Examinations are not a true test of knowledge | By Hephzibah Owoeye | Metaglossia: The Translation World | Scoop.it

Although examinations are important means of assessment or evaluation they should not determine intelligence neither should they be used as a true test of knowledge.

Examinations are not a true test of knowledge | By Hephzibah Owoeye
Guest WriterOctober 11, 2021 4:30 AM 

Examinations are a formal test which one takes to show knowledge or ability in a particular subject or to obtain a qualification, according to Google’s meaning.

According to Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary, a test is an examination of someone’s knowledge or ability, consisting of questions for them to answer or activities for them to perform.

According to Cambridge Dictionary, knowledge is the understanding of or the information about a subject that you get by experience or study, either known by one person or by people generally.

From the definition given above, we can see that examination and test are closely related but they are not the same thing. Examinations are meant to test one’s knowledge about a number of lessons while tests are to test your knowledge about a particular lesson.

Categorically, it can be strongly argued with cogent facts that examination is not a true test of knowledge.

Conventionally, examinations test one’s ability to memorize rather than analyze and fully understand what was taught. If a student has a very good memory, they wouldn’t fully know what was taught in class to be able to pass the exams as they have the ability to memorize for the exams, which was supposed to be carried out in order to ensure students understood what was taught. Consequently, this tends to render the ultimate purpose of the examination useless; and by implication only the ability to memorize is tested.

Secondly, intelligence can not be defined through examination. According to Edward de Bono “Many highly intelligent people are poor thinkers. Many people of average intelligence are skilled thinkers. The power of a car is separated from the way the car is driven”. Examinations were designed to separate the intelligent from the less intelligent. It is not possible to determine someone’s intelligence by making them take exams because as earlier pointed, some students have good memorizing skills. They have such good memory that they could just write down everything they saw in their notes and get higher marks than those who actually applied creative thinking.

Thirdly, examinations don’t determine if one would succeed in life. They are simply conducted to test one’s ability, which is not always accurate. One might pass the A-level examinations he/she wrote but still not make it in life because instead of schools to teach money-making skills and life skills, students are rather taught various formulas that they would not use in life.

The fourth point is that students have different abilities. A student who is good in music or literature might not be good in Mathematics and Physics but the same exams are given despite the different abilities of the students. In this regard, students’ grades cannot be said to be the objective determinant of their intelligence. The result of an examination depends, to a greater degree, on the examiner and as such students’ grades should not matter. If a student gets low grades, that does not mean that they are not smart or that they lack a diligent attitude to work and school. It simply means that their ability to learn is different. While some grasp at a relatively faster pace others may be slower.

In conclusion, although examinations are important means of assessment or evaluation they should not determine intelligence neither should they be used as a true test of knowledge.

Hephzibah Owoeye is an SS3 student of Chrisfield College, Itamaga, Ikorodu, Lagos.

Email: hzdelight01@gmail.com