"Errors in automated translation systems used by California courts are raising concerns that residents with limited English proficiency may be denied meaningful access to justice.


 


The issue is particularly relevant to Korean Americans, as Korean remains one of the most frequently requested languages for court interpretation in the state, underscoring the need for accurate and reliable interpretation and translation services.


 


Thirty-five legal and community organizations, including California Rural Legal Assistance, Inc. (CRLA), the Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles (LAFLA) and the Mixteco Indígena Community Organizing Project (MICOP), recently called on the Judicial Council of California to suspend the use of automated translation in state courts and strengthen language access services through qualified interpreters and translators.


 


In a joint public comment submitted earlier this month to the Language Access Subcommittee of the Judicial Council’s Advisory Committee on Providing Access and Fairness, the organizations said courts have failed to fully meet language access standards, leaving many residents with limited English proficiency unable to fully understand or participate in critical legal proceedings.


 


At a public hearing before the subcommittee, residents also voiced repeated calls for interpretation services provided by trained human interpreters.


 


Korean ranks eighth in court interpretation demand


The scale of language assistance needed in California courts is substantial, according to the Judicial Council’s 2025 Language Need and Interpreter Use Study, released last year.


 


From fiscal year 2020-21 through fiscal year 2023-24, California’s 58 superior courts recorded a total of 2,534,207 interpretations.


 


Korean accounted for 14,410 interpretations during the four-year period, ranking eighth among all languages, behind Spanish, Mandarin, Vietnamese, American Sign Language, Punjabi, Cantonese and Arabic. Korean is also among the languages for which the Judicial Council maintains a certification program for professional court interpreters.


 


Demand for Korean-language interpretation was heavily concentrated in the Los Angeles area. According to the report, 70.8% of all Korean interpretations took place in Region 1, which includes Los Angeles, San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara counties.


 


Region 1 recorded 10,214 Korean-language interpretations during the study period, representing 1.7% of all interpretations in the region. Excluding Spanish, Korean had the second-highest number of interpretations after Mandarin.


 


Korean interpretation particularly significant in civil cases


The report also found relatively high demand for Korean interpretation in civil cases.


 


Statewide, Korean was used in 5,315 civil-case interpretations, accounting for 3.7% of all civil interpretations during the study period. Excluding Spanish, Korean ranked second only to Mandarin, which accounted for 6.0%.


 


Civil cases can include matters such as eviction, domestic violence and civil harassment, proceedings that can directly affect a person’s housing, safety, property and livelihood.


 


Language assistance needs are significant across California as a whole. As of 2022, about 16.29 million residents age 5 and older, or 43.9%, spoke a language other than English at home. About 6.36 million people, or 17.1%, were classified as limited-English-proficient, meaning they spoke English less than “very well.”


 


At the household level, 8.4% of California households were classified as limited-English-speaking households. In Los Angeles County, home to a large Korean American population, the share was 12.0%, well above the statewide average.


 


The report also noted that Korean speakers, along with Chinese and Vietnamese speakers, continue to have relatively high levels of limited English proficiency, indicating an ongoing need for targeted language assistance.


 


‘DUI’ translated as ‘IUD’


Despite the high demand for language services, legal advocates say courts are increasingly relying on machine translation without sufficient review by qualified translators or interpreters.


 


In 2015, the Judicial Council adopted the Strategic Plan for Language Access in the California Courts, establishing 75 recommendations intended to ensure equal access to court services for people with limited English proficiency.


 


According to the Judicial Council’s 2025 report, more than 60 of those recommendations have been completed, while several remain in progress. The report also states that the council is developing training and guidance for court staff on the appropriate use of machine translation tools.


 


The organizations that submitted the joint public comment, however, said key language access measures remain inadequately implemented and criticized courts for using machine translation since 2020 without sufficient oversight by qualified human translators and interpreters.


 


Their comments included examples of automated translation errors drawn from actual court data.


 


In one case, instructions from a court staff member were translated as, “Sting the judge to reduce a fever,” a phrase bearing no resemblance to the intended meaning.


 


In another case, “DUI,” referring to driving under the influence, was translated as “IUD,” the abbreviation for an intrauterine contraceptive device.


 


The organizations warned that such errors can have consequences far beyond inconvenience. Court users may miss hearings or filing deadlines, lose opportunities to reduce fines or avoid points on their driver’s licenses, or make important legal decisions without fully understanding their cases.


 


Joann H. Lee, the attorney overseeing language access at LAFLA, said California, as the nation’s most linguistically diverse state and home to the country’s largest court system, has a responsibility to ensure that language does not become a barrier to justice.


 


“For many people, court proceedings involve some of the most consequential moments of their lives,” Lee said. “Yet too often, they are left unable to fully understand or participate in decisions that affect their families, housing, safety and livelihoods.”


 


Aging and limited interpreter workforce


Securing enough qualified court interpreters is another growing concern.


 


As of March 2025, 1,856 certified and registered court interpreters were listed with the Judicial Council, covering 114 spoken languages and American Sign Language. However, 32% of interpreters on the master list were over age 65, highlighting concerns about an aging workforce.


 


As of 2024, there were 25 certified Korean court interpreters in California. Korean, meanwhile, remains one of the 10 most frequently interpreted spoken languages in the state court system.


 


Norma Ventura, Indigenous Justice Program Director at CRLA, said safeguards are essential as courts and other public agencies expand their use of machine translation and other AI technologies.


 


“As we see an increase in the use of machine translation tools and other AI technologies in courts and other public agencies, it is imperative that these entities implement safeguards that ensure accuracy,” Ventura said in the statement. “Safeguards such as qualified human review ensure equal access to services for all communities.”


 


Vanessa Terán, policy director at MICOP, said the Judicial Council’s 2015 language access plan represented important progress but has yet to fully deliver on its promise.


 


“More must be done to ensure that everyone, regardless of the language they speak, can fully understand and participate in proceedings that profoundly affect their lives,” Terán said.


 


The legal and community organizations are urging the Judicial Council to fully implement its existing language access plan before expanding automated translation and to stop using machine-generated translations that have not been reviewed by qualified professional interpreters or translators."


August 16, 2026


By Nicole Chang, originally published by American Community Media


Automated Translation Errors in California Courts Raise Concerns Over Korean Americans’ Access to Justice


https://asamnews.com/2026/08/16/translation-errors-california-courts-korean-americans-justice/


#metaglossia 


#metaglossia_mundus