 Your new post is loading...
 Your new post is loading...
Rockström, J., Kassam, A., Friedrich, T., Reicosky, D., Dumansky, J., Goddard, T. & Peiretti, R.A. 2026. Global Sustainability. 9. Article e11, pages 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2025.10045
Schiavo, J.A., Lopes, V.R., Araújo, A.R., Macedo, M.C.M.,Oliveira, N. de S., Coêlho, R. da S., Souza, C.B. da Silva, Farias, P.G. da Silva, Panachuki, E., Couto, A.M. & Oelbermann, M. 2025. Applied and Environmental Soil Science. 2025 (1). Article 8491885. https://doi.org/10.1155/aess/8491885
Yuan, C., Ma, Z., Liu, S., Nie, H., Feng, G., Wang, S. & Luo, S. 2025. Frontiers in Microbiology. 16. Article 173092. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1730920
Nthebere, K., Prakash, T.R., Bhimireddy, P., Chandran, L.P., Gudapati, J., Admala, M. & Prasad, K. 2025 Heliyon. 11 (1) Article e41196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41196
Attia, A., Woli, P., Long, C.R., Rouquette, F.M., Smith, G.R., Datta, A., Felke, T. & Rajan, N. 2025. Journal of Environmental Management. 391. Article 126352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126352
Fagodiya, R.K., Verma, K., Sharma, G., Rai, A.K., Prajapat, K., Singh, R., Sheoran, P., Basak, N., Chandra, P., Sharma, D.P., Yadav, R.K. & Biswas, A.K. 2025. Soil and Tillage Research. 254. Article 106697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2025.106697
Madzivanzira, T., Mvumi, B.M., Nazare, R.M., Nyakudya, E., Mtambanengwe, F. & Mapfumo, P. 2025.Advances in Agriculture. 1. Article 4837619. https://doi.org/10.1155/aia/4837619
Zhou, Y., Ferdinand, M.S., van Wesemael, J., Dvorakova, K., Baret, P.V., Van Oost, K. & van Wesemael, B. 2025. Remote Sensing of Environment. 328. Article 114858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2025.114858
Kim, D.H., Wade, T., Brym, Z., Ogisma, L., Bhattarai, R., Bai, X., Bhadha, J. & Her, Y. 2025. Journal of Environmental Management. 387. Article 125833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125833
|
Hasanain, Md., Singh, V.K., Rathore, S.S., Meena, V.S., Singh, R.K., et al., (9 more). Biomass and Bioenergy. 208. Article 108864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.108864
Jia, Y., Sun, Y., Zhang, D., Yang, W., Pang, J., Siddique, K.H.. & Qu, Z. 2025. Agronomy-Basel. 15 (5) Article 1007. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15051007
Khosa, M.K., Barik, K., Aksakal, E., Jahangir, Md MR., Didenko, N.O. & Islam, K.R. 2025. Plos One. 20 (5) Article e0322891. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0322891
|
This study looked at three tillage practices and four maize based cropping systems on physical hydraulic properties in a sandy loam soil in NW India from a long-term 10-year experiment. The three tillage treatments were conventional (CT), no-till (NT) and permanent raised beds (PB). The hydraulic properties were derived from infiltration rates. Results showed that the bulk density (BD) of the soil under conservation agriculture (CA) practices (PB and ZT) were significantly lower than that in CT practices. The BD in the maize-chickpea-sesbania cropping system was the lowest of all the cropping systems. The soil aggregate mean weight diameter (MWD) and hydraulic conductivity under PB and ZT were higher than in the CT treatments. Among the cropping system choices, M-W-mungbean was more effective in improving the soil's hydro-physical properties in the study area.