 Your new post is loading...
 Your new post is loading...
Ghosh, S., Das, T.K., Shivay, Y.S., Bandyopadhyay, K.K., Bhatia, A. & Yeasin, Md. 2022. Journal of Crop and Weed. 18 (1) 111-119. https://doi.org/10.22271/09746315.2022.v18.i1.1540
Hossain, M.M., Begum, M., Hashem, A., Rahman, M.M., Haque, M.E. & Bell, R. 2021. Agriculture (Switzerland) 11 (9). # 895. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11090895
Zahan, T., Hossain, M.F., Chowdhury, A.K., Ali, M.O., Ali, M.A., Dessoky, E.S., Hassan, M.M., Maitra, S. & Hossain, A. 2021. Agronomy. 11 (9). Aticle number 1704. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11091704
Cordeau, S., Baudron, A., Busset, H., Farcy, P., Vieren, E., Smith, R.G., Munier-Jolain, N. & Adeux, G. 2022. Frontiers in Agronomy. 3. Article number 769992. https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2021.769992
Hossain, Md.M., Begum, M., Hashem, A., Rahman, Md.M., Ahmed, S., Hassan, M.M., Javed, T., Shabbir, R., Hadifa, A., Sabagh, A.E.L & Bell, R.W. 2021. Agronomy-Basel. 11 (6) 1164. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11061164
|
Niassy, S., Agbodzavu, M.K., Mudereri, B.T., Kamalongo, D., Ligowe, I., Hailu, G., Kimathi, E., Jere, Z., Ochatum, N., Pittchar, J., Kassie, M. & Khna, Z. 2022. Sustainability. 14 (4) Article 2162. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042162
Fonteyne, S., Gonzalez, L.A.J., Alcala, O.J., Rodriguez, S.C., Penaloza, N.O., Galdamez, O.J.R., Singh, R.G. & Verhulst, N. 2022. Weed Research. 62 (3). 224-239. https://doi.org/10.1111/wre.12530
Conservation Agriculture in North-eastern Hill Region of India: Potential and Opportunities for Sustainable Development
Das, A., Ghosh, P.K., Yadav, G.S., Layek, J., Babu, S., Singh, R., Ansari, M.A. 2021. Journal of Agricultural Physics. 21 (1) 113-134. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360995699
Dhaliwal, S.S., Sharma, S., Shukla, A.K., Sharma, V., Bhullar, M.S., Dhaliwal, T.K., Alorabi, M., Alotaibi, S.S., Gaber, A. & Hossain, A. 2021. Plants. 10 (11) Article number 2431. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10112431
Grahmann, K., Honsdorf, N., Crossa, J., Beltran, G.A., Govaerts, B. & Verhulst, N. 2021. Field Crops Research. 274 Article number 108310 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108310
Jalli, M., Huusela, E., Jalli, H., Kauppi, K., Niemi, M., Himanen, S. & Jauhiainen, L. 2021. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 5. Article number 647335. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.647335
|
This study analyzed 84 on-farm trials comparing CA-based practices (CA) with farmers' conventional ones (CT) in rice-wheat systems of the Eastern Tarai region on Nepal. The objectives were to investigate crop and cropping systems productivity, profitability, yield stability, irrigation (WPi) and total water productivity (WP(r+i)), and fertilizer-use efficiencies of three CA- and one CT-based practice in R−W systems. The CT system was puddled transplanted rice (PTR) and tilled wheat (CTW). The three CA based systems were 1) PTR - ZTW; 2) Direct seeded rice (DSR) -ZTW; and 3) unpuddled transplanted rice (UPTR) - ZTW. There were no significant differences in rice or wheat yields between CT and CA treatments, but significant reduction in production cost due to reduced labor use and increased net gain (188−223 USD ha−1) in all CA-based R−W systems. DSR−ZTW showed the highest yield stability and net profit, demonstrating its adaptability in the region. CA based systems reduced production costs and increased farm profits, saved energy and water, increased land and labor productivity, and improved food security.