 Your new post is loading...
 Your new post is loading...
Rockström, J., Kassam, A., Friedrich, T., Reicosky, D., Dumansky, J., Goddard, T. & Peiretti, R.A. 2026. Global Sustainability. 9. Article e11, pages 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2025.10045
Schiavo, J.A., Lopes, V.R., Araújo, A.R., Macedo, M.C.M.,Oliveira, N. de S., Coêlho, R. da S., Souza, C.B. da Silva, Farias, P.G. da Silva, Panachuki, E., Couto, A.M. & Oelbermann, M. 2025. Applied and Environmental Soil Science. 2025 (1). Article 8491885. https://doi.org/10.1155/aess/8491885
Yuan, C., Ma, Z., Liu, S., Nie, H., Feng, G., Wang, S. & Luo, S. 2025. Frontiers in Microbiology. 16. Article 173092. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1730920
Nthebere, K., Prakash, T.R., Bhimireddy, P., Chandran, L.P., Gudapati, J., Admala, M. & Prasad, K. 2025 Heliyon. 11 (1) Article e41196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41196
Attia, A., Woli, P., Long, C.R., Rouquette, F.M., Smith, G.R., Datta, A., Felke, T. & Rajan, N. 2025. Journal of Environmental Management. 391. Article 126352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126352
Fagodiya, R.K., Verma, K., Sharma, G., Rai, A.K., Prajapat, K., Singh, R., Sheoran, P., Basak, N., Chandra, P., Sharma, D.P., Yadav, R.K. & Biswas, A.K. 2025. Soil and Tillage Research. 254. Article 106697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2025.106697
Madzivanzira, T., Mvumi, B.M., Nazare, R.M., Nyakudya, E., Mtambanengwe, F. & Mapfumo, P. 2025.Advances in Agriculture. 1. Article 4837619. https://doi.org/10.1155/aia/4837619
Zhou, Y., Ferdinand, M.S., van Wesemael, J., Dvorakova, K., Baret, P.V., Van Oost, K. & van Wesemael, B. 2025. Remote Sensing of Environment. 328. Article 114858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2025.114858
Kim, D.H., Wade, T., Brym, Z., Ogisma, L., Bhattarai, R., Bai, X., Bhadha, J. & Her, Y. 2025. Journal of Environmental Management. 387. Article 125833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125833
|
Hasanain, Md., Singh, V.K., Rathore, S.S., Meena, V.S., Singh, R.K., et al., (9 more). Biomass and Bioenergy. 208. Article 108864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.108864
Jia, Y., Sun, Y., Zhang, D., Yang, W., Pang, J., Siddique, K.H.. & Qu, Z. 2025. Agronomy-Basel. 15 (5) Article 1007. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15051007
Khosa, M.K., Barik, K., Aksakal, E., Jahangir, Md MR., Didenko, N.O. & Islam, K.R. 2025. Plos One. 20 (5) Article e0322891. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0322891
|
Low yields are often related to variable rainfall in semi-arid regions under conventional farming. This paper from the highlands of Mexico evaluates CA in 2 sites on-farm experiments and 17 farmer fields from 2013-2020 to assess yields and profits. Maize grown conventionally on the flat (CT) was compared with maize on permanent beds with residue mulch. The latter plots had monocrop maize and three rotations with either triticale, oats, or common beans. Results showed that average maize yields on beds exceeded CT maize by 70% in one location. Whereas in a second location there was no difference in maize yields between CT and CA systems. On the farmer fields, bed planting was 70% better then the CT. The most profitable rotation was maize-beans in farmer fields and the 2 on-farm trails.