The article on the overlooked terrestrial impacts of mountaintop mining that appears on p. 335 of this issue provides a valuable overview of research on this destructive and polluting practice. The authors, James Wickham of the US Environmental Protection Agency’s National Exposure Research Laboratory, Petra Bohall Wood of the US Geological Survey’s (USGS) West Virginia Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, and eight others, draw attention to the dearth of research on terrestrial—as distinct from aquatic—effects of this mining technique. But readers of the article should know that, after it went through peer review, revision, approval by a BioScience editorial board member, formal acceptance, editing byBioScience staff, and approval of the edits by the authors, Wickham and Wood wrote BioScience to say that the USGS required a change before the article could be published.
|
|
Scooped by
PIRatE Lab
onto Capstone: An ESRM Coda February 1, 2014 11:39 PM
|
Your new post is loading...
When politics interferes with peer review and basic science.