Innovating in an Age of Personalization
13.1K views | +0 today
Follow
Innovating in an Age of Personalization
FountainBlue curates articles and information about the emergence of the Age of Personalization, and how leaders and companies are succeeding with the opportunities ahead.
Curated by Linda Holroyd
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Scooped by Linda Holroyd
March 16, 2016 11:59 AM
Scoop.it!

‘Transformer in chief’: The new chief digital officer | McKinsey & Company

‘Transformer in chief’: The new chief digital officer | McKinsey & Company | Innovating in an Age of Personalization | Scoop.it

The CDO role is changing dramatically. Here are the skills today’s world demands.

In the alphabet soup that is today’s crowded C-suite, few roles attract as much attention as that of the chief digital officer, or CDO. While the position isn’t exactly new, what’s required of the average CDO is. Gone are the days of being responsible for introducing basic digital capabilities and perhaps piloting a handful of initiatives. The CDO is now a “transformer in chief,” charged with coordinating and managing comprehensive changes that address everything from updating how a company works to building out entirely new businesses. And he or she must make progress quickly.

SidebarDo you need a CDO?

Given these demands, it’s not surprising that the number of people in CDO roles doubled from 2013 to 2014 and is expected to double again this year.1We find that companies bring in a CDO for two primary reasons. The first is when they need to approach the complex root causes that must be dissected, understood, and addressed before any substantive progress on digitization can be made. And the second is when the CEO realizes the organization can’t meet the primary challenge of creating integrated transformation within its current construct (see sidebar, “Do you need a CDO?”).

In fact, the true measure of a CDO’s success is when the role becomes unnecessary: by its very nature, a high-functioning digital company does not need a CDO (however, it may want its former CDO to be the CEO). Of course, the vast majority of organizations are not yet at that point. And while there are numerous actions companies can and should take to help these executives work themselves out of a job—such as providing sufficient resources and active CEO support—this article focuses on five areas CDOs themselves must get right if their organizations are to successfully transition to digital.

1. Make digital integral to the strategy

Digital isn’t merely a thing—it’s a new way of doing things. Many companies are focused on developing a digital strategy when they should instead focus on integrating digital into all aspects of the business, from channels and processes and data to the operating model, incentives, and culture. Our analysis of how companies with a high Digital Quotient (DQ) operate shows that 90 percent of top performers have fully integrated digital initiatives into their strategic-planning process.2

Getting the strategy right requires the CDO to work closely with the CEO, the chief information officer (CIO), business-unit leaders, and the chief financial officer; the CDO also needs to be an active participant in and shaper of the strategy. An important foundation for CDOs to establish credibility and secure a seat at the strategy table is providing detailed analysis of market trends and developments in technology and customer behavior, both inside and outside the sector.

Yet CDOs can’t stop there. They need to bring a bold vision: 65 percent of companies that are “digital leaders” in our DQ analysis have a high tolerance for bold initiatives; among average performers, 70 percent of companies don’t see support for risk taking. This vision could include starting new businesses, acquiring technologies, or investing in innovations—one CDO we know made it his mantra to drive agile as a new software-development methodology for 40 percent of the company’s projects. No matter how it’s branded, CDOs need to be known within their organization for something that is courageous, new, and adds value.

In addition, CDOs must be specific about their goals. One international publishing house, for example, set a target of generating 50 percent of its revenue and profit from digital media within ten years, and it wound up doing so in almost half that time. Similarly, several banks that set the objective of increasing digital-channel sales to more than 50 percent are seeing that specific and measurable goal rally the organization.

 

Read more about Digital Quotient

 

2. Obsess over the customer

While most companies say they know their customers, CDOs must make it a driving passion and core competency of the organization. With technology and customer habits changing so quickly, developing a deep and detailed view of customer behavior across all channels provides a common reference point in any business discussion and arms the CDO to challenge the status quo and make changes. For example, one CDO used the concept of customer journeys and big data mapping of these paths to show her peers where opportunities and pain points existed—and, in doing so, destroyed several myths.

This type of analysis is critical, to be sure, but an equally important part of the CDO’s job is communicating how essential the customer is to the organization. One CDO created clear and visually compelling dashboards on the customer journey and made a habit of consistently referencing them in meetings and when making decisions. Another set up a digitally enabled “war room” with real-time reporting on several key digital metrics, which soon will be piped to the tablets and smartphones of other C-suite executives. Yet another CDO sends regular company-wide emails highlighting customer breakthroughs, insights, and “voice of the customer” anecdotes. Such actions can help the business start to think more specifically about the customer so that everyone approaches all issues with a single crucial question: How will this affect the customer?

Digital capabilities ultimately provide an important foundation for improving the customer experience. It’s up to the CDO to identify those functions where digital is critical: for example, investing in automation capabilities to rapidly respond to customer interactions, developing sophisticated reporting and analytics capabilities to interpret customer needs, building innovative interfaces to gather customer data (for example, an alternative payment method), and creating mechanisms to deliver content and offers across all relevant channels. While the CDO will need to work closely with marketing and IT leadership, he or she should define the customer-experience journey and identify the requirements for developing and then supporting a dynamic system that is constantly learning and evolving.

3. Build agility, speed, and data

CDOs can build strong foundations for change by creating a “spirit of digital” throughout the organization. That could include setting up coding days for the board or holding company-wide hackathons—one company we know even had drones flying around the atrium of its headquarters. Core to building this spirit, however, is increasing the “metabolic rate” of the organization. That starts with changing basic habits, such as having strategy leadership meetings weekly or even biweekly to help ingrain the idea of moving at a faster pace. CDOs must look at how the organization operates and find ways to inject speed into processes. In some cases, it could be as straightforward as working with IT to automate existing development processes. But in others, it will require radically changing how the company works, such as setting extremely aggressive goals—as few as six weeks—for getting a product to market. Some CDOs do this by setting up “digital factories,” which are cross-functional groups focused on developing one product or process using a different technology, operational, or managerial methodology from the rest of the company. Embedding these factories in business units has the advantage of spreading the new culture and making the digital-factory approach the norm.

Managing a portfolio of these types of initiatives requires leaders to be decisive. If the data show a prototype doesn’t work, the CDO must be ruthless about killing the project, incorporating anything learned from the experience, and moving on. On the other hand, CDOs should establish flexible budgeting processes so that projects that show signs of success can get resources to scale quickly.

4. Extend networks

In a digital world, threats often do not come from established competitors but rather from innovative technologies that enable new businesses, start-ups that undermine established business models, or new developments outside the way the company defined its competitive space. For example, one of the big trends in the payments sector is the merging of commerce and payments functionalities in the same app—so, being able to pay for your restaurant meal using the OpenTable app you used to reserve your table.

Successful CDOs are keenly aware of such trends. They build networks of people, technologies, and ideas far outside of their company, constantly scanning the small-business landscape to identify possible acquisitions or partners that can provide complementary capabilities. Some CDOs spend as much as 50 percent of their time working with external partners to build effective working relationships that take advantage of every organization’s capabilities. To help bring these outside voices into the organization, many CDOs establish advisory boards of start-up leaders or create “challenger” boards of people with digital experience and expertise to review corporate initiatives and strategies. At a more pedestrian level, they regularly invite technologists or entrepreneurs to team lunches.

Building an internal network is just as important because company systems and technologies need to be flexible enough to work with outside parties. In particular, CDOs need to work with IT leaders to develop application programming interfaces and cloud-based architecture that works with a broader ecosystem of providers. Some CDOs realize too late that functions such as compliance, finance, human resources, legal, procurement, and risk also need to change to support a more digitally focused company. At one company, for example, an effort to accelerate time to market is in full swing, but procurement still insists it requires six months to approve a vendor. Changing such supporting processes isn’t easy—functions often have good reasons for why processes are undertaken as they are. But brokering compromises and testing new ways of operating that are necessary to make progress will be virtually impossible if a CDO doesn’t build internal networks early and engage with leaders across the business.

5. Get stuff done

CDOs are ultimately judged not by the quality of their ideas but by their ability to lead different types of teams, guide projects, overcome hurdles, and deliver integrated change.

Getting stuff done often requires hard-nosed negotiating skills. Consider the CDO at a financial-services company who wanted to stop business units from draining IT resources on independent projects that didn’t align with the overarching strategy. The CDO worked closely with the CIO and agreed to use her new budget to fund some of his projects; she also helped him retain and motivate key people by staffing them on important digital initiatives (which also assured him visibility into what she was doing). In return, the CIO agreed to stop supporting initiatives that the CDO didn’t explicitly approve. Both won in the end, and they now have a close working relationship.

A new CDO will benefit from the early establishment of near-term goals that can yield quick wins and wow moments that help build enthusiasm and momentum. Some CDOs find that building the marketing-commerce function is a great way to quickly demonstrate value, while others embark on accelerated cost cutting by automating core processes. It pays to define how success is measured, whether it’s tracking key digital and business metrics—such as digital-media revenue as a percentage of total revenue—or creating a full digital profit-and-loss statement (or both). To be meaningful for the business overall and to build credibility, key performance indicators must be aligned with those used by established business units.

Within his first month, for example, the new CDO at one financial-services company defined clear, discrete digital initiatives; developed a long-term vision in partnership with an anchor business-unit leader; and got his budget approved. Within six months, he hired a handful of key employees, launched several initiatives, identified gaps in the organization, and pulled together teams to fill them. A year and a half into the job, he was able to claim some solid wins and moved from a “shadow” profit and loss to an explicit one.

Of course, the projects CDOs commit to must be core to the business—such as developing new revenue streams, cutting costs, or getting to market faster—and not peripheral experiments, which could end up marginalizing their efforts. We’ve actually found it works best when a CDO’s budget is funded through the efficiencies and growth that he or she drives. In addition, we believe that budgeting is critical to ensuring that things get done. Successful CDOs not only time their actions to maximize budgetary flexibility but also change how funding is allocated. One CDO shifted from annual approval of large capital expenses for IT to a more venture capital–like monthly cycle, ensuring he could get more projects funded and launched. This approach also served to maintain funding momentum, with small bites over the course of the year predicated on demonstrated effectiveness.

Defining characteristics of the new CDO

When hiring a CDO, people often agonize over finding someone with experience that is just right. Yet we’ve found it’s the ability to lead transformation across an organization that is the true indicator of likely success in the role, and that requires a combination of hard and soft skills. Hard skills include the ability to articulate a strategic vision, the means to take on problems by identifying root causes across functions and making the tough decisions necessary to resolve them, experience in “pure play” digital and larger company transformations (typically in the consumer and technology sectors), and the managerial ability to lead and see programs through to fruition.

The importance of soft skills should not be understated: some CDOs estimate they spend 80 percent of their time building relationships. In our experience, successful CDOs have the patience to navigate the complex organizational structures of large businesses; additionally, they collaborate to get buy-in across functions and are able to diplomatically challenge the status quo and solidify relationships with a broad group of people. They also demonstrate leadership and charisma that excites the organization to drive change forward.

Of course, companies would be lucky to have executives in any function with this skill set. But driving organization-wide change isdifferent from the mandate for other senior roles. A recent Russell Reynolds Associates survey found that CDOs are meaningfully different from other senior executives across five categories: they are on average 34 percent more likely to be innovative and 32 percent more likely to be disruptive, and also differ with regard to determination, boldness of leadership, and social adeptness.3Leading an organizational transformation is messy work that requires masterful social skills to implement digital initiatives that create disruption by their very nature. Indeed, a CDO’s strong bias for action, bold thinking, and high tolerance for risk requires someone who can also manage the ruffled feathers, bruised egos, and flaring tempers that are common fallout from his or her activities.

As the digital age scrambles the traditional organizational structure, CDOs must not only launch the organization on its digital trajectory but also help it fundamentally evolve. The role requires a “bifocal” approach: achieving the near-term imperative of getting things moving quickly, while setting in place the longer-term conditions of success so the organization can compete digitally. Those CDOs that succeed will truly have earned their place in the already-crowded C-suite.

About the Authors

Tuck Rickards is a managing director at Russell Reynolds Associates, where he coleads the executive-search company’s Digital Transformation Practice. Kate Smaje is a director in McKinsey’s London office, and Vik Sohoni is a director in the Chicago office.

Linda Holroyd's insight:

Here's to the exceptional CDOs out there, and to those who are striving to get there. 

No comment yet.
Scooped by Linda Holroyd
March 16, 2016 11:38 AM
Scoop.it!

How China's Increasingly Emotional Consumers Are Shaking the World

How China's Increasingly Emotional Consumers Are Shaking the World | Innovating in an Age of Personalization | Scoop.it

Chinese consumers continue to grow relentlessly in number and wealth. This is a well-studied economic trend. But what people are missing is how the changing behavior of these consumers is now regularly shaking the world.

Suddenly, when Chinese consumers change their minds about something, it ripples outward into the global economy. And this phenomenon is going to get a lot more noticeable in the next years.

The economic trend underlying this is the steady advance of China's urban middle class families. This is the group to watch. According to McKinsey & Co., Chinese urban household disposable income will reach $8,000 a year by 2020. This will be about the same level as South Korea, but in a much, much larger population. After Middle Eastern oil, Chinese urban middle class families are arguably the most valuable natural resource on the planet.

But within this big trend, an important shift is now occurring. Urban families are rapidly transitioning from "value hunters" to more emotional, aspirational and free-spending consumers.

Price-focused consumers have dominated the China story thus far. They typically have had little brand loyalty and tend to shop around for the best deals, mostly for life's necessities. Chinese companies such as Haier Group and China Vanke have done very well selling these consumers air conditioners and apartments at affordable prices.

The more emotional group now emerging, called "new mainstream" consumers by McKinsey, already has life's basics. And they have enough disposable income to buy discretionary items such as lattes and trips to Thailand. What they care about is quality, brands and how products make them feel. So they want real iPhones, not cheap alternatives, and they are able and willing to pay for them. What is fascinating about this group is that they behave similarly to consumers in developed markets.

And here's the factoid that matters. These "new mainstream" consumers accounted for about 5% of China in 2010, with value seekers then accounting for the overwhelming majority. But according to McKinsey, the new mainstream will represent at least half of urban middle class families by 2020. This is the important transition that is happening right now.

It means Chinese consumers are rapidly becoming much more emotional and unpredictable. Suddenly, when Chinese consumers like a movie, such as "Star Wars: The Force Awakens," they become one of the biggest source of revenue for it.

In 2015, McDonald's, KFC and other U.S. fast-food chains got a painful lesson in this phenomenon after media reports of alleged contaminated food in their Chinese outlets. Their global financial results took significant hits. While reported as a food scandal, this incident was really about urban Chinese families caring more about food safety now than in the past.

Overwhelmed

Conversely, if Chinese consumers decide that a particular brand is safe or better than its rivals, foreign companies can suddenly be overwhelmed with orders. This recently happened to Swisse Wellness Group, one of Australia's leading vitamin and supplement companies.

During the first half of 2015, Swisse, which had virtually no operations in China, suddenly found its sales there growing very rapidly. It turned out that Chinese consumers had begun ranking its products highly on Tmall. Revenues for the year (ended in June) jumped to A$313.1 million ($235 million) from A$125.6 million a year earlier. And unsurprisingly, a Chinese company (Biostime International Holdings) quickly bought Swisse in A$1.39 billion deal.

Another example is the story of the Bobbie Bear, a bright purple teddy bear stuffed with lavender and sold by a farm in Tasmania. This small lavender farm, a retirement project of owner Robert Ravenus, became inundated with orders after Chinese model / actress Zhang Xinyu posted a photo of her Bobbie Bear online. Orders surged to more than 45,000 and the farm was forced to suspend online sales, as it could not handle the demand from China.

The company then had to place limits on how many bears could be bought by visitors to the farm's gift shop. Chinese tourists were showing up in Tasmania in droves to make purchases. Annual visitors to the farm exceeded 60,000. At one point, a hacker, presumed to have been Chinese, broke into the farm's computer system to try to place orders.

My point is that increasingly emotional Chinese consumers (i.e., less pure value seeking) are now regularly causing events such as this around the world.

Increasing mechanisms

A second important factor is that the mechanisms through which Chinese consumers can impact companies around the world are increasing. The Swisse vitamin example was possible because cross-border e-commerce, known as "haitao" in China, now lets consumers there buy overseas goods online and get them delivered. Both Amazon and Tmall are charging after this cross-border opportunity right now.

Another mechanism is real estate. Every six to 12 months, Chinese consumers seem to discover a new favorite place and start buying huge numbers of homes there. This phenomenon started in Hong Kong a few years ago. Buying then switched to Vancouver and Toronto. In the last year, we have seen heavy Chinese purchasing of homes in New York and California.

Tourism is another powerful mechanism. The number of trips abroad by Chinese tourists now exceeds 120 million a year and their travels tastes can be unpredictable as well. For example, following the 2012 hit movie "Lost in Thailand," Chinese tourists started flooding into Chiang Mai, the main tourist hub in the area where the movie was filmed. Arrivals to the city were reportedly up 500% in 2013 alone.

So in 2016, two important factors are coming together: the increasingly emotional behavior of Chinese consumers (who are growing in power) and a multiplication of the mechanisms by which this influence can impact the world, often in real-time.

What this means for markets and businesses around the globe is that they can now be directly impacted by what is discussed at dinner tables, in offices and online in China. My recommendation is to start paying attention to those conversations.

Linda Holroyd's insight:

The 'new mainstream' Chinese consumer will change the future of retail and even real estate

No comment yet.
Scooped by Linda Holroyd
March 15, 2016 5:55 PM
Scoop.it!

The economic essentials of digital strategy | McKinsey & Company

The economic essentials of digital strategy | McKinsey & Company | Innovating in an Age of Personalization | Scoop.it

July 2015, during the championship round of the World Surf League’s J-Bay Open, in South Africa, a great white shark attacked Australian surfing star Mick Fanning. Right before the attack, Fanning said later, he had the eerie feeling that “something was behind me.”1 Then he turned and saw the fin.
Thankfully, Fanning was unharmed. But the incident reverberated in the surfing world, whose denizens face not only the danger of loss of limb or life from sharks—surfers account for nearly half of all shark victims—but also the uncomfortable, even terrifying feeling that can accompany unseen perils.
Just two years earlier, off the coast of Nazarre, Portugal, Brazilian surfer Carlos Burle rode what, unofficially, at least, ranks as the largest wave in history. He is a member of a small group of people who, backed by board shapers and other support personnel, tackle the planet’s biggest, most fearsome, and most impressive waves. Working in small teams, they are totally committed to riding them, testing the limits of human performance that extreme conditions offer. Instead of a threat of peril, they turn stormy seas into an opportunity for amazing human accomplishment.
These days, something of a mix of the fear of sharks and the thrill of big-wave surfing pervades the executive suites we visit, when the conversation turns to the threats and opportunities arising from digitization. The digitization of processes and interfaces is itself a source of worry. But the feeling of not knowing when, or from which direction, an effective attack on a business might come creates a whole different level of concern. News-making digital attackers now successfully disrupt existing business models—often far beyond the attackers’ national boundaries:
Simple (later bought by BBVA) took on big-cap banks without opening a single branch.
A DIY investment tool from Acorns shook up the financial-advisory business.
Snapchat got a jump on mainstream media by distributing content on a platform-as-a-service infrastructure.
Web and mobile-based map applications broke GPS companies’ hold on the personal navigation market.
No wonder many business leaders live in a heightened state of alert. Thanks to outsourced cloud infrastructure, mix-and-match technology components, and a steady flood of venture money, start-ups and established attackers can bite before their victims even see the fin. At the same time, the opportunities presented by digital disruption excite and allure. Forward-leaning companies are immersing themselves deeply in the world of the attackers, seeking to harness new technologies, and rethinking their business models—the better to catch and ride a disruptive wave of their own. But they are increasingly concerned that dealing with the shark they can see is not enough—others may lurk below the surface.

Deeper forces

Consider an insurance company in which the CEO and her top team have reconvened following a recent trip to Silicon Valley, where they went to observe the forces reshaping, and potentially upending, their business. The team has seen how technology companies are exploiting data, virtualizing infrastructure, reimagining customer experiences, and seemingly injecting social features into everything. Now it is buzzing with new insights, new possibilities, and new threats.

The team’s members take stock of what they’ve seen and who might disrupt their business. They make a list including not only many insurance start-ups but also, ominously, tech giants such as Google and Uber—companies whose driverless cars, command of data, and reimagined transportation alternatives could change the fundamentals of insurance. Soon the team has charted who needs to be monitored, what partnerships need to be pursued, and which digital initiatives need to be launched.

Just as the team’s members begin to feel satisfied with their efforts, the CEO brings the proceedings to a halt. “Hang on,” she says. “Are we sure we really understand the nature of the disruption we face? What about the next 50 start-ups and the next wave of innovations? How can we monitor them all? Don’t we need to focus more on the nature of the disruption we expect to occur in our industry rather than on who the disruptors are today? I’m pretty sure most of those on our list won’t be around in a decade, yet by then we will have been fundamentally disrupted. And how do we get ahead of these trends so we can be the disruptors, too?”

This discussion resembles many we hear from management teams thoughtful about digital disruption, which is pushing them to develop a view of the deeper forces behind it. An understanding of those forces, combined with solid analysis, can help explain not so much which companies will disrupt a business as why—the nature of the transformation and disruption they face rather than just the specific parties that might initiate them.

In helping executives to answer this question, we have—paradoxically, perhaps, since digital “makes everything new”—returned to the fundamentals of supply, demand, and market dynamics to clarify the sources of digital disruption and the conditions in which it occurs. We explore supply and demand across a continuum: the extent to which their underlying elements change. This approach helps reveal the two primary sources of digital transformation and disruption. The first is the making of new markets, where supply and demand change less. But in the second, the dynamics of hyperscaling platforms, the shifts are more profound (exhibit). Of course, these opportunities and threats aren’t mutually exclusive; new entrants, disruptive attackers, and aggressive incumbents typically exploit digital dislocations in combination.

We have been working with executives to sort through their companies’ situations in the digital space, separating realities from fads and identifying the threats and opportunities and the biggest digital priorities. Think of our approach as a barometer to provide an early measure of your exposure to a threat or to a window of opportunity—a way of revealing the mechanisms of digital disruption at their most fundamental. It’s designed to enable leaders to structure and focus their discussions by peeling back hard-to-understand effects into a series of discrete drivers or indicators they can track and to help indicate the level of urgency they should feel about the opportunities and threats.

We’ve written this article from the perspective of large, established companies worried about being attacked. But those same companies can use this framework to spot opportunities to disrupt competitors—or themselves. Strategy in the digital age is often asymmetrical, but it isn’t just newcomers that can tilt the playing field to their advantage.

Linda Holroyd's insight:

When reviewing and creating your company's digitization strategy, look at it from the lens of supply and demand

No comment yet.
Scooped by Linda Holroyd
March 15, 2016 1:53 PM
Scoop.it!

Mobile Will Disrupt These Industries Next

Mobile Will Disrupt These Industries Next | Innovating in an Age of Personalization | Scoop.it
Technologists from across the globe recently gathered in Barcelona for the Mobile World Congress, the annual conversation on connectivity and celebration of new gadgets. While the conference traditionally focuses on phones, the discussions about mobile—in Barcelona and beyond—have grown increasingly wide-ranging as mobile technologies continue to seep into more areas of daily life. As one journalist covering the conference eloquently noted, "The Internet is becoming an invisible fabric—like air—that enables all the services we’ve come to depend on." In this schema, mobile devices and their apps are the stitches weaving together these services that help us work, play and live.

Indeed, the rise of mobile technologies has spurred the transformation of industries once considered sleepy into areas where some of the hottest new startups are operating. Uber and Lyft drivers have largely displaced cabbies; Airbnb has won over travelers who had previously booked hotel rooms; Postmates couriers have sped past the bike messengers of yesteryear with their promise of any local product delivered to your door in under one hour.

Looking at the common denominators of these startups gives us some clues about where the next mobility-enabled disruption might occur. First, these companies all offer services characterized by high time-sensitivity. After all, it's far more likely that someone waiting for a ride they've requested will return to a service that supplies a driver in four to five minutes as opposed to ten. By bypassing the dispatching step of traditional cab companies with location-based data capabilities, Uber et al. have cornered that competitive edge.

Second, these companies invest in technology but stay capital light by relying on assets that are already owned by the independent providers they partner with: Cars, bikes, houses and apartments. This low barrier to entry for service providers—no pricey taxi medallion to buy or hotel to maintain— results in the greater supply that drives down costs for consumers and thereby renders these services more desirable.

Finally, these companies are able to use technology to turn what I'll call "serendipity" into operating efficiencies. Theoretically at least, Lyft drivers or Postmates couriers accept jobs close to where they already are when the job comes up. Jobs are done more quickly, which means that workers make more money in less time and customers are more satisfied.

While a variety of industries have one or more of these features of providing time-sensitive services, possessing the option to rely on shared assets, and capitalizing on serendipity, I believe three more traditional areas especially ripe for mobile-enabled disruption are healthcare, staffing and banking. Watch these spaces if you're looking for the next company to have its "Uber moment."

Healthcare

Pioneers in telemedicine are improving access to care for patients who live in underserved areas or who can't otherwise travel to their doctor's offices. Startups like American Well and Doctor on Demand offer live video doctor visits via mobile app for a relatively small patient fee, and they're starting to gain momentum in part by making inroads to employer-sponsored plans. These services might be especially valuable in the arena of mental health, where on-demand offerings are growing and a shortage of face-to-face appointment availability means that patients are often unable to get the timely help they need to avoid crisis.

Staffing

Many of today's contingent workers find project-based "gigs" and other short-term work using mobile workforce platforms like Upwork, Fiverr and the company I co-founded, Gigwalk. The rise of such platforms has changed the game not just for independent workers, but also for HR departments and staffing agencies, which must now bolster their technological capabilities to stay competitive. The employers of today want to work with staffing partners who can anticipate and meet constantly and rapidly shifting staffing needs. The day when the average staffing agency employee wakes up and glances at an app on her phone to get that day's work location and assignment is closer than we think.

Banking

Brick-and-mortar and online-only banks alike have been quick to offer mobile apps that let their customers check balances, transfer funds and deposit checks from their phones, but there's still room for innovation in the key area of cash transfer. While mobile apps like Venmo and Circle let users send or receive cash instantly via text at no charge, we still haven't seen this capability offered at large scale and integrated with other banking services. The area is ripe for players who can wrap these services together at a low price point.

Just like EBay changed the garage sale to a large-scale virtual goldmine in the '90s as it used the Internet to match far-flung buyers and sellers, mobile is causing another wave of disruption that will reward a new crop of innovative players. Wherever they emerge from, they promise to further ease the "life on-the-go" that is our 21st century reality.  
Linda Holroyd's insight:

Mobile continues to turn industries on their head - next up - healthcare, banking and staffing

No comment yet.
Scooped by Linda Holroyd
March 7, 2016 5:22 PM
Scoop.it!

What Will The Next President Do About Obamacare?

What Will The Next President Do About Obamacare? | Innovating in an Age of Personalization | Scoop.it
What Will The Next President Do About Obamacare?
With the presidential elections less than a few months away and the race to the White House heating up, it is a good time to take stock and assess the future of healthcare in the United States. The election of a Democrat for president is widely expected to result in a continuation and expansion of the goals set out by the Affordable Care Act (ACA), while the election of a Republican will most certainly result in a roll back of some, if not all, of the act’s key initiatives. What we can expect from either of these electoral outcomes depends entirely on the individual in the Oval Office, the amount of Congressional support he or she is able to generate, and the overall healthcare objectives outlined by the next administration.


Precinct captain Christa DeHerrera, left, puts a band on voter Janell Lindsey after she checked in at a Democratic caucus late Tuesday, March 1, 2016, in Denver. (AP Photo/David Zalubowski)

Scenario 1: Assessing the Healthcare Landscape Following a Democrat Victory

Hospitals will Continue to Benefit from Rise in Insured Population

A Democratic presidential victory will broadly result in the continuation of the ACA with potential to increase the scope, subject to favorable congressional approval. In this scenario, patients will benefit greatly through greater state-based adoption of health exchanges, enhanced federal subsidies from policies purchased on national exchanges and removal of exclusion criteria by insurers. This continued growth in insurance patient base will reduce declining hospital volumes and increase revenues. As per a Moody’s assessment of hospital financial performance in 2015, an increased insurance base has resulted in not-for-profit hospitals witnessing rising revenues (compared to a decline in 2014), while the financial status of for-profit hospitals has shifted from “stable” to “profitable.” Hospitals will use these revenues to provide high-quality acute care services, as well as play a greater role in pioneering novel therapies such as genetic medicine, nano medicine and 3D printing health technologies.

Retail Clinics: The New Linchpin of Care Provision

Rise of ambulatory care providers such as retail clinics and urgent care centers will be critical in transitioning chronic and non-critical emergency care away from hospitals. Hospitals will leverage the rise of these service providers to further decongest emergency wards, reduce operating costs and transition chronic care management of patients outside the hospital. At the same time, ambulatory service providers will also act as patient referral nodes for hospitals. As of 2015, over 100 partnership agreements had been signed between various hospitals/health systems and ambulatory care providers. The number of deals will extend significantly post-2017 as hospitals seek greater collaboration with ambulatory care providers. With an average cost of $100 to $150 per consultation in retail and urgent care clinics, insurers will seek to incentivize patients covered by their plans to seek care from these providers whenever possible.

Primary Care: In Desperate Need of an Overhaul

While primary care will continue to play a key role in the healthcare value chain, with over 60% of primary care practices acquired or in partnerships with hospitals or health systems, the high cost of primary care services and an expected shortage of 46,000 to 90,000 primary care doctors over the next few years will experience the adoption of primary care technologies, such as telemedicine and virtual consultation services, to improve efficiency of care provision.

CMS Spending will Continue to Remain the Bedrock of U.S. Healthcare Spending

While Medicare reimbursements will continue to decline across healthcare providers, greater statewide adoption of Medicaid expansion services will play a key role in financing care, especially for elderly patients and those suffering from one or more chronic conditions requiring care in a specialty long-term care hospital or in residential, semi-residential and nursing facilities. With 283 rural hospitals at risk of closure, Medicaid expansion will be critical in ensuring financial stability of rural hospitals. As of 2015, only 8.3% of rural hospitals were at risk of closure in Medicare expansion states, compared to 16.6% in non-Medicare expansion states. With a rapidly aging population and increase in chronic diseases, enhanced Medicare expansion will be critical in ensuring greater affordability and accessibility to care.

Scenario 2: Assessing the Healthcare Landscape Following a Republican Victory

Reduced Insurance Coverage, Lower Inpatient Volumes and Falling Hospital Revenues Sound the Death Knell for Hospital-Based Innovation

A Republican presidential victory will most likely result in a rollback of some ACA elements, if not the act in its entirety. Rollback of health insurance exchanges, including public, private, state and federal, will likely be the first step, which will result in the reintroduction of exclusion criteria and high co-payment plans for those suffering from pre-existing conditions. This will result in a reduction of patient base, which, in turn, will cause a steep decline in hospital inpatient volumes. This reduction in volumes will undermine and eventually erode the revenue gains made by not-for-profit hospitals over the past year. Traditionally, for-profit hospitals have been more adept at responding to market changes. In the coming years for-profit hospitals will be capable of holding on to patient volumes but will witness reductions in profits. These reduced revenues, coupled with ongoing Medicare cuts, will prevent hospitals from offering high-quality acute care services. Research of novel therapies such as genetic and nano medicine will remain within academic institutions, with large-scale utilization delayed by several years.

Ambulatory Care Providers: Overburdened, Underfunded and Stretched

In this environment, ambulatory care providers will become the de facto providers of choice for the increasing number of uninsured patients, most of which suffer from chronic conditions. Lack of insurance coverage for these types of patients will result in patients having to pay for services out of pocket. This will lead to sluggish revenue growth and will impact the rate at which these providers expand service lines and increase geographical coverage. In this scenario, hospitals will find it increasingly difficult to transition chronic care to these providers, resulting in increasing operating costs, which will impact hospital emergency wards the most.

No Country for Old Men (and Women)

The biggest impact of a Republican victory will most likely be rollback of Medicaid expansion across individual states. While existing Medicaid expansion states may not choose to roll back services, chances of adoption by non-Medicaid expansion states will reduce significantly. This will adversely impact financial health of rural hospitals and LTC providers, resulting in serious gaps in healthcare provision, especially for those patients living in remote areas and those who require 24/7 oversight and care management. With a rapidly aging population and rising incidence of chronic diseases, care providers will become ill-equipped and ill funded to handle the demand for LTC services, resulting in a huge economic burden on caregivers and patient family members.

Placing Pragmatism before Emotion and Rhetoric

Should a Republican win the presidency, he must take steps to ensure that the ACA will continue to be enforced. Rollback of elements of the act, while appealing to conservatives within the party, would most certainly create serious long-term damage to healthcare systems’ ability to cope with the increased demand for care services while continuing to be at the forefront of global medical innovation. It is absolutely imperative that a careful study be conducted to assess the efficacy of the ACA on various aspects of care in order to understand how to make the act more efficient and align it closer to the goals of the next administration.

This article was written with contribution from Tanvir Jaikishen, Senior Research Analyst with Frost & Sullivan’s Transformation Health Program.
Linda Holroyd's insight:

Thought-provoking and on-point, as always. Thank you Reenita Das

No comment yet.
Scooped by Linda Holroyd
March 1, 2016 6:15 PM
Scoop.it!

Thoughts on the Future of Work

Thoughts on the Future of Work | Innovating in an Age of Personalization | Scoop.it

There’s  been so much change in the way companies, leaders and businesses work with each other and together, so it’s difficult to plan your future, whether you’re new to the workforce, returning to the workforce or planning how to remain gainfully employed in later years. Here are my thoughts on the type of work that’s available and how to embrace these opportunities and and prepare for the challenges to come.

  1. The tech-philic worker will be favored, and those who reject or deny this fact will be much less employable. Technology will help workers to gather and interpret data and information so that they can be more productive and better serve the customer, both of which are critical to the performance of any company.
  2. The learning-agile worker will be favored. Those who are resistant to learning new ways of doing things will be left behind, especially as automation will replace the need of workers-who-perform-repetitive-tasks.
  3. The communicative worker will more likely succeed as it would be easier for them to work with all the internal and external stakeholders involved in any job – from colleague to teammate, from partner to customer.
  4. The patient, helpful, service-oriented worker will be better positioned to serve demanding customers. There will always be jobs for people who know how to make even the pickiest of customers happy.
  5. Collaboration between people and companies will more likely succeed. Leaders will be those who can envision the benefits of collaborating across roles, companies and industries, and create and facilitate those successful partnerships.
  6. If you combine the 5 traits above, you will find a worker who may be able to tailor products and services to the needs of the customer. There will always be a role for people who can succeed in doing this well.
  7. Company leaders will be more focused on data and analytics, and there will be more meritocracy-based cultures and less politics.
  8. Along those same lines, productivity of people and product/service lines will be based more on data and information, and less on politics and agendas.
  9. Company leaders will help make it easy for adiverse population of workers to succeed – whether it’s making remote work possible or providing tech tools to support an aging or disabled or other non-standard worker.
  10. The bottom line is that companies and leaders will acknowledge that they are only as good as their people, and think, speak and act accordingly.

Those are my thoughts on the Future of Work. How will these things impact YOU? Your comments are welcome.

Linda Holroyd's insight:

How will work change in the future and how will you and your company be affected?

No comment yet.
Scooped by Linda Holroyd
February 18, 2016 6:10 PM
Scoop.it!

BigCos, NewCos, and the Nine Trends Remaking Business

BigCos, NewCos, and the Nine Trends Remaking Business | Innovating in an Age of Personalization | Scoop.it
Thanks to NewCo, I’ve gotten out of the Bay Area bubble and visited more than a dozen major cities across several continents in the past year. I’ve met with founders inside hundreds of mission-driven companies, in cities as diverse as Istanbul, Boulder, Cincinnati, and Mexico City. I’ve learned about the change these companies are making in the world, and I’ve compared notes with the leaders of large, established companies, many of which are the targets of that change.

(First published at NewCo. Get the NewCo newsletter here)

As I reflect on my travels, a few consistent themes emerge:

1. Technology has moved from a vertical industry to a horizontal layer across our society. Technology used to be a specialized field. Technology companies sold their wares to large companies in large, complicated IT packages and to consumers as discrete products (computers and software applications). In the past decade, technology has dissolved into the fabric of our society. We all can access powerful technology stacks. We don’t need to know how to program. We don’t need a big IT department either. Now, technology is infrastructure, like our physical systems of highways and roads. This levels the playing field so new kinds of companies can emerge, and it’s forcing big companies to respond to a new breed of competitor, as well as a newly empowered (and informed) consumer base.

2. Big companies are on the precipice of the most wrenching transformation in history — and tech is only part of the reason why.BigCos change very slowly. They are cautious by nature and extremely suspicious of “the new.” BigCos study new developments and wait for proof before they change. As digital technology spread through society over the past three decades, big companies were slow to get a web page, slow to conduct business over the web, slow to lean into mobile and social, and slow to respond to new types of startup competition. Of course, now that the web is mature and consumer platforms like Facebook and Google are massive, BigCos have shifted resources to digital. But that last point — responding to startup and business model competition — is far more problematic, because responding to new kinds of competition isn’t something you can outsource. It requires a fundamental shift in corporate social structure — and culture is hard to change.

3. The next generation’s leaders don’t want to work at BigCos (if they don't have to). In the past year I’ve met with senior executives at massive companies like Nestle, Publicis, P&G, Walmart, Visa, and McDonald’s. When I ask what keeps them up at night, all of them answer “hiring the next generation of leaders.” The best and brightest now see “launching a company,” “working at a startup,” or “working at a digital leader like Google or Facebook,” as a preferable career choice, starving BigCos of their most valuable asset: talent. While one might dismiss young professionals’ penchant for startups as a fad or a phase, there’s something far deeper at work, namely …

4. A job is table stakes. To win talent, companies must compete on purpose, authenticity, and organizational structure. Millennials are now the largest force in the global economy, and they have a markedly different view of work: Purpose and “making a difference in the world” are central in their work-related decisions. They’d rather work at The Honest Company than Unilever, if given a choice — and the best and brightest always have a choice. Members of the next generation want to be at a company where work means more than a paycheck. They believe work can be a calling (Reich) or an expression of our creativity (Florida). BigCos aren’t currently organized to enable their workforces in this way (human resources, anyone?), but NewCos — even the very largest ones like Google — most definitely are.

5. Today’s consumers are newly empowered and are making decisions on more than price. If millennials are choosing employers based on purpose and authenticity, it follows that they decide how they spend their money in similar fashion. Convenience, selection, and price are important, but new kinds of competitors are exposing weaknesses in big companies’ essential truths, and that’s an existential threat. Dollar Shave Club questions Gillette’s core premise,MetroMile questions Geico’s core premise, Earnest does the same to large financial institutions, HolaLuz to energy companies, and the list goes on. Companies profiting from practices or products that demonstrably create more harm than good in the world are threatened in an age of transparency and accountability. Regardless of good intent or excellent marketing, if your business makes people unhealthy, or depends on exploitation of vulnerable workers, or can be laddered to climate change, it’s at risk of mass consumer migration to businesses with better narratives.

6. The platform economy means traditional competitive moats are falling away. Today’s largest consumer companies earned their power by consolidating and optimizing their access to commodities (what their products were made of), manufacturing (how their products were made), and distribution (where their products were sold and how people became aware of them). They were built on humanity’s first global platforms: television and mass transportation networks. We all know that the Internet undermined this hegemony; physical distribution is no longer a surefire competitive advantage (just ask Walmart). But what’s not well understood is how quickly other parts of the product stack have become platform-ized. Just as startups can now access technology as a service, they can also access sourcing and manufacturing as a service (Dollar Shave doesn’t make its blades, for example). This of course bolsters point #5 above: If any company can access the same economies of scale, brands must compete on more than price or distribution, they must compete on voice, innovative (and information-first) approaches to markets, and purpose.

7. Cities are resurgent. I just returned from Mexico City, which earlier this month hosted its first NewCo festival. While there, I heard a refrain consistent with my visits around the world: The city is changing for the better and new kinds of companies are at the heart of that change. When people gather at NewCo meetups or inside NewCo sessions, I keep hearing “There’s just no way these kinds of companies could have made it in this city ten years ago.” Coupled with the horizontal force of technology and the rise of a purpose-driven zeitgeist, cities have become both the epicenter of humanity’s greatest challenges, as well as the birthplace of our greatest innovation. One generation ago, one-third of humanity lived in urban centers. Today, it’s more than 50 percent. One generation from now, more than two-thirds of us will reside in the tangled banks of a city center, and that number will surpass 80 percent by the end of this century. Cities offer access to capital, education, regulatory frameworks, and a collaborative density of human curiosity and connections. It’s where great companies are born and grow.

8. BigCos are deeply aware of all this — and a massive shift is about to reveal itself. For as long as I’ve been in the media and technology business, I’ve heard big company executives proclaim they were committed to change. But it always rang hollow: Large companies expended far more resources preventingchange than they ever did committing to it. Over the past year, however, I’ve sensed a deep shift in the tone of my conversations with BigCos. These are some of the smartest people in the world, and they understand the technological, generational, and social tectonics at play. In their board rooms and C-suites, conversations are already underway about changes so significant, they’ll be viewed as “calendar reset” moment: Before Shift and After Shift. We’re already seeing leading indicators — Walmart’s commitment to sustainability, GE’s move to Boston, Publicis’s rewritten purpose statement and organizational structure — but in the next year or two, the pace will quicken. New CEOs at category-leading companies like McDonald’s, Ford, and P&G will most likely announce stunning new initiatives that would have been inconceivable a decade ago.

9. The best NewCos realize there’s a lot to learn from the BigCos. After years of feasting on BigCo markets, “established upstarts” like Google, Facebook, Uber, Zenefits, and Square are transitioning from cultures based on “move fast and break things” and “ask for forgiveness, not permission.” Their leaders are now turning to questions like “How do I build a company that will last for generations? How can I maintain a strong corporate culture when I have thousands of employees? How do I work productively with regulatory and policy frameworks, now that I’m an established player?” Turns out, BigCos have decades, if not centuries, of experience in answering these kinds of questions. In my conversations with leaders of both NewCos and BigCos, I sense a new kind of detente as each side realizes how much it has to learn from the other. In the coming months and years, I expect we’ll see a lot more cooperation between the two.

In the coming months, NewCo will be focused on exploring these business trends, with new media and event products. If you’d like to join the conversation, please follow us on Facebook or Twitter, hit “Like” below, and/or sign up for our daily newsletter. We believe this the most important story in business, and we’re committed to covering it for you.

Linda Holroyd's insight:

Insightful thoughts on how tech convergence and the empowerment of customers and demands of employees will affect companies of all sizes

No comment yet.
Scooped by Linda Holroyd
February 10, 2016 10:00 AM
Scoop.it!

Shire's Baxalta Acquisition: An Orphan Drug Market Dream?

Shire's Baxalta Acquisition: An Orphan Drug Market Dream? | Innovating in an Age of Personalization | Scoop.it

After a long list of mergers and acquisitions in healthcare, what does Shire’s acquisition of Baxalta mean for the industry?

Research suggests approximately 95% of the estimated 6,000+ rare diseases are yet to have a single FDA-approved drug treatment. However, this could be a thing of the past, going by the current trends in the market.

The acquisition of Baxalta by Shire being a case in point, following the trodden path of the Sanofi-Genzyme and the Roche-Genentech deals. With this successful acquisition, Shire is moving to consolidate its position in the orphan drugs market across therapeutic segments ranging from gastroenterology to lysosomal disorders.

Understandably, the orphan drug segment has enjoyed a longer exclusivity status from FDA, with companies spending less on shorter trials with smaller patient populations, along with a provision for a maximum pricing power to the invested pharma company, has made this segment a sweet spot for pharma mergers and acquisitions.

With the minimized patient population available for clinical trials, the market is also open to the adoption of genetic biomarkers and clinical endpoints for orphan drug clinical trials, a major step towards personalized medicine.

The orphan drugs market is very attractive: it’s worth $100+ billion and has a CAGR of 12%, almost twice of the general drugs market. Of the top 10 projected best-selling drugs worldwide in 2015, almost seven bear the orphan status. Additionally, the market has had favorable regulatory environment, having witnessed a record year for FDA/EU/Japan orphan designations in 2014.

Baxalta’s acquisition is very logical, as the company’s assets complement Shire’s rare disease platform, which made up 40% of Shire’s 2014 revenue. Additionally, it follows Shire’s recent portfolio expansion with the purchase of NPS Pharmaceuticals and its drugs for a rare disease, short bowel syndrome.

The combined entity can be shaped as a global leader in rare diseases with multiple billion-dollar franchises in high-value therapeutic areas with substantial barriers to entry. It puts Shire in fourth spot, very close to Celgene and within reach of the market leaders of orphan drug sales, Novartis and Roche. Building a strong diversified portfolio and achieving market leadership is very crucial for Shire to compete in this market, estimated to be worth $180+ billion in 2020!

This acquisition is in line with large platform acquisition activity like Abbvie-Pharmacyclics (2015) Amgen-Onyyx (2013) and Sanofi-Genzyme (2011), and also helps access a lower effective tax rate for the combined entity by 2017-2018.

This piece was written with contribution from Sangeetha Prabakaran, Program Manager and Nitin Naik, Vice President of Global Life Sciences with Frost & Sullivan’s Transformation Health Program.

Linda Holroyd's insight:

'The combined entity can be shaped as a global leader in rare diseases with multiple billion-dollar franchises in high-value therapeutic areas with substantial barriers to entry.'

No comment yet.
Scooped by Linda Holroyd
February 8, 2016 1:23 PM
Scoop.it!

The Internet Of Medical Things: Digitization Revolutionizes Respiratory Care Management

The Internet Of Medical Things: Digitization Revolutionizes Respiratory Care Management | Innovating in an Age of Personalization | Scoop.it

The Internet Of Medical Things: Digitization Revolutionizes Respiratory Care Management
During this time of year, incidences of severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) escalate. Today there are 60 million people with moderate to severe COPD and an additional 235 million who live with asthma worldwide. The total direct costs associated with COPD were approximately $40 billion in 2015 and are estimated to reach $49 billion by 2020. The economic burden of COPD and asthma in the European Union was estimated to be more than 80 billion euros in 2013.

Adherence is the biggest challenge with any chronic disease, especially COPD. According to World Health Organization (WHO), the rate of non-adherence varies from 30% to 70% for asthmatic patients. Hence, there is a need to prioritize the role of patient adherence in improving patient outcomes and reducing the associated costs.

The transformation of the healthcare industry toward a patient-centric model, coupled with the rise of digital health, is set to transform respiratory care management. Many pharmaceutical companies are revitalizing their capabilities and operative models through digital health technologies and are transforming themselves toward prevention, precision, personalization, consumer engagement and improved patient outcomes to remain competitive.

The Big Pull: Next-Generation Inhalers

Next-generation inhalers, often known as smart inhalers, are rapidly emerging as the key focus area for pharmaceutical companies. These devices enable patients and healthcare entities to access data in real time and utilize the data to improve the treatment outcomes using digital technology. Leading pharmaceutical companies such as AstraZeneca, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) already recognize the role of digital health in connecting to the patients and improving medication adherence.

In July 2015, AstraZeneca partnered with a New Zealand-based digital health technology provider, Adherium, to incorporate digital health technology into its products. Adherium’s Smartinhaler products are cleared for marketing by the U.S. FDA and European CE marking, as well as TGA and MedSafe in Australia and New Zealand. Furthermore, the company is in the process of CFDA registration in China.

Another U.S. based, FDA-approved digital health technology provider, Propeller health, entered into a partnership with Boehringer Ingelheim and GSK for their inhaler device to enhance product value by improving patient adherence and gathering insight on patients, and thereby personalizing treatment for its consumers. Propeller health received FDA approval for its system to be used in association with Boehringer Ingelheim’s Respimat device and GSK’s Diskus device.

Additionally, Novartis entered into a partnership with QualComm to incorporate digital technologies in its COPD device, Breezhaler, in January 2016.

What Does this Mean for Patients and Providers?

The new products enable patients to adhere to their medication by continuous reminder and dosage information. Patients receive alerts through their mobile or electronic devices as a part of the adherence program. The information empowers healthcare providers and companies to monitor patients as well as make informed decisions on choice of treatment and medication changes. Evaluating the patient information allows companies and providers to quantify the factors on medication adherence and better understand the patient to improve the quality of healthcare.

The drive toward integration or a connected healthcare environment will rapidly change the clinical workflow of physicians and providers. As consumer engagement and data increases, physicians will need to enhance their skills and tools to interpret the results as well as broaden their consultations with patients to support them more often in their choice of treatment. Patients will become more empowered to make decisions for themselves based on the data generated from digital inhalers.

Eventually, the goal with digitization is to increase adherence, reduce costs and improve quality of life. Digital health is not only transforming patient care, but also allows companies to innovate and create opportunities.

The impact of digitization of healthcare is clearly visible in the respiratory care management segment as pharmaceutical companies are developing a collaborative culture in embracing digital technology. Digitization allows pharmaceutical companies to gather patient data, connect with patients and providers to make informed decisions, and continue to innovate ideas needed to stay ahead of the competition. For companies, the next five to 10 years will be essential as they manage the data from patients and incorporate this into the physician’s workflow.

This article was written with contribution from Brahadeesh Chandrasekaran, Industry Analyst with Frost & Sullivan’s Transformation Health Program.

Linda Holroyd's insight:

The digitization of healthcare is further empowering patients - what's the opportunity for businesses?

No comment yet.
Scooped by Linda Holroyd
January 26, 2016 5:24 PM
Scoop.it!

How private-equity owners lean into turnarounds | McKinsey & Company

How private-equity owners lean into turnarounds | McKinsey & Company | Innovating in an Age of Personalization | Scoop.it

How private-equity owners lean into turnarounds
PE-backed companies outperform their public counterparts during periods of distress because the owners play a more active role in management.

January 2016 | byHyder Kazimi and Tao Tan
It’s well known that the boards of the best private-equity (PE) firms create value by using financial leverage to increase their returns on equity, by improving the strategy and operations of their target companies, and by exiting at higher multiples. Proponents of PE further argue that management incentives, strong board governance, and a concentrated shareholder base are critical for long-term success.

Struck by recent difficulties in sectors such as oil and gas (not to mention mining) in the wake of collapsing commodity prices, we decided to find out whether more disciplined PE practices can make a difference during troubled economic times. To that end, we compared the performance of 659 PE-backed and publicly owned enterprises across different sectors over the last nine years. Our finding: PE-backed companies outperformed their public peers when recovering from business distress, even taking into account a higher risk of bankruptcy.

Exhibit 1 shows that PE-backed companies with more than $250 million in revenue at the time they got into trouble recovered their EBITDA margins significantly faster than their public counterparts did for the turnaround’s duration—typically, up to 18 months. On average, they succeeded in recovering their pre-distress margins during that period, regardless of their size.1
PE ownership does provide some natural advantages over public ownership. Our recent experience working with both types of companies during episodes of economic pressure indicates that the key differences are the active role PE boards play in setting the ground rules and their willingness to hold management teams accountable for driving a turnaround. We have found, for example, that the most successful PE-backed company boards quickly and significantly change the rules of engagement, clearly communicate specific performance targets, set an explicit timetable for action, and decide whether the CEO and management team have the mind-set and capabilities required to execute the plans (Exhibit 2). These successful PE boards, we have found, are also very effective in shifting their behavior from normal-working mode to crisis mode as planning moves into execution.
Not all company boards must follow these prescriptions. Some may lack the time to do so; others have incentives different from those of PE directors. Nonetheless, we believe that the boards and leadership teams of public companies can learn from the energy, urgency, and hands-on involvement of rapid owner-assisted transformations. PE governance provides clear advantages during tough times, as well as the less tangible benefits of active board leadership and direct owner accountability. These can truly change the game.

Linda Holroyd's insight:

Up-sides of private-equity leadership for turnarounds

No comment yet.
Scooped by Linda Holroyd
January 4, 2016 12:55 PM
Scoop.it!

Shift to software will be key for Michigan's auto industry to flourish

Shift to software will be key for Michigan's auto industry to flourish | Innovating in an Age of Personalization | Scoop.it

Tesla is at the forefront of the electric car industry, however, Michigan automakers are quickly jumping on board on the electronic movement with partnerships with Silicon Valley businesses.By Rick Haglund

LOS ANGELES — You can go to the mall on a Sunday afternoon to buy a pair of shoes in Southern California and come home with a Tesla Model S electric car.

That is, if you can afford the $76,200 selling price.

Tesla sells directly to consumers in California and about 20 other states. Michigan isn't one of them. Our state requires new cars and trucks be sold through franchised dealers, a system Tesla is fighting to upend.

But the long-held dealer franchise system isn't the only part of the auto industry California companies are seeking to disrupt.

California is competing, and in some cases, partnering with Michigan companies to transform the automobile from a mechanical to an electronic marvel.

Ford Motor Co. and other automakers and suppliers have established research operations in Northern California's Silicon Valley to develop various automotive software technologies.

Dragos Maciuca, the director of Ford's new California operation, recently told the Los Angeles Times that Ford is there because of a profound shift away from mechanical engineering — Detroit's forte — in the auto industry.

"Now, there is the shift to software — and the mecca of software is Silicon Valley," said Maciuca, a former Apple engineer.

Ford and Google, which has been testing self-driving cars for years, are rumored to be in talks to jointly build an autonomous vehicle.

This isn't the first time Detroit has come to California seeking new knowledge about the auto industry.

California, the largest auto market in the country, long has been a social and style trendsetter. The hot-rod culture that developed here after World War II, for example, influenced cars from Detroit for decades.

In the 1980s, General Motors jointly operated an assembly plant with Toyota in Fremont, California, that GM used to learn about Toyota's manufacturing techniques.

The plant, known as NUMMI, closed in 2010. Tesla now owns it.

California's auto industry is not a threat to Michigan's in terms of size. Michigan dwarfs California in auto employment, manufacturing plants and engineering centers.

California companies often rely on Michigan businesses when they get ready to build products.

Roush Industries in Livonia is building Google's test fleet of self-driving cars. Last year, Tesla purchased Riviera Tool in Grand Rapids for its metal-bending expertise.

But Michigan's auto supremacy isn't assured just because state automakers have been designing, engineering and building cars for more than 100 years.

Crain's Detroit Business recently asked retired Visteon CEO Tim Leuliette what advice he would give new executives in the auto industry.

"Face reality," he said. "Don't work for a company that makes mechanical parts in an electronic world."

That should send shivers down the spines of those working to ensure Michigan's automotive future.

Linda Holroyd's insight:

Software is transforming all industries and companies

No comment yet.
Scooped by Linda Holroyd
November 24, 2015 1:26 PM
Scoop.it!

New Book, New Rules

New Book, New Rules | Innovating in an Age of Personalization | Scoop.it

Why do start-ups routinely outperform incumbents when it comes to catching the next wave in disrupted markets? Because they are not conflicted!

So what would happen if the established leaders could sort out their internal (and external) conflicts? What if they could organize in a way that let them leverage their size and use it to their advantage? What if an aging gorilla could become Godzilla?

That is the outcome Zone to Win seeks to enable—to help established enterprises organize to compete in an age of disruption. Its key principles include the following:

  • The resource allocation conflicts that paralyze established enterprises derive from competing ROI time horizons. To resolve them companies must organize into zones defined by which horizon is being targeted.

 

  • Three of the four required zones are typically already in place and function reasonably well—although they could do better. These are the Performance Zone, the Productivity Zone, and the Incubation Zone.

 

  • The fourth zone by contrast, the one that enables an established enterprise to onboard a disruptive business model and scale it to material size, is typically neither organized nor funded to succeed. This is the Transformation Zone, and it requires a very specific set of disciplines if its transformational goals are to be achieved.

 

  • Transformational initiatives put enormous pressure on each of the other three zones, so in fact the entire enterprise must reorganize and reprioritize across all four zones in order to succeed.

 

  • Finally, such transformations can be entered into voluntarily in an effort to catch the next wave ahead of the competition—what we call playing Zone Offense, the case study for which is Salesforce.com—or reactively in an effort to keep the next wave from catching you—what we call playing Zone Defense, for which the case study is Microsoft.

Zone to Win overall is a playbook. It is highly prescriptive and pulls no punches. Its BHAG is indeed big, hairy, and audacious—namely, to reengineer conventional management principles to compete successfully in an age of disruption. If this is something you would like to learn more about, please click here.

One last note: Initial versions of each of the chapters in Zone to Win were test driven early this year in this blog, and it was my pleasure to give a shout out in the Acknowledgments section to those readers whose comments made a material change to the book’s argument. Thanks again to all who participated.

Linda Holroyd's insight:

Awesome thoughts on why start-ups have that innovation edge, and what corporates can do to embrace a 'Transformation Zone'. Thanks Geoffrey Moore!

No comment yet.
Scooped by Linda Holroyd
October 22, 2015 11:07 AM
Scoop.it!

With 120+ News Publishers Signed On, Google Opens Applications For $170M DNI Innovation Fund

With 120+ News Publishers Signed On, Google Opens Applications For $170M DNI Innovation Fund | Innovating in an Age of Personalization | Scoop.it

Search giant Google today is taking the next step in its bid to rehabilitate its relationship with the news and publishing industry.

In Europe today, the company is opening up applications for startups and others who are interested in receiving grants from Google’s Digital News Initiative Innovation Fund: Google has put aside €150 million ($170 million) for startups and others building new services, products and technologies for the news industry, and it will give out in grants twice a year, typically ranging from €50,000 to €1 million, but occasionally higher, with no strings attached, Google said today:

“We’re looking for projects that demonstrate new thinking in the practice of digital journalism; that support the development of new business models, or maybe even change the way users consume digital news,” writes Ludovic Blecher of Google, who heads the DNI Innovation Fund. “Projects can be highly experimental, but must have well-defined goals and have a significant digital component. There is no requirement to use any Google products. Successful projects will show innovation and have a positive impact on the production of original digital journalism and on the future sustainability of the news business.”

At the same time, Google said that it now has over 120 news organizations in its Digital News Initiative, the European umbrella group for the fund, which was first announced in April with 11 members and a pledge to work on projects and products focused on high quality journalism. It includes publishers like Die Zeit, FAZ and Der Spiegel, the Guardian, Financial Times, the BBC, The Economist, La Stampa, El Pais and Les Echos.

Since then, the DNI has been working on training by way of projects like the Google News Lab. And some of the work that the DNI has been running and funding also formed a cornerstone of Google’s recently announced AMP (accelerated mobile pages) project, tech that Google has developed to produce faster-loading sites for smaller screens.

The €150 million fund was actually first made public in April, but now, as part of the application process opening up, Google is laying out more details about how it will work, who is eligible and more.

Grants will be open to any individual or organization working on innovations in online news — and that can range from startups through to established news publishers. Google says that application rounds each year with the first starting today and closing December 4. (The next will be in Spring 2016.)

Google says that funding will fall into three categories:

Prototype projects that need up to €50,000 of funding. “These projects should be very early stage, with ideas yet to be designed and assumptions yet to be tested. We will fast-track such projects and will fund 100% of the total cost,” Google says.

Medium projects that need up to €300,000 of funding. “We will accept funding requests up to 70% of the total cost of the project,” it notes.

Large projects open to organisations that need more than €300,000. “We will accept funding requests up to 70% of the total cost of the project. Funding is capped at €1 million,” says Google.

There may be exceptions to the €1 million cap, Google says. All of this is irrespective of whatever other funding a company or person may get for the work in question. That means you may also be getting VC backing. Google does not take any equity as a result of the DNI grant.

Google is, in general, making quite some effort here to make sure that it’s as unbiased as it can be when considering and awarding grants.

Google says it has “consulted widely to ensure that the Fund has inclusive and transparent application and selection processes. Confidentiality is critical; applicants should not share business-sensitive or highly confidential information.”

It adds that initial selection for the first two tiers of projects will be done by a Project team, which will be a mix of Google staff and external industry figures. Then the Fund’s Council (12 people currently, listed below)  will review and decide further. The Council will both sift and decide on the “Large” projects.

While there are a number of ways of getting funding for startups today — indeed we’re in something of a high water mark for VC funding more generally — the idea here is to try to give some oxygen to projects in the lesser-explored corners of Europe and the wider ecosystem. At a time when there is a huge emphasis on the news industry dying, this might be a ripe moment to step in and offer a little lifeline in the form of some money for new ideas.

Google has come under fire for having a fractious relationship with the news industry, with many publishers criticising the search giant and its own content efforts for effectively making it too easy to bypass their own sites (and business models) to provide consumers with news. Some have held out against Google while others have caved in somewhat reluctantly to a company that essentially dominates how people navigate to information on the Internet today.

But Google has had a lot of heat both in terms of bad publicity for being a giant bully, and from regulators, and it is now looking for a more conciliatory approach, one perhaps less evil.

Linda Holroyd's insight:

Google's giving back through its  $170 million Digital News Initiative Innovation Fund earmarked for startups and others building new services, products and technologies for the news industry 

No comment yet.
Scooped by Linda Holroyd
March 16, 2016 11:52 AM
Scoop.it!

Things Science Says Will Make You Much Happier

Things Science Says Will Make You Much Happier | Innovating in an Age of Personalization | Scoop.it

It’s no secret that we’re obsessed with happiness. After all, the “pursuit of happiness” is even enshrined in the Declaration of Independence. But happiness is fleeting. How can we find it and keep it alive?

Psychologists at the University of California have discovered some fascinating things about happiness that could change your life.

Dr. Sonja Lyubomirsky is a psychology professor at the Riverside campus who is known among her peers as “the queen of happiness.” She began studying happiness as a grad student and never stopped, devoting her career to the subject.

One of her main discoveries is that we all have a happiness “set point.” When extremely positive or negative events happen—such as buying a bigger house or losing a job—they temporarily increase or decrease our happiness, but we eventually drift back to our set point.

The breakthrough in Dr. Lyubomirsky’s research is that you can make yourself happier—permanently. Lyubomirsky and others have found that our genetic set point is responsible for only about 50% of our happiness, life circumstances affect about 10%, and a whopping 40% is completely up to us. The large portion of your happiness that you control is determined by your habits, attitude, and outlook on life.

"Happiness depends upon ourselves." -Aristotle

Even when you accomplish something great, that high won’t last. It won’t make you happy on its own; you have to work to make and keep yourself happy.

Your happiness, or lack thereof, is rooted in your habits. Permanently adopting new habits—especially those that involve intangibles, such as how you see the world—is hard, but breaking the habits that make you unhappy is much easier.

There are numerous bad habits that tend to make us unhappy. Eradicating these bad habits can move your happiness set point in short order.

Immunity to awe. Amazing things happen around you every day if you only know where to look. Technology has exposed us to so much and made the world so much smaller. Yet, there’s a downside that isn’t spoken of much: exposure raises the bar on what it takes to be awestricken. And that’s a shame, because few things are as uplifting as experiencing true awe. True awe is humbling. It reminds us that we’re not the center of the universe. Awe is also inspiring and full of wonder, underscoring the richness of life and our ability to both contribute to it and be captivated by it. It’s hard to be happy when you just shrug your shoulders every time you see something new.

Isolating yourself. Isolating yourself from social contact is a pretty common response to feeling unhappy, but there’s a large body of research that says it’s the worst thing you can do. This is a huge mistake, as socializing, even when you don’t enjoy it, is great for your mood. We all have those days when we just want to pull the covers over our heads and refuse to talk to anybody, but the moment this becomes a tendency, it destroys your mood. Recognize that when unhappiness is making you antisocial, you need to force yourself to get out there and mingle. You’ll notice the difference right away.

Blaming. We need to feel in control of our lives in order to be happy, which is why blaming is so incompatible with happiness. When you blame other people or circumstances for the bad things that happen to you, you’ve decided that you have no control over your life, which is terrible for your mood.

Controlling. It’s hard to be happy without feeling in control of your life, but you can take this too far in the other direction by making yourself unhappy through trying to control too much. This is especially true with people. The only person you can control in your life is you. When you feel that nagging desire to dictate other people’s behavior, this will inevitably blow up in your face and make you unhappy. Even if you can control someone in the short term, it usually requires pressure in the form of force or fear, and treating people this way won’t leave you feeling good about yourself.

Criticizing. Judging other people and speaking poorly of them is a lot like overindulging in a decadent dessert; it feels good while you’re doing it, but afterwards, you feel guilty and sick. Sociopaths find real pleasure in being mean. For the rest of us, criticizing other people (even privately or to ourselves) is just a bad habit that’s intended to make us feel better about ourselves. Unfortunately, it doesn’t. It just creates a spiral of negativity.

Complaining. Complaining is troubling, as well as the attitude that precedes it. Complaining is a self-reinforcing behavior. By constantly talking—and therefore thinking—about how bad things are, you reaffirm your negative beliefs. While talking about what bothers you can help you feel better, there’s a fine line between complaining being therapeutic and it fueling unhappiness. Beyond making you unhappy, complaining drives other people away.

Impressing. People will like your clothes, your car, and your fancy job, but that doesn’t mean they like you. Trying to impress other people is a source of unhappiness, because it doesn’t get to the source of what makes you happy—finding people who like you and accept you for who you are. All the things you acquire in the quest to impress people won’t make you happy either. There’s an ocean of research that shows that material things don’t make you happy. When you make a habit of chasing things, you are likely to become unhappy because, beyond the disappointment you experience once you get them, you discover that you’ve gained them at the expense of the real things that can make you happy, such as friends, family, and taking good care of yourself.

Negativity. Life won’t always go the way you want it to, but when it comes down to it, you have the same 24 hours in the day as everyone else. Happy people make their time count. Instead of complaining about how things could have been or should have been, they reflect on everything they have to be grateful for. Then they find the best solution available to the problem, tackle it, and move on. Nothing fuels unhappiness quite like pessimism. The problem with a pessimistic attitude, apart from the damage it does to your mood, is that it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy: if you expect bad things, you’re more likely to get bad things. Pessimistic thoughts are hard to shake off until you recognize how illogical they are. Force yourself to look at the facts, and you’ll see that things are not nearly as bad as they seem.

Hanging around negative people. Complainers and negative people are bad news because they wallow in their problems and fail to focus on solutions. They want people to join their pity party so that they can feel better about themselves. People often feel pressure to listen to complainers because they don’t want to be seen as callous or rude, but there’s a fine line between lending a sympathetic ear and getting sucked into their negative emotional spirals. You can avoid getting drawn in only by setting limits and distancing yourself when necessary. Think of it this way: If a person were smoking, would you sit there all afternoon inhaling the second-hand smoke? You’d distance yourself, and you should do the same with negative people. A great way to set limits is to ask them how they intend to fix their problems. The complainer will then either quiet down or redirect the conversation in a productive direction.

You should strive to surround yourself with people who inspire you, people who make you want to be better, and you probably do. But what about the people who drag you down? Why do you allow them to be a part of your life? Anyone who makes you feel worthless, anxious, or uninspired is wasting your time and, quite possibly, making you more like them. Life is too short to associate with people like this. Cut them loose.

Comparing your own life to the lives people portray on social media.The Happiness Research Institute conducted the Facebook Experiment to find out how our social media habits affect our happiness. Half of the study’s participants kept using Facebook as they normally would, while the other half stayed off Facebook for a week. The results were striking. At the end of the week, the participants who stayed off Facebook reported a significantly higher degree of satisfaction with their lives and lower levels of sadness and loneliness. The researchers also concluded that people on Facebook were 55% more likely to feel stress as a result.

The thing to remember about Facebook and social media in general is that they rarely represent reality. Social media provides an airbrushed, color-enhanced look at the lives people want to portray. I’m not suggesting that you give up social media; just take it sparingly and with a grain of salt.

Neglecting to set goals. Having goals gives you hope and the ability to look forward to a better future, and working towards those goals makes you feel good about yourself and your abilities. It’s important to set goals that are challenging, specific (and measurable), and driven by your personal values. Without goals, instead of learning and improving yourself, you just plod along wondering why things never change.

Giving in to fear. Fear is nothing more than a lingering emotion that’s fueled by your imagination. Danger is real. It’s the uncomfortable rush of adrenaline you get when you almost step in front of a bus. Fear is a choice. Happy people know this better than anyone does, so they flip fear on its head. They are addicted to the euphoric feeling they get from conquering their fears.

When all is said and done, you will lament the chances you didn’t take far more than you will your failures. Don’t be afraid to take risks. I often hear people say, “What’s the worst thing that can happen to you? Will it kill you?” Yet, death isn’t the worst thing that can happen to you. The worst thing that can happen to you is allowing yourself to die inside while you’re still alive.

Leaving the present. Like fear, the past and the future are products of your mind. No amount of guilt can change the past, and no amount of anxiety can change the future. Happy people know this, so they focus on living in the present moment. It’s impossible to reach your full potential if you’re constantly somewhere else, unable to fully embrace the reality (good or bad) of the very moment. To live in the moment, you must do two things:

1) Accept your past. If you don’t make peace with your past, it will never leave you and it will create your future. Happy people know that the only good reason to look at the past is to see how far you’ve come.

2) Accept the uncertainty of the future, and don’t place unnecessary expectations upon yourself. Worry has no place in the here and now. As Mark Twain once said,

“Worrying is like paying a debt you don’t owe.”
Bringing It All Together

We can’t control our genes, and we can’t control all of our circumstances, but we can rid ourselves of habits that serve no purpose other than to make us miserable.

Linda Holroyd's insight:

Choose happiness!

Linda Holroyd's curator insight, March 16, 2016 11:54 AM

Choose happiness!

Scooped by Linda Holroyd
March 16, 2016 11:31 AM
Scoop.it!

12 ways Google Fiber could trigger the next economic boom

12 ways Google Fiber could trigger the next economic boom | Innovating in an Age of Personalization | Scoop.it

Silicon valley having 1 Gbps Google Fiber to the home have the power to trigger behavioral, social and economic change. But for massive change, the rest of the country will also have to follow suit.

1 Gbps to the home will have a cascading effect across several sectors in the economy. It will force innovation and a new way of thinking and could eventually trigger the next economic boom. Here is how it could :

  1. Increase in 4K/8K content : Availability of more bandwidth will result in proliferation of 4K & 8K content. More pressure on content creators like Netflix to create and publish 4K & soon even 8K content. Japan is already planning to shoot 130 hours of 8K content during the 2016 Olympics. This in turn will create pressure on the regular cable providers and networks to create and publish 4K/8K content.
  2. Increased adoption of 4K/8K TV sets : While 4K TVs are fueling the need for faster bandwidth to home, there is a cyclical effect. When more people have high bandwidth available to download & stream high resolution content, it will in turn increase the demand for 4K and higher resolution TVs. This will cause price on these TVs to come down resulting in even more 4K/8K TV demand.
  3. Acceleration of IoT/IoE : More bandwidth in the last mile means an improved ability for more “Things” & “non-Things” to be able to generate and send more data to the cloud to be analyzed and acted upon. This would accelerate and open up the IoT economy – in turn creating even more data to be transmitted, stored and analyzed.
  4. Extension of the BigData & Analytics wave : More content and more data will increase the need for weeding out the needles in the haystack. Meaning better analytics for targeting the right content to the right user, the right ads to the right user, more accurate predictions and better algorithms for user retention and more importantly user-attention retention and stickiness.
  5. More usage of Cloud storage and services : The above means increased data storage and more capacity of shared Hadoop/SPARK platforms to run that Analytics. Means more cloud storage and services usage. Translates to more innovation and competitive pricing from the major Cloud providers aka Amazon, Google, Microsoft.
  6. Pressure on Internet Providers to upgrade bandwidth : This will of course result in competition among other Cable & Internet Providers to step up and deliver 1Gbps or more at a more economical price. As one can see, Google Fiber announcements have been quickly followed by Verizon FiOS, Comcast GigabitPro & AT&T announcements already. It remains to be seen how the race to rollout and the price to customers workout.
  7. Investment in the Telecom backbone infrastructure : Processing and routing high volume traffic through the internet backbone will result in existing Telecom providers (the Comcasts, AT&Ts, Verizons of the world) to upgrade or add to their capacity.
  8. Innovation in the Telecom infrastructure : This in turn will lead to innovation for higher capacity, bigger, faster boxes and line-card by telecom manufacturers (the Cisco, Juniper, Ericssons of the world). This will also trigger innovation in Network Protocols.
  9. Investment in Data Centers : More higher resolution content means bigger Data centers
  10. Innovation in Data Center cooling : Mark Zuckerberg has already made a conscious effort for low-cost cooling by building a Facebook Data Center close to the Arctic circle while Microsoft is experimenting with under-ocean Data centers using Ocean currents to power the turbines to generate electricity. The need for mammoth data centers with gargantuan cooling needs, with a pressure to keep costs low will lead to such innovative approaches and more innovations in Data Center infrastructure & cooling.
  11. Opening of the Telecom economy (SDN) : Bigger, better boxes cost bigger bucks. But Cable Providers are being pressured to reduce prices. This will create a back-pressure on the manufacturers of the equipment to reduce prices aka margins, there will also be pressure to add lower priced options from the Open network economy (ONF) created by Facebook, Google & other collaborators including several SDN startups. This means several SDN startups will see the light of the day and may boom -  grow stand-alone and/or get acquired by larger giants.
  12. Rekindling the Telecom boom : In any case there will be need for newer/additional Data Center & Network equipment, which would translate to Cisco, Juniper stock prices going up.

Of course, all this won't happen in a day. But the faster Gigabit comes to every home in the US (& the world), the faster the telecom and all related economies will overhaul and boom

Linda Holroyd's insight:

Google Fiber will help us raise the bar

No comment yet.
Scooped by Linda Holroyd
March 15, 2016 2:27 PM
Scoop.it!

20 Priceless Lessons Everyone Should Learn in Their 20s

20 Priceless Lessons Everyone Should Learn in Their 20s | Innovating in an Age of Personalization | Scoop.it

20 Priceless Lessons Everyone Should Learn in Their 20s
15-minute meetings can be ultra productive.

BY QUORA

WRITE A COMMENT


IMAGE: Getty Images

What are the most difficult and useful things people have to learn in their 20s? originally appeared on Quora - the knowledge sharing network where compelling questions are answered by people with unique insights.

Answer by Nelson Wang, entrepreneur, writer, and founder of ceolifestyle.io, on Quora:

Here are the top 20 things I learned in my twenties:

1. Marry your ideas with execution. Ideas are good. An idea married to execution is better. So you came up with 100 good ideas. That's great. Can you actually make any of them a success?
2. Being able to focus is a skill. When I was in my 20s, I wanted to be a writer, a producer, an actor, a financial analyst, a salesperson, and an entrepreneur. And that was just in the category of careers. Imagine what that list looked like for multitasking my daily activities. As I got older, I realized that our time and energy is incredibly limited each day. Being able to focus is absolutely critical if you want to make a big impact.
3. Perseverance is the most important skill you can learn. You will fail, sometimes over and over again. It's human. No one's perfect. It's not about you fall, but how you get up each time. Did you learn? Did you quit when it made sense? Did you try again? Learn to persevere. I wanted to quit after writing my first book because it was such a flop. Guess what? I continued writing for years and eventually I got published in Forbes, Time, Fortune, Inc and Business Insider. #StayTheCourse.
4. Working hard doesn't guarantee success, but it makes it more likely. Working hard does ensure a few things: you'll learn a lot, you'll develop discipline, and you'll typically see more opportunities. Combine working hard with working smart, and you've got a recipe for success.
5. Work is very personal. You spend about 24% of your time at work your entire life. Bring your whole, authentic self every single day. (This is Sheryl Sandberg's idea). Do you think people say, "Gosh, I love working with Nelson because he's so robotic and shows no emotion or personality." Nope, didn't think so.
6. You don't know everything; learn from others. According to Socrates, "The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing." Okay, I think Socrates is kind of right here. Just kind of. I think you know something. But none of us know everything. Leverage the intellectual power of your network and always be insanely curious to learn from others. You never know what incredible knowledge they can share with you. For example, the other day I sat down with a friend for a coffee and learned how he built a business that generated tens of thousands of dollars in sales in a few months with only a few hours of work a week. #MindBlown.
7. An important part of business is setting proper expectations. Learn to let people know in advance what to expect when they work with you. This is half the battle.
8. 15-minute meetings can be ultra productive. Hour-long meetings are almost always too long. Seriously, when's the last time you really had to have a meeting that long to be productive? Try aiming for 15 minutes. It forces you to be concise.
9. You can lead, with or without a title. When I worked at a huge technology company in Silicon Valley, I was an individual contributor. I came up with an innovative idea for generating sales and new customers on my own and soon the word spread about its success. Before you knew it, I was asked by the executive leadership team to present it nationally to the entire team. That's when I realized, leaders lead by inspiring, coaching, and empowering people to be great. You can lead with or without the title.
10. First impressions make a difference. I flew to over 70 cities in 2 years for business. When I wore a hoodie and fell asleep once, the stewardess woke me up and said, "It's time to wake up, teddy bear." I was 29 years old at the time. When I wore a suit (because I had business meetings that same day), people would treat me differently and call me "sir." First impressions make a difference.
11. Time is the most valuable currency. In college I spent an inordinate amount of time playing Mario Kart and partying. Yes, it was fun, but as I've gotten older I realize now how valuable that time was. If I could go back in time, I would spend that time pushing myself to learn, to grow as a person, to spend more quality time with my friends and family, and to even start a business. Also, when I was in my early 20s, I often thought about how to make more money. Money is important. We need it for food, shelter, and clothing. It's absolutely necessary in life. But the most valuable currency is time. Time with our loved ones. Time to live a life we can be proud of. Time is finite. Spend it wisely.
12. Most arguments don't matter. Choose your battles wisely. 13. Most people have a limited amount of social currency.
Sometimes only you can motivate yourself to be great. Sometimes one of your idols can inspire you. Sometimes a family member can get you amped up. Sometimes a love interest can drive you. And sometimes, only you can motivate yourself.
14. Figure out your why. Your purpose will fuel your drive. This is the strongest motivator of all.
15. Have strong opinions, weakly held. I love hearing people talk about their ideas and opinions in a passionate way. It shows they care. I also love it when people realize that there's a better way to do things (even when it's different from their own opinion). Be passionate and be open to changing if there's a better way.
16. Data-driven decisions are powerful. "I think the "subscribe" button on the site should be blue," said the executive. "Why?" replied the marketing manager. "Because, I just think blue will do better." Instead of simply making decisions based on opinion, consider leveraging data to arrive at an answer. For example, an A/B test is a common and great way to find out which variations perform better on a webpage. Embrace testing.
17. Intuition can be just as powerful. Sometimes, though, intuition can be really powerful. When Steve Jobs created the iPhone, he had an incredible sense of what he thought people would want. It reminds me of the quote from Henry Ford: "If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses."
18. Your most important investment is in your health. Treat your body well and it will thank you many years later. Eat more fruits and vegetables and exercise regularly. Your energy, focus, and general happiness will improve. My secret to how I got on track with my health? Eating a green smoothie daily for 30 days.
19. Integrity is what you do when no one is looking. But no one will ever know, you think to yourself. Yes, but you always will. And you'll have to live with it. Do the right thing.
20. Love is what really matters. At the end of the day, love is what matters. Love more.
This question originally appeared on Quora - the knowledge sharing network where compelling questions are answered by people with unique insights.

Linda Holroyd's insight:

Wise and practical advice I wish someone told me when I was in my 20s

Linda Holroyd's curator insight, March 16, 2016 11:55 AM

Wise and practical advice I wish someone told me when I was in my 20s

Scooped by Linda Holroyd
March 9, 2016 3:08 PM
Scoop.it!

Why I won't give up my Blackberry

Why I won't give up my Blackberry | Innovating in an Age of Personalization | Scoop.it
Why I won't give up my Blackberry
Mar 1, 2016101,346 views182 Likes146 CommentsShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookShare on Twitter
Every day ‎someone questions my Blackberry as the smartphone of choice but I can honestly say that it makes my life easier and me a more productive manager.



It's been a love affair since I first got my blue Blackberry in 2004 (the 6720 with a chrome screen which I'm definitely not nostalgic about). Since then I've easily and fast been able to compose and respond to e-mails wherever and whenever I am on the move without the need to ‎take out my laptop other than for working with documents. Most recently I have a Blackberry Q10 which is without a doubt the best Blackberry ever.

As a manager of a team at Vodafone and later founding and managing Golden Gekko my Blackberry has been a huge productivity booster as I'm always in control of my communication channels. In addition to this I use it to blog, read my daily newsletters, take notes, book and keep track of all my meetings, instant messaging and yes, for phone calls!

So how does the Blackberry improve productivity versus other smartphones?

E-mail and calendar work amazing well and are lightning fast
Type super fast on the physical keyboard without looking, taking notes, writing blogs and other longer texts
The battery always lasts a full day even if the phone is used heavily
It's small and can easily be used with one hand when needed.
The hardware is robust and has never failed me in the last 5 years.
When roaming it uses a minimum amount of data when sending and receiving and messages and no need to turn off other applications
The services are extremely reliable with only one major incident in October 2011
Related to the first point but usability is extremely good with swipes, touch screen and keyboard complementing each other
Core services such as Camera, Calculator, Weather, Whatsapp and Evernote work really well
The lack of distraction from ‎latest games and apps may be related to discipline rather than the device but I'll put it on the list anyway
And yes, I have an iPhone 6S and a Samsung Galaxy S6 with me as backup and to use all the great apps that also improve my daily life.‎ Maybe the combination of two or three phones is the reason that Blackberry remains my primary device. Because if I had to choose one phone then I would probably have to chose the iPhone or Galaxy.

...until very recently that is.



With the Blackberry Priv with a big screen, a keyboard and running Android available since December there might be an-all-in-one-device. I'm still trying it out‎ so will let you know when I've made up my mind.

‎Anyone else that still uses the Blackberry or that wish you could have it back? Let me know so I can add you to the dying bread of Blackberry fans.

About: Magnus Jern is a serial entrepreneur, mobile envangelist, published writer and speaker at conferences around the world. He helps big and small companies succeed in mobile currently serving as President of DMI International (acquired Golden Gekko in 2013). Get in touch with him through Linkedin.
Linda Holroyd's insight:

Much to be said about the old Blackberrys! May current phones rise to those usage, convenience and power standards!

No comment yet.
Scooped by Linda Holroyd
March 4, 2016 6:52 PM
Scoop.it!

WordPress.com › Log In

Email or Username Password Stay signed in
Linda Holroyd's insight:

FountainBlue's March 4 VIP roundtable on the topic of Strategies for Serving a More Demanding, More Diversified Customer Base! Below are notes from the conversation.

  • Leaders from across industries, roles and sectors are impacted by a more empowered and informed customer base, and responding in many different ways. 
  • The pace of change has escalated, and the demands of the customers are elevated, which impacts the products and services offered and the processes and communications necessary to ensure smooth delivery and scale of growth and response.
  • Hardware will continue to get commoditized, and the value will be on the software and services side of the equation. 
  • Customers are becoming progressively more empowered because of their access to information, the immediacy of access to information, the wide and broad availability of mobile devices, the social online networks, etc., Hence we are evolving from an age of information to an age of the customer, and leaders and companies who acknowledge and work with this trend will be more likely to benefit from it.
  • Digitizing front end functions has gotten more standardized, but there's still a great need to digitize the middle and back end processes, especially for non-tech industries. We need to support customers in being more agile, more flexible, and more scalable. See CBInsights March 3, 2016 report on digitization opportunities for start-ups.  CBI Digitization Opportunities, March 3, 2016

Below is advice on how to better serve a demanding customer base.

  • Ihe Age of the Customer, know what is nice-to-have, and what they need-to-have. It's easier to sell one than the other.
  • When customers are deciding whether to engage, they are considering is it easier and cheaper to solve the problem or live with the problem, so plan your offerings and pricing accordingly.
  • The consumer is demanding quality products and services which area tailored to their needs. These customers are also in general more mindful of the earth and humanity, so organic and sustainable products and processes will be favored progressively more.
  • Technologists need to work hand-in-hand with experts in non-technical fields in collaboration to meet the personalized needs of the consumer.
  • Whereas before, business units and teams might have been isolated and siloed in working with customers, a more collaborative, coordinated communication and strategy is now necessary to better understand the current and future needs of the customer.
  • There's a trend toward selling to business unit managers and users more, even if the product is for an extremely technical audience. In other words, the user may not be the decision-maker, and the sales person needs to talk to both the decision-maker and the user to complete a sale.
  • Data will remain important, of course. Be the type of leader who can translate what the data is saying to create a strategy and plan on how to better serve customers, better expand offerings.
  • We will continue to progress toward pay-as-you-go functionality for a wide range of functions. Communicating clearly to customers and walking them through the adoption curve will help them help themselves in maintaining, supporting and tailoring their own solutions. 

Below are some predictions for opportunities ahead.

  • There's a push pull between the need for security, access and privacy, and there's an opportunity for organizations to provide innovative solutions for a broad and wide audience in this space.
  • There will be a continued trend toward 'freemium' services as the new normal.
  • Interactive solutions which allow customers to learn by doing through simulations provides a huge opportunity to train and educate workers.
  • There will be a trend toward more collaborative, consultative selling by experienced enterprise professionals working with engaged customers to build and iterate use cases.
  • There will be a trend toward paying customers for their aggregated usage data.

Recommended Resources:

  • Pretotype Labs is a PDF ebook which helps entrepreneurs and execs really understand and focus on what the customers want www.pretotypelabs.com
  • AYTM (Ask Your Target Market www.aytm.com) allows entrepreneurs and execs to send tailored surveys to specific target audiences for small amounts of money.
No comment yet.
Scooped by Linda Holroyd
February 18, 2016 6:17 PM
Scoop.it!

The eight essentials of innovation | McKinsey & Company

The eight essentials of innovation | McKinsey & Company | Innovating in an Age of Personalization | Scoop.it

It’s no secret: innovation is difficult for well-established companies. By and large, they are better executors than innovators, and most succeed less through game-changing creativity than by optimizing their existing businesses.

Innovation and creativity
In this engaging presentation, McKinsey principal Nathan Marston explains why innovation is increasingly important to driving corporate growth and brings to life the eight essentials of innovation performance.

Yet hard as it is for such organizations to innovate, large ones as diverse as Alcoa, the Discovery Group, and NASA’s Ames Research Center are actually doing so. What can other companies learn from their approaches and attributes? That question formed the core of a multiyear study comprising in-depth interviews, workshops, and surveys of more than 2,500 executives in over 300 companies, including both performance leaders and laggards, in a broad set of industries and countries (Exhibit 1). What we found were a set of eight essential attributes that are present, either in part or in full, at every big company that’s a high performer in product, process, or business-model innovation.

Since innovation is a complex, company-wide endeavor, it requires a set of crosscutting practices and processes to structure, organize, and encourage it. Taken together, the essentials described in this article constitute just such an operating system, as seen in Exhibit 2. These often overlapping, iterative, and nonsequential practices resist systematic categorization but can nonetheless be thought of in two groups. The first four, which are strategic and creative in nature, help set and prioritize the terms and conditions under which innovation is more likely to thrive. The next four essentials deal with how to deliver and organize for innovation repeatedly over time and with enough value to contribute meaningfully to overall performance.

Exhibit 1
Exhibit 2

To be sure, there’s no proven formula for success, particularly when it comes to innovation. While our years of client-service experience provide strong indicators for the existence of a causal relationship between the attributes that survey respondents reported and the innovations of the companies we studied, the statistics described here can only prove correlation. Yet we firmly believe that if companies assimilate and apply these essentials—in their own way, in accordance with their particular context, capabilities, organizational culture, and appetite for risk—they will improve the likelihood that they, too, can rekindle the lost spark of innovation. In the digital age, the pace of change has gone into hyperspeed, so companies must get these strategic, creative, executional, and organizational factors right to innovate successfully.

Aspire

President John F. Kennedy’s bold aspiration, in 1962, to “go to the moon in this decade” motivated a nation to unprecedented levels of innovation. A far-reaching vision can be a compelling catalyst, provided it’s realistic enough to stimulate action today.

But in a corporate setting, as many CEOs have discovered, even the most inspiring words often are insufficient, no matter how many times they are repeated. It helps to combine high-level aspirations with estimates of the value that innovation should generate to meet financial-growth objectives. Quantifying an “innovation target for growth,” and making it an explicit part of future strategic plans, helps solidify the importance of and accountability for innovation. The target itself must be large enough to force managers to include innovation investments in their business plans. If they can make their numbers using other, less risky tactics, our experience suggests that they (quite rationally) will.

Establishing a quantitative innovation aspiration is not enough, however. The target value needs to be apportioned to relevant business “owners” and cascaded down to their organizations in the form of performance targets and timelines. Anything less risks encouraging inaction or the belief that innovation is someone else’s job.

For example, Lantmännen, a big Nordic agricultural cooperative, was challenged by flat organic growth and directionless innovation. Top executives created an aspirational vision and strategic plan linked to financial targets: 6 percent growth in the core business and 2 percent growth in new organic ventures. To encourage innovation projects, these quantitative targets were cascaded down to business units and, ultimately, to product groups. During the development of each innovation project, it had to show how it was helping to achieve the growth targets for its category and markets. As a result, Lantmännen went from 4 percent to 13 percent annual growth, underpinned by the successful launch of several new brands. Indeed, it became the market leader in premade food only four years after entry and created a new premium segment in this market.

Such performance parameters can seem painful to managers more accustomed to the traditional approach. In our experience, though, CEOs are likely just going through the motions if they don’t use evaluations and remuneration to assess and recognize the contribution that all top managers make to innovation.

Choose

Fresh, creative insights are invaluable, but in our experience many companies run into difficulty less from a scarcity of new ideas than from the struggle to determinewhich ideas to support and scale. At bigger companies, this can be particularly problematic during market discontinuities, when supporting the next wave of growth may seem too risky, at least until competitive dynamics force painful changes.

Innovation is inherently risky, to be sure, and getting the most from a portfolio of innovation initiatives is more about managing risk than eliminating it. Since no one knows exactly where valuable innovations will emerge, and searching everywhere is impractical, executives must create some boundary conditions for the opportunity spaces they want to explore. The process of identifying and bounding these spaces can run the gamut from intuitive visions of the future to carefully scrutinized strategic analyses. Thoughtfully prioritizing these spaces also allows companies to assess whether they have enough investment behind their most valuable opportunities.

During this process, companies should set in motion more projects than they will ultimately be able to finance, which makes it easier to kill those that prove less promising. RELX Group, for example, runs 10 to 15 experiments per major customer segment, each funded with a preliminary budget of around $200,000, through its innovation pipeline every year, choosing subsequently to invest more significant funds in one or two of them, and dropping the rest. “One of the hardest things to figure out is when to kill something,” says Kumsal Bayazit, RELX Group’s chief strategy officer. “It’s a heck of a lot easier if you have a portfolio of ideas.”

Once the opportunities are defined, companies need transparency into what people are working on and a governance process that constantly assesses not only the expected value, timing, and risk of the initiatives in the portfolio but also its overall composition. There’s no single mix that’s universally right. Most established companies err on the side of overloading their innovation pipelines with relatively safe, short-term, and incremental projects that have little chance of realizing their growth targets or staying within their risk parameters. Some spread themselves thinly across too many projects instead of focusing on those with the highest potential for success and resourcing them to win.

These tendencies get reinforced by a sluggish resource-reallocation process. Our research shows that a company typically reallocates only a tiny fraction of its resources from year to year, thereby sentencing innovation to a stagnating march of incrementalism.1

Discover

Innovation also requires actionable and differentiated insights—the kind that excite customers and bring new categories and markets into being. How do companies develop them? Genius is always an appealing approach, if you have or can get it. Fortunately, innovation yields to other approaches besides exceptional creativity.

The rest of us can look for insights by methodically and systematically scrutinizing three areas: a valuable problem to solve, a technology that enables a solution, and a business model that generates money from it. You could argue that nearly every successful innovation occurs at the intersection of these three elements. Companies that effectively collect, synthesize, and “collide” them stand the highest probability of success. “If you get the sweet spot of what the customer is struggling with, and at the same time get a deeper knowledge of the new technologies coming along and find a mechanism for how these two things can come together, then you are going to get good returns,” says Alcoa chairman and chief executive Klaus Kleinfeld.

The insight-discovery process, which extends beyond a company’s boundaries to include insight-generating partnerships, is the lifeblood of innovation. We won’t belabor the matter here, though, because it’s already the subject of countless articles and books.2One thing we can add is that discovery is iterative, and the active use of prototypes can help companies continue to learn as they develop, test, validate, and refine their innovations. Moreover, we firmly believe that without a fully developed innovation system encompassing the other elements described in this article, large organizations probably won’t innovate successfully, no matter how effective their insight-generation process is.

Evolve

Business-model innovations—which change the economics of the value chain, diversify profit streams, and/or modify delivery models—have always been a vital part of a strong innovation portfolio. As smartphones and mobile apps threaten to upend oldline industries, business-model innovation has become all the more urgent: established companies must reinvent their businesses before technology-driven upstarts do. Why, then, do most innovation systems so squarely emphasize new products? The reason, of course, is that most big companies are reluctant to risk tampering with their core business model until it’s visibly under threat. At that point, they can only hope it’s not too late.

Leading companies combat this troubling tendency in a number of ways. They up their game in market intelligence, the better to separate signal from noise. They establish funding vehicles for new businesses that don’t fit into the current structure. They constantly reevaluate their position in the value chain, carefully considering business models that might deliver value to priority groups of new customers. They sponsor pilot projects and experiments away from the core business to help combat narrow conceptions of what they are and do. And they stress-test newly emerging value propositions and operating models against countermoves by competitors.

Amazon does a particularly strong job extending itself into new business models by addressing the emerging needs of its customers and suppliers. In fact, it has included many of its suppliers in its customer base by offering them an increasingly wide range of services, from hosted computing to warehouse management. Another strong performer, the Financial Times, was already experimenting with its business model in response to the increasing digitalization of media when, in 2007, it launched an innovative subscription model, upending its relationship with advertisers and readers. “We went against the received wisdom of popular strategies at the time,” says Caspar de Bono, FT board member and managing director of B2B. “We were very deliberate in getting ahead of the emerging structural change, and the decisions turned out to be very successful.” In print’s heyday, 80 percent of the FT’s revenue came from print advertising. Now, more than half of it comes from content, and two-thirds of circulation comes from digital subscriptions.

Accelerate

Virulent antibodies undermine innovation at many large companies. Cautious governance processes make it easy for stifling bureaucracies in marketing, legal, IT, and other functions to find reasons to halt or slow approvals. Too often, companies simply get in the way of their own attempts to innovate. A surprising number of impressive innovations from companies were actually the fruit of their mavericks, who succeeded in bypassing their early-approval processes. Clearly, there’s a balance to be maintained: bureaucracy must be held in check, yet the rush to market should not undermine the cross-functional collaboration, continuous learning cycles, and clear decision pathways that help enable innovation. Are managers with the right knowledge, skills, and experience making the crucial decisions in a timely manner, so that innovation continually moves through an organization in a way that creates and maintains competitive advantage, without exposing a company to unnecessary risk?

Companies also thrive by testing their promising ideas with customers early in the process, before internal forces impose modifications that blur the original value proposition. To end up with the innovation initially envisioned, it’s necessary to knock down the barriers that stand between a great idea and the end user. Companies need a well-connected manager to take charge of a project and be responsible for the budget, time to market, and key specifications—a person who can say yes rather than no. In addition, the project team needs to be cross-functional in reality, not just on paper. This means locating its members in a single place and ensuring that they give the project a significant amount of their time (at least half) to support a culture that puts the innovation project’s success above the success of each function.

Cross-functional collaboration can help ensure end-user involvement throughout the development process. At many companies, marketing’s role is to champion the interests of end users as development teams evolve products and to help ensure that the final result is what everyone first envisioned. But this responsibility is honored more often in the breach than in the observance. Other companies, meanwhile, rationalize that consumers don’t necessarily know what they want until it becomes available. This may be true, but customers can certainly say what they don’t like. And the more quickly and frequently a project team gets—and uses—feedback, the more quickly it gets a great end result.

Scale

Some ideas, such as luxury goods and many smartphone apps, are destined for niche markets. Others, like social networks, work at global scale. Explicitly considering the appropriate magnitude and reach of a given idea is important to ensuring that the right resources and risks are involved in pursuing it. The seemingly safer option of scaling up over time can be a death sentence. Resources and capabilities must be marshaled to make sure a new product or service can be delivered quickly at the desired volume and quality. Manufacturing facilities, suppliers, distributors, and others must be prepared to execute a rapid and full rollout.

For example, when TomTom launched its first touch-screen navigational device, in 2004, the product flew off the shelves. By 2006, TomTom’s line of portable navigation devices reached sales of about 5 million units a year, and by 2008, yearly volume had jumped to more than 12 million. “That’s faster market penetration than mobile phones” had, says Harold Goddijn, TomTom’s CEO and cofounder. While TomTom’s initial accomplishment lay in combining a well-defined consumer problem with widely available technology components, rapid scaling was vital to the product’s continuing success. “We doubled down on managing our cash, our operations, maintaining quality, all the parts of the iceberg no one sees,” Goddijn adds. “We were hugely well organized.”

Extend

In the space of only a few years, companies in nearly every sector have conceded that innovation requires external collaborators. Flows of talent and knowledge increasingly transcend company and geographic boundaries. Successful innovators achieve significant multiples for every dollar invested in innovation by accessing the skills and talents of others. In this way, they speed up innovation and uncover new ways to create value for their customers and ecosystem partners.

Smart collaboration with external partners, though, goes beyond merely sourcing new ideas and insights; it can involve sharing costs and finding faster routes to market. Famously, the components of Apple’s first iPod were developed almost entirely outside the company; by efficiently managing these external partnerships, Apple was able to move from initial concept to marketable product in only nine months. NASA’s Ames Research Center teams up not just with international partners—launching joint satellites with nations as diverse as Lithuania, Saudi Arabia, and Sweden—but also with emerging companies, such as SpaceX.

High-performing innovators work hard to develop the ecosystems that help deliver these benefits. Indeed, they strive to become partners of choice, increasing the likelihood that the best ideas and people will come their way. That requires a systematic approach. First, these companies find out which partners they are already working with; surprisingly few companies know this. Then they decide which networks—say, four or five of them—they ideally need to support their innovation strategies. This step helps them to narrow and focus their collaboration efforts and to manage the flow of possibilities from outside the company. Strong innovators also regularly review their networks, extending and pruning them as appropriate and using sophisticated incentives and contractual structures to motivate high-performing business partners. Becoming a true partner of choice is, among other things, about clarifying what a partnership can offer the junior member: brand, reach, or access, perhaps. It is also about behavior. Partners of choice are fair and transparent in their dealings.

Moreover, companies that make the most of external networks have a good idea of what’s most useful at which stages of the innovation process. In general, they cast a relatively wide net in the early going. But as they come closer to commercializing a new product or service, they become narrower and more specific in their sourcing, since by then the new offering’s design is relatively set.

Mobilize

How do leading companies stimulate, encourage, support, and reward innovative behavior and thinking among the right groups of people? The best companies find ways to embed innovation into the fibers of their culture, from the core to the periphery.

They start back where we began: with aspirations that forge tight connections among innovation, strategy, and performance. When a company sets financial targets for innovation and defines market spaces, minds become far more focused. As those aspirations come to life through individual projects across the company, innovation leaders clarify responsibilities using the appropriate incentives and rewards.

The Discovery Group, for example, is upending the medical and life-insurance industries in its native South Africa and also has operations in the United Kingdom, the United States, and China, among other locations. Innovation is a standard measure in the company’s semiannual divisional scorecards—a process that helps mobilize the organization and affects roughly 1,000 of the company’s business leaders. “They are all required to innovate every year,” Discovery founder and CEO Adrian Gore says of the company’s business leaders. “They have no choice.”

Organizational changes may be necessary, not because structural silver bullets exist—we’ve looked hard for them and don’t think they do—but rather to promote collaboration, learning, and experimentation. Companies must help people to share ideas and knowledge freely, perhaps by locating teams working on different types of innovation in the same place, reviewing the structure of project teams to make sure they always have new blood, ensuring that lessons learned from success and failure are captured and assimilated, and recognizing innovation efforts even when they fall short of success.

Internal collaboration and experimentation can take years to establish, particularly in large, mature companies with strong cultures and ways of working that, in other respects, may have served them well. Some companies set up “innovation garages” where small groups can work on important projects unconstrained by the normal working environment while building new ways of working that can be scaled up and absorbed into the larger organization. NASA, for example, has ten field centers. But the space agency relies on the Ames Research Center, in Silicon Valley, to maintain what its former director, Dr. Pete Worden, calls “the character of rebels” to function as “a laboratory that’s part of a much larger organization.”

Big companies do not easily reinvent themselves as leading innovators. Too many fixed routines and cultural factors can get in the way. For those that do make the attempt, innovation excellence is often built in a multiyear effort that touches most, if not all, parts of the organization. Our experience and research suggest that any company looking to make this journey will maximize its probability of success by closely studying and appropriately assimilating the leading practices of high-performing innovators. Taken together, these form an essential operating system for innovation within a company’s organizational structure and culture.

About the Authors

Marc de Jong is a principal in McKinsey’s Amsterdam office, Nathan Marston is a principal in the London office, and Erik Roth is a principal in the Shanghai office.

The authors wish to thank Jill Hellman and McKinsey’s Peet van Biljon for their contributions to this article.

Linda Holroyd's insight:

Useful and practical ways to look at/break down the innovation process

No comment yet.
Scooped by Linda Holroyd
February 12, 2016 1:35 PM
Scoop.it!

Unlocking the potential of the Internet of Things | McKinsey & Company

Unlocking the potential of the Internet of Things | McKinsey & Company | Innovating in an Age of Personalization | Scoop.it

The Internet of Things—sensors and actuators connected by networks to computing systems—has received enormous attention over the past five years. A new McKinsey Global Institute report, The Internet of Things: Mapping the value beyond the hype, attempts to determine exactly how IoT technology can create real economic value.
Our central finding is that the hype may actually understate the full potential—but that capturing it will require an understanding of where real value can be created and a successful effort to address a set of systems issues, including interoperability.
To get a broader view of the IoT’s potential benefits and challenges across the global economy, we analyzed more than 150 use cases, ranging from people whose devices monitor health and wellness to manufacturers that utilize sensors to optimize the maintenance of equipment and protect the safety of workers. Our bottom-up analysis for the applications we size estimates that the IoT has a total potential economic impact of $3.9 trillion to $11.1 trillion a year by 2025. At the top end, that level of value—including the consumer surplus—would be equivalent to about 11 percent of the world economy (exhibit).
Achieving this kind of impact would require certain conditions to be in place, notably overcoming the technical, organizational, and regulatory hurdles. In particular, companies that use IoT technology will play a critical role in developing the right systems and processes to maximize its value. Among our findings:
Interoperability between IoT systems is critical. Of the total potential economic value the IoT enables, interoperability is required for 40 percent on average and for nearly 60 percent in some settings.
Currently, most IoT data are not used. For example, on an oil rig that has 30,000 sensors, only 1 percent of the data are examined. That’s because this information is used mostly to detect and control anomalies—not for optimization and prediction, which provide the greatest value.
Business-to-business applications will probably capture more value—nearly 70 percent of it—than consumer uses, although consumer applications, such as fitness monitors and self-driving cars, attract the most attention and can create significant value, too.
The IoT has a large potential in developing economies. Still, we estimate that it will have a higher overall value impact in advanced economies because of the higher value per use. However, developing economies could generate nearly 40 percent of the IoT’s value, and nearly half in some settings.
Customers will capture most of the benefits. We estimate that IoT users (businesses, other organizations, and consumers) could capture 90 percent of the value that IoT applications generate. For example, in 2025 remote monitoring could create as much as $1.1 trillion a year in value by improving the health of chronic-disease patients.
A dynamic industry is evolving around IoT technology. As in other technology waves, both incumbents and new players have opportunities. Digitization blurs the lines between technology companies and other types of businesses; makers of industrial machinery, for example, are creating new business models by using IoT links and data to offer their products as a service.
The digitization of machines, vehicles, and other elements of the physical world is a powerful idea. Even at this early stage, the IoT is starting to have a real impact by changing how goods are made and distributed, how products are serviced and refined, and how doctors and patients manage health and wellness. But capturing the full potential of IoT applications will require innovation in technologies and business models, as well as investment in new capabilities and talent. With policy actions to encourage interoperability, ensure security, and protect privacy and property rights, the Internet of Things can begin to reach its full potential—especially if leaders truly embrace data-driven decision making.
About the authors
James Manyika, Jonathan Woetzel, and Richard Dobbs are directors of the McKinsey Global Institute, where Michael Chui is a partner; Peter Bisson is a director in McKinsey’s Stamford office; Jacques Bughin is a director in the Brussels office; and Dan Aharon is a consultant in the New York office.

Linda Holroyd's insight:

Who will execute on the IoT potential? Those who can make products and services standardized and interoperable, those who serve the needs of the customer, those who serve emerging countries

No comment yet.
Scooped by Linda Holroyd
February 10, 2016 9:52 AM
Scoop.it!

From horseless to driverless: the future of the car

From horseless to driverless: the future of the car | Innovating in an Age of Personalization | Scoop.it
A hundred years ago, cities such as London and New York had a major crisis. They were literally drowning under the manure of the thousands of horses that were used for transporting both goods and people. The arrival of the petrol-powered car saved the day, relegating horse-drawn carriages to a mere tourist attraction. Today the automobile industry is facing its own moment of disruption.

The modern car is a magical thing, combining utility, aspiration and exhilaration. After a television and refrigerator, it’s what every new middle-class family aspires to. For the wealthy, a car is the ultimate and most conspicuous status symbol. A car is so much more than a means of getting around. A car is freedom, it is identity and an object of desire. Governments, too, love cars. Automotive companies with their supply chains account for 5% of all manufacturing jobs. This is why the automotive industry is so incredibly important globally. However, five trends are combining to create a major disruption.

First, half the world’s population now lives in cities. Especially in developing countries such as India, the explosion of car ownership is putting a huge strain on both roads and the environment. Air quality, traffic gridlock, shortage of parking and noise pollution is becoming unbearable in many cities, such as Delhi and Bengaluru. Cities and citizens are beginning to push back. City planners are beginning to wake up to the need for vastly better public transportation. Many cities around the world such as Delhi and Mexico City are beginning to use license plate numbers to ration the number of days when cars can be used. European cities are establishing low-emission zones where non-electric cars cannot ply. Citizens in Bengaluru are beginning to protest against the unregulated growth of vehicles. In Beijing, a driver who wants to purchase a car must first enter a lottery and can wait two years before receiving a licence plate. Such restrictions on car use are likely to become more stringent as cities struggle to deal with the exponential increase in the number of vehicles.

The rise of the sharing-economy is another big trend. The success of sharing services like Uber, Ola and BlaBlaCar raise the question of whether it is necessary to even own a car. The convenience, ubiquity and affordability of such services is persuading more and more people to forego driving and even car ownership. Uber is experimenting with carpooling. This promises to make it even less attractive to own a car and may be a real solution to reducing traffic congestion.

The rise of autonomous vehicles or self-driving cars, pioneered by Google and now being emulated by others, poses another challenge. This is no longer science fiction; partially autonomous cars are being sold today by Volvo and Mercedes. Tesla just introduced a software update that enables its cars to park automatically. The potential here is mind-boggling. Zero accidents. Less traffic congestion. Elderly people and people with disabilities who are able to hop into a car. The challenge for car manufacturers is that it requires them to become software companies and take on the likes of Google and Apple or risk seeing their profits erode. There are many unanswered questions around safety, ethics, regulation and liability. And the really big question is whether driverless cars encourage more car ownership or more car sharing.

If these trends were not enough, car manufacturers have to worry about the mindset shift amongst young people who are far more fascinated by smartphones and social media than cars. Sociological studies show that a driving licence and leaping behind a wheel is becoming less important as a rite of passage into adulthood and that among so-called millennials and digital natives, there is less fascination in owning big-ticket items such as cars. This may be particularly true when young people struggle to find well-paying jobs and as urbanization increases. Car companies have to be watchful. Is this really a trend? Is it more a rich-country phenomenon?

Finally, there is the impact of emission standards. Rapidly worsening air quality in our cities will have a huge impact on the technology of cars. Diesel engines, hugely popular for their fuel economy, are out of favour not just in Delhi but in many parts of the world. Car companies are facing a challenge meeting new emission standards affordably, tempting an unspecified number to experiment with defeat devices. The leader in electric cars is Tesla, started by a Silicon Valley entrepreneur. How much longer will it be possible to eke out fuel-efficiency gains from traditional combustion engines? Will the future car be all electric or hybrid and how fast will the mix change? All these questions add profoundly to the uncertainty faced by car companies.

There is no question that cars as we know them will be around for a long time. The real questions are some of these. With some of the most important innovations coming increasingly from technology companies such as Tesla, Google and Uber, what will it take for car companies to retain control of their destiny? At what point will a car become software on wheels? Second, will car companies embrace societal concerns such as air quality and traffic congestion and evolve innovative solutions or will they continue to merely grudgingly comply with regulations and legislation, thereby becoming victims of their own success? Is car ownership nearing a peak? Can the planet afford to have more people own more cars or is there a way to innovatively harness some of these trends to give billions of more people affordable and safe access to the joy and convenience of cars in a much more sustainable way?

Moments of industry disruption pose grave threats, especially to incumbents but they are also windows of opportunity to gain leadership for the next century. The key is to embrace fundamental trends rather than wish them away
Linda Holroyd's insight:

How will a world filled with driver-less cars impact you?

No comment yet.
Scooped by Linda Holroyd
January 28, 2016 11:23 AM
Scoop.it!

Choose a New Way

Choose a New Way | Innovating in an Age of Personalization | Scoop.it

Can you feel that accelerated pace of business where you’re sitting right now? There’s going to be a tipping point where those in the lead will grow by leaps and bounds, and those fighting and resisting the inevitable change will be left in the dust. We certainly *are* at a nexus, because of all the changes in communications, infrastructure and technology that have come before us. I’ve worked with a wide range of both early stage and large established companies, and it’s my hope that this post will help more leaders and companies choose a new way of doing business.

  1. Choose to be customer-centric. Know and anticipate what your most desired customers want and don’t only deliver it, anticipate it before delivering it, exceeding even their high expectations. Gone are the days when we create a cool technology and tool, and customers have to figure out why they need it and how to use it!
  2. The internet of things is not just a buzz word, it’s about the technology embedded in real everyday things that will be an integral part of everyone’s lives. The leaders will be companies who can create compelling solutions which are easily used, managed and scaled, as well as secure and attractive for customers, whose lives will be easier and more comfortable because of these solutions.
  3. Expect that tech will reach all industries, no matter how mundane, everyday, disconnected, isolated, unromantic you once thought they were. From garbage to clothes, from drugs to books, from energy to food, from flooring to accessories, tech will touch it all, and customize it to the needs of the customer. The only questions are how, when, with whom. The leaders are the companies who can envision how non-tech can embrace the technology that will scale the growth for partner companies.
  4. Proactive management of data and processes will be an integral part of all successful solutions. Separating the noise from the critical data points, visualizing the trends from the volumes of information are critical to understanding what customers want and how to deliver it.
  5. Robust analytics, versatile security and cloud-based architectural planning to help ensure scalable growth and processing and optimize reliability and flexibility.
  6. Moving to mobile apps, integrated with web and cloud solutions is just responding to the needs and preferences of the customer.
  7. Making it easy for customers to communicate and connect with each other and the company will help company leaders keep their finger on the pulse, and empower advocates and ambassadors for the product and company.
  8. Separating what’s real and what’s vapor in terms of financials is just being honest with yourself and those who work with you and believe in you. Start with an honest assessment and real projections, and be strong enough to own up to discrepancies between actual and reported numbers. As Warren Buffet would say, ‘You know who’s been swimming without their shorts when the tide goes out’.
  9. What I’m saying with all of the above is that we are in the Age of the Customer – and those who know that and live that and respond to that will be the companies and leaders who succeed.
  10. And lastly, what I’m saying is that it takes true leaders to respond to all of the above, and seize the opportunities in the new way business is done.

Your mileage probably varies! Please share your thoughts and perspectives. We hope that you choose and grow a company and leader adopting the New Way!

Linda Holroyd's insight:

Will you and your company choose a new way? Will it be in time to go with the times?

No comment yet.
Scooped by Linda Holroyd
January 11, 2016 1:07 PM
Scoop.it!

The Future of Wearables: Can Companies Avoid The Pitfalls Threatening Healthcare Wearables?

The Future of Wearables: Can Companies Avoid The Pitfalls Threatening Healthcare Wearables? | Innovating in an Age of Personalization | Scoop.it


Why are 50% of customers abandoning wearables within six months of use?

Today, the healthcare wearable industry is booming, witnessing compound annual growth rates of 25% to 2020. In 2015, the market was worth $5.1 billion. Strong customer demands and surging sales are one side of the story; the other side of the narrative captures the tale of a highly volatile marketplace where due to intense competition, there is a revolving door of company entries and exits. In fact, for every 100 wearable technologies, less than 5% make it through that door.

Accordingly, our team, through its tracking of winning and losing strategies in the wearables space, has put together a list of issues most commonly plaguing products failing to live up to their expected promise.

  1. Over Engineering Complicates Development and Usage

A recent survey conducted by the Acquity Group on wearable use noted 24% of consumers found their health monitor to be too complicated. Wearable device makers trying to pack too many bells and whistles actually end up making the product too complicated for the user to understand and maximize its multifaceted applications. End-user research shows that depending on the device, anywhere between 33 to 50% of customers will stop using a purchased wearable within six months.

Many health wearables demand a great deal of user effort to enter information, perform calibrations and require the user to interpret information on their own. If the user fails to regimentally perform certain interactions, it diminishes the usefulness of the information provided through the user interface.

Take, for example, the case of the Kreyos Meteor smartwatch, a product that raised over $1.5 million on crowdfunding platform Indiegogo. In an effort to distinguish from other wearables, the product attempted to capture an over-ambitious spectrum of information and functionalities that could be performed on the device. Ultimately, after multiple delays, the final product was overly complicated and did effectively accomplish of its core features. In contrast to crowdfunding success stories like Misfit and Pebble, stories like Kreyos are becoming more of the norm for wearables developers.

  1. Wearables Have Limited Plug-and-Play Features

Many wearable developers, in an effort to emulate Apple, create products capable of operating in a restrictive platform proprietary to them. The assumption being that they can then capture the consumer and position other services and applications. However, unless a device is as transformative as the iPod and iPhone, there will be a great deal of resistance from consumers to abandon the other systems and technologies they currently use. Customers want plug-and-play, not another platform. Devices like the Samsung Galaxy Gear 2, Nike Fuel Band and Jawbone Up overestimated to what degree customers would be willing to buy into their ecosystem. In fact, Samsung, which once controlled 71% of the smartwatch market, indicated in March of 2015 it was putting a “pause” on new wearable products to rethink its strategy.

The true next-generation wearable devices will go beyond syncing with smartphones and will automate a variety of interactions seamlessly between the wearer as well as potentially other wearables and connected technologies. Companies like Withings aren’t just focused on the wearable tracker, but also looking to develop and interact with other devices in the “smart home.”

  1. Discounting the Importance of Security and Privacy

Many companies, in a rush to get their technologies to market; have made glaring oversights regarding privacy concerns and other vulnerabilities of their devices.

Famously, the first generation of Google Glasscaused a public uproar when it was released into the marketplace, and lawmakers were then forced to react and consider the repercussions of this technology on privacy and security.

The implications for medical-grade technology are even more precarious. Academics have shown how easily wearable medical products, like insulin pumps, can be hacked and altered to perform potentially catastrophic actions. Even simple monitoring devices can not only be penetrated to reveal health information about the user, but potentially leveraged to create a backdoor to other connected health information databases.

Developers must be predictive, not reactive, to what potential scenarios their device could experience, and what precautions must be taken to prevent adverse breaches.

  1. Unreliable and Inaccurate Data Capture

Many wearable developers proudly tout the number of biometrics and data points their device is able to capture as a chief selling point. However, many of those devices are often found to have a high degree of variability in terms of the accuracy of their captured biometric data versus the information captured from more reliable devices considered to be the gold standards of clinical testing. Fitbit shares have dropped 18% and the company is facing a big setback as allegations of inaccurate heart rate monitoring technology emerge.

Oftentimes, wearables are able to capture accurate information in very specific idealized circumstances, yet when exposed to a wider gamut of use cases, the information is highly inaccurate. For example, even when comparing information from first and second generations of the Microsoft Band, users have found a high degree of variability. How can users be expected to make decisions about their health when the discrete data being presented is itself ambiguous?

  1. Medical Versus Consumer Strategy Prioritization

Staff and resource limitations force early-stage developers to judiciously narrow down a potentially wide field of directions for their technology to one or two targeted areas of focus. One of the biggest decisions these companies must make along this path is whether to position their device as a consumer device for health and wellness or a true medical-grade product validated for use in clinical decision making.

Invariably, most developers choose the path of a consumer focus over medical. Part of the rationalization is that as a consumer device, the technology would not fall under CE mark or FDA regulatory guidance. This more navigable path to market allows them to quickly commercialize and show revenues to investors.

Ultimately, information captured on a device intended for more general health and wellness cannot be used by a chronic disease sufferer or medical professional to make any sort of definitive decision on a diagnosis or course of treatment. Though it is a more complicated path to market, requiring buy-in from stakeholders across the healthcare continuum (payers, patients, clinicians, hospitals, etc.), a product approved for medical use has a greater potential for delivering on value and long-term staying power.

Accordingly, our analysts are beginning to see a shift away from the crowded consumer wellness sector to more robust medical solutions. A main reason for doing so is that consumer market dynamics are prone to chase style over substance. By focusing on medical-grade solutions, developers are starting to see more tangible value from applications tackling some of the most glaring inefficiencies in today’s care delivery.

Take the case of the AmpStrip product, which our analysts came across at the Consumer Electronics Show (CES) in 2015, where it received a CES Innovation Award. A wearable patch capable of capturing heart rate, respiratory function, activity, sleep, skin temperature and posture, the device was originally positioned as a fitness product. Through Indiegogo, the company far surpassed its fundraising target and raised over $500,000. However, in October the company announced:

Going forward, the company is focusing on the device’s potential uses as a medical device. As you can imagine, there are so many potential medical benefits—the ability for patients and doctors to monitor irregular heart rate, respiratory function and activity levels to name just a few. FitLinxx believes that in that capacity, this device can make a huge difference in people’s lives.

While likely a disappointment to early investors who were hoping to get a differentiated fitness tracker, we believe in light of market trends, the company made a wise decision to alter its course, putting it in better position to address the more challenging issues of chronic disease management.

The medical wearable market presents a gigantic opportunity in the future, but it is critical to engage the medical community as early as possible so doctors and hospitals can utilize the data and analytics for prevention and reduce hospital readmissions over time.

Frost & Sullivan

The future in wearable technology lies in the cognitive computing sector, and creating segments of people with similar data measurements capable of predicting or preventing future occurrences. Medtronic’s new app for diabetes management partnering with IBM’s Watson is a wonderful example of predicting occurrences of hypoglycaemia four hours before it occurs. It helps to reduce cost and improve quality of life for diabetics, and in the true sense of the word, a technology that is an “actionable wearable”.

This article was written with contribution from Kamaljit Behera, Industry Analyst and Venkat Rajan, Global Program Director of Visionary Healthcare with Frost & Sullivan’s Transformation Health Program.

Linda Holroyd's insight:

Don't over-engineer wearables, but do make them plug-and-play, as well as secure and private, providing reliable data. Lastly, where are the opportunities where data can predict health occurrences?

No comment yet.
Scooped by Linda Holroyd
December 29, 2015 2:01 PM
Scoop.it!

Four Questions for 2016

Four Questions for 2016 | Innovating in an Age of Personalization | Scoop.it

Here are some of the top questions I’ll be thinking about as the new year begins:

1.  What will the world’s best CEOs do to stay on top?

Elon Musk of SpaceX and Tesla; Tim Cook of Apple; Jack Ma of Alibaba (Chairman, not CEO); Marc Zuckerberg of Facebook; Mark Parker of Nike. These CEOs are all winners, but the history of business is littered with previously successful CEOs who have fallen from grace. Do we need to go any further than Volkswagen’s Martin Winterkorn? After years of studying CEO failure, I’d suggest savvy investors pay attention to signs of hubris. For example, watch out when CEO compensation is way out of line to what other top managers are getting at the same company.

2.  What will happen to IBM and Samsung?

Giants, able to do pretty much as they please, right? Think again. IBM is in the midst of a secular decline in their business that’s been going on for two years, and may well accelerate. Samsung took over from Sony as the top global electronics brand years ago. Now the question is, will Samsung continue to follow Sony’s path, to second-tier, maybe third-tier, competitor? I hope not. But there’s a little company in Cupertino, CA that’s doing everything it can to beat up on both IBM and Samsung. And so far, at least, it’s working. Apple.

3.  Who will solve the talent puzzle?

Every smart CEO I know spends more time on talent than they ever did before. And there’s a good reason for that – creating an organization that generates and regenerates talent on a continuous basis is the surest way to win, and keep winning. The problem is that despite incredible investments in time, money, and energy, leaders are scratching their heads trying to figure out how to manage talent better. Shameless plug: my new book Superbosses, available on pre-order now, provides a blueprint that explains what the world’s best talent spawners do to identify, motivate, inspire, teach, and leverage talent. Take a look.

4.  What businesses are in really good shape for 2016?

Who knows? But there are a few places to look. Here are two:

As the world’s population grows, and wealth grows, the demand for pharmaceuticals is exploding. There are big challenges that come from pricing pressures in different parts of the world, but the major global pharma companies are well placed to produce a new round of blockbuster drugs, driven by genetic research and personalized medicine, among other things. And with an aging population, more people around the world will be lining up to get access.
Mobile – anything mobile – is booming. An entire generation of younger people lives on their smartphones and occasionally, tablets. The ability to deliver what ever a customer wants via mobile app has never been more important. Even “old” people (35+ years and up) are learning to rely on apps. There’s never been as much upside to mobile.

Linda Holroyd's insight:

It's about leaders who can attract and retain the best and the brightest, and a value-proposition that addresses the needs of an exploding and aging population hungry for mobile solutions

No comment yet.
Scooped by Linda Holroyd
October 23, 2015 4:19 PM
Scoop.it!

Forbes: Real Estate Industry Seen as Hot Spot for Mergers and Deals

Forbes: Real Estate Industry Seen as Hot Spot for Mergers and Deals | Innovating in an Age of Personalization | Scoop.it

Real estate reportedly is poised to be one of the hottest sectors for mergers and acquisitions growth in the coming year, even if the Federal Reserve finally begins raising interest rates.

“Due diligence activity in real estate during the first half of 2015 was up 57%, according to Intralinks’ Deal Flow Predictor which forecasts M&A activity six months into the future, the largest increase for any industry, Forbes reports.

“This may be surprising because investors have been anticipating rising interest rates, which ultimately should act as a brake on such a finance-dependent industry. But so far this year, real estate M&A is on a roll. Announced deals in North America were up 37% during the first half of the year compared to the year-ago period, while deal value was up 94%,” Forbes reported.

“Prices for property, both commercial and residential, have come bouncing back, fueling excitement in the sector. An expanding economy continues pushing rents higher.

Occupancy rates are strong, and a key metric for real estate owners, same property net-operating income, is healthy,” Forbes reported.

Meanwhile, private-equity firms have made big real estate purchases, and are also investing in commercial real estate brokers. Activist investors are also gaining a foothold in the sector, Forbes reported.

Earlier this month, Blackstone Group LP, the world’s biggest alternative-asset manager, gathered $15.8 billion for the largest fund to invest in global real estate.

The firm collected more than 90 percent of the pool, its eighth fund for global property, from institutions in about four months, a person with knowledge of the matter recently told Bloomberg. The remainder was raised from individual investors, a process that takes longer to complete because of the paperwork involved, the person said.

Blackstone has already committed 20 percent of the fund to deals, according to a statement. The New York-based firm in April agreed to a $14 billion transaction to buy real estate assets being divested by General Electric Co., and last month agreed to buy Strategic Hotels & Resorts Inc., the manager of properties including Manhattan’s Essex House and the Ritz- Carlton Half Moon Bay, for about $3.9 billion.

Blackstone has built the largest real estate investing business, overseeing $92 billion in assets as of June 30. Its seven previous global property funds have doubled their invested capital, with annualized returns of 18 percent after fees since 1994, according to the firm’s most recent earnings statement.

The real estate group is led by Jon Gray, 45, considered a possible successor to Chief Executive Officer Steve Schwarzman. Gray’s group also manages an $8.2 billion fund investing in European property and a $5 billion pool for deals in Asia.

Linda Holroyd's insight:

Occupancy rates and same property net-operating income look good

No comment yet.