Conservation Agriculture Research Updates - October 2025
16.3K views | +2 today
Follow
Conservation Agriculture Research Updates - October 2025
See our full research database for more CA articles at https://www.zotero.org/groups/348525/cornell_conservation_agriculture/collections/KGBFX8BX  See our CA web site at https://soilhealth.org and click the "Research" menu item and then "How to use database" so you can apply to join our Zotero CA group to better able to look at the data in our CA database.
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Scooped by Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)
September 28, 2020 3:46 PM

Soil health and ecosystem services: Lessons from sub-Sahara Africa (SSA).

Kihara, J., Bolo, P., Kinyua, M., Nyawira, S.S. & Sommer, R. 2020. Geoderma. 370. Article Number 114342.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114342

Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)'s insight:

This review documents the current knowledge of ecosystem services for key management practices based on experiences from agricultural lands in sub-Sahara Africa (SSA). Here, practicing conservation agriculture (CA) and Integrated Soil fertility management (ISFM) have overall positive benefits on increasing infiltration (>44), reducing runoff (>30%) and soil erosion (>33%) and increases soil biodiversity. This summary of key considerations for evaluating practices from multiple perspectives including provisioning, regulating, supporting and cultural ecosystem services is important to inform future soil health policy and research initiatives in SSA.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)
September 28, 2020 12:05 PM

Dynamics in soil organic carbon of wheat-maize dominant cropping system in the North China Plain under tillage and residue management.

Zhao, X., Virk, A.L., Ma, S.T., Qi, J.Y., Pu C., Yang, X.G. & Zhang, H.L. 2020. Journal of Environmental Management. 265 (1). Number 110549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110549

Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)'s insight:

This study in China looked at temporal dynamics of SOC under NT with residue retention (RR) in a wheat-maize system. Their data shows that SOC can significantly increase to a depth of 30 cm with NT and RR. On average, NT increased SOC by 8.1–34.5% compared with CT, and RR increased SOC by 3.5–14.4% compared with R0 at 0–10 cm. Positive effects of NT and RR on SOC were both confirmed, but fluctuations and variations induced by interactions of practices and seasonal climatic conditions were also significant in the North China Plain

No comment yet.
Scooped by Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)
August 27, 2020 2:25 PM

Effects of crop residue retention on soil carbon pools after 6 years of rice–wheat cropping system.

Sharma, S., Thind, H.S., Yadvinder-Singh, Sidhu, H.S., Jat, M.L. & Parihar, C.M. 2019. Environmental Earth Sciences. 78 (10): 296

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8305-1

Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)'s insight:

This paper looked at the effect of tillage, crop establishment and residue management on total and different pools of  SOC in a sandy-loam soil from a 6 year study in NW India. Treatments looked at CT against ZT with direct seeded and Transplanted rice followed by wheat with and without residues. The study showed that adoption of ZTDSR followed by ZTW + R was the better crop production strategy for increasing C-sequestration, improving and sustaining the soil quality and crop productivity in the RW system. This practice also provides an opportunity to retain crop residues as an alternative to burning, which causes severe air pollution in the RW system in the IGP of South Asia.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)
August 26, 2020 2:51 PM

Effect of conservation agriculture on soil organic and inorganic carbon sequestration and lability: A study from a rice–wheat cropping system on a calcareous soil of the eastern Indo‐Gangetic Plain...

Dey, A., Dwivedi, B.S., Bhattacharyya, R., Datta, S.P., Meena, M.C., Jat, R.K., Gupta, R.K., Jat, M.L., Singh, V.K., Das, D. & Singh, R.G. 2020. Soil Use and Management. 36 (3): 429-438.

https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12577

Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)'s insight:

This study looked at changes in soil organic and inorganic (SOC and SIC) carbon under CA in Eastern India. The treatments included various combinations of CT and ZT rice and wheat with and without residue and on permanent beds (PB) with residue. The highest SOC at both 0-15 and 15-30 cm was with the ZT plus residue for both crops. The benefits of ZT and residue retention were greatest for very labile SOC, which showed a significant  increase (50%) under ZT-ZT+R compared with CT-CT. They conclude the adoption of CA should be recommended in calcareous soils, for C sequestration, and also as a reclamation technique. 

No comment yet.
Scooped by Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)
July 28, 2020 11:54 AM

Conservation Agriculture Improves Long-term Yield and Soil Quality in Irrigated Maize-oats Rotation

Fonteyne, S., Martinez-Gamino, M.A., Saldivia Tejeda, A. & Verhulst, N. 2019. Agronomy - Basel: 9 (12) On-line

https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9120845

Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)'s insight:

This study evaluated the level of tillage and quantity of soil cover for CA to work under irrigated conditions in the highlands of Mexico. Treatments included conventional tillage (CT), two types of reduced tillage, and permanent beds (PB) without tillage and 4 levels of soil cover in a maize, fodder oats rotation. Both crops yielded most under PBs without tillage and had the highest net returns. . 

No comment yet.
Scooped by Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)
June 28, 2020 11:21 AM

Long-term impact of no-till conservation agriculture and N-fertilizer on soil aggregate stability, infiltration and distribution of C in different size fractions.

Sithole, N.J., Magwaza, L.S. & Thibaud, G.R. 2019. Soil and Tillage Research. 190: 147-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.03.004

Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)'s insight:

Soil degradation by soil organic carbon loss is a major concern in SSA. This study assesses the long-term (13 years) changes in SOC, aggregate associated C, particulate organic C (POC) and infiltration in sub-tropical, monocropping maize at 3 soil depths in South Africa. Tillage treatments were No-till (NT) and rotational tillage (RT) both with permanent residue cover and CT with residue removed. Nitrogen treatments were 0, 100 and 200 kg/ha. On average Total SOC did not differ between tillage treatments, but varied with depth where it was stratified in the 0-10 cm depth in NT and RT. POC varied and decreased significantly in the 0-10 cm depth with increased tillage intensity. They conclude that reduced soil disturbance improves physical protection of SOC, soil structure and infiltration but TSOC takes time to improve.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)
May 29, 2020 4:11 PM

Conservation agriculture based on diversified and high performance production system leads to soil carbon sequestration in subtropical environments.

Conservation agriculture based on diversified and high performance production system leads to soil carbon sequestration in subtropical environments. | Conservation Agriculture Research Updates - October 2025 | Scoop.it

Gonçalves, D., Sa, J.C de M., Mishra, U., Fornari, A.J., Furlan, F.J.F., Ferreira, L.A., Inagaki, T.M., Romaniw, J., Ferreira, A. & Briedis, C. 2019. Journal of Cleaner Production. 219: 136-147.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.263

Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)'s insight:

This paper looks at a farm using CA principles for 30 years to look at carbon sequestration. They used Century and Roth-C models to simulate the carbon stocks. Their data show that SOC continuously increased after CA practices from 1985 to 2015 and now is in equilibrium. Yields also increased with time with maize increasing more than wheat or soybeans. The paper presents data on the quantity of soil organic carbon increase over a 60 year period.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)
May 26, 2020 4:06 PM

Increases in soil sequestered carbon under conservation agriculture cropping decrease the estimated greenhouse gas emissions of wetland rice using life cycle assessment.

Increases in soil sequestered carbon under conservation agriculture cropping decrease the estimated greenhouse gas emissions of wetland rice using life cycle assessment. | Conservation Agriculture Research Updates - October 2025 | Scoop.it

Alam, M.K., Bell, R.W., & Biswas, W.K. 2019. Journal of Cleaner Production. 224: 72-87.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.215

Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)'s insight:

This study looked at GHG emissions from monsoon rice grown on puddled versus non-puddled soils, with and without residue retention in Bangladesh. A cradle to farm-gate Life Cycle analysis was used to calculate GHG emissions. The GHG emissions with non-puddling and low residue retention were 31% lower than puddling and crop residue retention. Non-puddled with residue retention had 16% GHG emissions compared to the puddled treatment. CH4 was the main GHG comprising 63-67% of the GHS's. But non-puddling with residue retention gave the highest rice yield.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)
September 28, 2020 2:59 PM

Have we reached the turning point? Looking for evidence of SOC increase under conservation agriculture and cover crop practices.

Camarotto, C., piccoli, I., dal Ferro, N., polese, R., Chiarini, F., Furlan, L. & Morari, F. 2020. European Journal of Soil Science. Special Issue Article Early View.

https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12953

Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)'s insight:

This paper looks at the effect of CA and CT with cover crops (CC) on carbon sequestration in northeast Italy. They looked at SOC stock over a 6 year period within a 0-50cm soil profile. The results suggested that CA changed the SOC distribution rather than the total amount of SOC. Over a 6-year period, no benefit in SOC sequestration was observed with CA and CC. They hypothesize that a longer study period would be required to better understand the potential benefits of CA and CC on SOC sequestration. 

No comment yet.
Scooped by Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)
September 27, 2020 3:37 PM

Can conservation agriculture increase soil carbon sequestration? A modelling approach.

Valkama, E., Kunypiyaeva, G., Zhapayev, R., Karabayev, M., Zhusupbekov, E., Perego, A., Schillaci, C., Sacco, D., Moretti, B., Grignani, C., & Acutis, M. Geoderma. 369. Article 114298.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114298

Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)'s insight:

This paper used the ARMOSA process-based crop model to simulate the contribution of different CA components to soil organic carbon stocks sequestration at 0-30 cm depth compared to conventional in three different regions (Central Asia, N and S Europe). Simulations looked at current and future climate conditions.  Five cropping systems were used. The paper concludes the simultaneous adoption of all the three CA principles becomes more and more relevant in order to accomplish soil C sequestration as an urgent action to combat climate change and to ensure food security.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)
August 27, 2020 11:53 AM

Tillage and crop rotation effects on soil carbon and selected soil physical properties in a Haplic Cambisol in Eastern Cape, South Africa

Mtyobile, M., Muzangwa, L. & Mnkeni, P.N.S. 2020. Soil and Water Research. 15 (1) 47-54.

https://doi.org/10.17221/176/2018-SWR

Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)'s insight:

Data presented is from the 6th season of an on-station trial with CT and NT and 4 crop rotations that included maize, wheat and soybeans. The residues were left on the surface in NT and incorporated in the CT after every cropping season. Soil physical properties were measured. The study concluded that the crop rotations, MWM and the MWS under the no-till coupled with the residue retention improved the soil porosity and the soil water content levels the most. 

No comment yet.
Scooped by Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)
July 29, 2020 10:04 AM

Combining no-till with rye (Secale cereale L.) cover crop mitigates nitrous oxide emissions without decreasing yield.

Fiorini, A., Maris, S.C., Abalos, D., Amaducci, S. & Tabaglio, V. 2020. Soil and Tillage Research. 196: 104442.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.104442

Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)'s insight:

This study compared N2O emissions and crop yield of soybean under NT and CT using rye and hairy vetch residues from cover crops for 3 years in Italy. N2O emissions in NT were 40-55% lower compared to CT. NT also increased SOC content and earthworm abundance. Within NT systems rye had lower N2O emissions compared to hairy vetch as a consequence of the high C/N ratio of rye residues.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)
June 28, 2020 3:12 PM

Impact of conservation tillage in rice-based cropping systems on soil aggregation, carbon pools and nutrients.

Nandan, R., Singh, V., Singh, S.S., Kumar, V., Hazra, K.K., Nath, C.P., Poonia, S., Malik, R.K., Bhattacharyya, R. & McDonald, A. 2019. Geoderma: 340: 104-114.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.01.001

Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)'s insight:

This study looked at conventional (CT) and No-till (NT) in wheat/maize following puddled  or non-puddled TP rice or direct seeded rice. Also residue removal or retention. They looked at soil aggregation, carbon pools, nutrient availability and yield. After 6 years in top 20 cm soil, NT treatments had had more total organic carbon than CT treatments. NT treatments also had more stable soil aggregates. Retention of residues increased TOC,  and soil available nutrients, especially P, K and Zinc over residue removal. The conclude that NT with residue retention should be recommended for improving soil quality and production sustainability.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)
June 28, 2020 11:01 AM

Long-term effects of tillage and straw management on soil organic carbon, crop yield, and yield stability in a wheat-maize system.

 Xu, J., Han, H., Ning, T., Li, Z. & Lal, R. 2019. Field Crops Research. 233: 33-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2018.12.016

Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)'s insight:

This study in the Northern China Plain looked at 11 years of of six agricultural practices on soil organic carbon storage, crop yield and yield stability in a maize-wheat system. The three tillage systems were conventional (CT), No-till (NT) and sub-soiling (ST) with straw returned or removed. The highest SOC was in NT and ST with residue. Highest yields were with ST with and without straw return. NT, ST and straw return both increased crop yield stability. Maize and wheat yields were positively correlated with SOC storage. 

No comment yet.
Scooped by Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)
May 29, 2020 3:22 PM

Long-term effects of crop succession, soil tillage and climate on wheat yield and soil properties.

Long-term effects of crop succession, soil tillage and climate on wheat yield and soil properties. | Conservation Agriculture Research Updates - October 2025 | Scoop.it

Carcer, P.S., Sinaj, S., Santonja, M., Fossati, D. & Jeangros, B. 2019. Soil and Tillage Research. 190: 201-219.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.01.012

Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)'s insight:

This paper used data from a 50 year long-term trial that included climate, soil organic carbon, monoculture versus crop rotation and minimum tillage versus plowing on wheat yield in Switzerland. Wheat yield was 16% higher in rotation. There was difference in wheat yield due to tillage, but minimal tillage had 7% higher SOC than the plough treatment. Rotation had no effect on SOC.

No comment yet.