agricultural trial

PelosiCéline, Michel BertrandJodie Thénard, and Christian Mougin. 2015. Earthworms in a 15 years agriculture trail. Applied Soil Ecology. 88: 1-8. doi:/10.1016/j.apsoil.2014.12.004.


This study looks at the effect of alternative cropping systems on soil biodiversity -- in this case earthworms, indicators of soil health. It compares conventional, organic and CA based systems and samples earthworm incidence in a wheat crop in France. While earthworm abundance and biomass increased slightly in the conventional system between the two periods, they at least tripled in the other two systems but earthworm species differed in the organic and CA systems. After at least 14 years, organic and living mulch cropping systems contained between 1.5 and 2.3 times more earthworms than the conventional system.


Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)'s insight:

Abstract available but for full text need subscription to journal

No comment yet.