Nandan, R., Singh, V., Singh, S.S., Kumar, V., Hazra, K.K., Nath, C.P., Poonia, S., Malik, R.K., Bhattacharyya, R. & McDonald, A. 2019. Geoderma: 340: 104-114.
|
|
Scooped by
Cornell Conservation Agriculture Group (soilhealth.org)
June 28, 2020 3:12 PM
|
Your new post is loading...
This study looked at conventional (CT) and No-till (NT) in wheat/maize following puddled or non-puddled TP rice or direct seeded rice. Also residue removal or retention. They looked at soil aggregation, carbon pools, nutrient availability and yield. After 6 years in top 20 cm soil, NT treatments had had more total organic carbon than CT treatments. NT treatments also had more stable soil aggregates. Retention of residues increased TOC, and soil available nutrients, especially P, K and Zinc over residue removal. The conclude that NT with residue retention should be recommended for improving soil quality and production sustainability.