My recent "No Canopy For You!" post generated a substantial response on social media. Many commenters questioned the decision to reject the Donatelli's Italian Steakhouse canopy at the former Brick Hotel property, while others raised questions about historic preservation, signage, consistency, and whether approval should have been obtained before the canopy was installed.
Although the comments reflect different opinions, the overwhelming theme of this particular social-media discussion was skepticism about the canopy decision. Many commenters argued that the canopy is attractive, useful in bad weather, and preferable to the temporary tent previously used at the property.
Others raised a broader question: How should Newtown balance historic preservation with the need to keep historic properties economically viable and welcoming to new businesses?
There were also legitimate questions about whether the canopy should have received approval before installation, whether its lettering causes it to function as a sign, and how the Historic Architectural Review Board's (HARB's) standards are being applied to comparable properties.
UPDATE: The canopy has been removed!
Your new post is loading...

Note that the Borough HARB is separate from the Township HARB. It's minutes stated "While the Board felt the awnings are appropriate, it felt that the canopy is inappropriate in its shape and that it is too long and overpowers the historic building. It also cuts the façade in half.'
The local government of Newtown Borough recently reached a stalemate regarding a design dispute at a historic hotel. The Mayor broke a tie vote to officially reject a permanent entrance canopy installed by the new owners of Donatelli’s Italian Steakhouse.
Related Content: