The widespread collapse of common sense, rise in senseless wars, and irrational civil unrest since 2020 may be partially explained by a sobering fact:

Over 70% of the global population received at least one dose of a neurotoxic product—now linked to 86 serious neuropsychiatric adverse events.

⚠️Thorp et al found that CDC/FDA safety thresholds were breached (PRR ≥ 2) for:

📈 Homicidal ideation – 25× more likely
📈 Psychosis – 440× more likely
📈 Violent behavior – 80× more likely
📈 Dementia – 140× more likely
📈 Suicidal thoughts – 150× more likely
📈 Brain clots – 3,000× more likely
📈 Schizophrenia – 315× more likely
📈 Depression – 530× more likely
📈 Cognitive decline – 115× more likely
📈 Delusions – 50× more likely
and many more..

Study breakdown: https://lnkd.in/g25BFWBD

Study: https://lnkd.in/gFq733pK

Critical analysis of a research paper seems to be something McCullough Foundation is really bad at. And properly presenting the results from a study as well. So, while claiming that Zoster vaccination is not an efficient / effective approach, McCullough Foundation forgot to tell you that, of the entire cohort, 38.1% only received one of the dose recommended doses. Despite such, The JAMA Open study showed that even 3-4 years after vaccination, zoster vaccination reduced risk of Postherpetic Neuralgia by 77% reduced risk of Herpes Zoster Ophthalmicus by 74%. OOPS, McCullough Foundation can’t read, can’t quote or can’t write ?


https://lnkd.in/eEsUXkr5

If it was only lies !!! RFK Jr’s being fact-checked shows the extreme extent of such lies…

“Anyone who wants to defund, denigrate or destabilize science can say, ‘You’ve been lying to us,’” said science journalist Ivan Oransky, one of the founders of Retraction Watch. “Now we’re at a point where journals, scientists, universities have given ammunition to an administration that has lots of other motives.”

Our Ivan Oransky speaks with The Wall Street Journal.

https://lnkd.in/g4uKeQu6

From the Boston Museum of Science

Call for Participation: Information Disorder Workshop

Does your work explore misinformation, disinformation, scams, online hate, or other forms of harmful information? As the world continues to grapple with the destabilizing effects of information disorder, we are convening a workshop at the CSCW conference to bring together a global community of scholars committed to understanding and addressing these issues.

This workshop will provide space to reflect on the current state of the field, identify shared priorities, and discuss how we can support one another in sustaining this vital work. Participants may join online in early October or in person in Bergen, Norway on October 18th.

We are soliciting 2-6 page workshop papers from empirical pre-quels/sequels, position papers, theories, provocations and more.

All the information is on our website: https://lnkd.in/gZt8m-qs

Email ninalutz@uw.edu and sprochas@uw.edu with any questions! | 12 comments on LinkedIn

My sabbatical adventures continue...

Just wrapped up two wonderful days at the Karolinska Institutet attending the UNIVACC 2025 Conference! Focus of the meeting- 'Understanding and strengthening vaccine confidence among underserved populations'. The event brought together a diverse group of participants from civil society, academia, and public health institutions such as ECDC and WHO.

I think they were a little shocked to have an Aussie in the mix! Made it into the program to present my research around community-led communication efforts for migrants and refugees!

Key takeaways:
👉 Focus on timeliness of vaccines, not just completion at 5 years = plus need better data to track under immunisation!
👉 Recognise that we have community members who start but don’t complete the vaccine journey... not due to hesitancy but others barriers
👉 Address the lack of systems for adult/adolescent catch-up
👉 Explore innovative access strategies: like Sweden’s HPV vaccine drop-ins at cinemas and mobile vans for older community member.

Sadly we have critical blind spots in the research- people who are homeless, those living with disabilities, migrant adults!

Sad to have missed this years #CDIC2025! Promise to stop gallivanting and be back in time for next years conference in Melbourne!

Peter Hotez MD PhD DSc(hon) posted images on LinkedIn

One should concerned of anyone supporting this candidacy… It was bad enough that such happen, but to see support for it… WOW.

🩺 Les effets secondaires de la vaccination covid 19 existent et les victimes méritent d’être reconnues comme telle.

La vaccination a été une expérimentation à échelle humaine, puisque les autorités ont d’abord vaccinés puis observés les conséquences. Pour certaines personnes, ces conséquences ont été terribles.

⚠️ Il s’agit clairement du scandale sanitaire du siècle et la lumière est loin d’être faite sur ce qui s’est déroulé durant cette période.

Si nous n’agissons pas pour faire reconnaître ce statut de victime, et obtenir la réparation qui leur est due, alors nous pouvons être certain qu’ils recommenceront.

C’est pourquoi je serai toujours du côté des victimes. 🤝

A tous ceux qui nous ont empoisonné pour des raisons « scientifiques » ou « économiques », vous connaîtrez de votre vivant le courroux de la justice et vous me trouverez sur votre route.

⚖️ La justice est en marche, et rien ne l’arrêtera !

📺 Lundi 16 juin à 20h, nous serons en direct sur YouTube pour discuter des droits et recours possibles pour les personnes concernées.

Posez-nous vos questions en commentaire, nous y répondrons en live !
Ensemble, faisons valoir vos droits.

📣 Partagez cet événement autour de vous et rejoignez-nous en direct !

🎥 Accédez au live ici : https://lnkd.in/exkvTp_u


#effetssecondaires #covid19 #vaccination | 10 comments on LinkedIn

RFK Jr and Children's Health Defense are ignorant on the notion of placebo. And here is why :
« Dr. Stanley Plotkin to Senator Bill Cassidy, in response to Secretary Kennedy's misleading explanation on why he dismissed all ACIP:
"Dear Senator Cassidy:
Taking up your request, here are my comments on Kennedy’s screed.
Par 3- It is true that an American child receives many vaccines. Not mentioned are the diseases that those children no longer get compared to when I was a child, and almost died from pertussis, pneumococcal pneumonia and influenza encephalopathy (I am not exaggerating). He also says that they were not tested against placebo. See below.
Most of his post on X revolves around the definition of a placebo. What Kennedy wants is comparing vaccine to water. What he fails to understand is that the material in placebos are small amounts of substances that may cause mild reactions, and that the objective of a controlled study is to determine whether the vaccine itself added to those common substances causes additional and serious reactions. How could you do a controlled study if the placebo recipients know immediately that they have not received the vaccine because there is no local redness or irritation? Under those circumstances no valid study of safety or efficacy would be possible. Kennedy refers to Salk’s famous study that led to control of polio, in which he used a placebo that was the same as the vaccine except for the inactivated viruses. What scientist would have accepted a placebo containing only water?
Also, he seems to criticize trials in which an improved vaccine is compared to an older vaccine that was shown to be effective in order to show better efficacy and equal safety. How else could you show an improved vaccine is better?
I won’t bore you with more. Kennedy has never had a scientific education and is mouthing idiotic statements that unfortunately will end up hurting all of us, particularly children. His publication on X is just another piece of garbage on that method of communication.
Stanley »

It’s 2025, and no one in the White House has acknowledged that we’ve just lived through a second civil war.

That Robert Malone believes the U.S. government has “reality-bending information-control capabilities,” is extremely worrisome and warrant psychiatric care. That he will guide the future of American medical care may push to seek such care… It will be a nightmare.

📢 𝗡𝗲𝘄 𝗣𝘂𝗯𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻: “Pandemic, religion, and vaccination resistance: a multidimensional analysis
of religious communities in Italy”

I am trilled to share with you a new publication with Ricciardi Walter and Maria Rosaria Gualano analysing how religious beliefs and practices influenced vaccine hesitancy during the pandemic and to assess the broader impact on public health outcomes. It also seeks to identify strategies for mitigating conflicts between religious freedoms and public health imperatives in future crises. #vaccine #publichealth #pandemic #health #vaccinehesitancy
https://lnkd.in/dh4bVvBk

Some ? All except two have uncomfortable links with vaccine disinformation, denial and hesitancy. If we expected RFK Jr to be a disaster, and it is, what is next is eve

We recently received a comment asking, “Why are there ZERO cases of SIDS or autism in unvaccinated Amish communities?” This claim is a common myth, but it is not supported by scientific evidence. In reality, both SIDS (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome) and autism have been documented in Amish communities. Peer-reviewed studies and medical reports confirm that SIDS does occur among the Amish, including cases linked to genetic syndromes unique to these populations.

Similarly, multiple studies have identified and diagnosed autism in Amish children, along with many other health conditions, though rates may appear lower due to factors like limited healthcare access, cultural attitudes, and underreporting—not because these conditions are absent.

Additionally, it’s a misconception that the Amish universally refuse vaccines. Research shows that many Amish parents accept at least some vaccines for their children, and only a small minority refuse all immunizations. Lower vaccination rates in some Amish communities are often due to concerns about vaccine safety or logistical barriers, not blanket opposition. And sadly, vaccine-preventable infections are diagnosed at higher rates in unvaccinated Amish children (compared to other children who are vaccinated).

In summary: SIDS and autism are present in Amish communities, and the idea that they are “zero” in unvaccinated groups is a myth. Accurate information helps us all make better health decisions and supports scientific literacy in our communities.

Sources:
https://ow.ly/KFQY50W8iVQ
https://ow.ly/SGQg50W8iVT
https://ow.ly/jmOI50W8iVM
https://ow.ly/KtN050W8iVR
https://ow.ly/qU2K50W8iVI
https://ow.ly/WSyO50W8iVS
https://ow.ly/bIk150W8iVF
https://ow.ly/V1lw50W8iVP
https://ow.ly/jmOI50W8iVM

"One of the primary architects of the Make America Healthy Again takeover of the federal health apparatus, Means has risen to power in part on the strength of his personal narrative: he was a Big Food and Big Pharma lobbyist who saw the light. Yet, a six-month Vanity Fair investigation raises questions about whether Means has embellished his personal story. “Calley Means is not a whistleblower. He is an opportunist, peddling junk science to make millions,” says his former boss and mentor Steve Schmidt."
https://lnkd.in/gvUdwkQg

How intriguing that the authors are in such conflict of interest that their results mean nothing. Especially that
all being described is also seen with COVID infections.
As well, it is another VAERS analysis with all the flaws seen with such : « contribution.The limitations of this study stem from the inherent constraints of the CDC/FDA VAERS system. It cannot compare vaccine adverse events (AEs) to a non-vaccinated control population, nor does it allow for prospective observational analysis. VAERS only enables the comparison of novel vaccines to vaccines already in use, assumed to be safe. » One of the most important limitation as well, and not mentioned, is that these individuals could have contracted COVID, which the authors have not assessed.

A document circulated to members of Congress misinterprets studies and cites debunked research, scientists say. It could influence congressional perceptions of vaccine safety.

Vaccine hesitancy: a gamble ? A deadly one in some situation. Game theory reveals that vaccine hesitancy is not a moral failure, but simply the predictable outcome of a system in which individual and collective incentives aren't properly aligned. In other words, because of a fundamental tension between individual choice and collective welfare, relying solely on individual choice may not achieve public health goals.

https://flip.it/7wta.b