 Your new post is loading...
"Science communicator and journalist Sibusiso Biyela says the future of inclusive science on the continent depends on whether scientific knowledge can be meaningfully communicated in African languages – not as a symbolic gesture, but as a necessity.
Inside Education spoke to Biyela about his dedication to making science accessible beyond the confines of English.
Biyela’s commitment to African-language science journalism took shape in 2017, while he was attempting to write a science news article about the discovery of Ledumahadi mafube, a newly identified dinosaur species found in South Africa.
Although the dinosaur’s name was scientifically derived from Sesotho, which he said he found interesting, the process exposed a deeper problem.
“I found it difficult to write much about the discovery when every second scientific term needed translating without any Zulu language counterparts,” Biyela said.
Growing up, Biyela learned science exclusively in English, while isiZulu remained the language of his cultural and everyday life.
He describes this linguistic and cultural divide as more than an inconvenience, creating a lasting barrier between science and his identity.
“As I immersed myself further into the universe science opened for me, I found that barrier existing between myself and the rest of my cultural and linguistic identity as a Zulu,” he said.
“Having benefitted so much from the satisfaction of my curiosity that science provides, it pains me to not be able to share that joy with others through my mother tongue.”
He said the lack of scientific discourse in African languages contributes to the perception that science and technology are foreign or inaccessible to African communities.
He added that the loss is mutual: African-language speakers miss out on science, and science misses out on their perspectives, including the dignity of engaging in institutions through a language they are proud of.
Biyela placed these challenges within a broader discussion about decolonising science communication. He said this does not mean rejecting science, but rather acknowledging its complex and often violent colonial history, while opening scientific inquiry to new voices and ways of knowing.
“Decolonising science means that we understand that what we understand about science today is coloured by colonial history of violence and the many excuses that justified the Atlantic Slave Trade and Apartheid, and continues to justify many people’s understanding of human history that justifies black people’s lot in life in the present day,” he said.
He said wider participation in scientific discourse — particularly beyond a small group of dominant global languages — could fundamentally expand what questions science asks and what knowledge is valued.
Reflecting on the impact of writing about dinosaurs in isiZulu, Biyela said it changed how audiences engaged with and talked about these ancient creatures, making them more responsive and culturally connected in ways English-language communication never could.
Despite growing interest, Biyela acknowledged that many African researchers and communicators he has spoken to still face structural barriers — particularly limited access to resources — which often pushes them to seek opportunities abroad.
Although some governments have promised increased research funding, he said the long-term impact remains uncertain.
While progress has been slow over the past decade, Biyela sees more African-language science discussions emerging through community radio, social media, and podcasts.
“If I could predict the future, I would quit my job as a journalist and become a stockbroker or crypto-bro, but my best would be that in ten years’ time, there will be a lot more people like myself doing this kind of work,” he said.
“That can only happen if we all stay motivated to continue this work. And that can happen with support from the government and other institutions, not for handouts, but for the value that we continue to demonstrate comes from this kind of work”.
One of the most ambitious aspects of his work involves explaining complex concepts, such as particle physics terms like “flavour,” “colour,” and “spin”, in isiZulu. He said these concepts are challenging because their scientific meanings differ entirely from everyday English usage.
“I do not want to be the next clever science communicator or linguist to create terms that no one else uses, so the best way to balance scientific accuracy with cultural relevance would be to create these terms publicly with the help of the very people who would be making use of these terms,” he said.
He said that rather than imposing scientific terminology, he and his team — through the iLukuluku podcast — co-create new isiZulu scientific terms with linguists and listeners in public, drawing on existing but underused words and leaving room for community feedback.
For Biyela, African-language science communication is not about translation alone, but about participation — ensuring that African languages are not only vehicles for culture, but also for curiosity, inquiry, and discovery itself.
https://insideeducation.co.za/why-africas-science-future-must-speak-african-languages/
#Metaglossia
#metaglossia_mundus
Google Translate now supports real-time Gemini audio translation, bringing us one step closer to Star Trek's universal translator.
"In Star Trek, it took until the year 2151 for a functional universal translator to come into existence, but Google is leveraging Gemini to accelerate that timeline. The company is offering real-time speech-to-speech translation via Google Translate, using your existing phone's audio hardware. It's hard not to be critical of generative AI and its content and copyright abuses, but employing AI for real-world use-cases like live translation is great—and based on Google's demo, it seems to work quite well. Google Translate has already proven capable of translating text in real-time, and
can even identify food and products in photographs, so this is a natural expansion of Gemini's feature set.
While there are bound to be errors and hiccups for various reasons (for example: translating audio in a crowded room, from a poor-quality mic, or both), technology like this is as impressive as it is useful. Though not the same as actually learning a different language, this is still a great tool for travelers hoping to conversate with folks that speak a different language.
Does Google's new feature achieve the same things as Star Trek's universal translator? Of course not—that fictional technology is real-time, functions on brain waves, and is most importantly a plot tool that explains how characters from different planets seemingly speak perfect English. But seeing real-world technology inch closer and closer to that goal is a welcome development, and it should bode well for the future of both casual communication and education, despite language barriers.
Google's official blog post states that the feature is now available for testing across the United States, Mexico, and India, and supports 70 languages. The feature will also expand to iOS in 2026."
by Chris Harper — Saturday, December 13, 2025, 02:12 PM EDT
https://hothardware.com/news/google-translate-now-turns-your-earbuds-into-a-real-time-interpreter
#Metaglossia
#metaglossia_mundus
"Google annonce l’arrivée de nouvelles fonctions liées à la traduction. L’une d’elles est la compatibilité de la traduction en temps réel à l’ensemble des accessoires audio et à tous les smartphones. Si le déploiement initial est limité, elle s’étendra bientôt à de nombreux pays et à plusieurs systèmes d’exploitation. Voici comment en profiter.
Ces dernières années, la traduction en temps réel est presque devenue une réalité. En s’appuyant sur Gemini, deux interlocuteurs parlant deux langues (plus de 70 langues sont prises en charge) différentes peuvent se comprendre. Il suffit pour cela d’un smartphone et d’une paire d’écouteurs. Le smartphone écoute l’interlocuteur et traduit ses paroles en temps réel dans les écouteurs de l’utilisateur. Et inversement. À l’occasion du lancement des Pixel 10, nous avons assisté à une démonstration assez bluffante.
Lire aussi – Vous avez l’impression que vos émojis Gboard sont devenus énormes ? Ne changez pas de lunettes : c’est la faute de Google et ça pourrait encore évoluer
La traduction en temps réel, qui va certainement briser certaines barrières linguistiques, ne va pas rester cantonnée à l’écosystème de Google. Elle va être étendue à l’ensemble des smartphones et à tous les écouteurs et casques audio. En effet, Google annonce l’extension de cette fonction à tous les casques et écouteurs Bluetooth du marché. Vous n’aurez donc plus l’obligation d’utiliser des Pixel Buds. Et cela marche lors d’une conversation, mais aussi tout autre contenu, comme un film, une série, ou une conférence.
Il est désormais plus facile d'utiliser la traduction temps réel de Google
Pour en profiter, il y a plusieurs conditions. La première est l’installation de la version bêta de l’application Google Traduction. Cette fonction n’est actuellement pas disponible dans sa version « publique ». Ensuite, il faut utiliser un smartphone sous Android. Google promet toutefois que les propriétaires d’iPhone en profiteront en 2026, sans plus de précision. Enfin, la fonction n’est accessible que dans trois pays seulement : les États-Unis, le Mexique et l’Inde. Le déploiement dans les autres pays sera progressif.
La traduction en temps réel avec n’importe quel smartphone Android et n’importe quel accessoire audio n’est qu’une des quelques nouveautés annoncées pour Google Traduction. Google confirme également la prise en charge des expressions, du contexte et des tics de langage courant par Gemini, pour une compréhension plus naturelle des propos. Enfin, le mode d’apprentissage des langues est étendu non seulement en nombre de langages disponibles, mais aussi en nombre de pays où ce mode est disponible."
https://www.phonandroid.com/google-etend-la-traduction-temps-reel-a-tous-les-casques-et-tous-les-smartphones.html
#Metaglossia
#metaglossia_mundus
"L’UNESCO célèbre le 18 décembre la Journée mondiale de la langue arabe, en organisant à son siège parisien un événement consacré aux voies innovantes pour un avenir linguistique inclusif.
Cette rencontre, qui se tiendra de 10h45 à 16h30 (GMT+2) dans la salle IV, se déroulera en français, arabe et anglais.
Placée sous le thème « Voies innovantes pour l’arabe : orientations et pratiques pour un avenir linguistique plus inclusif », l’édition 2025 mettra en avant le rôle de l’innovation et de l’inclusion dans le développement de la langue arabe. Éducation, médias, technologies numériques et politiques publiques seront au cœur des discussions visant à renforcer la présence de l’arabe dans les systèmes éducatifs, les plateformes numériques et l’espace public, en particulier dans les contextes multilingues ou à ressources limitées.
Au fil des siècles, la langue arabe a joué un rôle central dans la création de liens entre les sociétés et la promotion du développement culturel, scientifique et intellectuel. Aujourd’hui, elle est parlée par 450 millions de personnes, coexiste avec de nombreux dialectes et figure parmi les six langues officielles des Nations Unies. Sa calligraphie est inscrite au Patrimoine immatériel de l’UNESCO et son influence se retrouve dans plus de 50 langues à travers l’Asie, l’Afrique et l’Europe. Des générations de scientifiques et de penseurs ont également produit des découvertes majeures en arabe, illustrant son rôle durable dans la transmission du savoir et des valeurs à l’échelle mondiale.
Depuis 2016, l’UNESCO s’engage à renforcer l’usage de l’arabe en son sein, avec le soutien de la Fondation Sultan Bin Abdulaziz Al Saoud, partenaire clé de l’événement. La Fondation contribue à la promotion de la langue arabe, à la transmission du patrimoine linguistique et à l’innovation dans l’éducation, et considère la langue comme un vecteur de cohésion, d’autonomisation des communautés et d’inspiration pour les générations futures.
Selon Gabriela Ramos, Sous-Directrice générale pour les Sciences sociales et humaines de l’UNESCO, « La langue arabe joue un rôle majeur dans la promotion de la compréhension mutuelle et de la création de connaissances. Sa contribution à l’humanité ne peut être réduite à un seul peuple, car elle est un héritage civilisationnel destiné au monde entier ».
Organisée en collaboration avec la Délégation permanente du Royaume d’Arabie saoudite auprès de l’UNESCO, la célébration met également en lumière le Programme Prince Sultan Bin Abdulaziz Al Saoud pour la langue arabe, qui soutient la recherche, la formation et la coopération internationale pour renforcer la place de l’arabe dans les milieux académiques et scientifiques.
L’événement se veut une plateforme internationale de dialogue, d’innovation et de promotion de la diversité linguistique, réaffirmant le rôle de la langue arabe comme patrimoine universel et vecteur de savoir et de culture."
https://www.webmanagercenter.com/2025/12/15/557623/journee-mondiale-de-la-langue-arabe
#Metaglossia
#metaglossia_mundus
Poems, readings, poetry news and the entire 110-year archive of POETRY magazine.
"Sometimes, choosing the “wrong” word can reveal what the “right” one can’t.
By Yuki Tanaka
Originally Published: December 15, 2025
Poets on Translation is a series of short essays in which poets examine the intersections of poetry and translation in relation to questions of language, identity, authorship, and more.
When I was a child in a small Japanese fishing town in the 80s, translation didn’t seem to exist. Whenever foreign words entered Japanese, they’d become fully domesticated: from shirt to shatsu, from elevator to erebētā. They sounded as if they had been part of the language forever. I grew up watching American sitcoms like Full House and Alf, all dubbed, often by well-known Japanese actors or voice actors. Luke Skywalker spoke perfect Japanese and even looked Japanese, dressed in a white robe that resembled a judo uniform.
The first time I became conscious of language differences, I was six or seven. English had been in the air at home since I was little, as my mother enjoyed studying it and encouraged me to learn. Each night, when she tucked me into bed, she’d say, “Have a nice dream,” in English. One night, I asked her why milk was called milk. She was smoking on the stairs after our family inn had closed for the night. When I asked, she exhaled smoke and said nothing. I continued: the Japanese word gyūnyū has two characters, one meaning “cow” and the other meaning “milk,” so it all made sense, but m-i-l-k had none of that cow-ness. She said, “It’s just the way it is in English.” I refused to accept that. She explained again and again until finally she stubbed out her cigarette, released one last puff, and walked away. I wanted milk to match gyūnyū exactly, and the realization that it didn’t frustrated me.
Years later, after I’d moved to the United States for college and was traveling back to Japan each summer, I began to see the gap between languages differently. One afternoon in Japan, I went to a small neighborhood rice shop and asked if they had rice that didn’t require rinsing. “We don’t rinse rice,” the owner said, “we sharpen it.” In Japanese, to sharpen rice is an idiom for rinsing rice, a phrase that once referred to rubbing the grains together to polish away the bran. The verb togu (“to sharpen,” “to hone”) still carries that trace of abrasion, long after modern rice no longer needs it.
I’d never thought about this etymology before: after years of speaking, reading, and writing in English, the phrase reached me as if for the first time. My unwitting mistranslation made me aware of what I’d forgotten, “to sharpen” sleeping inside “to rinse.” That mistake was accidental, but it taught me something I’ve since tried to do on purpose, in both my poems and my translations: to keep shifting between my native language and my adopted language until they become defamiliarized. While my slip at the rice shop revealed the semantic possibilities of togu, my later translations would explore how choosing the “wrong” word might reveal what the “right” one can’t.
The novelist Yoko Tawada, who writes in both Japanese and German, has said she would rather fall into the valley between two languages than master either one. When we travel between two or more languages, each language drifts into the orbits of the others, producing a new language that feels fresh and full of possibility. I see the gap between languages not as a translator’s nightmare but as a field of creative agency.
Translating a tanka by the contemporary poet Shizuka Omori, I encountered the word mizu aoi (水葵), which, translated literally, means “water hollyhock,” and is the name for a plant with bluish-purple flowers. But I didn’t like the sound—the h’s in “hollyhock” huffed like a horse. Aoi is also a homonym for “blue,” and when I hear mizu aoi, I picture blue water. I chose a mistranslation: “water hyacinth.” Hollyhocks and hyacinths are different plants though both have bluish flowers, but “hyacinth” avoids the huffing in “hollyhock,” and has a softness that feels true to the poem’s mood.
If all I wanted was pure accuracy, AI could do the work. But I’m more interested in replicating the mood and feeling a poem creates. Because one-to-one correspondence is impossible, especially between languages as different as Japanese and English, sometimes what’s required is willful mistranslation.
Once, while my mother was visiting me in St. Louis, we were walking along a gray, worn intersection on our way to a coffee shop when she suddenly asked me to stand beside a traffic light pole, before taking a photo of me. When I asked why, she pointed to a sign above that read: “Photo Enforced.” She thought it meant, “You must take a photo here.” My mother’s misreading turned a bureaucratic warning into an invitation. She stripped away the threat in favor of something playful, even friendly. In that moment, dictionary definitions loosened, and we stepped into the fluid in-between space where words float free, up for grabs..."
https://www.poetryfoundation.org/articles/1758992/poets-on-translation-huffing-like-a-horse
#Metaglossia
#metaglossia_mundus
"Reference and Beyond
JR: Moving on, you have a new book that’s just come out, Professor Devitt: Reference and Beyond: Essays in Philosophy of Language (Oxford 2025): ”a selection of published papers in philosophy of language, accompanied by many new footnotes and postscripts,” like the abstract has it. Could you shed light on these footnotes and postscripts? Do they include any key changes to your existing views?
MD: The postscripts seemed like an obvious thing to do when producing a collection of old papers. You don’t mess with the papers themselves, that’s just going to confuse everyone. You confine the minor things into the footnotes, and there’s a lot of that. If you’ve got something major to say, put it in the postscript. I did enjoy writing them.
Take the oldest article in the collection, ”Singular Terms” (1974).1 It wasn’t my first publication, but it was the first in a proper place, as it were. I’m still quite proud about a lot of it, but it suffered from something which a lot of work in those days suffered from, including the work of Keith Donnellan. We didn’t acknowledge this crucial Gricean distinction between speaker-meaning or speaker-reference and semantic meaning or semantic reference.2 So, you can read ”Singular Terms” with that distinction in mind and wonder which of these meanings and references I’m talking about, and the unhappy truth is I’m sometimes almost talking about them both at once. Mostly I’m talking about semantic meaning and reference though. The failure to make that distinction was a flaw, so, in the footnotes, I’ve made clear when the distinction is important to make, and in the Postscript I present a theory of speaker-meaning. I reject the Gricean theory of speaker-meaning which, as you know, is a very complicated theory based on the speaker’s communicative intentions. That is a mistake already, but it is compounded by the incredible complexity of the intentions.
In my dissertation I made the first attempt to give a unified account of what are often called ”singular referring expressions”, like proper names and demonstratives, and arguably, following Keith Donnellan, referential descriptions as well. I prefer calling them designational expressions. I gave a sort of causal theory of them all. In the first Postscript, I really wanted to clarify that theory. ”Singular Terms” was predominantly about names, so I wanted to be absolutely clear where I stood with demonstratives. In recent years, I have come to think of demonstrations as an independent referential device; I’m talking about gestures, pointings, and so on, which often accompany referential phrases, most notably demonstratives. So, I might say, ”that is a cat” while pointing at a cat, and in my view what you’ve got here are two linguistic devices both of which designate the cat, if all has gone well. There’s the demonstrative ”that” and then there’s the demonstration. I wanted to give a theory of demonstrations too, and since I’d recently written about that I wanted it extracted and put in the Preface. So, my unified theory of referential devices now covers proper names, definite descriptions, demonstratives and demonstrations.
Another postscript that I had wanted to write for 50 years originates from the time when I was so influenced by Saul Kripke, the first time I heard him lecture in Harvard in 1967. Around that time, Gareth Evans came to Harvard too. We were friends and associated with each other quite a lot. Gareth had of course heard all about Kripke’s ideas3, and wrote a very excellent, very insightful paper criticising Kripke. Panu, you know the name, what was it called?
PR: ”The Causal Theory of Names.”4
MD: This was after he and I had left Harvard. At the time Evans was writing that, I was writing my ”Singular Terms”. My paper is presented as a development of Saul’s, and Evans’ paper is presented as a critique of Saul’s views. What had always struck me from the start was that quite independently Evans and I had come up with quite similar ideas. So, what I wanted to do in the first Postscript, what I had in a way wanted to do for fifty years, was to draw out the similarities and resemblances between Gareth’s 1973 paper but also his 1982 book5, where he went much more against Kripke. I did enjoy doing that. That covers the Postscript for that era.
Another thing that I like doing in the volume is giving the broad outline of the views that pop up in the book, to gather them together. Other Postscripts deal with criticisms that some of the papers have met. Take the paper ”Rigid Application”. Saul famously introduced the notion of rigid designation which he explained like this. A term is a rigid designator if it designates the same object in every possible world in which that object exists. (Actually, there are a lot more subtleties going on here as became clear when Saul and David Kaplan started arguing about it, but that’s a clear enough basic idea.) Saul then extended in his Naming and Necessity lectures the use of this term to what he called natural kind terms like ”gold” and ”yellow”, ”heat” and ”tiger”. So just as proper names were rigid, so were many sorts of general terms. But how could they be rigid designators? They don’t seem to be designators at all!6
That was a problem everyone faced, and there is quite a literature trying to deal with this. Some people tried to accommodate Saul’s original idea by saying that the general terms are rigid designators, but what they designate are abstract entities. I thought that’s a very bad idea, and it was criticized by a number of people in the literature; this criticism I endorsed and added on.
So, how can we extend Kripke’s idea of rigidity to general terms and mass terms? Well, we move away from designation to application, I thought that is the way to go. A singular term like a proper name or a demonstrative designates a certain object, but general terms like ”tiger” or ”atom” apply to many objects. Application is a one-many relationship. That seemed to me like helpful terminology for semantics generally. The good idea, or truth, behind Saul’s notion of the rigidity of general and mass terms could be captured with the idea of rigid application. If a term rigidly applies to an object, it applies to that object in every possible world in which the object exists. Even if Saul didn’t have that in mind, it seemed to me like something he should’ve had in mind, because that would be the sort of notion of rigidity that could serve his theoretical purposes. What were his theoretical purposes? He wanted to use rigidity as another weapon to beat description theories, and rigid application does that job just as effectively for general and mass terms as rigid designation does for singular terms. Of course, there has been a lot of disagreement about this; in the Postscript to ”Rigid Application”, I took up some criticisms of this suggestion. But that is probably enough about the Postscripts.
JR: That is plenty indeed. May I ask what you would consider to be your most important, or favourite, idea in this book?
MD: Oh, I’ve got to tell you, Jaakko, ever since I was a child I’ve hated questions with superlatives, like ”who’s your best friend?”. So, I’m sorry, but I’m not going to answer.
Naturalism
JR: Perhaps a more encompassive question, then. You have become a famous defender of naturalism in many, if not all, areas of philosophy, most importantly in the methodological sense. But how far and deep does naturalism reach? Is it really the only game in town?7
MD: I wish!
JR: Perhaps it’s better to ask whether naturalism should be the only game in town for philosophy? Are there other legitimate methodologies beyond naturalism?
MD: This raises a very interesting general question which I’ve had to confront over my career. I do believe in naturalism and think it’s the right way to do philosophy. Do I think therefore that it’s not respectable to do anything else? I’m a great believer in the idea that you should let a thousand flowers bloom, a hundred schools of thought contend. That was Mao’s slogan which, of course, Mao didn’t follow. So, I’ve always been in favour, while pushing naturalism, for it having to exist in a dialectic with people who are not naturalists, in order to make progress. I don’t think it’s healthy that people should be cocooned from their opponents.
JR: I see. Well, moving on, you just said that you don’t like superlatives. Might I still dare to ask if there is any philosopher whom you’d consider naming as your most worthy opponent?
MD: I’m not going to do it. I mean, I’ve been opposed to some enormously important philosophers, like Noam Chomsky, one of the greatest intellectuals of the 20th century. He made these enormously important contributions to the theory of language, generative linguistics. I disagreed with him, not about the idea that generative linguistics is the way to go, but the sort of metatheory he had behind it, which was that a grammar is all about the mind – not about a system of representations that exists outside the mind like I think.8
I also argued at great length against Michael Dummett, who seemed to me obviously to be an extraordinarily smart and able philosopher who had terrific influence. Far too big an influence in my view because I basically thought his views wrongheaded, but I still have a great admiration for the seriousness of his work, the simple intellectual force with which he presented his views. Before the interview began you mentioned Davidson. I don’t have the same sort of admiration for Davidson as for Dummett.
There are a lot of people I took things from while disagreeing with them. I used to regard myself as in a way being a sort of Gricean, even though I did not go with certain important thoughts of his.
And then there’s my old teacher, Hilary Putnam. Well, there were actually many Putnams. The Putnam of my youth was a really important figure for me when I was at Harvard. He didn’t make me into a realist. I’m a Sydney boy, you know; we’re realists. Brutal realists. So, I was already a realist when I met Putnam. I hadn’t even thought about realism so much because it had always seemed so obviously true and I was worrying about more important things like epistemology and semantics and so on. I wasn’t worrying about it at Harvard, either, when Hilary was famous for his arguments to do with realism, including mathematical realism, and I was very impressed with his arguments like the inference to the best explanation for scientific realism.
It is really true to say that it was Putnam who converted me thoroughly to naturalism. It wasn’t that I wasn’t a naturalist before; I was a bit at sea. You see, I was brought up like everyone else those days, surrounded by a priorism. I mean, that’s what philosophy was. There was the Wittgensteinian a priorism, the ordinary language philosophy a priorism, the positivist a priorism… The whole history of philosophy. And so, I was sitting in an undergraduate class where Putnam was talking about epistemology and the history of philosophy from Descartes onwards. He was a wonderful teacher. And then, in a few deft strokes, after presenting what the French call the sceptical problematic, he solved it by presenting Quine, basically. I mean, I’d read Quine at Sydney, but I’d always been focused on the language stuff, and hadn’t really absorbed his naturalistic picture. When Putnam presented it, it was like a road to Damascus experience for me. Everything fell into place, I can remember.
Then, what happens in the mid 1970’s? Suddenly, Putnam goes anti-realist, abandons left-wing politics, and becomes religious all in a few weeks. It was a terrific shock to me, and I spent a lot of time, probably more time than I have spent on anyone else, arguing against Putnam’s new stuff; I was antithetical to what we might call the middle-Putnam. To give an idea of how opposed I was to what was happening then – you probably couldn’t pull this off these days – I published two critical notices9 of Putnam’s book Meaning and the Moral Sciences (1978)10. I was appalled by what was in that book. Not just by the anti-realism, but also the terrible mess that was made of what realism was. It just seemed to me to be spreading confusion around. I was absolutely, terribly bothered by what had happened to Hilary. A lovely man, but not reliable in keeping his views. Surely a worthy foe if there ever was one.
Quine, of course, is an interesting case. Like I said, thanks to Hilary I went and read Quine very carefully, and did my dissertation with Quine. But I don’t agree, as many people don’t, with his behaviourism about the mind or his deflationary view of meaning and reference.
Friendship with Kripke
JR: Moving on to the end of the interview, I was hoping you might shed some light on Saul Kripke, from whom you’ve not only gathered inspiration for your work but whom you also knew as a friend. For example, there is a nice anecdote that I learned from Panu related to what you have called ”the shocking idea about meaning”. Briefly, the idea is that at least for some theoretical purposes, the notion of Fregean sense could be identified with a certain non-descriptive, causal-historical mode of presentation of a term’s referent.11 Now, in the 1972 version of Naming and Necessity, Kripke had a footnote which Panu brought to my attention. The footnote goes like this: ”Hartry Field has proposed that, for some of the purposes of Frege’s theory, his notion of sense should be replaced by the chain which determines reference.”12
This footnote, however, is missing from the 1980 book edition. Panu reports that: ”At the 2013 Buenos Aires workshop (where both Devitt and I were present), Kripke explained that he had deleted the note simply because someone had informed him that he should have credited the idea to Devitt and not to Field.”13
I always thought this anecdote gives sort of an odd picture about Kripke. Could you elaborate the context here?
MD: I don’t know why you think it gives an odd picture about Kripke. Actually, there is a lot in this. First of all, notice that it is Panu who had to point this out. You’d think that I’d know about Kripke’s stuff, having thought about it from the 1960’s onwards, yet that footnote had never registered with me. But Panu is so much a better scholar than I am, so he drew my attention to it as well.
So, Saul said that. First, let me be clear about my view on the ”shocking idea”. I think the meaning of every expression – barring perhaps some syncategorematic expressions14 – should be understood as the mode of presentation of the reference. In the traditional Fregean view, the mode was descriptive. Sometimes it may indeed be. But what I think we should learn from Kripke is that the mode is not descriptive for many terms, like proper names. So, if Kripke’s ideas about borrowing are right, then the meaning for these terms is a certain type of causal chain. Something like that has got to be right. We can’t simply suppose that the meaning is the reference, because then we’re unable to explain a whole lot of things, most strikingly the informativeness of identity statements, the truth of negative singular existence statements and so on. We can’t explain them with direct reference. We’ve got to have something richer as the meaning than reference, and Frege got it right – it’s the way the reference is presented. When that isn’t descriptive, it has to be something else, and it seems to me that at least sometimes the something else has to be the causal way. That will do the job that Frege rightly thought the sense, or meaning, has to do.15
So, who came up with the shocking idea? Well, I’d been urging it for forever from my dissertation onwards. The question of who originally came up with it has always been sort of uninteresting to me. Hartry and I, from the moment when we first sat in – we’d only been in Harvard for a week or so – Saul’s lectures in 1967, started talking about it. And we talked about it forever. We explored everything. So, God knows who first came up with the shocking idea.
The real truth about the shocking idea is that Saul said that I was the one who made a fuss about it. I don’t know if Hartry ever mentioned it at all except in conversations with me and Saul.
JR: So, if I get that right, the reason why Kripke omitted the footnote in the later version of Naming and Necessity is that he didn’t think much of the shocking idea?
MD: No, I think it is because he first attributed the idea to Hartry, then came to think it wasn’t Hartry’s idea. I mean, Saul hated to say anything that wasn’t right. He was obsessive about saying only things which he was certain were true. That isn’t to say it isn’t true that Hartry came up with the shocking idea; like I said, Hartry and I talked so much, I don’t know who really came up with it.
The shocking idea itself wasn’t so shocking to Saul, I think. That doesn’t mean he embraced it. But if you know the history of direct reference, you know that people influenced by Saul, notably Nathan Salmon and Scott Soames, went down this direct reference route in which the meaning of a proper name is simply its referent. The history of this idea is really weird, because many people attribute it to Saul. (For anyone who’s interested in this, I tell the history in the book.) But Saul never embraced that view. And neither did he embrace my view. He sat on the fence. And no one could get him off the fence. As you said, I was friendly with Saul, and I would tease him quite a lot. I remember one conference in the CUNY Graduate Center, sometime in 2005 or 2006, when we were all gathered in honour of Saul. Nathan was there, Scott was there, and I was up on the podium talking about something I don’t remember, and Saul was sitting there too. I said to Saul in front of everyone: “So, you’ve heard Scott, Nathan, and me. Now it’s your turn: time to get off the fence.” No response. So, no one knows where Saul stood on this.
PR: I’d like to add that I recall a discussion with Saul where he insisted that he definitely didn’t believe in direct reference in Naming and Necessity. He admitted he came at least quite close to it in the late 1970’s, but my impression is that he regretted that phase. The problem with Saul was that if he wasn’t absolutely confident that this is the way something is, if he was even a little bit uncertain, he didn’t say it.
MD: Panu is speaking words of wisdom here. If Saul wasn’t absolutely confident, he wouldn’t say his view. He was mortified at the thought of ever saying something false. He was obsessive about this. Do you want to hear a personal anecdote?
JR: Please!
MD: Saul didn’t do a great deal of travelling, but he did do a little bit, of course. And when you travel around the world, you often get presented with various forms. For example, it at least used to be that, when returning to America you have to fill in a form, and you have to say a whole lot of things about what you have and have not done. It would take Saul hours! Because he would think about every section. ”Have I been near a farm or not?” and things like that. ”Well, I did go about half a mile away from one… But on the other hand…” And so on for every single question. He just couldn’t bear to say anything false, even on those silly forms.
JR: Well, that sort of answers my second question, which was why Kripke never developed a rigorous theory of language, meaning and reference based on the many ideas he had. Instead, it was left to you, among others, to build a theory out of the ”better picture” which Kripke presented. Kripke himself says in Naming and Necessity that he was ”sort of too lazy” to do it16.
MD: That’s just a joke though. One thing Saul wasn’t, was lazy. I mean, he was thinking all the time; it was a chronic condition which prevented him from sleeping.
If you want to explore this more, you might wonder what’s the sort of personal difference between me and Saul that left me to develop the better picture into a theory, as you said. A key thing, and we’ve already touched on this, is naturalism. Now, Saul was never a naturalist. He didn’t approve of naturalism. I already said that he wasn’t shocked by my shocking idea, but he was shocked by my naturalism. And he made this very clear on many occasions. For example, I published a textbook on philosophy of language.17 You might’ve thought that Saul would really love this textbook because it’s a sort of ”hooray for Saul!” for many chapters. It’s a setting-out of the Kripkean revolution in the theory of reference in a very supportive way. But Kim and I also had to confront the awful problem of writing a textbook in the philosophy of language, and we thought right from the beginning that there was no way we could write, as it were, a neutral book. We were just going to present the philosophy of language from a naturalistic perspective, as we say in the beginning. Even the blurb on the back says this.
Saul was outraged at this. He complained about it to me – you couldn’t mention the textbook without him going ”You even say it in the blurb it’s not neutral. This is not a textbook!” He was so funny. You didn’t want to have a thin skin if you dealt with Saul.
There were only two comments that I ever got from him on the book. I never got a thanks from him for presenting the revolution, but he did criticise the naturalism. So far as I know, there was only one bit of critical stuff on Saul in the book, and that was the discussion on ”Kripkenstein”. He did not like that at all. And he would always come to that, too. ”You say I don’t have an argument?” He’s a riot; I do miss him a lot.18
JR: Was Kripke’s opposition to naturalism part of his general unwillingness to commit to a view he was uncertain about or was it something more specific?
MD: I don’t know. I mean, that’s a very deep question. Why do so many philosophers have anti-naturalist positions? We know the consequences of this: they believe in the a priori; Saul said he believed in the a priori.
JR: Really?
MD: Oh God, yes. Oh yes.
PR: He even believed in contingent a priori.19
MD: We naturalists are really a minority. So, if you ask why Saul wasn’t, you need to ask that about humans in general. The whole history of philosophy seems to me to demonstrate a tension between naturalistic approaches and a priori approaches. Right the way through you see both. You see science being brought into philosophy and then philosophers going off and doing their own thing. My favourite example of this is John Locke. See his discussion of realism. It’s just a wonderful interplay between good empirical science and old a priori philosophy. And I think this ran right through philosophy until Quine. I mean, there were always naturalistic elements and a priori elements. One of the many contributions that Quine made was to make this stark and clear, because he laid down, with his vivid metaphors, what philosophy should be. It made so well the distinction that needed to be made. I think the whole subject moved forward just by being clear about this.
I hope you don’t think this is terribly rude, but I think that if we could understand the appeal of religion, we might understand the appeal of the a priori. Do you think that’s a bit overboard, Panu?
PR: You are famous for your shocking ideas.
* * *
JR: One last question, again a personal one. Are there any research topics that you’ve wanted to pursue but haven’t found the time to? Any blind spots?
MD: I like that question. I think one of the great things about philosophy is that there’s no end to interesting topics. There are lots. There’s virtually no broad area of philosophy (except the philosophy of religion) which I don’t find interesting. Let me just take one that I’ve never done anything in. I have done a very small amount of work in moral philosophy – I wrote a paper on moral realism20 – but I’ve never done anything in aesthetics. And this doesn’t mean I don’t think that is interesting.
When I was in Maryland, I got roped at once into being on a committee for a student writing her dissertation in aesthetics. Actually, I can remember her name: Monique Roelofs. Monique’s dissertation, I thought, was fascinating. Really insightful. I got quite engaged with the issues: ”Gee, I’d love to work on this.” But I’ve never done it. That’s just one example. You just never run out of topics.
JR: That is a sentiment easy to agree with. Thank you for the interview, Professor Devitt.
References
1
Michael Devitt, Singular Terms, The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 71, No. 7, 1974, 183–205.
2
Grice distinguished between two senses of sentential meaning: what the speaker meant by the sentence and what the semantic meaning is. The semantic sense is close to the literal meaning of the sentence, whereas the speaker-meaning means the use of the sentence in context. For example, the sentence ”Grass is green” literally means that grass is green, but some speaker might use it in context to mean that the summer is not over yet.
3
Kripke’s Naming and Necessity, originally held as a series of lectures in 1970, started a revolution in the philosophy of language and beyond by criticising the previously dominant descriptivist theories of reference and meaning. According to descriptivism, the meaning of an expression, such as a proper name, are based on the descriptions commonly associated with the referent of the name. For example the meaning of ”Aristotle” would be something like ”The teacher of Alexander the Great”. Kripke showed in several ways how the name’s reference and meaning are independent of such descriptions
4
Gareth Evans, The Causal Theory of Names. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. Supplementary Volumes. Vol. 47, No. 1, 1973, 187–208.
5
Gareth Evans, The Varieties of Reference. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1982.
6
Rigid designation” was one of the key technical terms which Kripke coined in the revolutionary lectures of Naming and Necessity. Roughly, a term is a rigid designator if and only if it refers to the same thing in every possible world in which the referent exists and never refers to anything else.
7
”Naturalism” in philosophy means roughly the view that philosophical theories should not only seek to be compatible with the findings of empirical sciences but also seek to conform to their methodologies and worldview as much as possible.
8
Noam Chomsky is famous, among other things, for being for one of the founders of generative grammar theory, which displaced the previously popular behaviorist views about language. According to Chomsky, language is not only based on biology, but in a sense biology itself is linguistic, and language exists in the brain. Devitt has criticized this view by claiming that we shouldn’t confuse linguistic competence, which does require a brain, with language itself, which exists primarily outside individual minds.
9
Michael Devitt, Critical Notice of Meaning and the Moral Sciences by Hilary Putnam. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 58 (1980), 395–404; Realism and the Renegade Putnam: a Critical Study of Meaning and the Moral Sciences by Hilary Putnam. Nous 17 (1983), 291–301.
10
Hilary Putnam, Meaning and the Moral Sciences. Routledge, London 1978.
11
One of Kripke’s most famous ideas is that the meaning and reference of a proper name is not determined by an associated description, but rather by a causal-historical chain of borrowing the name from other speakers, some of whom down the chain have been in contact with the referent. Devitt has argued that it is possible to understand the meaning of the name as constituted by such a chain. Many have considered this idea shocking, and that’s how Devitt has named it in his published works.
12
Saul Kripke, Naming and Necessity. In Semantics of Natural Language. Ed. Donald Davidson & Gilbert Harman. Reidel, Dordrecht 1972, 253–355 (346n22).
13
Panu Raatikainen, Theories of reference: what was the question? In Language and reality from a naturalistic perspective: Themes from Michael Devitt. Ed. Andrea Bianchi. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. 69–103 (99n65).
14
Syncategorematic expressions include words such as ”and”, ”or”, ”if” and ”because”. They are used to connect sentences together.
15
Frege noticed that two different names, though they refer to the same person, can have different ”meaning” in the sense that someone might not know that one name (e.g. ”Robert Zimmerman”) refers to the same as the other (”Bob Dylan”). Frege then thought that the difference in meaning must correspond to some difference in the descriptions associated with the names. Since Kripke’s criticism of this view in Naming and Necessity, Devitt urged the ”shocking idea” that the mode of presentation of the name can be non-descriptive, which is in opposition to so-called ”direct reference” theories, according to which the meaning of a proper name just is the referent. Such views have problems explaining the apparent meaningfulness of empty names and the apparent truth of negative existential statements.
16
Saul Kripke, Naming and Necessity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (MA) 1980 (93).
17
Michael Devitt & Kim Sterelny, Language and Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Language. Basil Blackwell, Oxford 1987.
18
The term ’Kripkenstein’ refers to Kripke’s ideas based on the thoughts of Ludvig Wittgenstein. In 1982 Kripke published a book on Wittgenstein (Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language, Harvard University Press) which is rivalled in fame only by Naming and Necessity. In the book, Kripke attributed a sceptical challenge about meaning to Wittgenstein. The textbook by Devitt and Sterelny discusses the challenge briefly and somewhat dismissively.
19
A priori knowledge means knowledge not based on empirical knowledge. Prior to Naming and Necessity¸ it was common to think that if something is known a priori, it must be necessary, and that if something is necessary, it must be knowable a priori. Kripke criticized this connection between necessity and a priori and introduced, for the first time in the history of philosophy, the notions of contingent a priori and necessary a posteriori.
20
Michael Devitt, Moral Realism: A Naturalistic Perspective. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 4 (2002), 1–15.
Numero
niin & näin 4/25"
https://netn.fi/artikkelit/interview-with-michael-devitt-on-philosophy-of-language-saul-kripke-and-naturalism/
#Metaglossia
#metaglossia_mundus
"The Literature Translation Institute of Korea has selected three winners for this year’s translation awards.
The three are Lee Ki-hyang, Tayfun Kartav and Justyna Agata Najbar-Miller.
The LTI Korea Translation Award was established in 1993 to encourage outstanding translators who contribute to communication between Korean and world literature, and to promote Korean literature overseas.
Lee, who heads publishing house Märchenwald Verlag München, translated Bora Chung's "Cursed Bunny" into German and received critical praise for effectively conveying the book's tension and fear.
Kartav won for his Turkish rendering of Chang Kang-myoung's "Homodominans," and Najbar-Miller, an assistant professor in the Korean studies department at the University of Warsaw, won the award for her Polish translation of Han Kang's "We Do Not Part.""
https://world.kbs.co.kr/service/news_view.htm?lang=e&Seq_Code=197861
#Metaglossia
#metaglossia_mundus
"
L'ONU célèbre la première Journée mondiale de la famille des langues turques
L’UNESCO, l’agence culturelle des Nations Unies, se prépare à célébrer lundi la toute première Journée mondiale de la famille des langues turques, suite à la décision de sa Conférence générale à Samarcande d’établir le 15 décembre comme date de célébration annuelle.
Cette nouvelle commémoration met en lumière le patrimoine linguistique et culturel commun des peuples turcophones et réaffirme l’engagement de l’Organisation des Nations Unies pour l'éducation, la science et la culture (UNESCO) en faveur du multilinguisme et de la diversité culturelle.
Une date historique
Le choix du 15 décembre s’inscrit dans un moment charnière de la linguistique. Ce jour-là, en 1893, le linguiste danois Vilhelm Thomsen annonçait avoir déchiffré l’alphabet des inscriptions de l’Orkhon, parmi les plus anciens témoignages écrits connus de la famille des langues turques.
Cette découverte majeure a ouvert la voie à une meilleure compréhension d’une tradition linguistique qui unit aujourd’hui des dizaines de communautés à travers l’Eurasie.
Des langues parlées par 200 millions de personnes
Les langues turques – dont l’azéri, le kazakh, le kirghize, le turc, le turkmène et l’ouzbek – sont parlées comme langue maternelle par plus de 200 millions de personnes sur un territoire d’environ 12 millions de kilomètres carrés.
L’UNESCO souligne que ces langues possèdent un riche patrimoine écrit, de fortes traditions orales et des pratiques culturelles diverses partagées par de nombreux États membres.
La proclamation de cette nouvelle Journée fait suite à une demande conjointe de l'Azerbaïdjan, du Kazakhstan, du Kirghizistan, de la Turquie et de l'Ouzbékistan et a reçu le soutien de 21 États membres, témoignant d'une large reconnaissance de la valeur de la diversité linguistique.
Renforcement de la coopération
L'UNESCO indique que cette commémoration annuelle s'inscrit dans le cadre plus large du programme multilingue des Nations Unies, tel qu'il est énoncé dans la résolution 71/328 de l'Assemblée générale.
En consacrant une journée à la famille des langues turques, l'agence vise à encourager la coopération linguistique, les échanges culturels et le dialogue entre les civilisations.
Les activités prévues comprennent des initiatives de sensibilisation, des recherches universitaires et des programmes de sauvegarde des langues turques et des traditions orales.
Célébration annuelle
Cette journée sera marquée par des expositions, des conférences, des événements littéraires et des spectacles artistiques destinés à mettre en lumière la richesse historique et le dynamisme contemporain des langues turques.
L'UNESCO affirme que cette commémoration est l'occasion d'honorer la diversité linguistique en tant que patrimoine commun de l'humanité et de renforcer les efforts internationaux visant à protéger les langues, vecteurs essentiels d'identité, de savoir et d'expression culturelle."
14 décembre 2025
https://news.un.org/fr/story/2025/12/1158079
#Metaglossia
#metaglossia_mundus
"Cherokee Nation Launches Digital Dictionary to Support Language Revitalization
Cherokee Nation leaders and Cherokee language speakers joined representatives from Kiwa Digital Ltd. on Tuesday to launch the new Cherokee Language Dictionary app during an event at the Durbin Feeling Language Center.
“Every Cherokee family, no matter where they live, can now carry this resource in their pocket,” Principal Chief Chuck Hoskin Jr. said. “This app represents our sovereignty, our knowledge, and our commitment to keeping the Cherokee language strong for generations to come.”
Durbin Feeling completed the first Cherokee Language Dictionary 50 years ago, laying the foundation for the tribe’s modern language revitalization work. In 2025, Cherokee Nation partnered with Kiwa Digital Ltd. to digitize the resource and make it publicly accessible as a mobile app.
Team members from Kiwa Digital traveled internationally for the launch. The company specializes in Indigenous language preservation through digital tools. Chief Hoskin first announced the partnership during his State of the Nation Address at the Cherokee National Holiday.
“Chief Hoskin and I have always said that it is critical we not only protect and save the Cherokee language, but that we perpetuate the language so that it continues to grow within our Cherokee families and communities,” Deputy Chief Bryan Warner said. “We can harness the power of technology to help us teach others how to speak Cherokee, and the Cherokee language dictionary app is a great resource.”
The app is available for download on the Apple App Store and Google Play Store. It currently includes more than 6,000 Cherokee words, audio recordings, grammar notes, phonetics, syllabary, and biographical information on first-language speakers. Cherokee Nation translators and Kiwa staff plan to continually add new entries.
“In just a few months, Kiwa Digital took what we have documented of our language and made it accessible to our citizens,” said Howard Paden, executive director of the Cherokee Language Department. “Their efforts will prevent the erosion of our language from continuing and empower us to revitalize and normalize this language in our communities. Our goal is to get at least 25,000 to 50,000 words on the app in order to have a more comprehensive overview of the language.”
The app also includes advanced search tools, pronunciation guides and a private AI learning assistant. Data is stored on a secure AWS platform.
During Tuesday’s launch, the tribe encouraged users to submit feedback through the app to support ongoing updates.
“As an Indigenous-owned company from Aotearoa New Zealand, we are honored to support the Cherokee Nation in developing this groundbreaking digital resource,” said Jill Tattersall, executive director of Kiwa Digital. “We look forward to Cherokee community feedback to help this treasured resource grow in impact and value.”
In October, the Cherokee Nation hosted its Seventh Annual First-Language Cherokee Speakers Gathering, where Chief Hoskin announced $2.3 million from the tribe’s Public Health and Wellness Fund Act to support the Language Department’s Peer Recovery Program, home care for fluent elders in vulnerable health, repairs for speaker homes and the Little Cherokee Seeds program.
The Durbin Feeling Act of 2019—authored by Chief Hoskin and Deputy Chief Warner with support from the Council of the Cherokee Nation—continues to drive the largest language investment in tribal history. This year’s language budget is nearly $25 million, and the act provides more than $20 million annually for language programs, totaling more than $68 million in capital projects to date."
By Levi Rickert
December 12, 2025
https://nativenewsonline.net/sovereignty/cherokee-nation-launches-digital-dictionary-to-support-language-revitalization
#Metaglossia
#metaglossia_mundus
Two Army soldiers and a civilian interpreter – were killed by a suspected Islamic State attacker.
"The attack comes as the United States and Syria’s new government, led by interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa, are looking at closer relations more than a year after rebels toppled Bashar al-Assad, who became known as one of the world's most brutal despots.
Since then, the United States and Syria have cooperated on anti-terrorism actions, which Trump said will be useful in the response to the Dec. 13 killings.
"There will be very serious retaliation," Trump said in a post on Truth Social..."
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/12/13/us-soldiers-killed-syria/87750585007/
#Metaglossia
#metaglossia_mundus
"Not a Big Reader? Google Translate Rolls Out Real-Time Audio Translation for Headphone Users
Google says you’ll be able to get live audio translations of conversations, speeches, and lectures in a different language, listen to a speech or lecture while abroad, or watch a TV show or film in another language through your headphones.
If your language learning journey isn’t going as planned, or your Duolingo streak is long since broken, Google has introduced a new tool that could make navigating the world of foreign languages more intuitive—with no reading required.
Rolling out this week on Android in beta, Google Translate will now support real-time audio translation delivered via your headphones. The beta will support over 70 languages, including Spanish, Hindi, Chinese, Japanese, and German, via the Translate app. Google says this means you’ll be able to understand conversations in a different language, listen to a speech or lecture while abroad, or watch a TV show or film in another language.
At present, the new feature will be limited to users located in the US, India, and Mexico using Android, while an iOS rollout is planned for the future. To try the tool out, connect your headphones, open the Google Translate app on your mobile device, and tap “Live translate” to hear a real-time translation in your preferred language.
In addition, Google is rolling out tools to improve its translations when it comes to things like idioms, local expressions, or slang, which might not make much sense in a purely literal translation. For example, phrases like “stealing my thunder.”
This update is also rolling out this week in the US and India, translating between English and almost 20 languages, such as Spanish, Hindi, Chinese, Japanese, and German. It will be available on Android and iOS, and on the web version.
After first introducing dedicated language practice features back in August this year, Google Translate is now also introducing "improved feedback" for users' speaking practice, as well as tools to track how many days in a row you've been learning, broadly comparable to language learning tools like Duolingo and Babbel. It's also expanding support for new language combinations such as German and Portuguese for English speakers, as well as English for Bengali, Mandarin Chinese, Dutch, German, Hindi, Italian, Romanian, and Swedish."
By Will McCurdy
December 13, 2025
https://www.pcmag.com/news/not-a-big-reader-google-translate-rolls-out-real-time-audio-translation
#Metaglossia
#metaglossia_mundus
By Sabrina Machetti and Raymond Siebetcheu
It is nearly ten years since the concept of lingue immigrate (Bagna et al., 2003), was formulated. To date, immigrant minority languages are poorly investigated in Italy. Actually, when referring to applied linguistics in the Italian context
"What happens when Italian and Immigrant languages come in contact with each other? A clear example that is useful to approach this question is called 'Camfranglais', an urban variety that stems from a mixture of French, English, Pidgin English and Cameroonian local languages. This working paper examines the outcome of the interaction between Italian and Camfranglais."
By Sabrina Machetti and Raymond Siebetcheu
https://www.diggitmagazine.com/working-papers/tpcs55-use-camfranglais-italian-migration-context
#Metaglossia
#metaglossia_mundus
Global Voices interviewed Moharaj Sharma to explore his path as a poet, journalist, and documentarian, and his enduring efforts to elevate Nepali literature, linguistic traditions, and diaspora narratives.
"Words across worlds: Moharaj Sharma on language, culture, and belonging in Nepal
Sharma is a poet, journalist, and documentarian amplifying Nepali literature and diaspora voices
Written by
Sangita Swechcha
Posted 15 December 2025
Poet, journalist, and documentary maker Moharaj Sharma is a leading figure in Nepal’s literary and media landscape, with two decades of influential work in radio and television. Widely respected for his cultural insight and integrity, he is known for poetry that reflects on identity, social change, and the human experience, resonating across Nepal and its global diaspora.
A long-time member of the International Nepali Literary Society (INLS), he currently serves as News Editor at AP1 Television, where he also hosts a weekly literary segment that brings writers and thinkers into national conversation. His research on the linguistic roots of Nepali and Sanskrit, along with his documentary on the resilience of Nepali-speaking Bhutanese refugees, highlights his commitment to cultural preservation. Recognised with honours from INLS, Gauhati University, and literary institutions in Bhutan, the US, and South Korea, Sharma continues to shape contemporary Nepali literature through a powerful blend of journalistic clarity and poetic vision.
Sangita Swechcha of Global Voices interviewed Moharaj Sharma via email to learn more about his journey as a poet, journalist, and documentarian, and his longstanding work in amplifying Nepali literature, linguistic heritage, and the stories of diasporic communities.
Sangita Swechcha (SS): Your work spans poetry, journalism, and documentary storytelling. How do these different forms of expression influence one another in your creative process?
Moharaj Sharma (MS): Poetry, journalism, and documentary — although these three subjects appear separate — have complemented one another in my creative journey. The inner dialogue among all three has inspired me to stay focused on my work. Just as Eastern philosophy describes the power of a mantra, I feel a similar power in poetry within literature. It is something that shakes society. Poetry speaks to the joys and sorrows of society in a deep and subtle way. I sense this same sensitivity in journalism as well. News is not merely information; it is a reality intertwined with human life, dreams, and struggles. The discipline of journalism — honesty toward facts, commitment, and respect for authentic voices — makes my writing responsible. Documentary ties these two worlds together in a single thread. In visual storytelling, I try to blend the factual discipline of journalism with the human sensitivity of poetry.
SS: Much of your writing explores identity, culture, and the Nepali diaspora. What personal experiences or encounters have most shaped your understanding of these themes?
MS: For the past two decades, I have been close to ordinary lives through journalism. Nepal has great ethnic, linguistic, and cultural diversity, with 142 ethnic groups and over 120 languages. Each ethnic group has its own language, religion, customs, culture, and traditions. This diversity and identity make Nepali society ‘many in one and one in many.’
Through my travels and learning experiences in the UK, USA, South Korea, India, and Indonesia, I gained a deep understanding of the importance of language, culture, and identity. In today’s global world, people cannot forget their roots; instead, they work to preserve and promote their heritage, enjoying the sweetness of their identity.
Statistics show Nepali-speaking people have reached around 150 countries. Wherever they go, they carry Nepali language, culture, and civilization. These learning and research experiences have greatly energized my professional and literary journey.
SS: You have documented the stories of Nepali-speaking Bhutanese refugees — a community whose decades-long displacement, life in refugee camps in eastern Nepal, and global resettlement have shaped a profound story of resilience and cultural survival. What continues to stay with you from their journey?
MS: In 1624 AD, after an agreement between Bhutan’s religious leader Zhabdrung Ngawang Namgyel and Nepal’s King Ram Shah, sixty Nepali households were taken to Bhutan. Though they helped unify and develop Bhutan, the government later suppressed them as their influence grew.
In the 1990s, the ‘One Nation, One People’ policy restricted Nepali language and culture, leading to the expulsion of over 100,000 Nepali speakers, who lived as refugees in Nepal for nearly two decades. Even then, they preserved their language and heritage, running classes and promoting literature through groups like the Literary Council of Bhutan.
After resettling in eight countries including the USA, Australia, and Canada, their struggle for identity continues. Preserving language and culture remains central, strengthening their presence abroad.
I traveled across the USA to study this community. Once stateless, they now show cultural prosperity: schools teach Nepali, government offices hire language experts, and communities maintain global cultural presence. Even after losing everything, they kept their pride and are active in politics and policy-making in their resettled countries.
Moharaj Sharma with Nepali-speaking Bhutanese children in the USA, studying Eastern philosophy. Image provided by Moharaj Sharma.
SS: As someone deeply involved in promoting Nepali literature through radio and television, how do you see the role of media evolving in nurturing literary culture?
MS: When I began in radio, access to media was limited, and poets, writers, and cultural scholars rarely reached the public. Over two decades, technology has advanced so much that the global community now fits within a mobile click. Earlier, poetry recitations, literary interviews, and TV discussions gave writers recognition and shaped cultural interest. Today, media not only promotes literature but sparks debates on new dimensions and global practices.
Digital media has broken the center-periphery divide. Those once absent from print now emerge via social networks, including poets, writers, cultural workers, migrant laborers, and homemakers. Yet media’s responsibility has grown, as confusion, exaggeration, and commercial content can overshadow meaningful creation, making the role of journalists, editors, producers, and cultural workers vital.
SS: Your research engages with the linguistic roots of Nepali and Sanskrit. What draws you to this historical and philosophical exploration of language?
MS: Nepal is a multilingual, multicultural, and multi-traditional country, with people living from 58 meters to nearly 5,000 meters above sea level, showing differences in language, culture, and lifestyle, yet inter-community tolerance is strong.
Vedic literature and Eastern philosophy highlight Nepal’s sacredness. It is where sages attained knowledge through yoga, meditation, and ascetic practice. According to Buddhist tradition, Kanakamuni, Krakuchhanda, and Shakyamuni Buddha were born here and spread wisdom. I am deeply interested in studying the languages, cultures, arts, and folk traditions that give Nepal its unique identity.
Media plays an important role in preserving and promoting these subjects. I traveled from the Sinja Valley of Jumla — where the Nepali language originated — to Oxford University, where Sanskrit is taught.
As the mother of many languages, including Nepali, Sanskrit is key to understanding history and linguistic evolution, which inspires me greatly.
SS: With your forthcoming poetry collection, what themes or perspectives are you most excited to share with readers?
MS: I like simple poetry that tells the stories of ordinary people. As a long-time editor showing countless faces and events, those experiences naturally appear in my work. I try to capture the pain, hope, and journey of the Nepali diaspora struggling for identity.
Our generation has witnessed many key historical moments of Nepal; through poetry, these experiences will remain as witnesses for the future. I continue to explore themes of identity, social change, and the tension between tradition and modernity."
https://globalvoices.org/2025/12/15/words-across-worlds-moharaj-sharma-on-language-culture-and-belonging/
#Metaglossia
#metaglossia_mundus
"Google has also introduced a new speech-to-speech translation feature for headphones.
Google is rolling out new Gemini-assisted functionality to Search and its Translate app. It says its AI can now provide more natural and accurate text translations for phrases that have more "nuanced meanings." Translate will now take slang terms and colloquial expressions into consideration rather than provide sometimes unhelpful direct translations.
The latest update to its text translation feature is rolling out first in the US and India, translating between English and just under 20 other languages, including German, Spanish, Chinese and Arabic. It works in the Translate app for iOS and Android and on the web.
Gemini’s speech-to-speech translation feature has also been updated, so you can now hear real-time translations in your headphones, like with Apple’s AirPods Pro 3. Google says the new functionality, which is now in beta in the Translate app for Android (iOS is coming next year) in the US, tries to "preserve the tone, emphasis and cadence of each speaker" so you better understand the direction of the conversation and who said what. It works with any headphones and supports more than 70 languages.
Advertisement
Finally, Google is adding more tools to its potentially Duolingo-rivaling AI-powered language learning tools, which it introduced to the Translate app in August. Like Duolingo, Translate can now track how many days in a row you’ve been attempting to learn a new language, so you can check your progress over time. Whether it will nag you as persistently as the Duolingo owl famously does for slacking off is not clear.
The feedback feature has also been improved, so you should receive more useful tips on how you’re pronouncing words or phrases. Germany, India and Sweden are among the 20 new countries that can now use these educational tools.
After not showing it much love for a while, Google has been busy adding new features to Translate recently. As well as the new language practice feature, an update last month added the ability to select between "Fast" and "Advanced" translations that allow you to prioritize speed when you’re in a rush (ordering a drink at the bar, for example) or receiving more accurate translations using Gemini."
Matt Tate
Contributing reporter
Fri, December 12, 2025 at 6:34 PM GMT+1
https://www.engadget.com/apps/google-translate-is-now-better-at-translating-slang-terms-and-idioms-using-ai-173428316.html
#Metaglossia
#metaglossia_mundus
"‘How we built an AI translator to help everyone in your church hear the gospel’
By Mike Ashelby1 December 20253 min read
Save articlePlease Sign in to your account to use this feature
Kingdom Code’s hackathon saw a room of Christian coders come together to tackle the language barrier isolating churchgoers whose first language isn’t English. Mike Ashelby tells the story behind the innovative AI translation tool they created.
Christmas is the season of the open door. It is the one time of year when the “stranger” is most likely to walk into our churches — neighbours, international students, and extended family members drawn by the carols and the candlelight.
But for the more than five million people in England and Wales who do not speak English as their main language, that open door often leads to a closed experience. They are physically welcomed, but spiritually isolated. They stand in the crowd, surrounded by the warmth of the community, but the message of the service remains locked behind a language barrier.
The incarnation was the ultimate act of translation. It wasn’t just God speaking to us; it was God becoming human so that we could truly know him. At Breeze Translate, our mission is to help the UK Church reflect that heart. We believe that if someone walks into a church this December, language should not stop them from hearing the most powerful message of all: Emmanuel, God is with us.
From Pizza and Code to a “Digital Pentecost”
This mission didn’t start in a cathedral, but in a room full of coders, snacks, and a tight deadline.
The setting was Kingdom Code, an annual Christian hackathon where technologists gather to ask: How can we use our skills to serve the Kingdom? Tim Moger from NEFC Church stood up and pitched a problem that is becoming increasingly common: our communities are diversifying, but our church services are leaving people out.
For me, this problem wasn’t theoretical; it was sitting in the seat next to me.
Two Iranian asylum seekers had recently joined our congregation. One spoke limited English; his mother-in-law spoke none. I remember the helplessness I felt trying to welcome them into the community. We did what we could — we pasted Persian text onto the projector for the liturgy — but the moment the service moved on, they were cut off.
It wasn’t just the sermon they missed. It was the notices, the updates on community life, the small invitations to belong. After the service, the young man could manage a basic conversation, but the heart of the message — and the invitation to participate in the family of the church — was inaccessible. His mother-in-law sat through the entire service in silence. We were welcoming them into the building, but we lacked the tools to welcome them into the fellowship.
A Romanian woman, who sat silently through services for three years was literally crying with joy the first time she could hear the sermon in her own language.
That weekend, a team formed around Tim’s idea, led on the technical side by Ben Hartman. Ben brought extensive expertise in real-time communications to the table, but perhaps more importantly, he brought a missionary’s heart. Living in Germany and speaking German as a second language, he knew intimately the fatigue of trying to process faith in a non-native tongue.
Over 24 hours, the team built a prototype. Originally, we called it “deBabel” — a reference to the Tower of Babel, seeking to reverse the confusion of languages. But as the project grew, we realised we didn’t just want to tear down a barrier; we wanted to invite the Spirit in.
We renamed it Breeze Translate, a nod to Acts 2. At Pentecost, the Holy Spirit came like a “mighty rushing wind” — a breeze — and suddenly, everyone heard the good news in their own native tongue. That became our hope: to build a tool that clears the way for a similar connection today.
How It Works
Since coming on board to help expand the reach of Breeze, I’ve seen that simplicity is key. We didn’t want to create an app that people had to download (a barrier in itself). Instead, Breeze is browser-based.
The church connects their sound desk to a computer — or simply places a mobile phone on the lectern — and the system does the rest. The congregation scans a QR code, and their own phone becomes a personal interpreter, providing live, real-time translation in their own language.
Crucially, it works both ways. The system supports a host of different input languages with automated language switching. This means a service can be truly multilingual — a contributor can get up and share a testimony in Farsi or pray in Ukrainian, and the English speakers in the room will see the translation instantly. With hundreds of output languages available, it allows everyone to participate, not just listen.
In Slough Baptist Church, the leadership used Breeze to support an Italian woman who had attended for years, relying on her husband’s faltering whispers to understand. When they switched on Breeze, she told the leadership it was the first time she felt she could truly connect with the service independently."
https://www.premierchristianity.com/real-life/how-we-built-an-ai-translator-to-help-everyone-in-your-church-hear-the-gospel/20567.article
#Metaglossia
#metaglossia_mundus
The Trump administration argues that providing real-time American Sign Language interpretation for events like White House press briefings would intrude on the president’s control over his public image. This stance is part of a lawsuit filed by the National Association for the Deaf, which claims the lack of ASL interpretation denies deaf Americans access to important communications. The Justice Department suggests alternatives like online transcripts and closed captioning provide what's needed. A federal judge recently ordered the White House to provide the interpreting, but the administration has appealed.
"Trump administration says sign language services ‘intrude’ on Trump’s ability to control his image
20 hours ago By MEG KINNARD - Associated Press
The Trump administration is arguing that requiring real-time American Sign Language interpretation of events like White House press briefings “would severely intrude on the President’s prerogative to control the image he presents to the public,” part of a lawsuit seeking to require the White House to provide the services.
Department of Justice attorneys haven’t elaborated on how doing so might hamper the portrayal President Donald Trump seeks to present to the public. But overturning policies encompassing diversity, equity and inclusion have become a hallmark of his second administration, starting with his very first week back in the White House.
The National Association for the Deaf sued the Trump administration in May, arguing that the cessation of American Sign Language interpretation — which the Biden administration had used regularly — represented “denying hundreds of thousands of deaf Americans meaningful access to the White House’s real-time communications on various issues of national and international import.” The group also sued during Trump’s first administration, seeking ASL interpretation for briefings related to the COVID-19 pandemic.
In a June court filing opposing the association’s request for a preliminary injunction, reported Thursday by Politico, attorneys for the Justice Department argued that being required to provide sign language interpretation for news conferences “would severely intrude on the President’s prerogative to control the image he presents to the public,” also writing that the president has “the prerogative to shape his Administration’s image and messaging as he sees fit.”
Government attorneys also argued that it provides the hard of hearing or Deaf community with other ways to access the president’s statements, like online transcripts of events, or closed captioning. The administration has also argued that it would be difficult to wrangle such services in the event that Trump spontaneously took questions from the press, rather than at a formal briefing.
A White House spokesperson did not immediately comment Friday on the ongoing lawsuit or answer questions about the administration’s argument regarding the damage of interpretation services to Trump’s “image.”
In their June filing, government attorneys questioned if other branches of government were being held to a similar standard if they didn’t provide the same interpretative services as sought by the association.
As home to Gallaudet University, the world’s premier college for the deaf and hard of hearing, Washington likely has an ample pool of trained ASL interpreters into which the White House could tap. Mayor Muriel Bowser has made ASL interpretation a mainstay of her appearances, including a pair of interpreters who swap in and out.
Last month, a federal judge rejected that and other objections from the government, issuing an order requiring the White House to provide American Sign Language interpreting for Trump and Leavitt’s remarks in real time. The White House has appealed the ruling, and while the administration has begun providing American Sign Language interpreting at some events, there’s disagreement over what services it has to supply.
On his first week back in office, Trump signed a sweeping executive order putting a stop to diversity, equity and inclusion programs across the U.S. government. In putting his own imprint on the Pentagon, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth in January issued an order stating that DEI policies were “incompatible” with the department’s mission,
This week, Secretary of State Marco Rubio ordered diplomatic correspondence to return to the more traditional Times New Roman font, arguing that the Biden administration’s 2023 shift to the sans serif Calibri font had emerged from misguided diversity, equity and inclusion policies pursued by his predecessor.
Meg Kinnard can be reached at http://x.com/MegKinnardAP";
https://www.fox21online.com/i/trump-administration-says-sign-language-services-intrude-on-trumps-ability-to-control-his-image/
#Metaglossia
#metaglossia_mundus
"Methodological Framework for Specialized Translation Curricula Development
Abstract
This article examines the scientific and methodological principles underlying the development of comprehensive educational and methodological complexes (EMC) for specialized translation courses, with particular emphasis on military translation. The study addresses the structural components of modern EMCs within the framework of competency-based approaches and Federal State Educational Standards (FSES) requirements. The research analyzes the sequential organization of educational content, the selection and systematization of thematic material, and the integration of didactic resources. Special attention is devoted to the development of textbooks for specialized translation, including their structural organization, the selection of authentic source materials, and the implementation of multimedia technologies. The article presents a practical case study of an electronic textbook for Italian military translation, demonstrating how theoretical principles can be applied in practice. The study emphasizes that modern EMCs function as flexible, variable, and non-linear scenarios of the educational process, incorporating not only traditional educational materials but also electronic resources, assessment tools, and methodological guidelines for both instructors and learners. The research concludes that effective EMC development requires consideration of subject-specific characteristics, linguistic and cultural particularities of the target language, and contemporary geopolitical contexts. The proposed approach to EMC design for specialized translation can be extrapolated to various language pairs and subject domains, thereby expanding its practical application in higher education systems.
Keywords: Educational and Methodological Complex, Specialized Translation, Military Translation, Competency-Based Approach, Textbook Design, Didactic Materials, Electronic Educational Resources, Authentic Source Materials, Translation Competencies, Higher Education, Curriculum Design, Language Pedagogy, Translation Studies."
Posted: 11 Dec 2025
Maria Smirnova
Moscow State University of International Relations (MGIMO University)
Date Written: October 14, 2025
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5838062
#Metaglossia
#metaglossia_mundus
"The art of translation is a specific and important one. In this workshop for younger translators, experts in the field provided feedback and support for challenges that may come with the work.
A “small-but-mighty community”
Translators are the heart of the international publishing industry. They are often the first to read a story that could be brought to a new market, the sole voice advocating for a work to be published, and the steward of the original writer’s story, voice, and intention.
In the last several years, questions have been raised about whether or not artificial intelligence will take the place of human translators, if the next generation of readers will be reading in their native language or reading books in English, or if markets, particularly the US in its current political state, will welcome stories from beyond its borders. All of these potential challenges ahead make the support of translators and their work and the building of community all the more important.
Award-winning translator and workshop leader Liz Lauffer, Image Sabine Schwarz
With that in mind, last month in New York City, the Goethe-Institut NYC and Frankfurter Buchmesse hosted a virtual translator workshop to provide community, education, and support for young German translators, hosted by acclaimed translator and winner of the 2014 Gutekunst Prize Liz Lauffer.
Rohan Kamicheril, senior editor at Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, founder of Tiffin and former editor at Words without Borders was a guest editor during the workshop to provide additional feedback and guidance to the translators.
Participants included Juliane Scholtz, Elizabeth Raab, Betsy Carter, Hayden Toftner, Jennifer Jenson, and Aziza Kasumov. Each of these translators had 8 weeks to translate an excerpt from Sara Gmuer’s Achtzehnter Stock, published in Germany by Hanser Verlag.
“I was eager to meet this merry band, discover how the next generation of literary translators is approaching our work, and dip into my own experience to see what I might pass on,” said Lauffer.
“They gave me a sense of belonging in this small-but-mighty community of ours. My hope is that this cohort will draw on the connections formed—whether it’s passing each other jobs, consulting on tricky bits, celebrating or commiserating with one another—and keep the flame lit.”
The translators submitted their translation samples two weeks before the workshop, on which Lauffer provided edits. Lauffer then chose an excerpt from each translation and shared those with Kamicheril who sent individual edits and comments back to each translator.
In preparation for the workshop, the translators were asked to each identify a paragraph they were struggling with. During the workshop, each participant shared what they found particularly challenging in the paragraphs they had chosen, which led to a lively exchange which highlighted the different perspectives and versions each could create.
Kamicheril stressed that there is right formulation because it is always about the bigger picture. What is the sound, the tone of the text? Which solution fits best in a particular context?
During the workshop, it became clear that the art of translation is closely tied to emotions, interactions, and interdependence, something AI cannot replicate.
“Though that’s been slowly changing, there’s just not a ton of infrastructure in the US to support emerging translators, so this was a rare opportunity to not only hone our skills but also learn more about the inner workings of the industry,” said Kasumov.
“I’m grateful to have been part of this group! My favorite part of the workshop itself was probably seeing how each and every one of us translated certain turns of phrases differently–a beautiful reminder that translation is an art, not something that can be automated away.”"
By Erin L. Cox, Publisher | @erinlcox
December 12, 2025
https://publishingperspectives.com/2025/12/building-the-future-of-translation-a-workshop-in-new-york-city/
#Metaglossia
#metaglossia_mundus
"Norfolk is celebrating the anniversary of INTRAN, the county's homegrown interpretation and translation service.
Founded in December of 2000 to offer interpretation and translation services in 54 languages to public sector organisations in Norfolk, INTRAN has grown to provide over 300 organisations with translation and interpretation support across 174 languages, including British Sign Language and braille.
Cllr Robert Savage, Vice-Chairman of Norfolk County Council, said: "It's wonderful to celebrate a quarter century of INTRAN's work: this is a clear example of what can be achieved when organisations collaborate, bringing together 6 original partners to create a service that helps save public resources by avoiding duplication and now helps hundreds of organisations communicate clearly and swiftly with their service users. The work of INTRAN has helped improve lives, deliver better outcomes and ensure access to services for thousands of people who might otherwise have struggled. Here's to another 25 years of such success!"
Before INTRAN was established those who needed translation and interpretation support often had to arrange for specialist help to be brought in from far afield, with Interpreters as far away as Glasgow travelling to Norfolk to support face to face events. INTRAN's creation changed all that, allowing a range of organisations in Norfolk to access swift and local translation services. Today INTRAN offers telephone and video interpreters as well as face to face options, with written translation services and staff training also available.
Julie Dwyer, member of the Norwich Deaf Club, explained that "Without an interpreter, I often feel invisible — INTRAN helps me being heard and understood clearly".
In 2024-25, interpretation and translation services were requested in over 82,000 individual bookings, covering 111 different languages for Norfolk and 126 in the region (data shows that 174 different languages are spoken in Norfolk and over 200 in the East of England). Today, languages such as Lithuanian, Arabic and Polish are the most in demand, a sharp contrast to the early 2000s when Portuguese, Russian and British Sign Language were the most requested languages.
Valerie Gidney, INTRAN Partnership Manager, said: "The risks of non-effective communication are now widely recognised and regulated by law. By putting themselves together to deliver a common goal, members of our partnership have been able to reduce delays for service users, and help staff deliver their duty of care in confidence, helping avoid service delays, clearly communicate processes and consent, improve diagnoses and speed up accurate interventions.
With the continuous evolution of technology, over the past 25 years we've introduced new solutions, such as video interpreting on demand, which staff use to respond to emergency needs, access languages that are harder to source locally (such as Oromo, Rohingya or Nuer), and bridge gaps. New opportunities are currently sought which we are confident will further improve accessibility for members of our local deaf communities. Watch this space!"
Top 10 Languages in Norfolk 2024-25
In 2024-25, interpretation and translation services were requested in 111 different languages for Norfolk and 126 in the region, of which 30 had not been requested during 2023-24. Between 2023-24 and 2024-25, Norfolk has seen some changes to the Top 10 most requested languages, which account for 69.94% of all bookings:
Lithuanian
Arabic
Polish
Portuguese
Russian
Romanian
Pashto
Kurdish-Sorani
Bulgarian
Dari
Ukrainian was number 14 on the Norfolk list of top languages that year.
Last modified: 11 December 2025"
Norfolk County Council ,11 December 2025
https://www.norfolk.gov.uk/article/74416/INTRAN-Celebrates-25-Years-of-Inclusive-Communication
#Metaglossia
#metaglossia_mundus
"Google Translate brings real-time speech translations to any headphones
Live speech translations were once only on the Pixel Buds.
Google Translate’s latest update brings live speech translations, originally available only on the Pixel Buds, to any headphones you want, with support for over 70 languages. It’s rolling out today in beta and just requires a compatible Android phone with the Translate app (unlike Apple’s similar feature, which requires AirPods).
It’s one of a few new features coming to Google Translate, along with improved text translations. Using Gemini, Translate will now offer more accurate translations of phrases like idioms and slang, which have a different meaning than what they literally sound like word for word, such as the expression “stealing my thunder.”
Android users will soon have an option to hear real-time translations through their headphones. Image: Google
Today’s update also includes an expansion of the Practice feature in Translate, bringing it to 20 new countries and adding more supported languages. The Practice feature, which launched in beta in August, is a bit like Duolingo, but baked into Google Translate. It uses AI to make customized language learning sessions based on your skill level, including vocabulary practice and listening comprehension.
Live speech-to-speech translation is rolling out today in the US, Mexico, and India on Android and will make its way over to the iOS Translate app next year. Improved text translations are rolling out today in the US and Mexico on both the Android and iOS Translate apps, as well as on the web version of Translate. Practice is still a beta feature in Translate, so it may not be available to everyone yet."
Stevie Bonifield
Dec 12, 2025
https://www.theverge.com/news/843483/google-translate-live-speech-translations-headphones
#Metaglossia
#metaglossia_mundus
"Depuis le 20 novembre et jusqu’au 20 janvier 2026, l’Association internationale des interprètes de conférence vous propose une exposition consacrée aux débuts de l’interprétation simultanée.
C’est à l’occasion du 80ᵉ anniversaire de l’ouverture des procès de Nuremberg que cette exposition a été inaugurée. Son objectif : mettre en valeur le rôle des interprètes lors du procès de Nuremberg. Une traduction menée alors en quatre langues, une première rendue possible grâce à la méthode novatrice de l’interprétation simultanée.
L'exposition se tiendra pendant 2 mois durant lesquels des projections de films seront prévus notamment le 19 décembre et le 1er janvier (inscription obligatoire).
Cette exposition se tient dans l’enceinte du musée de l’émigration BallinStadt. Elle est ouverte du Mardi au Dimanche de 10h à 18h.
🎟️ Prix : 13,90€"
https://lepetitjournal.com/hambourg/agenda/expositions/un-proces-quatre-langues-
#Metaglossia
#metaglossia_mundus
"Les principales recommandations du Conseil de l'Europe concernent la formation des enseignants, les services sociaux et de santé et les médias.
Le Comité d’experts de la Charte européenne des langues régionales ou minoritaires a publié aujourd’hui un rapport à mi-parcours sur la mise en œuvre par la Finlande de ses 22 recommandations pour action immédiate formulées dans le sixième rapport d’évaluation.
La Charte, entrée en vigueur en Finlande en 1998, s’applique au suédois (langue nationale la moins répandue), au sâme d’Inari, au sâme du Nord, au sâme skolt, au carélien, au romani, au russe, au tatar et au yiddish.
Le Comité d’experts se félicite des progrès accomplis, mais regrette que plusieurs recommandations n’aient pas été mises en œuvre, notamment celles sur la formation des enseignants, les services sociaux et de santé, les médias et l’absence de financement durable dans différents domaines. Il réaffirme également que la Finlande doit sensibiliser la population à ses minorités et prendre des mesures pour revitaliser le romani et le carélien. La Finlande devrait aussi renforcer les mesures visant à protéger le sâme skolt et le yiddish, qui sont gravement menacés et risquent de disparaître.
Le Comité d’experts se réjouit du fait que le sâme d’Inari, le sâme du Nord et le sâme skolt sont toujours enseignés dans les universités d’Oulu et de Laponie, ce qui peut déboucher sur de nouvelles opportunités pour la formation des enseignants. En outre, il encourage les autorités à élaborer, en coopération avec les représentants des locuteurs, une stratégie à long terme adossée à un financement durable, afin de veiller à la disponibilité d’enseignants en sâme d’Inari, en sâme du Nord et en sâme skolt. Les autorités devraient également mettre en place des mesures incitatives pour les étudiants, telles que des bourses, des garanties d’emploi ou des primes salariales, afin de les encourager à suivre une formation d’enseignement.
Étant donné que la majeure partie du financement reste liée à des projets spécifiques, le Comité d’experts renouvelle sa recommandation selon laquelle le financement de la promotion du sâme d’Inari, du sâme du Nord et du sâme skolt devrait être disponible pour des périodes plus longues, afin de ne pas entraver la continuité des services, parmi lesquels les services sociaux et de santé.
Le Comité d’experts recommande des mesures supplémentaires pour revitaliser la langue romani. Il encourage les autorités à remédier à la pénurie persistante d’enseignants et note que des mesures supplémentaires sont nécessaires pour garantir la pérennité de l’enseignement dans cette langue.
Une autre recommandation pour action immédiate concerne l’emploi du suédois, en particulier au sein des autorités locales et régionales, et dans les services sociaux et de santé. Des lacunes ayant été signalées dans les services numériques, notamment des traductions suédoises inadéquates et des liens manquants vers des informations en suédois, le Comité d’experts attend avec intérêt un rapport sur la disponibilité des services dans les comtés de services de bien-être bilingues ainsi que des données fiables sur les défis et les effets de la réforme de la santé de 2023.
Tout en prenant note des supports audiovisuels visant à mieux faire connaître les langues minoritaires parlées en Finlande, le Comité d’experts encourage les autorités à redoubler d’efforts pour sensibiliser la population majoritaire aux langues minoritaires, tant dans le domaine de l’éducation que dans les médias.
Les autorités finlandaises doivent présenter leur prochain rapport périodique avant le 1er mars 2028."
Conseil de l'Europe Strasbourg 12 Décembre 2025
https://www.coe.int/fr/web/portal/-/progress-in-protecting-minority-languages-in-finland-but-further-action-needed
#Metaglossia
#metaglossia_mundus
"Appel à tous les apprenants et locuteurs de langues autochtones!
Le Programme mentor-apprenti recherche de nouveaux mentors qui souhaitent enseigner leur langue autochtone et les apprentis qui souhaitent l’apprendre.
Le Programme mentor-apprenti est un programme d’apprentissage des langues qui consiste à jumeler un locuteur compétent (le mentor) à un apprenant sérieux (l’apprenti) pour qu’ensemble ils se livrent à des activités de la vie courante en n’utilisant que leur langue autochtone.
Les apprenants souhaitant apprendre une langue autochtone doivent trouver un mentor disposé à leur enseigner, et les locuteurs de langues autochtones souhaitant faire du mentorat et enseigner leur langue doivent trouver un apprenti. L’objectif du programme est de permettre aux apprentis d’améliorer leur capacité à comprendre et à parler leur langue en « vivant dans la langue ».
Les paires mentor-apprenti doivent accepter de passer environ 5 à 7 heures par semaine ensemble pendant le programme. Ils devront réaliser 200 heures d’immersion linguistique sur une période d’environ neuf mois à compter de mai 2026.
Le programme est ouvert aux apprenants de tous les niveaux. Les apprenants doivent être âgés d’au moins 18 ans. Les mentors et les apprentis sont rémunérés pour leur participation au programme grâce à des fonds provenant à la fois du gouvernement des Territoires du Nord-Ouest et de leur gouvernement autochtone. Jusqu’à dix paires mentor-apprenti par gouvernement autochtone partenaire seront sélectionnées pour y participer.
La date limite pour soumettre votre candidature est le 28 février 2026.
Pour obtenir de plus amples renseignements ou pour présenter une demande, veuillez visiter le www.ece.gov.nt.ca/fr/PMA, composez le 867-767-9346, poste 71044, ou écrivez à Indigenous_languages@gov.nt.ca.
Les représentants des médias sont priés de s’adresser à :
Agata Gutkowska
Gestionnaire des relations publiques et des communications
Gouvernement des Territoires du Nord-Ouest
agata_Gutkowska@gov.nt.ca"
Yellowknife — 11 décembre 2025
https://www.gov.nt.ca/fr/newsroom/appel-tous-les-apprenants-et-locuteurs-de-langues-autochtones
#Metaglossia
#metaglossia_mundus
By encouraging cross-cultural understanding and collaborative learning, the program prepares student leaders to thrive in and contribute to an increasingly interconnected world.
"Participants in this year’s Emory Intercultural Leadership Program (EILP) recently gathered for the annual leadership retreat, which Ava Havidic described as transformative.
“The EILP leadership retreat allowed me to expand international friendships across schools at Emory,” says Havidic, a second-year student at Emory College of Arts and Sciences. “It was a place of true connection, where vulnerability was welcomed. I was able to actively listen to the stories of those different than me, which will help me shape a better Emory, Atlanta and global community.”
That connection is exactly what the EILP aims to foster. Part of International Student and Scholar Services (ISSS), EILP is designed for both international and domestic students across Emory’s undergraduate, graduate and professional schools.
The EILP is an academic-year-long cohort program that equips participants with a powerful toolkit of global leadership skills and intercultural communication strategies, culminating in a service-learning experience.
“The EILP empowers students to lead with curiosity, empathy and purpose,” says Shinn Ko, assistant vice provost of International Student and Scholar Services. “By encouraging cross-cultural understanding and collaborative learning, the program prepares these student leaders to thrive in and contribute to an increasingly interconnected world.”
At the leadership retreat, students experienced immersive activities like storytelling, listening circles and team building. Intercultural conflict styles were also explored as a way to better understand diverse cultural perspectives and techniques to communicate across differences — tools necessary to lead in intercultural settings.
Through monthly seminars, students strengthen their understanding of emotional intelligence and intercultural effectiveness while engaging in rich, perspective-shifting dialogue. Reflecting on her decision to join the group, Emory College student Camilla Basco shared, “Within the EILP, I hope to build bridges not for the sake of connection alone, but for the new possibilities that can emerge when we cross those bridges together.”
In the spring semester, EILP participants will collaborate on a service-learning project, applying these skills in a real-world context to foster positive change.
“The EILP empowers the next generation of leaders to think globally, act with empathy and lead with purpose,” says Soundharya Kumaresan, a first-year PhD student in the Graduate Division of Biological and Biomedical Sciences with Laney Graduate School.
To learn more about the program, visit the ISSS EILP page. Follow @EmoryISSS on Instagram for participant spotlights and program updates."
https://news.emory.edu/stories/2025/12/er_isss_leadership_program_09-12-2025/story.html
#Metaglossia
#metaglossia_mundus
|
Scoop.it!
