"The Common Core standards are only the what. They describe what students should know and be able to do at each grade level. They're not the how. How the standards are taught, what happens in classrooms, that's the curriculum."
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Nancy J. Herr's curator insight,
December 2, 2013 10:17 AM
If you've been in education for a while, you know critical thinking has been a backbone of the curriculumk for years. Now students are being tested on it.
jhenehan's curator insight,
December 3, 2013 12:20 PM
Are kids too coddled? This is an interesting question. The article mentions that the problem with the common core is all of the high stakes testing. This testing causes high level anxiety. Finland having the best education program in the world, has one serious test in the first year of high school. All other grades are downplayed until this test. Students are allowed to retake this test if they are not pleased with their results that they got. They get feedback and this feedback can help them to do better. If we want the common core to succed in the U.S. the article says that we should too down play tests and have hgih stake testing every few years. If not we may be undoing the value of the common core. I feel that this article brings up a good point about how kids are too coddled and many have fear and anxiety of tests.
jhenehan's curator insight,
December 3, 2013 12:14 PM
I really enjoyed reading this aritcle. It was posted by a educator that has spent more than a decade in public educaiton. She mentioned that she wants all children to succed. I feel that this is extremely true. As an educators you should want all children to succed and to learn and grow. I also agree that just because there is now this common core, this doesnt mean that since this is in place that every student will now succed. It still takes work and it should be used as a guidepost for educators. The core is to prepare students for not only todays careers but for the career of the future. One quote that stood out to me in the article was that, " The CCSS will give us an oppurtunity to more closely allign what students are learning with the knowledge and skills that they need for the real world". This quote is key. The real world is important and educators should prepare students for the real world. It can be done with high quality education.
jhenehan's curator insight,
December 3, 2013 12:09 PM
I feel that the purpose of this article was to discuss how the common core was being implemented in Wisconsin and how they already feel that there may need to be some tweaking to these new standards. I think and feel that this is a good thing. Tweaking standards and improving them can always be beneificial in the long run. It mentions how the prior standards were too vague and that the new common core standards create more of a critical thinking atmosphere. I agree with the article that setting higher goals and assessing those goals can make better grades and performance in the long run. Boosting learning will always be important!!
Dr. Dea Conrad-Curry's curator insight,
November 26, 2013 8:36 PM
I disagree...you can prep for the test by meeting the standards! New Generation Assessments and standards are connected more tightly than interwoven wedding bands. One way to avoid the standards is through worrying about keyboarding skills. True, some kids aren't prepared for the computerized assessment in terms of the computer, but paper and pencil will to be an option. More important than keyboarding skills are the thinking skills...for the most part, that is what the test assesses. Why can the public not see that? Because in general, most people don't understand the assessments or the standards. |
TopMBA's comment,
December 4, 2013 6:11 PM
Great scoop! you may also like this: http://www.topmba.com/blog/new-study-reveals-corporate-canadas-gender-gap-mba-news
|