Activist mediaPolitical newsWeb promotion

#BBBundyBlog #NOMORELIES Tom Woods #Activist Award #Scoopiteer >20,000 Sources >250K Connections http://goo.gl/ruHO3Q

#BBBundyBlog and #NOMORELIES activist persona

A dormant but sizable activist archive where outrage news, web promotion, and anti-establishment suspicion fed the same signal.

26.9Kposts
5topics
1languages
The curator

Tom Woods, an activist publisher of the outrage web

Tom Woods built a sprawling Scoop.it archive in the early 2010s, dominated by English-language political outrage, activist alerts, and web-promotion material. The work has been dormant for years, but its shape is clear: a high-volume, combative, attention-seeking record of a curator who used Scoop.it as a protest board, news relay, and traffic machine.

Hashtag-first identity

Woods’s public persona leaned into hashtags, protest language, and anti-establishment slogans. The display name itself read like a rolling banner: activist, source-gatherer, connector, and campaigner all at once.

Selection as statement

His archive rarely paused for long explanation. Most posts were passed along silently or with title-like emphasis, leaving the selected headline to carry the argument, the emotion, and the call to action.

Activism meets opportunity

The bio’s emphasis on bitcoin, Virtapay, and speculative exchange value matched a broader pattern in the archive: politics and promotion sat side by side. The same feed could point to public outrage, traffic-building tools, giveaways, or money offers.

What defines this archive

Volume before polish

Across the analysed topics, Tom Woods built a very large English-language archive: 26,890 posts, with the overwhelming majority concentrated in the “News You Can Use” topic. The scale mattered more than refinement; the feed functioned as a high-volume relay.

A megaphone voice

The recurring tone was urgent, partisan, and alarm-driven. Headlines did most of the talking, often carrying hashtags, calls to share, and language designed to provoke an immediate reaction.

Blurred boundaries

Politics, social issues, technology, mental health, Pinterest marketing, and economics often crossed into one another. The result was a porous archive where activist messaging and promotional material could appear beside service journalism or how-to content.

A substantial dormant footprint

The account joined Scoop.it in 2011 and accumulated more than 91,000 views across all topics. Its largest topic reached a substantial audience, but the analysed activity had been dormant for years, making this page a portrait of a past publishing burst rather than a current operation.

Topics

Deep dives

The alarm-bell news machine

The central archive was built as a firehose of political alarm, protest tags, viral pleas, and practical web offers. It carried the label “News You Can Use,” but its real signature was urgency: outrage headlines, calls to repost, and a strong appetite for conflict-heavy public affairs.

International causes appeared when they could be framed as immediate moral emergencies, especially around Iran, violence against women, terrorism alerts, and veterans’ complaints. The selection favored headlines that asked for action more than analysis.

The topic also mixed public-affairs material with affiliate-style posts, giveaways, traffic tools, and money-saving pitches. That blend made the archive feel less like a newspaper page and more like an activist bulletin board wired to the attention economy.

Tech as utility, spectacle, and suspicion

The technology topic followed practical IT problems with a useful eye for enterprise anxieties: BYOD risk, cloud security, mobile threats, Windows repair, and cyberespionage. Its strongest moments were service-oriented, pointing readers toward fixes, forecasts, and security warnings.

Alongside the practical material, it also chased speculative science and future-facing curiosities, from moon elevators to dark lightning and nanomotors. This gave the topic a restless, magazine-like range, even when the feed drifted into polemics.

The selection did not separate science wonder from political suspicion. Mainstream tech sources sat beside ideological headlines, creating an archive where gadgets, infrastructure, space, and distrust of institutions shared the same shelf.

Economics as a politics of distrust

The economics topic treated finance less as neutral macro analysis and more as a warning system. Federal Reserve policy, debt, bailouts, taxes, and recession fears appeared through a skeptical, anti-establishment lens.

Retirement, government borrowing, and household security were recurring concerns. The archive favored headlines that implied ordinary people were exposed to hidden costs, policy failures, or institutional traps.

Its worldview was crisis-oriented. The recurring mood was that the economy was fragile, official explanations were suspect, and political power was tied too closely to money.

Selected posts