Putting body dysmorphia disorder under the microscope for a Catalyst documentary forced me to interrogate my own complicated body image, writes Ruby Jones.
Via Peter Mellow
Get Started for FREE
Sign up with Facebook Sign up with X
I don't have a Facebook or a X account
![]() ![]()
No comment yet.
Sign up to comment
Mary Reilley Clark's curator insight,
January 19, 2015 4:52 PM
This would be a good opportunity to have students read and compare articles about this incident from international news sites. It's also a great digital citizenship discussion opener. Should you check with people before you post their photos online? Would your selfies cause drama?
Dr. Pamela Rutledge's curator insight,
February 20, 2019 12:48 PM
A good rule of thumb is that images for things you can change — teeth straightening, hairstyle, painting a room — can be inspirational. Looking at things you can’t change — body build, height, the fact that you’ll never own a divine midcentury LA home like Mandy Moore — might be counterproductive. Best advice from Parks: Don't look at things that make you feel crappy."
Igor Espanhol's curator insight,
April 9, 2019 8:15 PM
"The 38-year-old mother of three (whose name has been changed for this piece) lives in the town of Kahama, in northern Tanzania. She had been coughing for weeks prior to her diagnosis and had visited several health facilities, but she was given regular antibiotics, which are ineffective against TB." |
Charles Tiayon's curator insight,
September 21, 2019 3:11 AM
(MENAFN - NewsBytes) Language was constructed around age-old sexist notions and traditions which have trickled down to the present day lexicon. And if you happen to disagree, here's some damning evidence. A recent online petition has underlined how the word ' woman ' is defined as 'bitch' and 'piece' among other things in the Oxford EnglishDictionary(OED), regarded as the most widely accepted dictionary.
The petition, titled ' Change Oxford Dictionary's Sexist Definition of 'Woman ,' was started in June by one Maria Beatrice Giovanardi who noticed how differently ' man ' and 'woman' were defined. It states, "'Bitch, besom, piece, bit, mare, baggage, wench, petticoat, frail, bird, bint, biddy, filly'- these are the words which the Oxford's English Dictionary online tells us mean the same as 'woman'. This sexist dictionary must change."
Synonyms aside, the dictionary also uses sexist phrases as example sentences under the definition of 'woman'. Some of them are as listed below: "Don't be daft, woman!" "One of his sophisticated London women" "I told you to be home when I get home, little woman." The petition reads, "These examples show women as sex objects, subordinate, and/or an irritation to men."
Love World news? Stay updated with the latest happenings.
On the contrary, the definition of 'man' projects them as workers, soldiers. One definition lists "bravery, spirit, or toughness" as qualities of men. In example phrases, the dictionary unnecessarily includes "She was more of a man than any of them," attaching the connotation that women are weaker than men, and exhibiting strength makes a woman "manly" as if strength was inherently a man's trait.
Now, the petition presents these three demands: "Eliminate phrases and definitions that discriminate against and patronize women and/or connote men's ownership of women." "Enlarge the dictionary's entry for 'woman.'" "Include examples representative of minorities, for example, a transgender woman, a lesbian woman, etc." It notes, "If we want to create an equal society, we need language fit for the 21st century that doesn't discriminate against women."
Since the petition, the search engines Google and Bing have started attributing the definitions to theOxford dictionary . Meanwhile, Katherine Connor Martin, Oxford's Head of Lexical Content Strategy took note of the petition in ablog postand attempted to rationalize why such definitions were included for the term 'woman'. Martin said there's "nuance to how words are defined and presented in our dictionaries."
Martin explained that the definitions are based on large quantities of evidence from real-life use which set the tone of how 'man' and 'woman' are used and defined. She said, "People speak of a 'man about town' but rarely of a 'woman about town'; of a 'ladies' man' but not a 'gentlemen's lady'; of 'womanly' curves and wiles, but 'manly' handshakes and jawlines."
Martin wrote, "As the usage of English speakers changes over time, the dictionary changes to reflect that new lexical terrain." She added, "The current cultural moment has seen an increasing acknowledgment of the real-life impact that words can have on individuals and groups. As this awareness leads to changes in linguistic behavior, the dictionary will seek to record them."
However, Giovanardi wasn't satisfied. In an interview withThe Bookseller , excerpted inDailyMail , Giovanardi said, "The blog post doesn't address our concerns, rather it almost patronizes the campaign and gives vague answers to 29,000+ people and that is worrying." She added, " Sexism , just like racism, and any oppressive ways of talking, should have no place in society, and of course, texts like the dictionary."
|