One Kansas school district has deployed a digital literacy program for its middle and high school students as it gears up for the implementation of Common Core State Standards.
In the midst of moving to the Common Core, one district education director shares how a technology-supported math program is getting students and teachers alike to think critically about data.
Over spring break I had the opportunity to attend a one day workshop with Doug Buehl on Disciplinary Literacy with the Common Core State Standards (CCSS)...
College-Ready? - In the report “Reading Between the Lines” on what the ACT reveals about college readiness in reading, you will find that the 2005 ACT shows that only 51% of our high school students are ready for college level reading! What’s worse is when this study looked at data on reading levels in 8th and 10th grade, students were on track for being college ready in reading, but then declined. What happens in high school?! This is why our students need the ELA standards for disciplinary literacy.
'Can Do' not 'Should Be Able to Do' - We cannot hide behind the “they should be able to do this by now” thinking. Especially with the gaps we will have as we implement the CCSS, yes they should be able to do this by now, but now it’s our job to scaffold their learning and get them to where they need to be. Think of where our students will be after a few years of the CCSS!
Mastery not Coverage - The CCSS no longer allow us to “cover” curriculum each year. We can no longer “cover history,” but teach history. No longer can we do “drive-by” teaching. The CCSS give you the permission to not have to teach everything that the book/curriculum says to cover.
Close Reading - We need to prepare our students to be able to read/learn on their own.
Independent Readers - The CCSS require us to teach students to read complex text independently, whereas, in the past we may have shied away from complex text due to having a variety of learners in our classrooms. We have learned ways to differentiate in our classrooms for our struggling learners (ex: teacher reading complex text to the class, rely on visuals, etc.) We need to scaffold our teaching for students to be able to learn how to read complex text and make meaning from it. As school leaders, we need to scaffold learning about the CCSS and instructional strategies for our teachers.
Ahead or Behind?
"I went to this workshop feeling like our district was far behind on implementation of the CCSS, however, I learned that we’re not in comparison to other districts."
Despite limited manpower and capacity at the state level, states like Maryland are trying to simultaneously implement five complex initiatives. Any one of these initiatives would put state capacity to a severe test. Combined, they spell big problems with implementation.
1. New Teacher Evaluation System
Full implementation of the new teacher evaluation standards is set to begin with the 2013-2014 school year. One of Race to the Top’s core concepts is the design of more clear-cut teacher evaluation systems that tie performance to student improvement and test scores, as well as professional development.
2. New Data Systems Maryland also had struggled to meet deadlines on data systems projects because of hiring issues and delays retaining contractors and receiving products, according to the report.
3. Value-Added Modeling
But linking teacher assessments to student success is a relatively new science, and the process of creating a fair and accurate evaluation model is still being debated.
4. Upgrading Technology
Foran said that when purchasing technology in large enough quantities, the procurement must be approved by another internal state agency, which was the main cause for delays.
In looking to see how closely district curricula and classroom libraries reflect a 50-50 split between literature and informational text, it is important to remember the key word in this shift is “balance.”
The Common Core is committed to “extensive reading of stories, dramas, poems, and myths” for their value in helping students “gain literary and cultural knowledge as well as familiarity with various text structures and elements.”
But the Common Core also recognizes the importance of reading in the disciplines as a way of building “a foundation of knowledge…that will give them the background to be better readers in all content areas.” (p.10)
Here is why cross-content literacy will be such a big challenge under the Common Core Standards:
A survey by The Jenkins Group, an independent publishing services firm, has shown that millions of Americans never read another book after leaving school.
33% of high school graduates never read another book for the rest of their lives.
42% of college graduates never read another book after college.
80% of U.S. families did not buy or read a book last year.
70% of U.S. adults have not been in a bookstore in the last five years.
To fill this need, the IFL has developed a set of model units K-12 in the four core content areas that illustrate how research-based content and pedagogical routines can transform instruction and raise student achievement.
These units suggest teaching progressions and routines that assure a focus on what specific content needs to be taught and how it should be learned.
Model units include suggested texts, tasks, and teaching routines and guidance, as well as supports for English language learners and students with disabilities.
If education accountability were an evolutionary chart, the Common Core curriculum, a set of uniform educational plans in English and math adopted by 45 states, would be Homo erectus.
The New York City Department of Education has taken a lead in implementing the Common Core State Standards in its schools. Middle College National Consortium Schools have been out front in embracing the Common Core Standards with professional development and an emphasis on aligning CCSS with the college and career ready work already being done.
Fourth and eighth grade students in Albuquerque are being taught using Common Core — an unprecedented nationwide effort to ensure students in every state are taught — and tested on — the same set of high academic math and reading standards.
The idea is to improve standards nationwide, while allowing for valid comparisons of student achievement between states. In Albuquerque Public Schools, these standards are being piloted by about 100 teachers in fourth- and eighth-grade classes.
By next fall, the standards will be in use in every kindergarten through third grade classroom in the state. And by fall of 2013, they will be used in all classrooms.
Chief State School Officer
New Mexixo Education Secretary-designate Hanna Skandera said the Common Core standards emphasize critical thinking and mastery of key topics, rather than a shallow understanding of many topics. “Part of the emphasis in Common Core is the ability for students to think critically and process,” Skandera said. “It’s moving beyond the first level of thinking to higher levels of thinking.”
Skandera said Common Core also aims to break down barriers between subjects, teaching skills like writing in every class.
Skandera said Common Core should elevate teaching across the country, as states will be able to share resources and programs that work. “The whole idea behind Common Core is that we have high standards and expectations, are taking best practices from across the nation, and are ensuring our kids across the nation are the recipients of those best practices,” she said.
Teacher Reaction
Burnham said she likes teaching to the Common Core standards because there are fewer of them and she can spend more time on each one. She said her day-to-day teaching strategies haven’t changed, just her emphasis.
More nonfiction
The Common Core English standards place more emphasis on reading nonfiction and complex texts, with less emphasis on novels. Students will have to read complex texts in college, and high school should prepare them. Eighth-graders might analyze the Gettysburg address, for example, or write an essay using evidence and arguments, rather than one about their summer break.
Over the last 30 years, the U.S. has made no progress whatsoever in increasing college graduation rates.
To be specific, 25-34 year olds in 2009 had a college degree rate of about 40%, almost exactly the same as for 55-64 year old baby boomers.
In the meantime, other industrialized countries were racking up substantial gains, most spectacularly in the case of South Korea where a little over 10% of 55-64 year olds have college degrees, but more than 60% in the 25-34 age group do.
If you want to understand how South Korea has gone from a poor developing country to an industrial powerhouse within our lifetimes, this is one big reason.
The Ohio Department of Education wants to urge districts to act quickly to change what — and how — they’re teaching.
If Ohio students had already taken the new, tougher state tests, only about 4 in 10 would have passed math or reading.
In Columbus City Schools, about 64 percent of students passed their reading tests last school year. Predictions show that passing rate would be about 25 percent on the new tests.
About 80 percent of Hamilton students passed math exams last school year. About 42 percent of those students would pass the new tests.
What role does background knowledge and making connections play in 21st century Common Core classrooms? Burkins and Yaris explore this role and its instructional implications in this short video.
1. Achieve the Core, from Student Achievement Partners (who were deeply involved in writing the Core), has great free resources beginning with this handy summary of instructional implications of the Core: ELA/Literacy Building knowledge through content-rich...
We have found no substantive research that indicates that beginning readers, or even elementary-aged readers, in small- or whole-group settings should exclusively, or even extensively, read frustration level texts.
There is a place for "frustration level" text in elementary classrooms.
If you are not using "frustration level" text in read aloud, shared reading, partner reading, and fluency practice, then we recommend you begin there.
Until we have more substantive and specific research on frustration level text, however, please don’t eliminate the bulk of the instructional level reading in your classroom.
The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) made a key move yesterday: It decided that higher education representatives from its member states will become voting members of PARCC on core decisions about how the forthcoming tests will reflect college readiness.
Why should school leaders care?
PARCC wants their assessments "embraced as a substitute for entry-level course placement."
What, after all, does a test of college readiness mean if colleges don't agree that it indeed connotes readiness for college-level work?
A key basket of work in this regard is getting colleges and universities on board to accept the two consortia's tests as solid indicators that students can skip remedial work and go right into entry-level, credit-bearing courses.
Fear: The emotion that CCSS supporters felt when they read that nearly three-fourths of teachers claim to be at least somewhat prepared to teach the new standards should be fear.
Because these results suggest that far too many teachers plan to make few, if any, changes to their instructional and curricular programs.
Which only reinforces what we’ve said many times before: Adoption of the standards was the easy part. Proper implementation is going to be the real struggle.
While the quick adoption of Common Core by 46 states was cheered by those who had been pushing for common standards for decades, the more jaded among us wondered: Do most states really understand what they signed up for?
Gates Survey...
of teachers released last week included some results cheered by supporters of Common Core, including:
that most teachers (78 percent) had heard of the standards
nearly two thirds (64 percent) felt that the expectations were going to have a “strong” or “very strong” impact on student achievement
73 percent of teachers felt “somewhat” or “very” prepared to teach to the standards.
Center for Education Policy Report
barely half of school districts in states that adopted the Common Core standards “are taking essential steps to implement them.”
Many are "peddling some “business as usual” tactics and passing them off as Common Core aligned."
As we work to prepare our students for the Common Core Mathematics Standards, I am continually reminded that the focus needs to move away from the teacher and shine on the student. Academic Dialogue is one way of focusing on the student. It allows students to talk about what they know, ask questions about what they don’t know, and lets them build their understanding.
NCTM and the Common Core develop the need for students of mathematics to develop their communication skills very intentionally. In 1989, NCTM described having students:
organize and consolidate their mathematical thinking through communication
communicate their thinking coherently and clearly to peers, teachers, and others
use the language of mathematics to express mathematical ideas precisely.
The Common Core Standards for Mathematical Practice provide ample opportunity for students to communicate around mathematical topics as well, including:
(students can) understand the approach of others to solving complex problems and identify correspondences between different approaches.
make conjectures and build a logical progression of statements to explore the truth of their conjectures
justify (students’) conclusions, communicate them to others, and respond to the arguments of others
students at all grades can listen to the arguments of others, decide whether they make sense, and ask useful questions to clarify or improve the arguments
Think-Pair-Share
To manage the student to student conversations, the teacher used good questions, proximity, asked questions to prompt more discussion, and perhaps most importantly, she provided a simple structure:
gave the students a task
provided time for students to think before sharing
provided specific timeframes for student discussion that was short but not too short
asked students to share a final product for accountability
To get content containing either thought or leadership enter:
To get content containing both thought and leadership enter:
To get content containing the expression thought leadership enter:
You can enter several keywords and you can refine them whenever you want. Our suggestion engine uses more signals but entering a few keywords here will rapidly give you great content to curate.