 Your new post is loading...
 Your new post is loading...
|
Scooped by
Gilbert C FAURE
December 3, 2022 4:38 AM
|
|
Scooped by
Gilbert C FAURE
August 12, 2022 2:10 AM
|
By signing up to participate in Media Literacy Week, you, your organization, school, or institution will join hundreds of others who are helping NAMLE amplify...
|
Scooped by
Gilbert C FAURE
July 13, 2022 5:11 AM
|
|
Scooped by
Gilbert C FAURE
April 12, 2022 11:45 AM
|
Pam McKinney here live blogging from the Lilac conference. Dr Karen Kauffman and Dr Clarence Maybee presented a session about th
|
Scooped by
Gilbert C FAURE
March 17, 2022 3:55 AM
|
This article is part of an ongoing series of articles on evidence-based knowledge management. As I've previously discussed, the knowledge management (
|
Scooped by
Gilbert C FAURE
February 4, 2022 5:54 AM
|
You may also feeled inclined to wander over to the Social Research Wiki.
|
Scooped by
Gilbert C FAURE
September 30, 2021 8:40 AM
|
UNESCO has just published a very substantial (400 page!) open-access document: Grizzle, A. et al. (2021). Media and information literat
|
Scooped by
Gilbert C FAURE
September 21, 2021 8:01 AM
|
Developing Metaliterate Learners There are four goals for metaliterate learners, each of which includes a number of learning objectives. While some of the metaliteracy goals echo long-valued information literacy principles, others are new, reflecting today’s evolving information environment. Most of the specific learning objectives range much further afield from traditional information literacy, providing outcomes that could…
|
Scooped by
Gilbert C FAURE
July 8, 2021 1:30 PM
|
Welcome to the Media and Information Literacy Alliance (MILA) Helping people be happier, healthier and safer online What is Media and Information Literacy (MIL)? Media and Information Literacy refers to the skills, competencies and confidence that people need in order to make informed judgements as users of information and media, as well as to become skilful creators and producers of information and media messages in their own right. MILA has endorsed the definitions and concepts set out by UNESCO in their Media and Information Literacy programme. Why does MIL matter? In today’s increasingly connected world, we are surrounded by information, all the time. We need to be able to make informed choices about the information we find and use so that we can avoid the risk of sharing fake news and misinformation and so that we can help each other to achieve more. Good MIL enables people to: · Be empowered · Be informed · Be connected · Be healthier · Be socially conscious Who are we? We are a cross-sector group with a common belief in the power of Media and Information Literacy to help people be happier, healthier, safer and more informed in their online lives. MILA has been founded by a group of partners including the Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals (CILIP) and the Information Literacy Group (ILG) to promote Media and Information Literacy in the UK as a fundamental building block for a healthy, inclusive and democratic society. Our Partners: Get in touch If you would like to be informed about MILA’s work, or you have something to offer our community, please tell us about yourself: Name Organisation Email Message I'd like to receive future updates about MILA's work: I am interested in joining MILA: Send The information you provide will only be used for the purpose of contacting you in relation to the Media & Information Literacy Alliance. CILIP GDPR statement
|
Suggested by
LIGHTING
May 24, 2021 11:19 AM
|
|
Suggested by
LIGHTING
March 27, 2021 3:05 PM
|
Ruth and Mick Healey, well known educationalists, are seeking "mini-case studies (250-300 words) of socially-just learning and teachin
|
Scooped by
Gilbert C FAURE
January 7, 2021 8:15 AM
|
In our latest guest post, Pip J. Jones (@Pip_J_Jones) of Bangor University reviews the CONUL Teaching & Learning and Research Groups Seminar that took place in November 2020. Every Librarian a Teacher; Integrating Scholarly Communication & Info Literacy; Exploring the Potential for Collaboration Information overload! With a sprinkle of questionable credibility, intrinsic bias, unethical promotion, data falsification, and highly publicised proliferation of mis…dis…information… 2020 smashed through the screens of our home offices with grim home-truths about the utter necessity of unequivocal scholarly communication and critical info literacy skills. Yet, in rapidly focusing our attention, pathways for collaboration within the Information Profession, and innovations in developing curricula for both students and emerging researchers, have arisen. On Nov 5th, the CONUL Teaching & Learning and Research Groups Seminar on Information Literacy & Scholarly Communication was a feast of practical ideas, thoughtful discussions and collaborative suggestions around the theme of integrating scholarly communication and information literacy. The event was inspired by the exciting recent CILIP Info Literacy Group event ‘Exploring the Intersections of Scholarly Communication & Information Literacy’. Here, I shall give a flavour of the nature of discussions with some key messages and innovative cross-sector suggestions. Research Evaluation & Info Literacy Skills: two sides to the same coin Whether we are from a research or teaching background, scholarly communication characterises the flow of information in an HE environment. From collaborative sparking of ideas, to transparent and reproducible protocols, fairly managed data, and dissemination and rebirth in fresh questions or reapplication in teaching; scholarly communication is the conduit for the entire information ‘lifecycle’. When ineffective, it incurs: bias, publishing frictions, unfair and plagiaristic use, and protectionism over sharing attitudes The need for quality scholarly communication training for students and researchers is clear. In her session, Katie Evans demonstrated that, by thinking of information literacy and research evaluation as two complementary sides of the same coin, we can develop scholarly communication at all stages of academia, and assist in supporting teaching and enhancing research impact. Katie likened how we characterise our research, including how it is evaluated, as trying to represent art. From a deeply-textured, botanically-detailed yet organically expressive oil painting, to a monochrome, outline cartoon. Citation data struggles to represent the multi-faceted nature of research outputs. Controversial as it should be, information published outside journals and in languages other than English becomes quickly ‘invisible’ ; we only see certain flowers from the bunch. Not everything “is counted”. Through an Information literacy lens, we can detect cognitive and systemic biases. We can then filter them out. Maybe more crucially, the use of information literacy to demonstrate these issues could catalyse universities to review their own policies about approaches to research assessment and management. At a systemic, somewhat perverse level, information literacy can expose inequalities in the research environment. In 2020, a notable drop in submissions to academic publishing from women occurred, indicating a potential unequal impact of the COVID pandemic on researcher outputs. On the flip side of our coin; knowledge of research evaluation, discussion of biases and ‘invisible research’ is fruitful for developing info literacy skills and strong scholarly communication in students (and future researchers). Michelle Dalton asked: “How can we expect students to be able to evaluate and use research without understanding the publishing processes behind it and the scholarly ecosystem it emanates from?” Discussion of the research landscape, its current issues, biases and fallacies and how these have driven and motivated past research is crucial in achieving the depth of questioning and critical thinking needed in our students and researchers. Using tools from research evaluation, such as citation network analysis, can help guide students searching intimidatingly large repositories, and deepen knowledge of both the research process and subjects of interest (see ideas below). Opportunities for building a future culture of access and fair use An open future for scholarly communication: for learning, sharing and discussing, in which “open practices are embedded in the research and publication cycle, all scientific research will be freely available to people inside and outside academia, research is open by default”. In his session, Hardy Schwamm lauded this vision and explained how realising a future of open scholarly communication would rely on the combined effects of “technological development and cultural change”. Hardy cited the Culture Change Model and described the role libraries might play in building communities that make this scholarly cultural change to open output and practice the future norm, echoing themes discussed at the LILAC Conference 2019. Communities are established by individuals sharing collective values. Embedding scholarly communication into information literacy can nurture the shift in mind-set needed to question the ways in which we value research, envisage how we might evaluate it more holistically and communicate it fairly, efficiently and ethically. Michelle described these aspects as ‘research integrity’, and explained how they might be related to more familiar information literacy concepts of plagiarism, data falsification and fabrication and to wider open science. She highlighted the LIBER Open Science Roadmap (Ayris et al., 2018) as a useful resource. Katie noted that addressing incentives created by existing research evaluation approaches are also “key to changes we want in scholarly communications and movement towards open scholarship”. Current systems disincentivise open access, less prestigious, innovative publishing channels, despite them potentially having greater societal impact. Intrinsic bias is generated by the attention gained by high impact, sensationalist and selective publishing, resulting in ‘gaps’ and invisibility of replication studies and those with negative or no-effect outcomes. Cultural change will require pressure from the research community against these incentives, and the current monopoly held by ‘prestigious publications’ with their costs to subscribe and publish. The 2020 pandemic bolstered this argument, as inaccessible research and unshared data breeds distrust: outputs that non-specialists can interpret unambiguously and can be disseminated rapidly are vital. With regard to ‘making it easy’, Samantha Holman’s session tackled barriers to an area many libraries find complex: copyright. Acknowledging the difficulty of navigating detailed legislation, ever-changing technology and curriculum delivery, she describes recent changes clearly and helpfully. She also suggests building into the curriculum responsible usage of publications at an early stage, building a culture of fair usage. Great practical ideas for teaching! Scattered throughout the sessions were some fantastic ideas for integrating scholarly communication, information literacy and research and evaluation techniques into training for students and researchers. Highlights included (relevant talk credited): Increasing searching precision by using data visualisation tools to map search results. Demonstrating to students keyword links between studies, mapping both useful articles and red herrings, then applying this to refine search queries or attach effective key words (Katie, figure 3) Using the citation networks tools (e.g. Topics in SciVal) to identify close clusters of related literature to follow subjects, researchers of interest or identify target journals for publishing (Katie) Comparing preprint and peer-reviewed publications, as a means to discuss the scientific review and publishing process (and its limits!), develop critical evaluation skills and identify quality research information (Michelle) Reviewing publications and calls from predatory and fraudulent journals, identifying their (low quality) publishing and ‘red flags’ versus the expectations and protocols of reputable publishers (Michelle) Questioning the omnipotence of citation frequency as the means of determining research quality. Whilst citations are frequently lauded as a handy shortcut, studies may be highly cited for notoriety or being retracted (Michelle). What else could highlight quality research? Utilising a reading list to talk about the different types of copyright (the average reading list has quite a few that apply!) and lead this into wider discussions about fair use and plagiarism (Samantha) Exploring research data and its lifecycle through finding and reusing existing data. What is FAIR use? What makes the data easy to reuse and how can it be documented meaningfully, and how can students and researchers apply this to their own data? (Michelle) Potential for Collaboration Innovations and insights are often sparked by viewing themes from opposite angles or importing concepts cross-sector to be born again – as evidenced by the practical suggestions above! There was a strong theme of collaboration throughout the seminar, realising that it is easy to remain within silos of ‘research evaluation’, ‘teaching support’, ‘academic liaison’, ‘copyright’… but that asking for advice and sharing of skills between colleagues in your institution not only increases professional confidence and knowledge but also strengthens our position by consolidating and highlighting provision to the whole institution. Suggestions for collaboration included: delivering training as a team: team-teaching with information literacy specialists delivering sessions for researchers (e.g. searching & publishing strategy), and research evaluation specialists demonstrating the research lifecycle to students sharing specific experiences in bias reduction: decolonising scholarly communication; using experience from work done in libraries bridging skills gap by sharing skills across/within profession: training each other, or acting as advisors on specialisms using resources developed in other sectors to guide your CPD: Katie highlighted the Bibliometric Competencies Model (Cox et al., 2017) as a helpful resource for developing skills in scholarly communication, research evaluation and bibliometrics in HE. Final Thoughts Integrating scholarly communication and information literacy is possible through collaboration and skill-sharing, and really sets the stage for fostering a culture and community of open, fair and ethical research and scholarship. Fusion of colleagues’ complementary perspectives generates innovative teaching ideas and avenues for discussion. Collaborative input from specialists in research evaluation, academic support and liaison and professionals working in copyright and publishing can together influence a culture change towards open, responsible and fair information management, with the HE library being the heart of a community of effective scholarly communication. Have you found any techniques useful for increasing scholarly communication or info literacy skills in students or researchers? Have you or could you implement skill or idea sharing between library, academic support and research evaluation staff? Have you utilised any of the practical suggestions from the seminars? Seminar credits: Chair: Dr Jane Secker, Senior Lecturer, Educational Development at City University, Chair of the CILIP Information Literacy Group & member of UK Copyright Negotiation & Advisory Committee. Panel & Session speakers: Katie Evans, Research Analytics Librarian, University of Bath Samantha Holman, Chief Executive Officer, Irish Copyright Licensing Association Michelle Dalton, Head of Research Services, University College Dublin Hardy Schwamm. Open Scholarship Librarian, NUI Galway References: Ayris, P., Bernal., I., Cavalli, V., Dorch, B., Frey, J., Hallik, M., Hormia-Poutanen, K., Labastida, I., MacColl, J., Ponsati Obiols, A., Sacchi, S., Scholzem F., Schmidt, B., Smit, A., Sofronijevic, A., Stojanovski, J., Svoboda, M., Tsakonas, G., van Otegem, M., Verheusen, A., Vilks, A., Widmark, W. & Horstmann, W. (2018). LIBER Open Science Roadmap. Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1303002 Cox, A., Gadd, E., Petersohn, S. & Sbaffi, L. (2017). Competencies for Bibliometrics. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 51(3), 746-762. http://doi.org/10.1177/0961000617728111 View recordings of the presentations and slides from the event Tags: Higher Education - Scholarly Communications - Teaching - Training - Workshops
The Internet Archive warehouses all kinds of fantastic materials (and some not-so-fantastic) that can be useful to teachers and students. The trouble with it is the organization is a little clunky for research purposes. Even if you limit the scope of your search to webpages and text you can still spend a lot of time weeding out material that isn't academic in nature. That could be changing now that Internet Archive Scholar is on the horizon.
Via Elizabeth E Charles
|
|
Scooped by
Gilbert C FAURE
November 25, 2022 5:07 AM
|
New South Wales has recently introduced a new framework to support information literacy. SCIS speaks to Department of Education Library Coordinator Carmel Grimmett about how this framework may prove useful for library staff across the country.
|
Scooped by
Gilbert C FAURE
July 13, 2022 8:47 AM
|
Global Media and Information Literacy Week Global Media and Information Literacy Week, commemorated annually, is a major occasion for stakeholders to review and celebrate the progress achieved towards Media and Information Literacy for All.
|
Scooped by
Gilbert C FAURE
June 21, 2022 3:27 AM
|
Now that Metaliteracy in a Connected World: Developing Learners as Producers has been published, what do the critics think? We were thrilled to read this review of our new book written by Jodie R Heap from Staffordshire University in the latest issue of Journal of Information Literacy, one of the premiere journals in the field!…
|
Scooped by
Gilbert C FAURE
March 26, 2022 5:49 AM
|
Expanding the Conversation: Digital, Media, and Civic Literacies In and Out of the LibraryPresented by College of DuPage Library, DePaul University Library, and Moraine Valley Community College Library The Information Literacy Summit will be held virtually on Friday, April 29, 2022. Registration is free. Register for the IL Summit Keynote Presentation Facing Our Computers: Algorithmic Literacies as PraxisMiriam E. Sweeney, Associate Professor, School of Library and Information Studies, University of Alabama Breakout Sessions Themes: Beyond the Library, Digital Literacy, Disinformation, Civic Literacy, Collaboration, Foundations of IL, FYE, IL in the Disciplines, News & Media Literacy, Social Justice, Technology and Tools Session 1 Student As Interviewer, Faculty Research As Topic: A New Model For University Library PodcastingEdward Remus, Social Sciences Librarian, Northeastern Illinois University Maria Gonzalez, Spring 2021 NEIUideas podcast intern, Northeastern Illinois UniversityJim Laczkowski, Summer 2021 NEIUideas podcast intern, Northeastern Illinois University, Library Associate, Chicago Public LibraryWhen you hear “library podcast,” you probably think of a podcast about libraries. This remains the traditional model, but is it the best model for your library? This panel presents an alternative: a university library podcast about subject faculty research, with interviews conducted by students who are trained by librarians. This model provides students with digital media literacy skills while strengthening partnerships between the library and campus departments. This panel presents a working example of this model alongside resources for starting a similar podcast at your library. It features a project coordinator, a podcasting expert, and an undergraduate student podcaster.Digital Literacy, Technology and Tools, Collaboration Disinformation & the Black Lives Matter Movement: Dismantling Neutrality for the Sake of Information and Racial EqualityFaith C. Rice, Librarian II & Doctoral Student, Dominican UniversityIn 2016, a Russian organization targeted the Black Lives Matter movement through social media, exploiting long-standing misconceptions about identity and inequality as part of their attempt to divide the Black voting community in the U.S. election. This event led to the disinformation phenomenon in which librarians began placing a high priority on information and media literacy. However, LIS professionals approach this task in the traditional manner of maintaining neutrality, which researchers identify as problematic in a profession that is inherently an act of social justice. This presentation will examine and present methods for studying structural inequality as it applies to information literacy.Disinformation, News & Media Literacy, Social Justice “I’m Sensing Some Hostility”: Teaching Students to Overcome Personal Biases When Evaluating SourcesJaclyn Spraetz, Information Literacy Librarian, Miami UniversityNate Floyd, Student Success Librarian for Foundational Learning. Miami UniversityThe hostile media effect helps to explain how opposing partisans believe neutral news reporting is biased against their side. By learning about this media effect, students can uncover their biases and reflect on how partisanship can make evaluating sources more difficult. Presenters will share ideas on how to incorporate the hostile media effect into information literacy instruction and discuss how it can empower students to think critically about political polarization and mistrust in the media.News & Media Literacy, Civic Literacy All We Can TikTok About: Media Literacy Instruction in the TikTok EraKelly Leahy, Student Success & Engagement Librarian, Beloit CollegeHaley Lott, Student Success & Engagement Librarian, Beloit CollegeYou wake up in the morning (feeling like P. Diddy), and the first thing you turn to is your phone, launching TikTok, entering the world of memes and misinformation. We came for the ‘Fancy Like’ dance challenge and gripping stories about the tragic taco-filled Millennial dating scene, but then encountered viral videos filled with questionable medical advice. Join us to discuss our TikTok literacy lesson plan, where we will provide resources to replicate this exercise with your community, and hold a mini-workshop where participants assume the role of ‘student’ to practice viewing and analyzing this new form of media from a casual users’ perspective.Technology and Tools, Digital Literacy, Beyond the Library When Your YouTube Algorithm Scares You: Data, Media, and Civic Literacy in a Semester-Long Library CourseDr. Colleen Harris, Head of Instruction, Engagement, California State University Channel IslandsBeth Blackwood, Digital Curation & Scholarship Librarian, California State University Channel IslandsA librarian redesigned a semester-long general education course providing learners with strategies to help them make sense of and interrogate our information-saturated world in context with data and algorithms. Participants will consider assignment design to engage learners with how data and algorithms function in the technologies they use in their everyday lives, learn how to engage students via traditional and innovative assignments, and will consider ideas for their own data, media, and civic literacy learning outcomes.News & Media Literacy, Civic Literacy Session 2 Bias, Perspective & Fake-News Oh My!: Opening Eyes & Minds in a First-year College Writing CourseMelanie Sellar, Head of Instruction and Assessment, University Library, Santa Clara UniversityRobin Tremblay-McGaw, Lecturer, English Department, Santa Clara UniversityStudent consumption of media and use of algorithmic news platforms has increased during the pandemic, building on an already well-documented reliance. An English faculty member and instruction librarian saw the need and opportunity to help develop students’ critical news literacies, so they collaborated to develop a multi-part, scaffolded assignment for first-year writing students –The Rhetorical Analysis of Bias and Perspective — with an accompanying set of asynchronous and synchronous information literacy activities. Learn about this partnership, explore the instructional materials and activities, and develop some additional ideas to take away for your own instruction.News & Media Literacy; FYE; Foundations of IL The Critical Cataloging Project at Chicago Public Schools – Culturally Responsive MetadataSarah Steiger, Library and Digital Media Manager, Department of Curriculum, Instruction and Digital Learning, Chicago Public SchoolsKara Thorstenson, Director of Libraries and Instructional Technology, Chicago Public SchoolsWhat are the ways that equity shows up in collection development and metadata? How does metadata passively thwart the equity work of collection development? How might I critically examine the subject headings in our school district’s or library’s catalog? Dive into critically examining your collection through keywords, subject headings, embellishments, and removals with Chicago Public Schools, where we are working on the Critical Cataloging Project, an initiative spearheaded by CPS Librarians to remove terms that are historically racist, sexist, ableist, and heteronormative. In this session, we will explore how through strategic partnerships we might transform library systems with micro-adjustments.Foundations of IL, Social Justice, Technology and Tools Where Media Literacy and Civic Literacy Can Unite: Engaging the Progressively Inclusive Representation in the Marvel Cinematic Universe with IL Instruction to Help Students Understand Their Own Civic EngagementHeather F. Ball, Critical Pedagogy Librarian for Student Success, Assistant Professor, St. John’s UniversityDana DeFilippoIn the increasingly accessible information age, it is imperative for users to understand how to discern and decipher certain messages embedded in popular media and culture. By doing so, it enables the user to reach a deeper understanding of the social and cultural issues around them, and how to uncover the motives and meanings behind them. To this end, the authors seek to use the popular media vehicle of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) to illustrate how to incorporate media literacy into information literacy instruction towards an effort of helping students to understand the possibilities of their own civic engagement.News & Media Literacy, Social Justice, Beyond the Library Embracing “Information Wellness”: A New Paradigm for Teaching Information LiteracyMaya Hobscheid, Instructional Design Librarian, Grand Valley State UniversityMeredith Knoff, Learning Commons Librarian, Indiana University BloomingtonDespite academic libraries’ work to cultivate information literate students, the rapidly evolving information landscape extends beyond the classroom. Because instruction often remains embedded in coursework, it can be difficult to determine if students are transferring information literacy practices beyond graduation. By partnering with units in student life, libraries can adapt wellness to information literacy, creating the concept “information wellness,” to transform how librarians prepare students to successfully navigate the information economy. This approach to teaching students about information production, dissemination, and the role that information plays in their everyday life provides potential to translate information literacy beyond students’ academic career.Beyond the Library, Collaboration Researching Primary Sources and Building OERs with First-Year StudentsBillie Cotterman, Head of Electronic Resources and Access Services, Nebraska Wesleyan UniversityAll first-year students take a seminar at our institution which usually culminates in a research paper. Using Project-Based Learning, I taught two sections of this class how to explore timely historical topics (first, the Civil War/Reconstruction; second, the Holocaust and America’s response) by finding, analyzing, and incorporating primary source documents into their research, which students used to build our class community’s Open Education Resource. In this session, we will explore how to use history and technology to talk about social justice and media literacy; assemble a toolkit of resources; view examples of student projects; and how this might be incorporated into other classes.Technology and Tools, News and Media Literacy, Social Justice Session 3 Civic Literacies and Information Literacy: What a Review of Literature Tells UsLeanna Fry Balci, Instructional Design Librarian, Brigham Young UniversityMatthew Armstrong, Experiential Studio and Online Learning Supervisor, Brigham Young UniversityWe hear a lot about the connection between civic literacy and information literacy, but what does the research actually say about the relationship between the two? This session will explore the connections—or lack thereof—between civic literacy and information literacy skills. The session will also discuss evidence-based best practices for those interested in teaching civic literacy in the context of information literacy. Attendees will leave the session with a better understanding of the research about civic literacy and information literacy, recommendations for future research ideas based on gaps in the literature, and knowledge of best teaching practices.Civic Literacy, Foundations of IL The Broken Mind?: Polarization, Bias, Rationality, & Information LiteracyTroy Swanson, Library Department Chair, Moraine Valley Community CollegeIt is sometimes easy to believe that the mind is broken. Heuristic thinking, my-side bias, and motivated reasoning seem to dominate decision-making and rationality. Current thinking in psychology & neuroscience offers insights that we can apply to information literacy skills. This session seeks to build connections between how the mind works and pedagogical approaches. In this talk, we will consider ways the conscious & unconscious interact, contexts when rationality is successful, and instances when worldview leads to biased decisions.Foundations of IL, Beyond the Library Missing Hand, Missing Information: Using Digital Scholarship to Expand Opportunities for Media Literacy InstructionAbigail Mann, Online Learning Librarian, Illinois Wesleyan UniversityThe hand in question has been missing since 1936. The student-created website contained a picture of its owner and nothing else, not even that she was famous for losing a hand in a munitions explosion. Yet after an online intervention, the turnaround was dramatic: the final website often emphasized an item’s origin and why that mattered. This session focuses on how the pitfalls of digital research can actually become potential, making students more aware of themselves as both consumers and producers of information. It also explores how the digital platform itself might become a space of continued interaction.Digital Literacy, Beyond the Llibrary Teaching Algorithmic Literacy to Promote Critical Information EngagementAshley Shea, Head of Instruction Initiatives, Cornell University LibraryReanna Esmail, Lead Librarian for Instruction, Cornell University LibraryIn this presentation, we will introduce an active learning activity in which we have students review the Split Screen on the Citizen Browser project to start learning about the effects that algorithms are having right now on their information consumption. Attendees will gain an understanding of algorithmic systems, how they influence and bias information retrieval, notable case studies in which biased decision-making is well-documented, and how librarians can teach students some of the skills needed to be savvy information consumers. We will provide strategies to critically engage students in questions about equitable information access, and privacy rights.Technology and Tools, Digital Literacy Not Either/Or but Better: Moving Beyond the CRAAP Test to Teach about Bias FiltersMandi Goodsett, Performing Arts & Humanities Librarian, Cleveland State UniversityMany librarians have pointed out the disadvantages of the CRAAP test for teaching students source evaluation. Mike Caulfield’s SIFT method does a better job of helping students navigate today’s information landscape; however, it doesn’t necessarily explain why some sources are more reliable than others. This session will describe an information literacy concept that addresses this issue: “bias filters.” Bias filters are aspects of the information creation process that help reduce bias in the final product, such as peer review and fact-checking teams. By describing bias filters, librarians can help students understand why some sources, despite being imperfect, are generally trustworthy.Foundations of IL, News & Media Literacy, Disinformation Session 4 Creating to Learn: Propaganda and the Attention EconomyPamela Mann, Associate Research and Instruction Librarian, St. Mary’s College of MarylandChristopher Heckman, Assistant Research and Instruction Librarian, St. Mary’s College of MarylandThis session will present a collaborative project, the Media Literacy Civic Engagement and Democracy Project (MLCED) between the Library and the Center for the Study of Democracy at a small public liberal arts college. Joined by faculty from the departments of International Languages & Cultures and the Fine Arts, we designed a workshop for college students focused on propaganda and the attention economy. Our presentation will provide an overview of the MLCED Project; discuss the planning and implementation of the workshop; including learning outcomes, lesson plans, and readings; potential collaborative partners; and media literacy professional development opportunities.Civic Literacy, News & Media Literacy, IL in the Disciplines, Collaboration Teaching Information and Media Literacy Skills for Application both Inside and Outside the ClassroomBrooke Gross, Research & Instruction Librarian and Assistant Professor, University of MississippiAdam Clemons, Research & Instruction Librarian and Assistant Professor, University of MississippiFor several years, librarians at the University of Mississippi have taught traditional information literacy sessions to students on academic probation, particularly those seeking readmission to the college after academic suspension or dismissal. These library sessions, instructional materials, and activities have recently been retooled to include more emphasis on critical thinking and media literacy. This presentation will describe how our instruction has evolved, focusing on changes to our pedagogical approach, session content, and assessment methods. We will also discuss key challenges and opportunities related to teaching information and media literacy beyond academic endeavors, conducting a sample hands-on activity.Foundations of IL, News & Media Literacy Information Literacy as Voting Literacy: Creating a Consultation Service to Educate Students about the Electoral ProcessEmily Alford, Head of Government Information, Maps, and Microform Services, Indiana University BloomingtonMeredith Knoff, Learning Commons Librarian, Indiana University BloomingtonThis session will discuss how a government information librarian and instruction/public services librarian created a one-on-one consultation service for students focused on voter registration and searching for and evaluating electoral information, such as candidate voting records, ballot measures, and identifying bias in information sources. Attendees will discuss the challenges and limitations of engaging in political discussions in public institutions, how to engage local partners, and outreach strategies for promoting a consultation service. The session will end with attendees identifying ways to launch a similar service at their own library.Civic Literacy, Collaboration Adding a Little Mystery to a University FYE Program: How Librarians Developed a Mystery Game to Teach Fundamental Search Skills to First YearsYi Han, Assistant Dean for Student Engagement, Illinois Institute of TechnologyNichole Novak, Online Learning and Instruction Librarian, Illinois Institute of TechnologyThis session will cover how one library team identified and collaborated with campus partners on a first-year experience (FYE) program by designing a library module that included creative and fun ways to teach first-year students fundamental search skills and lessen library anxiety. Presenters will share their successes and challenges in setting manageable learning goals and developing a lesson plan as well as the importance of test runs with feedback, program assessment, and scheduling. Librarians who want to learn how to inject some challenging fun into an FYE program should attend.Collaboration, FYE, Foundations of IL Small Actions, Grassroots Efforts, and Community Building: Inspiring Fresh Perspectives on Teaching Information Literacy in a Time of UncertaintyAndrea Baer, Public Services Librarian, Rowan UniversityDan Kipnis, Life Sciences Librarian, Rowan UniversityIn this workshop, two academic librarians will share their grassroots approach to fostering civic and digital literacies through their work in teaching “lateral reading” and online source evaluation. We will reflect on how a small action, creating an online research guide, was a seed for growing roots – connections and relationships – and for expanding our own teaching and our educational outreach. While we’ll touch on work with lateral reading, our primary focus will be reflecting with fellow librarians on small actions as regenerative responses to burnout and as starting points for more collective engagement in civic literacy education.Civic Literacy, Digital Literacy, Collaboration
"The action of shifting college students from consumers to creators of Open Educational Resources can have positive impacts on student learning ..."
Via Leona Ungerer
|
Scooped by
Gilbert C FAURE
January 31, 2022 6:02 AM
|
As the pandemic raises 'science literacy' worldwide, Jay Flynn says Wiley is rushing to enable research in a changing publishing business.
|
Scooped by
Gilbert C FAURE
September 22, 2021 3:14 AM
|
As part of this year's ECIL Online, Trudi Jacobson and Tom Mackey present an interactive workshop entitled "Teaching with Metaliteracy: Developing Informed, Reflective, and Participatory Citizens." This session applies the core components of the metaliteracy model and feature surveys and padlets to engage the audience. According to the description: In this interactive workshop, participants will…
|
Scooped by
Gilbert C FAURE
September 21, 2021 7:57 AM
|
Filed by the ACRL Board on February 2, 2015. Adopted by the ACRL Board, January 11, 2016. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. PDF Version Print copies may be purchased from the Association of College and Research Libraries for $15.00 for a package of 10, including standard postage. Expedited shipping is available for an additional charge. Due to the current pandemic, orders can be placed on Tuesdays of each week until further notice. To place your order over the phone with a credit card, please call 312-280-5277.
|
Scooped by
Gilbert C FAURE
June 9, 2021 7:15 AM
|
EPALE Discussion: News media literacy for adults – why is it important right now?
|
Scooped by
Gilbert C FAURE
April 6, 2021 2:27 AM
|
New to me - Internet Archive Scholar "This fulltext search index includes over 25 million research articles and other scholarly document
|
Rescooped by
Gilbert C FAURE
from Educational Technology News
March 13, 2021 1:31 AM
|
|
Scooped by
Gilbert C FAURE
December 28, 2020 9:29 AM
|
There are recordings from IFLA webinars in its Youtube channel (IFLA=International Federation for Library Associations & Institutions)
|