Philosophy as a living argument
The active Preshil Philosophy topic has a clear appetite for public philosophy: arguments that travel outside the seminar room and into questions of trust, testimony, free will, identity, and power. The presence of Miranda Fricker on epistemic injustice points to a moral and political imagination as much as an abstract one.
A second thread runs through mind and consciousness. Glenn Morris follows the live edge where philosophy meets AI, sentience, robots, and definitions of intelligent life. The topic treats these not as novelty items, but as pressure tests for old questions about persons, minds, and moral status.
The canon is present, but it is not sealed off. Plato, Nietzsche, Aristotle, Confucius, Thoreau, and Merleau-Ponty sit beside Aboriginal political philosophy and contemporary science writing. The result is a reading list that asks students and general readers to see philosophy as a living practice of comparison, argument, and doubt.
- Further reading
- The 10 Enduring Ideas of Plato That Still Shape Our World
- Theories are never true, they are only more or less useful | Manuel Delaflor » IAI TV
- Would you rather be an absurdist or an existentialist?
- Across cultures and centuries, Aristotle and Confucius agree: virtue is good in moderation | Jackie Bailey | The Guardian
- Merleau-Ponty On Other Selves and the Human World | by Philosophy Publics | Mar, 2025