Mucosal Immunity

SARS-CoV-2 typically enters the body via the nose or mouth. Because of this, many think a nasal spray vaccine would do a better job of preventing COVID-19 infection and cutting transmission than an injection.

Nasal mucosa is an immune responsive organ evidenced by eliciting both specific local secretory IgA and systemic IgG antibody responses with intra-nasal administration of antigens. Nevertheless, the role of nasal epithelial cells in modulating such responses is unclear.

Thai virologists at BIOTEC have 2 nasal spray options currently in development that may act as a substitute for Covid-19 vaccines in needle form.

Amid concerns over a possible third wave of the coronavirus pandemic and to speed up the vaccination process in the country, an expert panel of India's central drug authority has recommended giving an approval to Bharat Biotech to carry out a study on interchangeability of its Covaxin and the...

New technologies are expected to enhance nasal vaccines industry growth as particular attention is being paid to designing delivery strategies that take into account the broad range of diseases, populations and healthcare delivery settings that will benefit from the mucosal route of delivery.

Date 123: 25 March | 3:30PM GMT / 11:30AM EST / 4:30PM CETToday, there are three marketed nasal vaccines available for human use but many more are in development for both human and veterinary use.Nasal vaccination provides an alternative to the more...

Sci Immunol. 2021 Feb 26;6(56):eabb7221. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.abb7221. ABSTRACT Mast cells (MCs) play a pathobiologic role in type 2 (T2) allergic inflammatory diseases of the airway, including asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP).

Compared with nasal swabs, saliva tests may better reflect infection deep in the lungs.  To the known risk factors for developing severe COVID-19—age, male sex, or any of a series of underlying conditions—a new study adds one more: high levels of the virus in your saliva. Standard COVID-19 tests sample the nasal passage. But several new tests look for SARS-CoV-2, the pandemic coronavirus, in saliva, and the new work finds a striking correlation between high virus levels there and later hospitalization or death. If the results are confirmed, saliva tests could help doctors prioritize which patients in the early stages of the disease should receive medicines that drive down levels of the virus. “I thought it was pretty striking,” says Shane Crotty, a virologist at the La Jolla Institute for Immunology, who was not involved with the research. Crotty notes the results suggest virus levels in saliva reflect viral load deep in the lungs, where the disease does much of its damage in severe cases. “That is a fundamentally valuable insight,” Crotty says. The new work isn’t the first to link the body’s coronavirus load and disease outcome. Several research groups have found a correlation between high viral levels in the nasal passages at the time of a patient’s hospital admission and ultimate disease severity. But other groups have failed to find that same link. The standard test to detect SARS-CoV-2 samples nasal mucus using nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs. The procedure is unpleasant, but it is the customary way to sample respiratory pathogens. In recent months, however, several research groups have developed and received emergency use authorization from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for tests detecting SARS-CoV-2 in saliva. Yale University researchers were among the first, and the university’s hospitals have been using both saliva and NP swab tests. In both cases, labs analyze the samples using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction tests, which can detect genetic material from SARS-CoV-2 and quantify the number of viral particles in each milliliter of sample.

Researchers led by Akiko Iwasaki, an immunologist at Yale, compared viral loads in saliva and NP swabs from 154 patients and 109 people without the virus. They divided the patients into groups that had low, medium, and high viral loads as determined by both types of test. Then they compared those results with the severity of symptoms the patients developed later. They found that patients who developed severe disease, were hospitalized, or died were more likely to have had high virus loads in their saliva tests, but not in their NP swabs. Viral load in both saliva and nasal mucus declined over time in patients who recovered, but not in those who died. When Iwasaki and her colleagues reviewed patients’ electronic medical records for markers of disease in the blood, they found that high saliva viral loads correlated with high levels of immune signals such as cytokines and chemokines, nonspecific molecules that ramp up in response to viral infections and have been linked to tissue damage. People with more virus in their saliva also gradually lost certain cells that mount an immune response against viral targets, had lower levels of antibodies targeting the spike protein that the virus uses to enter cells, and were slower to develop the strong immune response needed to knock down the virus in cases where they recovered. The team’s results appeared on 10 January in a preprint that has not been peer reviewed.

Iwasaki and her colleagues argue that saliva may be a better predictor of disease outcome than nasal mucus because the latter comes from the upper respiratory tract, whereas severe disease is associated with damage deep in the lungs. “Saliva may better represent what is going on in the lower respiratory tract,” Iwasaki says, because cilia lining the respiratory tract naturally move mucus up from the lungs into the throat, where it mixes with saliva; coughs have the same effect. The results don’t have enough statistical power to reveal how much more likely a person with a high saliva viral load is to develop severe COVID-19, Iwasaki says. She is also eager for other groups to replicate the results, especially because efforts to link high NP swab viral loads with disease progression have had mixed results. If other research confirms the finding, “it would clear away a lot of the fog” around this disease, Crotty says. Monica Gandhi, an infectious disease expert at the University of California, San Francisco, adds that if saliva tests are predictive, they could help doctors identify patients to treat early with either antibodies to reduce viral load or steroids to tamp down overactive nonspecific immune responses. Saliva tests are cheaper and easier than NP tests, but much less widely available. So confirmation of the new results could bolster efforts to make saliva tests more readily available, says Sri Kosuri, CEO of Octant, Inc., a biotech company. “If this study happened in March, we’d be talking about whether we should be doing NP testing at all,” Kosuri says.

Preprint available in medRxiv  (Jan. 10, 2021):

https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.04.21249236 

The nasal mucosa is the body's first barrier against pathogens entering through the respiratory tract. The respiratory immune system of pigs has more similarities with humans than the mouse respiratory system does, and so was selected as the animal model ...

In a recent study, researchers conducted a nasopharyngeal microbiota profiling parallelism in an effort to analyze microbiota variations in COVID-19 patients.

SARS-CoV-2 infection induces strong type I IFN immunity in the nasopharyngeal cavity of mildly symptomatic COVID-19 patients, but this response is compromised i...

Click on the article title to read more.

There are now several monoclonal antibodies, identical copies of a therapeutic antibody produced in large numbers, that are authorized for the treatment of COVID-19. But in the ongoing effort to beat this terrible pandemic, there’s plenty of room for continued improvements in treating infections with SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19.

Increased IgE is a typical feature of allergic rhinitis. Local class-switch recombination has been intimated but B cell precursors and mechanisms remain elusive. Here we describe the dynamics underlying the generation of IgE-antibody secreting cells (ASC) in human nasal polyps (NP), mucosal...

Tiziana is all set to commence a Phase II trial of its nasal Foralumab in moderate to severe hospitalised Covid-19 patients in Brazil.