Loin des pièges à touristes et des adresses sur-cotées, ces dix restaurants aux allures de boui-boui servent le meilleur de la cuisine nippone. Des bols de ramen aux gyozas dorés en passant par le traditionnel donburi, on vous en révèle les spécialités.
"If you like interesting snippets on all sorts of subjects relevant to academia, information, the world, highly recommended is @grip54 's collection:"
La curation de contenus, la mémoire partagée d'une veille scientifique et sociétale
Gilbert C FAURE's insight:
... designed to collect posts and informations I found and want to keep available but not relevant to the other topics I am curating on Scoop.it (on behalf of ASSIM):
because we have a long standing collaboration through a french speaking medical training program between Faculté de Médecine de Nancy and WuDA, Wuhan university medical school and Zhongnan Hospital
La solution idéale pour le traitement des eaux usées de votre habitation principale. Une micro-station avec plus de 10 ans d'expérience et de satisfaction.
💙 🤍 ❤️ MedGPT a un mois ! Et on n’aurait jamais espéré un tel succès. Ce qui devait être une simple bêta est devenu un mouvement 🧑🧑🧒🧒
Quelques chiffres pour l'illustrer : ➡️ 615 professionnels de santé nous ont écrit spontanément pour notamment proposer de participer à son élaboration ! Une communauté se forme déjà.
➡️ 35.000 décisions cliniques accompagnées ! Ramené à la population de professionnels de santé, ce n'est "que" 15 fois moins que OpenEvidence sur la même période. A notre rythme de croissance actuel, on vise le même ratio d'utilisation national qu'OpenEvidence dans 5 mois. Les US ont pris une longueur d'avance, mais la France sait courir vite 🏃♂️➡️
➡️ Des centaines de retours positifs, des encouragements et plusieurs dizaines d'articles dans la presse.
Et MedGPT ne va pas s'arrêter là, des nouveautés arrivent : ) Pour tous ceux qui n'ont pas encore essayé le produit : c'est dispo et c'est gratuit, allez-y ! | 15 comments on LinkedIn
We talk about health literacy as if it lives inside people — as if the solution is to hand individuals better tools, clearer brochures, simpler language, and hope they can “navigate” the system. But that framing is fundamentally wrong. Health literacy is not an individual skill problem. It is a system design problem.
If a person struggles to understand, act, or make informed decisions, that is not a sign of their failure. It is a sign that the environment was not built to support them. It is an organizational failure, a policy failure, a leadership failure — a failure of design.
Health literacy is not about teaching people to try harder. It is about building systems that make health understanding, access, and action natural — not heroic. It is a matter of equity and power, not worksheets and pamphlets.
The true measure of a health-literate society is not how well individuals adapt to complexity — but how well institutions remove the complexity in the first place.
Until we shift the responsibility from people to systems, from coping to designing, from deficit to empowerment — we will keep treating symptoms while ignoring the root cause. | 11 comments on LinkedIn
Review articles used to be essential for scientific publishing - an important academic exercise, while reading them was important for anyone entering a field.
This week, I learned about Consensus App (thanks, Julian A. Serna), which seems to generate excellent, referenced summaries on any topic — often better than many “real” review papers.
So, my questions are: -Does it still make sense for humans to write review articles? Especially since no one today can realistically read and process all relevant papers in an active field. -If AI can already produce (and will soon perfect) summaries that are comprehensive, accurate, and continuously updated — what unique value does a traditional human-written (and probably with the use of AI anyway) review still add?
It’s also interesting what this shift means for publishers like Wiley, Elsevier, or Springer, whose journal impact factors often rely heavily on review articles.
My prediction is that the traditional concept of a “review paper” will soon lose its relevance.
Les plateformes sociales entrent dans une nouvelle ère : celle du désenchantement. La baisse mondiale du temps passé en ligne, combinée à l’arrivée massive de contenus générés par l’IA, révèle un tournant dans les usages.
1️⃣ L’ère du contenu ultra-transformé
Meta et OpenAI lancent leurs propres plateformes de vidéos générées par IA. Leur pari : que les utilisateurs aient encore envie de créer et surtout de consommer toujours plus de vidéos. Sauf que cette logique pousse à l’extrême ce que l’auteur du Financial Times appelle un « contenu ultra-transformé ». Dopamine garantie, valeur informationnelle quasi nulle…. Et perte de sens assurée.
2️⃣ Le reflux de l’attention
Les chiffres sont très intéressants. Selon une analyse du cabinet GWI, le temps passé sur les réseaux a atteint un pic en 2022 avant de chuter de près de 10 % fin 2024. Les 16 ans et plus y consacrent en moyenne deux heures et vingt minutes par jour. Et même les jeunes surconnectés décrochent les premiers.
💎En fait, les plateformes, devenues des « machines à capter l’attention », ne sont plus vraiment sociales.
Once considered a luxury during times of scarcity in China, pork fat with rice (猪油拌饭) is a timeless comfort dish. A chunk of jade-like solidified lard melts over a steaming bowl of rice, releasing its rich aroma and silky flavor.
Discover how to cook this classic favorite, below: #FriedRiceDay
I discovered that a reading pack for my doctoral leadership subject contained fabricated references. Almost everything listed was AI-generated citations that either didn’t exist or linked to the wrong papers.
When I raised it, the provider confirmed that AI had been used and that the material was shared before human review. They also reminded me that doctoral candidates should be able to verify their own sources.
That response was so disappointing. Doctoral candidates are expected to build on verified scholarship, not correct institutional errors. I’ve asked to withdraw from the course because the university doesn’t seem to understand why this is a serious concern and has pushed the responsibility back on me.
Distributing unverified academic material in a foundation subject is a breach of academic integrity and sets entirely the wrong ethical tone for the course.
Am I overreacting? Or is this yet another symptom of the wider issues that are undermining confidence in the sector? | 306 comments on LinkedIn
My first visit to Tbilisi, Georgia for the International Conference on Medical Education has been incredible and filled with thoughtful discussions, engaged learners, and the perfect mix of local and international perspectives. Thanks to Salome Voronovi for the invitation, and always nice to see David Taylor.
A concept that really struck a chord is what I’ve started calling the Suitcase Paradox:
In lifelong learning or curriculum design, just like when packing for a trip, you can’t keep adding new things unless you take something out first. And you have to fit it into the overhead compartment on a plane and in our anatomical overhead compartment, the brain!
Healthcare professionals must continually unlearn outdated practices to make room for new evidence, new technologies, and new ways of thinking.
That’s what lifelong learning, and particularly continuing professional development (CPD), is all about.
But to make it work, educators must evolve into learning facilitators, helping learners curate, adapt, and apply knowledge depending on where they are on the learning continuum.
And because healthcare doesn’t happen in silos, neither should learning. Interprofessional education (IPE) brings students from different health professions together.
Interprofessional continuing education (IPCE) extends that collaboration into practice. And when it’s done right, it leads to interprofessional collaborative practice (IPCP), where the ultimate outcome is better patient care.
I even got in a mention of the Donald & Barbara Zucker School of Medicine curriculum!
Plenty more to come: I’ve still got a wine tour 🍷 ahead and a masterclass on lifelong learning and CPD on Monday!
J’ai le plaisir de vous annoncer la tenue de la journée d’étude « Penser l’éducation avec John Dewey : une approche pragmatiste et pluridisciplinaire », qui se déroulera à Paris le 1er décembre 2025: https://lnkd.in/ehh5MbTx
Cet événement, co-organisé par Annabelle Cara, Anne BARRERE et moi-même, avec le soutien du CERLIS, de l’EDA et du Centre de recherche sur les médiations (Crem), proposera un regard croisé sur l’œuvre de Dewey et ses apports pour penser les questions et pratiques éducatives. Avec la participation de Renaud Hétier, Anne Lehmans, Samuel Renier, Sébastien-Akira Alix, Céline Robillard et Arthur Ancelin.
Une étude universitaire américaine met en lumière les limites de l’intelligence artificielle dans le domaine de l’éducation. Menée par les chercheurs Torrey Trust et Robert Maloy de l’Université du Massachusetts Amherst, cette analyse de plus de 300 plans de cours générés par ChatGPT, Gemini et Copilot conclut que l’IA, dans sa forme actuelle, échoue à…
This video is the FULL interview of the Business of Colorado segment featured on Studio Twelve.
From Studio Twelve: Business of Colorado, Frannie Matthews interviews Nicholas Sly of the Federal Reserve on Colorado’s economic trends, inflation challenges, and the evolving job market in the AI era.
étude, 1er semestre 2025 sur réponses à des questions d'actualité de 4 assistants d'IA : Copilot, ChatGPT, Perplexity et Gemini. Bilan : un % massif de reponses contenant des erreurs ! IA n’est pas info !
AI slop–low-quality, often fake AI-generated content – is proliferating at a staggering rate. So what do you and your students need to know to combat it?
"AI slop is the low-quality, often fake content, such as text, images, or videos, that is generated by AI. It’s currently overwhelming social media and the internet"
New paper just published with Shaydanay Urbani and Eric Wang. We wanted to understand how people searched for health information on AI-powered technologies (specifically ChatGPT, Alexa and Gemini Overviews on Google Search results), so we interviewed 27 people while watching their behavior and asking for additional information about why they were doing certain things and what they would do with the results. https://lnkd.in/eMfZUcxD
tl;dr : Participants integrated AI tools into their broader search routines rather than using them in isolation. ChatGPT was valued for its clarity, speed, and ability to generate keywords or summarize complex topics, even by users skeptical of its accuracy. Trust and utility did not always align; participants often used ChatGPT despite concerns about sourcing and bias. Google’s AI Overviews were met with caution—participants frequently skipped them to review traditional search results. Alexa was viewed as convenient but limited, particularly for in-depth health queries. Platform choice was influenced by the seriousness of the health issue, context of use, and prior experience. One-third of participants were multilingual, and they identified challenges with voice recognition, cultural relevance, and data provenance. Overall, users exhibited sophisticated “mix-and-match” behaviors, drawing on multiple tools depending on context, urgency, and familiarity.
Fascinating project, and as ever, people's behavior tends to be much more complex and nuanced than headlines would suggest.
Nous avons un cadeau pour vous : un tout nouveau MOOC gratuit sur l’intelligence artificielle ! 🎁
Quel que soit votre métier – industrie, services, médecine, art – l’IA peut devenir votre meilleur allié.
Ce MOOC a été conçu pour vous aider à la pratiquer concrètement, selon 3 parcours : > Débutants : pour découvrir pas à pas l’IA. > Professionnels : pour ceux qui ont déjà testé et veulent aller plus loin. > Experts : pour créer et utiliser des agents IA.
💡 Vous y trouverez des contenus exclusifs issus d’expériences du monde entier, bien au-delà des classiques formations des GAFAM ou des YouTubers.
L’objectif ? Vous permettre de transformer vos compétences et votre métier grâce à l’IA.
Réalisé au Cnam (Conservatoire national des arts et métiers) avec le #LearningLabHumanChange
📅 Rendez-vous le 13 octobre 2025 à 18h pour le lancement !
Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers CAIRE | 52 comments on LinkedIn
Discuter, s’informer, se distraire, consommer… aujourd’hui, plus que jamais les réseaux sociaux façonnent les comportements, les habitudes et les décisions d’achat. Auparavant effectués sur le web, la majorité des usages passent désormais par les réseaux sociaux, pour suivre ses proches, se divertir et se tenir informé de l’actualité.C’est entre autres ce que relève l’Observatoire des Réseaux Sociaux de Médiamétrie, nouvelle étude semestrielle qui dresse le panorama de ces plateformes devenues centrales dans les usages et dans les investissements publicitaires.
To get content containing either thought or leadership enter:
To get content containing both thought and leadership enter:
To get content containing the expression thought leadership enter:
You can enter several keywords and you can refine them whenever you want. Our suggestion engine uses more signals but entering a few keywords here will rapidly give you great content to curate.