 Your new post is loading...
 Your new post is loading...
Li, Z., Zhang, Q., Li, Z., Qiao, Y., Du, K., Yue, Z., Tian, C., Leng, P., Cheng, H., Chen, G. & Li, F. 2023. Field Crops Research. 294. Article 108832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2023.108832
Jat, H.S., Choudhary, M., Kakraliya, S.K., Gora, M.K., Kakraliya, M., Kumar, V., Priyanka, Poonia, T., McDonald, A.J., Jat, M.L., Sharma, P.C. & Abdallah, A.M. 2022. Agronomy-Basel. 12 (3) Article 658. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12030658
Raj, R., Das, T.K., Chakraborty, D., Bhattacharyya, R., Babu, S., Govindasamy, P., Kumar, V., Ekka, U., Sen, S., Ghosh, S., Roy, A. & Sharma, T. 2023. Environmental Technology and Innovation. 29. Article 102966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2022.102966
Lin, H., He, J., Li, H., Wang, Q., Lu, C., Yang, W., Wang, Q. & Yang, H. 2023. Land Degradation and Development. 34 (3) 698-709. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.4487
Alletto, L., Cueff, S., Brechemier, J., Lachaussee, M., Derrouch, D., Page, A., Gleizes, B., Perrin, P. & Bustillo, V. 2022. Geoderma. 428 Article 116228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.116228
Datta, A., Nayak, D., Smith, J.U., Sharma, P.C., Jat, H.S., Yadav, A.K. & Jat, M.L. 2022. Soil Research 60 (6) 455-469. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR21031
Bai, L., Kong, X., Li, H., Zhu, H., Wang, C. & Ma, S. 2022. Agriculture. 12 (9). Article number 1449. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12091449
Rao, K.K., Samal, S.K., Kumar, M., Naik, S.K., Bhatt, B.P., Prakash, V., Mondal, S., Choubey, A.K., Dalal, R.C., Mishra, J.S. & Kumar, U. 2021. Agrochimica. 65 (3) 229-246. https://doi.org/10.12871/00021857202132
Liu, X., Wu, X., Liang, G., Zheng, F., Zhang, M. & Li, S. 2021. Land Degradation & Development. 32 (18) 5292-5305. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.4109
Kumawat, A., Vishwakarma, A.K., Wanjari, R.H., Sharma, N.K., Yadav, D., Kumar, D. & Biswas, A.K. 2022. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. 68 (3) 368-382. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2020.1836345
|
Deng, F., Wang, H., Xie, H., Bao, X., Zhang, X. & Liang, C. 2022. Science of The Total Environment. 825. Article 153929 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153929
Liu, W-X., Wei, Y-X., Li, R-C., Chen, Z., Wang, H-D., Virk, A.L., Lal, Rattan., Zhao, X., Zhang, H-L., Science of the Total Environment. 847. Article 157518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157518
Carceles, B., Duran-Zuazo, V., Soriano, M., Garcia-Tejero, I.F., Galvez-Ruiz, B. & Tavira, S. 2022. Soil Systems. 6 article 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems6040087
Amadori, C., Conceicao, P.C., Casali, C.A., dos SantosCanalli, L.B., Calegari, A. & Dieckow, J. 2022. Bragantia: Soil and Plant Nutrition article. 81. Article number e3622. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.20210352
Rao, K.K, Samal, S.K., Poonia, S.P., Kumar, R., Mishra, J.S., Bhatt, B.P., Dwivedi, S.K., Mondal, S., Choubey, A.K., Kumar, S., Kumar, M., Malik, R.K. & Dalal, R.C. 2022. Soil Research. 60 (6) 442-454. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR20329
|
The goal of this study was to look at the relationship of soil CO2 emissions with soil physicochemical properties from soils tilled differently in a winter wheat, summer maize rotation in China. This 4 year trial compared conventional till (CT) with no-till (NT). Cumulative soil CO2 emissions were reduced by 28.7% in maize and increased by 9.0% in wheat under NT as compared to CT. On an annual scale, the cumulative CO2 emissions were decreased by 20.5% in NT as compared to CT. NT improved the above ground biomass by 7.74% and 6.44%, and grain yields by 10.2% and 4.49% for maize and wheat, respectively. They conclude that NT can be extensively used as an eco-friendly cropland tillage practice based on its positive effects of reducing CO2 emissions and increasing crop yields.