 Your new post is loading...
 Your new post is loading...
Rockström, J., Kassam, A., Friedrich, T., Reicosky, D., Dumansky, J., Goddard, T. & Peiretti, R.A. 2026. Global Sustainability. 9. Article e11, pages 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2025.10045
Schiavo, J.A., Lopes, V.R., Araújo, A.R., Macedo, M.C.M.,Oliveira, N. de S., Coêlho, R. da S., Souza, C.B. da Silva, Farias, P.G. da Silva, Panachuki, E., Couto, A.M. & Oelbermann, M. 2025. Applied and Environmental Soil Science. 2025 (1). Article 8491885. https://doi.org/10.1155/aess/8491885
Yuan, C., Ma, Z., Liu, S., Nie, H., Feng, G., Wang, S. & Luo, S. 2025. Frontiers in Microbiology. 16. Article 173092. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1730920
Nthebere, K., Prakash, T.R., Bhimireddy, P., Chandran, L.P., Gudapati, J., Admala, M. & Prasad, K. 2025 Heliyon. 11 (1) Article e41196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41196
Attia, A., Woli, P., Long, C.R., Rouquette, F.M., Smith, G.R., Datta, A., Felke, T. & Rajan, N. 2025. Journal of Environmental Management. 391. Article 126352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126352
Fagodiya, R.K., Verma, K., Sharma, G., Rai, A.K., Prajapat, K., Singh, R., Sheoran, P., Basak, N., Chandra, P., Sharma, D.P., Yadav, R.K. & Biswas, A.K. 2025. Soil and Tillage Research. 254. Article 106697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2025.106697
Madzivanzira, T., Mvumi, B.M., Nazare, R.M., Nyakudya, E., Mtambanengwe, F. & Mapfumo, P. 2025.Advances in Agriculture. 1. Article 4837619. https://doi.org/10.1155/aia/4837619
Zhou, Y., Ferdinand, M.S., van Wesemael, J., Dvorakova, K., Baret, P.V., Van Oost, K. & van Wesemael, B. 2025. Remote Sensing of Environment. 328. Article 114858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2025.114858
Kim, D.H., Wade, T., Brym, Z., Ogisma, L., Bhattarai, R., Bai, X., Bhadha, J. & Her, Y. 2025. Journal of Environmental Management. 387. Article 125833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125833
|
Hasanain, Md., Singh, V.K., Rathore, S.S., Meena, V.S., Singh, R.K., et al., (9 more). Biomass and Bioenergy. 208. Article 108864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.108864
Jia, Y., Sun, Y., Zhang, D., Yang, W., Pang, J., Siddique, K.H.. & Qu, Z. 2025. Agronomy-Basel. 15 (5) Article 1007. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15051007
Khosa, M.K., Barik, K., Aksakal, E., Jahangir, Md MR., Didenko, N.O. & Islam, K.R. 2025. Plos One. 20 (5) Article e0322891. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0322891
|
This paper from Mexico looked at the the impact of conservation tillage (CT) versus intensive tillage (IT) on bacterial communities from experimental platforms that had practiced these three different tillage options for 25 years. The three tillage options were IT, CT and reduced tillage (RT) with residue with and without for each tillage practice. CT or conservation tillage showed higher species diversity and beta diversity while IT showed higher richness. IT results were grouped in the same phylum range whereas CT had a different range. CT also improved the soil physicochemical properties. Although not mentioned in the abstract, zero tillage and reduced tillage systems led to the development of copiotrophic ecological niches, predominantly attributed to heightened organic matter levels stemming from the decomposition of agricultural residues and wastewater irrigation.