 Your new post is loading...
 Your new post is loading...
|
Scooped by
Gilbert C FAURE
February 13, 2020 8:05 AM
|
Systemic lupus erythematosus Neuropsychiatric events in systemic lupus erythematosus: a longitudinal analysis of outcomes in an international inception cohort using a multistate model approach John G Hanly1, http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7506-9166Murray B Urowitz2, Caroline Gordon3, http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4658-1093Sang-Cheol Bae4, Juanita Romero-Diaz5, Jorge Sanchez-Guerrero2, http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9515-2802Sasha Bernatsky6, Ann E Clarke7, Daniel J Wallace8, http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9514-2455David A Isenberg9, Anisur Rahman9, Joan T Merrill10, http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7278-2596Paul R Fortin11, http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9074-0592Dafna D Gladman2, Ian N Bruce12, http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1441-5373Michelle Petri13, Ellen M Ginzler14, Mary Anne Dooley15, Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman16, Susan Manzi17, Andreas Jönsen18, Graciela S Alarcón19, Ronald F van Vollenhoven20, http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9299-0053Cynthia Aranow21, Meggan Mackay21, Guillermo Ruiz-Irastorza22, Sam Lim23, Murat Inanc24, Kenneth C Kalunian25, Søren Jacobsen26, Christine A Peschken27, Diane L Kamen28, Anca Askanase29, Vernon Farewell30 Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine and Department of Pathology, Queen Elizabeth ll Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada Center for Prognosis Studies in the Rheumatic Diseases, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Seoul, Republic of Korea Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion, Mexico City, Mexico Divisions of Rheumatology and Clinical Epidemiology, Department of medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Divisions of Rheumatology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada Cedars-Sinai/David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA Centre for Rheumatology Research, Department of Medicine, University College, London, UK Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, USA Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, The University of Manchester, and NIHR Manchester Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK Department of Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA Department of Medicine, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA Thurston Arthritis Research Centre, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA Northwestern University and Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA Lupus Center of Excellence, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Rheumatology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA Autoimmune Diseases Research Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, BioCruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Hospital Universitario Cruces, University of the Basque Country, Barakaldo, Spain Emory University, Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey UCSD School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA Copenhagen Lupus and Vasculitis Clinic, 4242, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA Hospital for Joint Diseases, NYU, Seligman Centre for Advanced Therapeutics, New York, NY, USA MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK Correspondence to Dr John G Hanly, Queen Elizabeth llHlth Svc Ctr, Halifax, NS B3H 4K4, Canada; john.hanly{at}cdha.nshealth.ca Abstract Objectives Using a reversible multistate model, we prospectively examined neuropsychiatric (NP) events for attribution, outcome and association with health-related quality of life (HRQoL), in an international, inception cohort of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. Methods Annual assessments for 19 NP events attributed to SLE and non-SLE causes, physician determination of outcome and patient HRQoL (short-form (SF)-36 scores) were measured. Time-to-event analysis and multistate modelling examined the onset, recurrence and transition between NP states. Results NP events occurred in 955/1827 (52.3%) patients and 592/1910 (31.0%) unique events were attributed to SLE. In the first 2 years of follow-up the relative risk (95% CI) for SLE NP events was 6.16 (4.96, 7.66) and non-SLE events was 4.66 (4.01, 5.43) compared with thereafter. Patients without SLE NP events at initial assessment had a 74% probability of being event free at 10 years. For non-SLE NP events the estimate was 48%. The majority of NP events resolved over 10 years but mortality was higher in patients with NP events attributed to SLE (16%) versus patients with no NPSLE events (6%) while the rate was comparable in patients with non-SLE NP events (7%) compared with patients with no non-SLE events (6%). Patients with NP events had lower SF-36 summary scores compared with those without NP events and resolved NP states (p<0.001). Conclusions NP events occur most frequently around the diagnosis of SLE. Although the majority of events resolve they are associated with reduced HRQoL and excess mortality. Multistate modelling is well suited for the assessment of NP events in SLE. View Full Text Statistics from Altmetric.com View Full Text Footnotes Handling editor Josef S Smolen Contributors All authors contributed to drafting and reviewing the manuscript and approved the final version for publication. JGH has access to all data and analyses. Study conception and design: JGH, MU, CG, S-CB, JR-D, JS-G, SB, AEC, DJW, DI, AR, JTM, PRF, DDG, INB, MP, EMG, MAD, RR-G, SM, GSA, RvV, CA, KK, VF. Acquisition of data, and analysis and interpretation of data: JGH, MU, CG, S-CB, JR-D, JS-G, SB, AEC, DJW, DI, AR, JTM, PRF, DDG, INB, MP, EMG, MAD, RR-G, SM, AJ, GSA, RvV, CA, MM, GR-I, SL, MI, KK, SJ, CP, DLK, AA, VF. Funding Core funding for this investigator-initiated study was provided to JGH by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (grant MOP-88526). Other sources of funding supported activities at individual SLICC sites: S-CB’s work was supported in part by NRF-2017M3A9B4050335, Republic of Korea. CG is supported by Lupus UK, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust and the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)/Wellcome Trust Birmingham Clinical Research Facility. The views expressed are those of the authors(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. The Hopkins Lupus Cohort is supported by the NIH (grant AR43727 and 69572). The Montreal General Hospital Lupus Clinic is partially supported by the Singer Family Fund for Lupus Research. AEC holds The Arthritis Society Chair in Rheumatic Diseases at the University of Calgary. PRF holds a tier 1 Canada Research Chair on Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases at Université Laval. INB is a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Senior Investigator and is supported by Arthritis Research UK, the NIHR Manchester Biomedical Centre and the NIHR/Wellcome Trust Manchester Clinical Research Facility. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the National Institute for Health Research or the Department of Health. SJ is supported by the Danish Rheumatism Association (A3865) and the Novo Nordisk Foundation (A05990). RR-G’s work was supported by the NIH (grants 5UL1TR001422-02, formerly 8UL1TR000150 and UL-1RR-025741, K24-AR-02318, and P60AR064464 formerly P60-AR-48098). MAD’s work was supported by the NIH grant RR00046. GR-I is supported by the Department of Education, Universities and Research of the Basque Government. DI and AR are supported by the National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre. SL’s work was supported, in part, by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention grant U01DP005119. Competing interests RvV has received grants from BMS, GSK, Lilly, Pfizer, UCB Pharma, personal fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Biotest, Celgene, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Servier, UCB, outside the submitted work. Patient consent for publication Not required. Ethics approval The Nova Scotia Health Authority central zone Research Ethics Board and each of the participating centres’ research ethics review boards approved the study. Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed. Data availability statement All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information. Not applicable as all data relevant to the study are included in the article of in supplementary files. Request Permissions If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways. Copyright information: © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. Read the full text or download the PDF: Subscribe Log in
|
Scooped by
Gilbert C FAURE
December 6, 2019 6:23 AM
|
Objective IgG4‐related disease (IgG4‐RD) can cause fibroinflammatory lesions in nearly any organ. Correlation among clinical, serologic, radiologic, and pathologic data is required for diagnosis
|
Scooped by
Gilbert C FAURE
September 24, 2019 9:53 AM
|
Gout diagnostic criteria help focus attention on the accurate and early diagnosis of gout. New recommendations reinforce that joint aspiration and demonstration of monosodium urate crystals remains the gold standard for a diagnosis of gout and should be attempted in every patient with suspected gout.
|
Scooped by
Gilbert C FAURE
September 6, 2019 1:18 PM
|
Abstract Objective To evaluate patterns of elevations of isotypes of rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti‐citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) pre‐ and post‐rheumatoid arthritis (RA) diagnosis. Metho...
|
Scooped by
Gilbert C FAURE
April 19, 2019 1:29 PM
|
A new voice for rheumatology specialists worldwide Presenting The Lancet Rheumatology, a new specialty journal in the Lancet family. As an exclusively online journal, this monthly title is committed to publishing content relevant to rheumatology specialists worldwide, with a focus on studies that advance clinical practice, challenge the status quo, and advocate change in health policy. Content will include clinical research (with a focus on clinical trials), expert reviews, and provocative comment and opinion relating to the diagnosis & classification, management, and prevention of rheumatic diseases, including arthritic, musculoskeletal, and connective tissue diseases, as well as disorders of the immune system. The journal will also publish high-quality human translational studies that are supported by robust clinical data, with priority given to studies that identify potential new therapeutic targets, advance efforts toward precision medicine, or have the potential to directly inform future clinical trials. With a strong clinical focus, the journal will provide an independent voice for the rheumatology community and will advocate strongly for the improved lives of patients with rheumatic diseases around the globe.
|
Suggested by
Société Francaise d'Immunologie
April 9, 2019 2:13 PM
|
Research ArticleAgingTherapeutics Free access | 10.1172/jci.insight.125019 Senescence cell–associated extracellular vesicles serve as osteoarthritis disease and therapeutic markers Ok Hee Jeon,1 David R. Wilson,2 Cristina C. Clement,3 Sona Rathod,2 Christopher Cherry,2 Bonita Powell,4 Zhenghong Lee,5 Ahmad M. Khalil,6 Jordan J. Green,2 Judith Campisi,1,7 Laura Santambrogio,3 Kenneth W. Witwer,4 and Jennifer H. Elisseeff2 First published April 4, 2019 - More info Abstract Senescent cells (SnCs) are increasingly recognized as central effector cells in age-related pathologies. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are potential cellular communication tools through which SnCs exert central effector functions in the local tissue environment. To test this hypothesis in a medical indication that could be validated clinically, we evaluated EV production from SnCs enriched from chondrocytes isolated from human arthritic cartilage. EV production increased in a dose-responsive manner as the concentration of SnCs increased. The EVs were capable of transferring senescence to nonsenescent chondrocytes and inhibited cartilage formation by non-SnCs. microRNA (miR) profiles of EVs isolated from human arthritic synovial fluid did not fully overlap with the senescent chondrocyte EV profiles. The effect of SnC clearance was tested in a murine model of posttraumatic osteoarthritis. miR and protein profiles changed after senolytic treatment but varied depending on age. In young animals, senolytic treatment altered expression of miR-34a, -30c, -125a, -24, -92a, -150, and -186, and this expression correlated with cartilage production. The primary changes in EV contents in aged mice after senolytic treatment, which only reduced pain and degeneration, were immune related. In sum, EV contents found in synovial fluid may serve as a diagnostic for arthritic disease and indicator for therapeutic efficacy of senolytic treatment. Introduction Osteoarthritis (OA) is an age-related and posttraumatic degenerative joint disease that is accompanied by cartilage degradation, persistent pain, and impairment of mobility (1). Senescent cells (SnCs) are a newly implicated factor in the development of OA (2–6). Cellular senescence is characterized by a proliferation arrest, which protects against cancer, as well as other changes that can also contribute to aging phenotypes and pathologies (7, 8). SnCs accumulate with age in many tissues, including articular cartilage, where they promote pathological age-related deterioration. These and other tissue pathologies are presumably mediated by the secretion of extracellular proteases, proinflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors, termed the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP), by SnCs (9, 10). The local elimination of SnCs in a murine model of posttraumatic OA (PTOA) reduced pain and increased cartilage development (4). Bridging these results to human cells, the selective removal of senescent chondrocytes improved the cartilage-forming ability of chondrocytes isolated from human arthritic tissue. Recent findings suggest that SnCs can transmit limited senescent phenotypes to nearby cells, termed secondary or paracrine senescence (11, 12). Understanding the mechanisms of this SnC transmission may inform mechanisms of OA disease causation. Extracellular vesicles (EVs), including exosomes and microvesicles, are small membrane-limited particles (30 nm to 1 μm) that can participate in intercellular communication (13). EVs mediate local tissue development and homeostasis through the transfer of cargoes, such as proteins and microRNAs (miRs). For example, the EVs present in articular cartilage and synovial fluid can contribute to mineralization of the cartilage extracellular matrix (ECM) and formation of an inflammatory joint environment (14–16). Recently, it was reported that SnCs secrete more EVs compared with their nonsenescent counterparts (17, 18). These senescent-associated EVs may also induce senescence in neighboring cells (19). In the case of arthritis, SnCs can modulate the environment of the articular joint, increasing inflammation and ECM degradation. It is not known whether EVs secreted by SnCs in the articular joint are responsible for the progression of OA or whether they can be use as indicators of disease progression and treatment efficacy. In this study, we found that senescent chondrocytes isolated from OA patients secrete more EVs compared with nonsenescent chondrocytes. These EVs inhibit cartilage ECM deposition by healthy chondrocytes and can induce a senescent state in nearby cells. We profiled the miR and protein content of EVs isolated from the synovial fluid of OA joints from mice with SnCs. After treatment with a molecule to remove SnCs, termed a senolytic, the composition of EV-associated miR and protein was markedly altered. The senolytic reduced OA development and enhanced chondrogenesis, and these were attributable to several specific differentially expressed miRs (miR-30c, miR-92a, miR-34a, miR-24, miR-125a, miR-150, miR-186, and miR-223) and proteins (Serpina and aggrecan). In aged animals, treatment with senolytic modulated the inflammatory response by decreasing recruitment and activation of myeloid and phagocytic cells. Collectively, these findings suggest that altered levels of synovial EV miRs and proteins are a potential mechanism by which SnCs can transfer senescence, inhibit tissue formation, and promote OA development. When isolated from synovial fluid, EVs may also be used to predict therapeutic response to senolytic therapies in the articular joint. Results SnCs from OA patients impair cartilage ECM production by neighboring chondrocytes through secreted factors. To understand how senescent human chondrocytes might effect surrounding nonsenescent chondrocytes, we employed a coculture system in which cells are not in physical contact but are exposed to secreted factors. Since there are no known specific surface markers for SnCs, we sorted chondrocytes based on size (20) to isolate populations enriched in SnCs. Three relative concentrations (high, medium, low) of human senescent chondrocytes were enriched and validated by the presence of senescence-associated β-galactosidase (SA-β-Gal) activity, a marker of SnCs (21) (Supplemental Figure 1A; supplemental material available online with this article; https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.125019DS1). To characterize the secretory phenotypes of nonsenescent and senescent chondrocytes isolated from arthritic human cartilages, we measured the levels of 36 secreted proteins using antibody arrays (Supplemental Figure 1B). Many proteins secreted by the high-senescent cultures were previously reported SASP factors (22, 23). These factors included growth-regulated oncogene α (GROA), IL-1A, IL-1B, and IL-6, intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM1), chemokine (C–C motif) ligand 5 (CCL5), and macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF). Notably, nonsenescent chondrocytes cocultured with the high-senescent chondrocyte group significantly increased expression levels of mRNAs encoding p16INK4a (also known as cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2a [CDKN2A], which is a widely used SnC biomarker) (7, 8) and the SASP factor MMP3. Coculturing nonsenescent chondrocytes with SnCs also decreased chondrogenesis, as defined by Safranin-O staining for proteoglycans and type II collagen (COL2A1) mRNA levels (Supplemental Figure 1, C and D). Similar to that in the coculture experiments, nonsenescent chondrocytes cultured in SnC-conditioned medium for 7 days also reduced proteoglycan production, as confirmed by Safranin-O and Alcian blue staining. They also produced a dose-dependent increase in SA-β-Gal activity (Supplemental Figure 1, E and F). These findings indicate that SnCs from arthritic human cartilage impair the function of, and induce bystander senescence in, nonsenescent chondrocytes, both most likely through SASP factors. EVs secreted by senescent human chondrocytes induce bystander senescence. Since SnCs were found to secrete EVs (17, 18), we asked whether EVs secreted by senescent human chondrocytes mediated their effects on non-SnCs. We isolated vesicles with a characteristic EV diameter of ~100 nm by differential centrifugation (Supplemental Figure 2A), as visualized by electron microscopy (Figure 1A). Over 95% of the vesicles recovered from cultures with increasing amounts of senescent chondrocytes were <100 nm in diameter. Quantitative nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) showed that populations enriched with senescent chondrocytes released significantly more EVs than nonsenescent chondrocyte populations (Figure 1B). Figure 1 SnC-derived EVs inhibit cartilage ECM deposition of nonsenescent chondrocytes by transmitting cellular senescence. (A) Representative electron micrographs of nonsenescent chondrocyte-derived EVs. Scale bar: 200 nm. (B) Size distribution and concentration of EVs from nonsenescent primary chondrocytes (NS) and low, medium, or high levels of senescent OA chondrocytes, sorted by flow cytometry, determined by nanoparticle tracking analysis. (C) Uptake by nonsenescent chondrocytes of EVs labeled with SYTO RNASelect (arrows; dye-stained EVs). Scale bar: 100 μm. (D) Representative images of SA-β-Gal and Safranin-O staining of nonsenescent chondrocytes 6 days after incubation with EVs (8 × 108) derived from conditioned medium (CM) from high, medium, or low SnC populations to measure the induction of senescence and proteoglycan levels (left). Scale bar: 100 μm. Quantification of the percentage of SA-β-Gal–positive cells (n = 3 for NS; n = 8 for low and medium; n = 15 for high) and Safranin-O–stained areas (n = 6 for NS; n = 8 for low, medium, and high) (right). (E) The expression of selected miRs (hsa-miR-140-3p, -34a-5p, -128a-3p, and -146a-5p) in EVs collected from CM of senescent and nonsenescent chondrocytes, detected by RT-qPCR (n = 3 per group). All data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistics in B, D, and E were performed using 1-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple-comparisons test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. We hypothesized that EVs from SnCs might be a mechanism for the transmission of senescence characteristics to non-SnCs. To test this idea, we exposed EVs isolated from senescent human chondrocytes to nonsenescent chondrocytes. The OA-derived EVs induced a senescence-like phenotype in nonsenescent chondrocytes, as determined by SA-β-Gal activity. They also reduced proteoglycan production, as measured by Safranin-O staining (Supplemental Figure 2, B and C). To track EVs and their uptake by the normal cells, we labeled EVs isolated from low, medium, and high-senescent OA chondrocyte populations using the green RNA-selective nucleic acid stain SYTO RNASelect. We then cultured the labeled EVs for 6 hours with nonsenescent chondrocytes and confirmed EV internalization (Figure 1C). We then cultured nonsenescent chondrocytes with enriched EVs secreted by the low, medium, or high SnC populations or control EVs from nonsenescent chondrocytes for 6 days. Nonsenescent chondrocytes exposed to enriched EVs secreted by SnCs developed more senescence and reduced proteoglycan production in a dose-responsive manner (Figure 1D). These findings suggest that senescent chondrocyte EVs can induce bystander senescence, spreading senescent characteristics to neighboring cells, and, moreover, contribute to the decline in chondrocyte matrix production. To identify EV components that may mediate the bystander effect and reduced cartilage production, we investigated extracellular miRs associated with senescence and OA. EVs from highly enriched senescent chondrocyte populations contained less human miR-140-3p (hsa-miR-140-3p) and more hsa-miR-34a-5p compared with nonsenescent chondrocyte EVs (Figure 1E). Changes in miR-140 are known to be associated with chondrocyte dysfunction and OA development (24). Low miR-140 expression impairs cartilage homeostasis, and miR-140 is regulated by SOX9, a cartilage master regulator transcription factor that promotes cartilage development and ECM production during development and repair (24, 25). miR-34a and miR-128a are associated with cellular senescence and target the CDKN1A and CDKN2A pathways, respectively (26). These data suggest that hsa-miR-34a and -140 in senescent chondrocyte-derived EVs contribute to human OA development and cartilage loss. SnC removal decreases the secretion of EVs from human OA chondrocytes. We previously demonstrated the ability of a senolytic small molecule (UBX0101) to clear SnCs in cultures of human OA chondrocytes. We therefore evaluated EV production after treating senescent OA chondrocytes with this molecule. Exposure to UBX0101 (43 μM) did not change EV size (Figure 2A). The mean size of EVs secreted by human OA chondrocytes 1, 2, 4, and 6 days after incubation with vehicle or UBX0101, measured by NTA, was similar (Figure 2B). However, treatment with the senolytic for 2 days significantly reduced the number of secreted EVs at all time points evaluated (Figure 2C). Figure 2 Decreased secretion of EVs from human OA chondrocytes after removing SnCs and alteration in miRs carried by synovial EVs from OA patients. (A) Representative electron micrographs of EVs derived from OA chondrocytes treated with vehicle (veh) and UBX0101. Scale bar: 200 nm. (B and C) Mean size and concentration of EV enrichments released per cell in human OA chondrocytes at 1, 2, 4, and 6 days after incubation with veh or 43 μM UBX0101, measured by nanoparticle tracking analysis (n = 3 per data point). The experiment was performed 2 independent times. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed using 2-tailed t tests (unpaired). **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. (D) Heatmap and hierarchical clustering depicting statistically significant (P < 0.1 by t test) differentially expressed miRs. Synovial fluid was obtained from normal (Nor) individuals (age 77.3 ± 6.8 years; n = 3) and OA patients (age 64.5 ± 2.1 years; n = 2). PC, predicted candidate. EVs from synovial fluid of aged normal and arthritic articular joints have different miR expression patterns. To determine whether EVs were also present in human disease, we isolated and evaluated EVs from synovial fluid from normal and OA patients at relatively advanced ages (70–80 years), when both groups are likely to harbor SnCs from aging and potentially previous trauma. The OA donors had clinical evidence of OA based on pain that led to total joint arthroplasty. EV size and concentration in synovial fluid from both OA and normal donors were similar. Sequencing identified a large number of known and potentially novel miRs that were differentially present in EVs isolated from OA patients compared with healthy controls (Supplemental Figure 3, A and B, and Supplemental Table 1). Twenty-two miRs were significantly upregulated or downregulated in OA synovial EV enrichments (Figure 2D and Table 1). Of the differentially expressed miRs, only 4 known miRs (hsa-miR-27b-3p, miR-199a-5p, miR-185-5p, and miR-23b-3p) exhibited changes in read counts when synovial EVs from OA patients were compared with those of normal patients. The predicted target genes for these differentially expressed EV-associated miRs and their biological function are shown in Supplemental Figure 3, C and D. It has been previously reported that pathways for mucin-type O-glycan biosynthesis and proteoglycans in cancer play important roles in the pathogenesis of OA (27). These data suggest that synovial fluid EV–derived miRs are significantly altered in OA compared with age-relate degeneration and can be used as potential biomarkers for OA diagnosis. Diseased human chondrocyte EVs changed with senolytic treatment that was previously demonstrated to increase cartilage production. The EVs isolated from synovial fluid were different than the cell-derived EVs. The content of the EVs produced by chondrocytes did not appear to overlap with EVs found in the synovial fluid, suggesting that EV production from cells may change with culture or EVs are produced by multiple different cell types in the articular joint, such as cells in the synovium. Table 1 Mean read count, P values, and fold change of annotated miR, which differed in synovial EVs between normal and OA patients by sequencing Specific EV-associated miRs in synovial fluid correlate with response to senolytic therapy in a murine posttraumatic OA model. We previously demonstrated that SnCs develop after PTOA created by anterior cruciate ligament transection (ACLT) and that their selective elimination reduced inflammation and pain in young and aged mice (4). Furthermore, in young mice, new cartilage formed on the articular surface after ACLT and senolytic treatment (Supplemental Figure 4A). We hypothesized that differences in the content of EV-associated miR and protein in joint fluids might correlate with OA and varying response to senolytics. To determine whether EVs are present in the joint space after trauma, we isolated EVs from synovial fluid of mice after PTOA and examined the presence of common EV markers by mass spectrometry and FunRich analysis (28, 29). Comparison of the total proteins found in synovial EVs isolated from young and aged OA mice treated with vehicle or UBX0101 against records in Vesiclepedia revealed that there was robust enrichment for proteins annotated as EV associated (Supplemental Figures 4 and 5 and Supplemental Tables 2 and 3). We found that miR-34a, miR-146a, and miR-128a were more abundant in EVs enriched from the synovial fluid of young PTOA mice compared with no surgery controls. This miR profile is similar to that of EVs produced by human OA chondrocytes (Figure 3A). Clearance of SnCs by senolytic treatment significantly decreased miR-34a in synovial EVs from young OA joints. No differences in miR-34a, -146a, and -128a expression were observed in aged OA animals with or without SnCs removal; however, since these animals have SnCs before injury, accumulation of extracellular miRs may have masked any treatment-related differences. Figure 3 miRs carried by EVs are differentially present in OA synovial fluid from young versus aged mice after clearance of SnCs. (A) Quantification of miR-34a-5p, miR-128a-3p, and miR-146a-5p in young and aged PTOA mice treated with vehicle (veh) or the senolytic UBX0101, which can mediate senescence and the SASP, 28 days after ACLT surgery. All data are expressed as mean ± SEM, and each data point represents an individual mouse. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparisons test was used for statistical analysis (young, n = 4; aged, n = 5). *P < 0.05. (B) Workflow of analysis of EVs from the synovial fluid of PTOA mice treated with veh or UBX0101. (C and D) Plots illustrating the fold change (UBX0101/veh; x axis) and significance level expressed as the log P value (y axis). The blue circles represent miRs that were upregulated and red circles represent miRs that were downregulated by UBX0101 compared with veh-treated PTOA young (C) and aged (D) mice (n = 3 per group). Significance was determined based on a P value cutoff of 0.05. (E) The heatmap reveals significant correlations among mmu-miR-30c-5p, -92a-3p, -24-3p, -186-5p, -125a-5p, and -150-5p, expression of which was significantly altered by UBX0101 treatment in young PTOA mice and the signaling pathways in which they are predicted by the DIANA-miRPath (v3.0) to participate. To investigate potentially novel EV-associated miRs and proteins in young and old animals with PTOA treated with senolytic, we performed miR array and proteomic analyses on synovial fluid–derived EVs. The workflow for isolating and characterizing these EVs and the effects of senolytic treatment is illustrated in Figure 3B. Briefly, C57BL mice underwent ACLT of one rear limb to induce OA and were injected intra-articularly every other day with vehicle or UBX0101 (10 μl of a 1 mM solution) for 2 weeks starting 14 days after surgery. We collected synovial fluid on day 28 after surgery. EV enrichments were isolated through differential ultracentrifugation (30), followed by protein and RNA extraction for proteomics and miR analyses. To identify EV-associated miRs, we performed TaqMan mouse miR Low-Density Array analysis. Several miRs showed distinct profiles when we compared young mice treated with drug with vehicle-treated controls. Levels of mouse miR-92a-3p (mmu-miR-92a-3p), -186-5p, and -150-5p increased after senolytic treatment, while mmu-miR-30c-5p, -24-3p, and -125a-5p decreased (Figure 3, C and D). In aged animals, only mmu-miR-223-3p levels decreased significantly in synovial EVs after drug treatment. These findings suggest that the levels of miR-30c, -24, -125a, -92a, -150, -186, and -223 in synovial fluid–derived EVs correlate with senolytic response in mice. We next examined the target genes of the EV-derived miRs that are differentially expressed depending on the presence of SnCs. We applied the prediction algorithm DNA Intelligent Analysis (DIANA; DIANA-microT-CDS v5.0; ref. 31) to investigate the function of the extracellular miRs that are targets of the miRs. The analyses found that the increase in miR-92a-3p, -150-5p, and -186-5p combined with a decrease in miR-30c, -24, and -125a in the synovial EVs after senolytic treatment in young mice were enriched for target genes within pathways related to cartilage matrix formation (Figure 3E and Supplemental Figure 6). In contrast to that in young mice, analysis of EVs from aged mice identified only a decline in miR-223-3p after senolytic treatment. This miR participates in mucin-type O-glycan biosynthesis (Supplemental Table 4). These findings suggest that the miRs are differentially expressed in young and aged mice after UBX0101 treatment. These age-specific miRs identified target genes and signaling pathways that might explain the reduced cartilage regeneration observed in the older animals (4). Synovial fluid EVs from young OA mice treated with UBX0101 contain proteins associated with cartilage growth and cartilage protease inhibitors. To relate EV miRs and their predicted pathways to protein expression, we performed label-free quantitative (LFQ) proteomics and ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) on synovial fluid–derived EVs isolated from young and aged mice after injury and standard senolytic treatment. The analysis identified 59 proteins that were differentially expressed between young OA mouse joints with and without the senolytic. Specifically, Serpina 1 and Serpina 3 — subtypes of serine protease inhibitors that regulate proteases involved in the cartilage degradation (32) — were increased in young PTOA joints after senolytic treatment. In addition, SnC removal decreased the level of Prss2 — a protease, serine 2 that degrades type II collagen–rich cartilage ECM (Figure 4A). In addition, synovial EVs from treated young mice contained increased levels of aggrecan, one of the major ECM components in cartilage. Overall, the top 5 molecular networks predicted by the IPA analysis were (a) metabolic disease and molecular transport; (b) energy production, nucleic acid metabolism, and small-molecule biochemistry; (c) immunological and inflammatory disease; (d) cellular movement, organismal injury and abnormalities, and tissue morphology; and (5) cell-to-cell signaling and interaction (Table 2). Figure 4 Identification of proteins with altered levels in synovial EVs derived from young OA mice after selective SnC clearance. (A) Venn diagram of the number of proteins quantified by mass spectrometry and heatmap of upregulated or downregulated proteins (P < 0.05 calculated by a right-tailed Fisher’s exact test, fold change > 2, n = 3 per group). (B and C) Classification of the significantly regulated proteins according to their roles in cellular components and molecular functions. (D) Significant function and disease roles were analyzed by ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) from upregulated and downregulated proteins after treatment with UBX0101. Bars with positive Z-scores indicate that functional activity is increased, whereas negative Z-scores indicate decreased activity. Table 2 Physical function analysis using IPA-generated networks, ordered by a score denoting significance, in synovial EVs from young OA mouse joints after removal of SnCs To categorize the altered synovial EV–associated proteins after SnC clearance, we applied Gene Ontology analysis (Figure 4, B–D). As expected, the functions were predominantly in the ECM, protease inhibitor, and transporter categories (Figure 4C). The disease/functional analysis component of differentially expressed synovial EV–derived proteins in young OA mouse joints after SnC elimination showed increased development of body trunk, implicating cartilage growth (Figure 4D). Senolytic treatment in aged mice induced primarily immunological changes in EV proteins, and age-related synovial EVs can transfer arthritic disease to young animals. Synovial EVs from aged animals treated with only one round of senolytic therapy did not contain increased levels of cartilage ECM-related proteins, Serpins, or decreased serine proteases (Figure 5A). Gene Ontology analysis indicated that there were no significant changes in synovial EV–associated proteins after SnC clearance in aged animals (Figure 5, B and C). Most of the component changes after senolysis in aged animals were enriched in immunological responses, including the response of myeloid and phagocytic cells (Figure 5D). The top 5 molecular networks predicted by IPA were (a) cancer, cell death and survival, organismal injury, and abnormalities; (b) cellular assembly and organization, cell-to-cell signaling, and interaction; (c) cellular assembly and organization, cellular function and maintenance, cellular compromise, (d) cancer, hematological disease, immunological disease; and (e) humoral immune and inflammatory response (Table 3). These results are consistent with the in vivo observation of senolytic treatment reducing degeneration and pain in aged mice after traumatic injury. It also highlights the important of the immune system in disease and senolytic treatment in aged animals. Further studies on dosing and delivery of senolytics in aged mice exposed to articular trauma are needed. Figure 5 Differential expression of synovial EV–derived proteins altered by selective clearance of SnCs in aged PTOA mice. (A) Venn diagram of the number of proteins quantified by proteomics, and heatmap of upregulated and downregulated proteins that were present in PTOA joints and differentially present after UBX0101 treatment of 20-month-old mice (P < 0.05 calculated by a right-tailed Fisher’s exact test, fold change > 2, n = 3 per group). (B and C) Classification of the significantly differentially present proteins based on cellular components, molecular functions and cellular functions, and diseases. (D) Significant function and disease roles were analyzed by ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) using quantitatively upregulated and downregulated EV proteins after treatment of aged PTOA mice with UBX0101. Table 3 Physical function analysis using IPA of networks associated with SnC clearance by UBX0101 in aged OA mouse joints Even without significant trauma, aging contributes broadly to the development of chronic diseases such as OA. Aged mice experience cartilage degeneration and a more severe degenerative response after traumatic injury in the joint. To determine whether EVs from an aged animal can transfer and induce disease, we isolated EVs from the synovial fluid of aged mice and injected them into the articular space of young mice. Young mice that received the aged EVs developed marked cartilage degeneration after 84 days, as demonstrated by decreased Safranin-O staining for proteoglycans. The animals also exhibited increased pain, as demonstrated by decreased weight bearing on the EV-injected leg between days 56 and 84 compared with control animals injected with saline (Supplemental Figure 7). This work demonstrates the physiological and pathologic functions of senescence-associated synovial EVs and their ability to transfer a specific age-related disease to young animals. Discussion Multiple miRs in synovial fluids relevant to OA progression were differentially expressed, including miR-27b, -199a, -185, and -23b. These miRs have been suggested to play a role in bone sclerosis along with catabolic and inflammatory response (27, 33–36), pathways that are relevant in OA disease and diagnosis. The effect of SnC clearance on the synovial EV contents was defined in a murine model of PTOA. Differential expression of miR-34a after senolytic treatment occurred in both murine synovial EVs and human EVs from senescent chondrocytes. Therefore, expression of this miR may be used to evaluate disease progression and response to drugs that target SnCs. Further studies are needed to validate this observation, since there were low numbers of clinical samples due to limitations in collection of clinical OA samples. Any disturbance of joint homeostasis is reflected in the levels of soluble factors (such as cytokines, enzymes, and growth factors) in the synovial fluid and possibly also in the number and content of EVs. Recent evidence suggests that synovial fluid–derived EV miRs vary with sex and disease state (27). miRs we found showing differential expression in OA (miR-27b, miR-199a, miR-185) were previously reported to contribute to OA progression by causing abnormal subchondral bone development, chondrogenesis, and catabolic and inflammatory gene expression (27, 33–36). Our studies revealed the presence of these OA-specific miRs in EVs, along with other unique miRs (e.g., hsa-miR-151a-3p_R+1, hsa-miR-652-3p_R+1, hsa-miR-4450-p3-1ss12TG, hsa-miR-3665-p5_1ss2CA, has-miR-4488_L+1R-4, and hsa-miR1262-p5-1ss11GC). We speculate that synovial EV–derived miRs contribute to dysregulated cartilage homeostasis and initiation/amplification of inflammation. miR expression profiling in human synovial fluid–derived EVs could provide a disease fingerprint. But future studies need to further examine EV profile differences at different timings and stages during the diseases process on a larger clinical study. Transfer of age-related pathologies (or conversely the more popular transfer of youthfulness to aged animals) has been demonstrated using a number of modalities. Parabiosis studies that demonstrated the improvement of age-related pathology by introducing young factors, also found that exposure to the aged environment had a negative effect on the young animals. In a specific example of senescence transfer, transplantation of SnCs or human aged adipose tissue to young animals produced deleterious effects (37, 38). Our data show that EVs secreted from senescent chondrocytes isolated from human arthritic patients can transfer features of senescence to nonsenescent (from healthy donor) chondrocytes and suppress cartilage tissue formation. The increased secretion of EVs from highly enriched senescent chondrocyte populations — and especially their miR-34a cargo — can also provoke senescence in a paracrine manner (39). The phenotypic changes may correlate with the cellular senescence response during OA progression that also affects EV secretion, partially through p53 and one of its targets (17, 40, 41). miR‑140 is one of the few miRs that is highly expressed in nonsenescent chondrocytes (42), and its expression is lower in human OA cartilage as well as in IL-1B–induced inflammation in articular cartilage (24, 43). To validate physiological relevance and age-related pathology transference to young animals, SnC-associated EVs alone were able to induce symptoms of OA (pain) and induced tissue degeneration in the young joint. There is mounting evidence that the immune system plays a role in the development of PTOA (44). The cellular sources of miRs that we found to be differentially expressed in synovial EVs after senolytic therapy have been defined previously (45). For example, miR-223 is significantly enriched in neutrophils and monocytes while miR-150 and -125 are exclusively expressed by lymphocytes. This suggests that clearance of SnCs modulates the response, recruitment, and activation of cells from the myeloid and lymphoid lineage. Just as the human chondrocyte EV production did not fully overlap with the EVs found in synovial fluid, these results provide evidence of other cell types that may be contributing to the EV population found in the synovial fluid. Future studies need to address the possibility of identifying the cellular origin of EVs and tissue-specific EV profiles in order to elucidate detailed mechanistic roles of EVs in the OA diseases. The findings also support the relevance of the immune system in PTOA, which when combined with age-related immune changes, may affect senolytic therapy design. Methods Cell isolation and culture. Explanted OA articular cartilage and synovial fluid from human patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty were received from the National Disease Resource Institution (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA). The cartilage tissue was cut into 1-mm3 pieces, washed 3 times with PBS supplemented with 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin (Pen/Strep; Invitrogen, catalog 15140-122), and digested on a shaker for 16 hours at 37°C with 0.17% (w/v) type II collagenase (Worthington Biochemical, catalog 4176) in high-glucose DMEM (Gibco, catalog 11965-092) with 10% FBS (Hyclone, catalog SH30070.03). After the digestion, the filtrate was passed through a 70-μm strainer and cells were rinsed 3 times with growth media containing DMEM supplemented with 1% Pen/Strep and 10% FBS. For culture experiments in which EVs derived from SnCs were exposed to healthy chondrocytes, healthy chondrocytes were cultured with EVs (8 × 108) in growth medium that was precentrifuged at 100,000 rcf for 20 hours to remove FBS-associated EVs for 6 days. Sorting senescent chondrocytes by flow cytometry. Human primary osteoarthritic chondrocytes were trypsinized, collected in the chondrocyte growth medium, and immediately used for sorting in a FACSAria IIu Sorter (BD Biosciences). Signals were analyzed using FACS Diva Version 6.1.3 software. There are currently no known markers of SnCs for live sort; therefore, the sort was based on examining the enlarged size and accumulated autofluorescence of the age pigment lipofuscin in SnCs (20, 46). SnCs were sorted based upon size in FL1 and autofluorescence (488 nm) by FSC as previously described (31). The FSC/SSC dot plot of autofluorescence versus size was then generated and used to arbitrarily set up gates to sort the chondrocytes into 3 groups to generate populations with different proportions of SnCs. Live cells were sorted in buffer composed of PBS with 1% FBS and collected in buffer composed of chondrocyte medium with 2× Pen/Strep. We sorted populations containing high- (65%), medium- (45%), and low-senescent (20%) chondrocytes using the upper 5.9%, middle 10.8%, and lower 9.9% quartiles, respectively, with respect to both FSC-A and FITC-A, which was confirmed by SA-β-Gal assay (Supplemental Figure 1). We collected sorted populations of SnCs in chondrocyte growth medium and used these for coculture experiments. Coculture of senescent chondrocytes with healthy chondrocytes. A 24-well Corning Transwell plate with 6.5-mm inserts (MilliporeSigma, catalog 3470) was used for coculture experiments. Transwell inserts (0.4-μm pore size) containing varying concentrations of senescent chondrocytes at a cell density of 20,000/insert were fitted into the 24-well containing primary nonsenescent chondrocytes at a cell density of 20,000/well. The coculture was incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 in chondrocyte growth medium for 7 days; control cultures contained only nonsenescent chondrocytes. For SnC-conditioned media, high- (65%), medium- (45%), and low-senescent (20%) chondrocytes were plated in a 24-well culture plate at a cell density of 20,000/well and collected the conditioned media after 7 days of culture. After centrifugation (300 g for 10 minutes at 4°C), we aliquoted the conditioned medium, which was stored at –80°C. Nonsenescent chondrocytes at a density of 20,000/well were cultured in the conditioned medium for 7 days. The conditioned medium was changed on alternate days. Cytokine antibody array assay. Cytokines in conditioned media were assessed using the human cytokine array kit (R&D Systems, catalog ARY005) according to the manufacture’s instructions. Briefly, conditioned media were prepared by washing approximately 0.2 × 105 cells once with PBS and incubating them in serum-free medium for 24 hours. The conditioned media were collected in 1.5-ml centrifuge tubes and clarified by centrifugation. The array membrane was incubated with 1.5 ml of 3-fold diluted conditioned media overnight at 4°C, washed, and incubated with biotin-conjugated antibody cocktail, washed, and then incubated with streptavidin-HRP conjugate. Cytokines were detected by Chemi reagent mix. The signals were developed on x-ray film and quantified relative to the average signal (pixel density) of a pair of duplicate spots representing each cytokine by ImageJ software (NIH). The experiments were performed in duplicate. SA-β-Gal staining. SA-β-Gal staining was done using a kit (BioVision Senescence Detection Kit, catalog K320-250) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. SnCs were identified as blue-stained cells under light microscopy. Total cells were counted using a nuclear DAPI counterstain in 10 random fields per culture dish to determine the percentage of SA-β-Gal–positive cells. Surgically induced OA mouse model. ACLT surgery was performed on 10-week-old or 19-month-old male C57BL/6 mice from Charles River. Mice were placed under general anesthesia with 3% isoflurane, and the hind limbs shaved and prepared for aseptic surgery. The knee joint was exposed following a medial capsular incision, and the ACL was transected with microscissors under a surgical microscope. After irrigation with saline to remove tissue debris, the skin incision was closed. EV enrichment by ultracentrifugation. EVs were isolated by differential ultracentrifugation according to established methods shown in Supplemental Figure 2A (30, 47). The 10,000 g step from that protocol was skipped because we did not see a need to focus on any particular class of EV in this initial study and thus did not try to deplete microvesicle-sized particles. For isolation of EVs from in vitro cultured cells, conditioned medium was collected and centrifuged at 2,000 rcf for 20 minutes at 4°C to remove cells and cell debris; the supernatant containing EVs was then centrifuged at 100,000 rcf for 70 minutes at 4°C. The EV pellet was suspended in PBS and centrifuged at 100,000 rcf again to eliminate contaminant proteins and nucleic acids. The pellet was then resuspended in PBS and store at –80°C until use. Isolation of EVs from synovial fluid was performed similarly, but synovial fluid was first diluted 1:4 with PBS prior to differential centrifugation. EV characterization via NTA and transmission electron microscopy. EVs isolated and resuspended in PBS were analyzed for size and concentration via NTA using a NanoSight NS300 (Malvern Panalytical) equipped with a 532-nm laser, low-volume flow-cell, syringe pump, and concentration upgrade. Thawed EV samples were further diluted in PBS to yield concentrations of between 20 and 100 particles/frame on NanoSight, and three 60-second videos were acquired per sample using the same camera settings and NTA 3.1 or 3.2 software. For transmission electron microscopy, EVs were incubated overnight on carbon film 400 square mesh transmission electron microscopy grids. Grids were briefly dipped in a droplet of ultrapure water, wicked dry, vacuum dried, and imaged on a Philips CM120 (Philips Research). Protein extraction from synovial fluid–derived EVs from young and aged OA joints. The final EV pellets were resuspended in 100 μl solubilization buffer (7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, in 30 mM Tris, pH 8.0). Aliquots from the solubilized EV extractions were used to determine the total protein concentration using the BCA method (Thermo Scientific). miR qPCR array. miR was harvested from EVs of conditioned media and synovial fluids of OA mouse joints using the miRCURY RNA isolation kit for biofluids (Exiqon, catalog 300112). A TaqMan low-density microRNA array A (TLDA; Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog 4398967) was used for 375 miRs targets and for 6 common miRs as controls. Reverse transcription (TaqMan, PN 4366596), preamplification (TaqMan, PN 4391128), and TLDA card processing were done using manufacturer’s protocol. Data were extracted and processed as previously described (48). Normalization was performed to the geometric mean of 26 miRs detected in all samples. In-solution trypsin/LysC/Glu-C digestion of EVs proteomes. For proteomic analysis of proteins extracted from the EVs purified from synovial fluid from young and old OA joints of mice subjected to ACLT surgery, with or without UBX0101 treatment, equal aliquots (0.5–1 μg) were subjected to the in-solution reduction with 100 mM dithiothreitol for 50 minutes at 55°C followed by alkylation with 550 mM iodoacetamide for 1 hour at room temperature in the dark. The samples were further subjected to digestion for 18 hours at 37°C with endoproteinase Lys-C (sequencing grade, Promega) (1:50, protein/enzyme ratio) in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate buffer, pH 8.5. Then, tryptic digestion was performed for 3 hours at 37°C, in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate buffer, at pH 8.5 (1:50, protein/enzyme ratio). Finally, Glu-C was added (1:10, Glu-C/protein ratio) in ammonium 50 mM bicarbonate buffer (pH 7.5) at 37°C for 10 hours. Total peptides, extracted from all enzymatic digestions, were combined, desalted on C18 Prep clean columns, and further subjected to nanoLC/ESI/MS/MS on a Q Exactive HF quadrupole orbitrap mass spectrometer. NanoLC-ESI-MS/MS analysis of peptides generated from the digestion with LysC/trypsin/Glu-C enzymes. Each sample digest was analyzed by nano LC/MS/MS (liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry). For LFQ analysis, technical replicates (2 × 1μg) from each digested sample and corresponding EVs were analyzed on a Q Exactive HF quadrupole orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) coupled to an Easy nLC 1000 UHPLC (Thermo Fisher Scientific) through a nanoelectrospray ion source. The mass spectrometer was operated in the positive ion mode and data-dependent acquisition mode. The full MS scans were obtained with a m/z range of 300–1600 and a mass resolution of 120,000 at m/z 200. Higher-energy collision-induced dissociation was performed on the 15 most significant peaks, and tandem mass spectra were acquired at a mass resolution of 30,000 at m/z 200 and a target value of 1.00 × 105 with a maximum injection time of 100 ms. Protein identification and label-free relative peptide quantification (LFQ analysis). Raw files from each technical and biological replicate were filtered, de novo sequenced, and assigned with protein ID using PEAKS 7.0, 7.5, and 8.0 software (Bioinformatics Solutions) by searching against the mouse (Mus musculus) Swiss-Prot database (82,628 entries). The following search parameters were applied for LFQ analysis: trypsin, Lys-C, and GluC restriction for enzymes, with the allowance of one missing cleaved enzyme at one peptide end. The parent mass tolerance was set to 15–18 ppm using monoisotopic mass, and fragment ion mass tolerance was set to 0.05 Da. Carbamidomethyl cysteine (+57.0215 on C) was specified in PEAKS as a fixed modification. Methionine, lysine, proline, arginine, cysteine, and asparagine oxidations (+15.99 on CKMNPR) and deamidation of asparagine and glutamine (NQ-0.98) and pyro-Glu from glutamine (Q-18.01 N-term) were set as variable modifications. Data were validated using the FDR built into PEAKS 7.0–8.0, and protein identification was accepted at a confidence score (–10logP) > 15 for peptides and (–10logP) > 15 for proteins; a minimum of 1 peptide per protein after data was filtered for an FDR of less than 1.0% for peptides and less than 1.5% FDR for protein identifications (P < 0.05). LFQ analysis followed by quantitative IPA were performed as described previously (49). Gene ontology, pathway enrichment, and protein analysis of proteomics data. Networks, functional analyses, and biochemical and cellular pathways were generated by employing IPA (Ingenuity Systems). Specifically, experimentally determined protein ratios were used to calculate the fold changes by rescaling values using a log2 transformation, such that positive values reflected fold increases while negative values reflected fold decreases. For network generation, data sets containing gene identifiers (symbols) were uploaded into the IPA application together with their rescaled log2 transformation ratios. For all quantitative IPA, we used data sets that represent >2-fold expressed proteins across all analyzed samples. These molecules were overlaid onto a global molecular network in the Ingenuity Knowledge Base. The networks were then algorithmically generated based on their connectivity index using the IPA algorithm. The probability of having a relationship between each IPA-indexed function and the experimentally determined genes was calculated by a right-tailed Fisher’s exact test. The level of significance was set to P < 0.05. Accordingly, IPA identified the molecular and cellular pathways from the library of established biochemical pathways that were most significant to the data set (–log [P value] > 2.0). miR target selection and validation. To identify molecular pathways potentially altered by multiple miRs, we used DIANA-mirPath (v 3.0) (http://diana.imis.athena-innovation.gr/DianaTools/index.php), which performs an enrichment analysis of multiple miR target genes, comparing each set of miR targets to all known Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes pathways. Library prep and miR sequencing. Sequencing was performed on the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform in the 50 cycle SE configuration. In brief, single-end sequencing reads were cleaned with quality filter, adapter cutter, and length filter, using ACGT101_miR_v4.2g from LC Sciences. Considering that extremely low abundance might lead to false results, the known and new candidate miRs with less than 10 raw reads in the libraries were removed from the analysis. The cleaned reads were mapped to miRBase (miRBase v21) using Bowtie v1.1.1. The unmapped reads were mapped to multiple databases, including mRNA, Rfam11, and genomic DNA, using Bowtie v1.1.1. miR candidates we believe to be novel were identified from genome mapped reads based on the propensity of hairpin formation in corresponding genome positions using ACGT101_miR_v4.2g from LC Sciences. Data were normalized by dividing the sequence counts of individual samples by the corresponding normalization factors, which are the median values of the ratios between specific sample counts and geometric mean counts of all samples. The sequencing data presented in this study were submitted to the Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE126677). Labeling EVs with a lipophilic and near-infrared fluorescent cyanine dye. A 199-μl stock solution of DiR (Xenolight DiR, MW 1013.4, 25 mg, PerkinElmer, catalog 125964) was prepared by dissolving 25 mg in 3 ml 200 proof ethanol (~8.2 mM) and then diluting it in PBS to make a working solution of 320 μg/ml (0.31 mM). EVs from mouse synovial fluids were incubated with 320 μg/ml DiR at 37°C for 30 minutes. The EVs were then washed with 750 μl PBS and subjected to ultracentrifugation for 1 hour at 100,000 rcf. EVs were resuspend in 35 μl of 150 mM PBS. In vivo fluorescence imaging using the IVIS system was performed using 710 nm excitation and 760 nm emission at 10 minutes, 1 hour, 7 days, and 14 days after injecting DiR labeled EVs under the same imaging conditions. Weight bearing. Static incapacitance measurements were performed using an Incapacitance Tester (Columbus Instruments). Mice were first acclimated to the chamber at least 3 times before measurement. After acclimatization, mice were maneuvered inside the chamber such that they stood with 1 paw on each scale. Weight placed on each hind limb was measured over a 3-second interval for at least 3 separate measurements. Results are expressed as a percentage of weight placed on the operated limb versus contralateral control limb. The observer was blinded to the genotype and treatment of the mice. Histology. The mouse joints were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight, dehydrated in increasing concentrations of ethanol, and embedded in paraffin. Five-micrometer-thick sections were cut from the paraffin block and collected onto glass slides. The sections were stained for proteoglycans with aqueous Safranin-O (0.1%) for 5 minutes, and then specimens were mounted. Statistics. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. All analyses were performed using Prism 8 (GraphPad software). Statistical tests used to calculate P values for each figure are indicated in the figure legends. One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple-comparisons test were used for statistical analysis in Figures 1 and 3. Two-tailed t tests (unpaired) were performed for statistical analysis in Figure 2. A right-tailed Fisher’s exact test was performed to define statistical significance of functional analyses and biochemical and cellular pathways for proteomic studies in Figures 4 and 5. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant (except P < 0.1 for differentially expressed miRs in synovial EVs between normal and OA patients in Figure 2D and Table 1). Study approval. All animal studies were performed with approval of and in accordance with the guidelines established by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. Human cartilage and synovial fluid samples were received from the National Disease Resource Institution according to an IRB-approved protocol. Author contributions OHJ designed and carried out most of the experiments and analyzed data from experiments and wrote the manuscript with input from all coauthors. DRW, CCC, LS, and KWW designed experiments and analyzed and interpreted data from experiments. CC, SR, and BP performed experiments. JC and JJG analyzed and interpreted data and revised the manuscript. JHE conceived, designed, and supervised the study; analyzed and interpreted data; and wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript. ZL and AMK carried out miR sequencing for human synovial EV samples. Supplemental material Acknowledgments The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Morton Goldberg Chair (to JHE), the Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy (to JHE), the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs through the Peer Reviewed Medical Research Program (W81XWH-17-1-0627) (to JHE), the NIH (AG009909) (to JC), National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (1P41EB021911-01) (to AMK), and a fellowship from the Glenn Foundation for Medical Research (to OHJ). Footnotes Conflict of interest: JHE, OHJ, and JC are inventors on patents owned by Unity Biotechnology, Buck Institute, Mayo Clinic, and Johns Hopkins and licensed to Unity Biotechnology (9,849,218 and 9,855,266). JC is a founder of Unity Biotechnology. Copyright: © 2019 American Society for Clinical Investigation Reference information: JCI Insight. 2019;4(7):e125019. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.125019. References Wieland HA, Michaelis M, Kirschbaum BJ, Rudolphi KA. Osteoarthritis - an untreatable disease? Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005;4(4):331–344. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Loeser RF. Aging and osteoarthritis: the role of chondrocyte senescence and aging changes in the cartilage matrix. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2009;17(8):971–979. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Martin JA, Brown T, Heiner A, Buckwalter JA. Post-traumatic osteoarthritis: the role of accelerated chondrocyte senescence. Biorheology. 2004;41(3-4):479–491. View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar Jeon OH, et al. Local clearance of senescent cells attenuates the development of post-traumatic osteoarthritis and creates a pro-regenerative environment. Nat Med. 2017;23(6):775–781. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Price JS, et al. The role of chondrocyte senescence in osteoarthritis. Aging Cell. 2002;1(1):57–65. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Jeon OH, David N, Campisi J, Elisseeff JH. Senescent cells and osteoarthritis: a painful connection. J Clin Invest. 2018;128(4):1229–1237. View this article via: JCI PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Kuilman T, Michaloglou C, Mooi WJ, Peeper DS. The essence of senescence. Genes Dev. 2010;24(22):2463–2479. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Campisi J, d’Adda di Fagagna F. Cellular senescence: when bad things happen to good cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8(9):729–740. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Coppé JP, et al. Senescence-associated secretory phenotypes reveal cell-nonautonomous functions of oncogenic RAS and the p53 tumor suppressor. PLoS Biol. 2008;6(12):2853–2868. View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar Baker DJ, et al. Naturally occurring p16(Ink4a)-positive cells shorten healthy lifespan. Nature. 2016;530(7589):184–189. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Ferreira-Gonzalez S, et al. Paracrine cellular senescence exacerbates biliary injury and impairs regeneration. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1020. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Acosta JC, et al. A complex secretory program orchestrated by the inflammasome controls paracrine senescence. Nat Cell Biol. 2013;15(8):978–990. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Valadi H, Ekström K, Bossios A, Sjöstrand M, Lee JJ, Lötvall JO. Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2007;9(6):654–659. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Kato T, et al. Exosomes from IL-1β stimulated synovial fibroblasts induce osteoarthritic changes in articular chondrocytes. Arthritis Res Ther. 2014;16(4):R163. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Withrow J, Murphy C, Liu Y, Hunter M, Fulzele S, Hamrick MW. Extracellular vesicles in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2016;18(1):286. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Jubeck B, et al. Promotion of articular cartilage matrix vesicle mineralization by type I collagen. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58(9):2809–2817. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Lehmann BD, et al. Senescence-associated exosome release from human prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2008;68(19):7864–7871. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Effenberger T, et al. Senescence-associated release of transmembrane proteins involves proteolytic processing by ADAM17 and microvesicle shedding. FASEB J. 2014;28(11):4847–4856. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Overhoff MG, Garbe JC, Koh J, Stampfer MR, Beach DH, Bishop CL. Cellular senescence mediated by p16INK4A-coupled miRNA pathways. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(3):1606–1618. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Passos JF, von Zglinicki T. Methods for cell sorting of young and senescent cells. Methods Mol Biol. 2007;371:33–44. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Dimri GP, et al. A biomarker that identifies senescent human cells in culture and in aging skin in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92(20):9363–9367. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Coppé JP, Desprez PY, Krtolica A, Campisi J. The senescence-associated secretory phenotype: the dark side of tumor suppression. Annu Rev Pathol. 2010;5:99–118. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Cahu J, Bustany S, Sola B. Senescence-associated secretory phenotype favors the emergence of cancer stem-like cells. Cell Death Dis. 2012;3:e446. View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar Miyaki S, et al. MicroRNA-140 is expressed in differentiated human articular chondrocytes and modulates interleukin-1 responses. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60(9):2723–2730. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Miyaki S, Asahara H. Macro view of microRNA function in osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2012;8(9):543–552. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Feliciano A, Sánchez-Sendra B, Kondoh H, Lleonart ME. MicroRNAs regulate key effector pathways of senescence. J Aging Res. 2011;2011:205378. View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar Kolhe R, et al. Gender-specific differential expression of exosomal miRNA in synovial fluid of patients with osteoarthritis. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):2029. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Pathan M, et al. FunRich: An open access standalone functional enrichment and interaction network analysis tool. Proteomics. 2015;15(15):2597–2601. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Pathan M, et al. A novel community driven software for functional enrichment analysis of extracellular vesicles data. J Extracell Vesicles. 2017;6(1):1321455. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Théry C, Amigorena S, Raposo G, Clayton A. Isolation and characterization of exosomes from cell culture supernatants and biological fluids. Curr Protoc Cell Biol. 2006;Chapter 3:Unit 3.22. View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar Paraskevopoulou MD, et al. DIANA-microT web server v5.0: service integration into miRNA functional analysis workflows. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(Web Server issue):W169–W173. View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar Balakrishnan L, et al. Proteomic analysis of human osteoarthritis synovial fluid. Clin Proteomics. 2014;11(1):6. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Akhtar N, Rasheed Z, Ramamurthy S, Anbazhagan AN, Voss FR, Haqqi TM. MicroRNA-27b regulates the expression of matrix metalloproteinase 13 in human osteoarthritis chondrocytes. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(5):1361–1371. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Prasadam I, Batra J, Perry S, Gu W, Crawford R, Xiao Y. Systematic identification, characterization and target gene analysis of microRNAs involved in osteoarthritis subchondral bone pathogenesis. Calcif Tissue Int. 2016;99(1):43–55. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Wang X, Ning Y, Zhou B, Yang L, Wang Y, Guo X. Integrated bioinformatics analysis of the osteoarthritis‑associated microRNA expression signature. Mol Med Rep. 2018;17(1):1833–1838. View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar Ham O, et al. Upregulation of miR-23b enhances the autologous therapeutic potential for degenerative arthritis by targeting PRKACB in synovial fluid-derived mesenchymal stem cells from patients. Mol Cells. 2014;37(6):449–456. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Conboy IM, Conboy MJ, Wagers AJ, Girma ER, Weissman IL, Rando TA. Rejuvenat
Cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibody has been shown recently to be a promising marker for early detection and diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In order to exploit newly developed...
Via Krishan Maggon
|
Scooped by
Gilbert C FAURE
February 6, 2019 1:39 AM
|
I participated in “Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Closer Look at the Burden on Patients and Caregivers,” a CME/MOC/CNE activity from @PeerView
|
Suggested by
Société Francaise d'Immunologie
December 31, 2018 1:26 PM
|
This activity is jointly provided by Global Education Group and Integritas Communications. Based on a live symposium supported by an educational grant from Gilead Sciences, Inc. Target Audience This activity has been designed to meet the educational needs of health care professionals involved in the diagnosis, treatment, or management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Educational Objectives After completing this activity, the participant should be better able to: Discuss the latest insights into RA immunopathology with a focus on JAK enzyme activation Evaluate patients with RA longitudinally based on an understanding of treat-to-target recommendations and appropriate disease activity measures Describe the mechanistic profiles and clinical trial data for current and emerging targeted synthetic DMARDs Integrate targeted synthetic DMARDs into treatment regimens for patients with RA based on current clinical practice guidelines and evidence for efficacy and safety Faculty Rieke Alten, MD (Course Chair) Professor of Medicine Department Head Internal Medicine, Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology, and Osteology Schlosspark-Klinik University Medicine Berlin Berlin, Germany Joel Kremer, MD, FACP Pfaff Family Professor of Medicine Albany Medical College Director of Research The Center for Rheumatology Albany, New York, USA Josef Smolen, MD Professor of Medicine Chair, Division of Rheumatology Department of Medicine III Medical University of Vienna Vienna, Austria Agenda Pathophysiology: A Focus on JAK Enzymes Josef Smolen, MD Long-term Assessment of Patients With RA: Understanding Treatment Targets as a Foundation for Therapeutic Tailoring Joel Kremer, MD Targeted Synthetic DMARDs in the Treatment of RA Rieke Alten, MD Case Study Panel Discussion: Putting the Evidence to Practice Moderated by: Rieke Alten, MD Program Overview Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory joint disease that can cause bone and cartilage damage and lead to disability.1 RA affects about 24.5 million people, with 5 and 50 per 100,000 people newly developing the condition each year.1,2 RA has resulted in increased mortality in recent years, creating a need for an understanding of treat-to-target recommendations and appropriate disease activity measures.3 Adopting treat-to-target strategies in RA patients has shown great promise in improving RA outcomes.4 Treatments for RA continue to emerge along with advances in the understanding of its pathologic mechanisms and the development of drugs that target them.5 Many cytokines involved in controlling cell growth and the immune response in RA function by binding to and activating cytokine receptors, which in turn rely on the Janus kinase (JAK) family of enzymes for signal transduction. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) inhibit the activity of these JAK enzymes and block cytokine signaling.6 Identifying the mechanistic profiles and clinical trial data for current and emerging targeted synthetic DMARDs can assist health care providers in optimizing RA patient outcomes.7 In this Clinical Issues™ program, an expert faculty panel will discuss and debate the latest insights into RA immunopathology with a focus on JAK enzyme activation, increase participants’ understanding of treat-to-target recommendations and appropriate disease activity measures, and describe the mechanistic profiles and clinical trial data for current and emerging targeted synthetic DMARDs. Attendees will leave this engaging program with new information and a fresh perspective on the evolving best practices for managing patients with RA. References Smolen JS, et al. Lancet. 2016;388(10055):2023-2038. GBD 2015 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence, Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388 (10053): 1545-1602. GBD 2013 Mortality and Causes of Death, Collaborators. Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2014;385 (9963): 117-171. Bykerk VP, et al. Tocilizumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate responses to DMARDs and/or TNF inhibitors: a large, open-label study close to clinical practice. Ann Rheum Di. 2012;71(12): 1950-1954. Kahlenberg JM, Fox DA. Advances in the medical treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Hand Clin. 2011;27(1):11-20. Kontzias A, et al. Jakinibs: a new class of kinase inhibitors in cancer and autoimmune disease. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2012;12(4):464-470. Ramiro S, et al. Safety of synthetic and biological DMARDs: a systematic literature review informing the 2016 update of the EULAR recommendations for management of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(6):1101-1136. Physician Accreditation Statement This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the accreditation requirements and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint providership of Global Education Group (Global) and Integritas Communications. Global is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians. Credit Designation Global Education Group designates this enduring activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Global Contact Information For information about the accreditation of this program, please contact Global at 303-395-1782 or cme@globaleducationgroup.com. Fee Information There is no fee for this educational activity. Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest Global Education Group (Global) requires instructors, planners, managers, and other individuals and their spouses/life partners who are in a position to control the content of this activity to disclose any real or apparent conflict of interest they may have as related to the content of this activity. All identified conflicts of interest are thoroughly vetted by Global for fair balance, scientific objectivity of studies mentioned in the materials or used as the basis for content, and appropriateness of patient care recommendations. The faculty reported the following financial relationships or relationships to products or devices they or their spouses/life partners have with commercial interests related to the content of this CME activity: Rieke Alten, MD: Grants/Research Support: Gilead Sciences, Inc., and Pfizer Inc. Honoraria/Consultation fees: Eli Lilly & Company, and Pfizer Inc. Speakers Bureau: Eli Lilly & Company, and Pfizer Inc. Joel Kremer, MD, FACP: Grants/Research Support: AbbVie Inc., Genentech, Inc., Eli Lilly & Company, and Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. Stock Shareholder: Corrona Josef Smolen, MD: Grants/Research Support: AbbVie Inc., AstraZeneca, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Eli Lilly & Company, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Merck Sharp Dohme Corp., and Pfizer Inc. Honoraria/Consultation fees: AbbVie Inc., Amgen Inc., AstraZeneca, Astro-Pharma GmbH, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene Corporation, Celltrion Inc., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly & Company, Gilead Sciences, Inc., GlaxoSmithKline, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, ILTOO Pharma, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Medimmune, LLC, Merck Sharp Dohme Corp., Pfizer Inc., Sandoz International GmbH, Samsung Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Sanofi, and UCB S.A. The planners and managers reported the following financial relationships or relationships to products or devices they or their spouse/life partner have with commercial interests related to the content of this CME activity: Lindsay Borvansky: Nothing to disclose Andrea Funk: Nothing to disclose Liddy Knight: Nothing to disclose Jim Kappler, PhD: Nothing to disclose Disclosure of Unlabeled Use This educational activity may contain discussion of published and/or investigational uses of agents that are not indicated by the FDA. Global Education Group (Global) and Integritas do not recommend the use of any agent outside of the labeled indications. The opinions expressed in the educational activity are those of the faculty and do not necessarily represent the views of any organization associated with this activity. Please refer to the official prescribing information for each product for discussion of approved indications, contraindications, and warnings. Disclaimer Participants have an implied responsibility to use the newly acquired information to enhance patient outcomes and their own professional development. The information presented in this activity is not meant to serve as a guideline for patient management. Any procedures, medications, or other courses of diagnosis or treatment discussed in this activity should not be used by clinicians without evaluation of patient conditions and possible contraindications on dangers in use, review of any applicable manufacturer’s product information, and comparison with recommendations of other authorities. Instructions to Receive Credit In order to receive credit for this activity, the participant must score 70% on the posttest and complete the program evaluation
|
Scooped by
Gilbert C FAURE
November 17, 2018 5:09 AM
|
Abstract Objective To estimate the prevalence and distribution of asymptomatic monosodium urate monohydrate (MSU) crystal deposition in sons of patients with gout. Methods Patients with gout were mailed an explanatory letter with an enclosed postage‐paid study packet to mail to their son(s) age ≥20 years old. Sons interested in participating returned a reply form and underwent telephone screening. Subsequently, they attended a study visit at which blood and urine samples were obtained and musculoskeletal ultrasonography was performed, with the sonographer blinded with regard to the subject's serum urate level. Images were assessed for double contour sign, intraarticular or intratendinous aggregates/tophi, effusion, and power Doppler signal. Logistic regression was used to examine associations. Adjusted odds ratios (ORadj) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated. Results One hundred thirty‐one sons (mean age 43.8 years, mean body mass index 27.1 kg/m2) completed assessments. The serum urate level was ≥6 mg/dl in 64.1%, and 29.8% had either a double contour sign or intraarticular aggregates/tophi in ≥1 joint. All participants with MSU deposition had involvement of 1 or both first metatarsophalangeal joints. Intratendinous aggregates were present in 21.4% and were associated with intraarticular MSU crystal deposits (ORadj 2.96 [95% CI 1.17–7.49]). No participant with a serum urate level of ≤5 mg/dl had MSU crystal deposition seen on ultrasonography, and 24.2% of those with serum urate levels between 5 and 6 mg/dl had ultrasonographic MSU deposition. MSU crystal deposition was associated with increasing serum urate levels (ORadj 1.61 [95% CI 1.10–2.36] for each increase of 1 mg/dl). Conclusion Asymptomatic sons of patients with gout frequently have hyperuricemia and MSU crystal deposits. In this study MSU crystal deposits were present in participants with serum urate levels of ≥5 mg/dl. Evaluation of subjects without a family history of gout is needed to determine whether the threshold for MSU crystal deposition is also lower in the general population. Gout is the most common form of inflammatory arthritis and results from persistent hyperuricemia that causes intra‐ and periarticular monosodium urate monohydrate (MSU) crystal deposition. It has multiple risk factors including genetic factors that act by modulating renal uric acid excretion 1. The heritability of serum urate and urinary uric acid excretion is estimated to be ~60% and 60–87%, respectively 2, while the heritability of gout is lower at 17.0% and 35.1% in Taiwanese women and men, respectively 3, and was estimated to range between 0% and 58% in a study from the US 1. As 14.5–25% of people with high serum urate levels have asymptomatic MSU crystal deposition 4-6, studies that use a symptomatic disease phenotype may underestimate the heritability of MSU crystal deposition. The prevalence of asymptomatic MSU crystal deposition in people at high genetic risk of gout, e.g., those with a parent who has gout, is not known. It has implications for screening and primary prevention of symptomatic gout and contrasts with rheumatoid arthritis, in which familial risk and prevalence of autoantibodies in first‐degree relatives are well understood. Thus, we undertook the present study to 1) examine the prevalence and distribution of asymptomatic MSU crystal deposition among sons of people with gout; 2) examine the association between serum urate, age, and asymptomatic MSU crystal deposition; and 3) explore whether parental age at gout onset is associated with asymptomatic MSU crystal deposition in sons. Patients and Methods Study design, subject recruitment, and ethics approval. This community‐based cross‐sectional study was approved by the Nottingham NHS Research Ethics Committee 2 (Rec ref: 15/EM/0316). People with self‐reported physician‐diagnosed gout who had participated in previous surveys at Academic Rheumatology, University of Nottingham and consented to future research contact were mailed a letter informing them of the present study and were asked to mail an enclosed study packet to their sons age ≥20 years. Sons of patients with primary gout who attended the rheumatology clinic at the Nottingham NHS Treatment Centre were approached in a similar manner, and the study was advertised on Facebook and once in a local newspaper. These advertisements were targeted at sons living in and around Nottingham who have a parent with gout. Sons who returned a reply form or contacted us in response to the advertisements underwent a telephone screening questionnaire to exclude those with gout 7. The screening questionnaire included questions that form part of the 8‐point chronic gout diagnosis (CGD) scale 7. The CGD scale includes current or past history of attack of acute arthritis, monoarthritis or oligoarthritis, rapid progression of pain and swelling (<24 hours), podagra, erythema, unilateral tarsitis, tophi, and hyperuricemia 7. As serum urate was not measured at the screening visit in this study, a history of hyperuricemia was substituted. Participants scoring ≤3 on the CGD were invited for the study visit. Study visit. Participants attended a study visit at which data on demographic characteristics, lifestyle factors, comorbidities, and drug prescriptions were collected. Targeted musculoskeletal assessment was performed, height, weight, and blood pressure were measured, and random blood and second‐void early‐morning urine samples were collected. Serum urate and creatinine and urinary uric acid and creatinine were measured at the clinical pathology laboratories of Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust. Fractional excretion of uric acid (FEUA) was calculated as ([urinary uric acid × serum creatinine]/[serum urate × urinary creatinine]) × 100% 8. Ultrasonography was performed by a rheumatologist with 5 years of ultrasonography experience (AA), who was blinded with regard to the subject's serum urate level. The ultrasonographic examination involved assessment of both first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints, talar domes, femoral condyles, second metacarpophalangeal joints, wrist triangular fibrocartilages, and patellar and triceps tendon insertions 9. These joints and tendons were chosen as they have best sensitivity and specificity for differentiating subjects with gout from those with other arthropathies 9. Ultrasound images were scored for double contour sign, intraarticular or intratendinous tophi/aggregates, and hyperechoic deposits (present or absent, as defined by the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology group 10). Joint effusion and power Doppler signal were graded on a 0–3 scale. All ultrasonographic assessments were performed using a Toshiba Aplio machine (8–14 MHz). Images with inconclusive readings were reviewed by a second ultrasonographer with >15 years of ultrasonography experience (PC), also under blinded conditions with regard to the subject's serum urate level. For the purpose of this study, MSU crystal deposits were defined as present if there was an intraarticular double contour sign or tophi/aggregates. Hyperechoic deposits alone were not sufficient to define MSU crystal deposits. When available, data on sex of the parent with gout and age at onset of gout were extracted from databases at Academic Rheumatology, University of Nottingham. Statistical analysis. The mean ± SD and the number (%) were used to describe continuous and categorical data, respectively. Independent‐sample t‐tests and chi‐square tests were used for univariate analysis; the Kruskal‐Wallis test was used if the data were nonparametric. Logistic regression was used to examine the association between intraarticular MSU crystal deposition at any joint in an individual and 1) serum urate level, 2) FEUA, 3) age, and 4) intratendinous aggregates/tophi at any tendon. The associations were adjusted for age where required, body mass index (kg/m2), current purine‐rich alcohol consumption (yes/no), hypertension (yes/no), hyperlipidemia (yes/no), diabetes (yes/no), estimated glomerular filtration rate (ml/minute), and father with gout (yes/no). Adjusted odds ratios (ORadj) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated. The individual was the unit of analysis. Statistical calculations were performed using Stata version 15. P values less than 0.05 were considered significant. Results One hundred thirty‐four participants were recruited into the study: 125 via postal survey (1,435 study packets sent, 249 replies received), 6 from among sons of gout patients attending Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, and 3 from advertisements. The 3 individuals recruited from advertisements did not present for ultrasonographic assessment and were excluded from further analysis. The serum urate level was ≥6 mg/dl in 64.1% of the subjects and ≥7 mg/dl in 29.0%. Demographic characteristics and comorbidities of the 131 participants are summarized in Table 1. The mean ± SD FEUA was 5.33 ± 1.87%, and FEUA was low (defined as ≤6.6%) in 78.6% of the subjects with a serum urate level of ≥6 mg/dl. Total Asymptomatic MSU crystal deposition Present (n = 39) Absent (n = 92) Age, mean ± SD years 43.80 ± 11.20 44.20 ± 8.91 43.63 ± 12.08 Age 20–29 years, no. (%) 20 (15.3) 3 17 Age 30–39 years, no. (%) 27 (20.6) 10 17 Age 40–49 years, no. (%) 40 (30.5) 15 25 Age 50–59 years, no. (%) 36 (27.5) 10 26 Age 60–69 years, no. (%) 8 (6.1) 1 7 Body mass index, mean ± SD kg/m2 27.10 ± 4.75 27.65 ± 3.99 26.85 ± 5.04 Current purine‐rich alcohol consumption, no. (%) 97 (74.1) 31 (79.5) 66 (71.7) Weekly purine‐rich alcohol intake, median (IQR) units 10 (5–20) 10 (5–20) 10 (4–20) Hypertension, no. (%) 12 (9.2)b 3 (7.7) 9 (9.8) Hyperlipidemia, no. (%) 10 (7.6)c 3 (7.7) 7 (7.6) Diabetes, no. (%) 2 (1.5)d 0 2 (2.2) eGFR, mean ± SD ml/minute 85.23 ± 7.19 85.21 ± 7.71 85.24 ± 7.00 Serum urate, mean ± SD mg/dl 6.41 ± 1.13 6.79 ± 0.96e 6.25 ± 1.16 Serum urate <5 mg/dl, no. (%) 14 (10.5) 0 14 Serum urate ≥5 and <6 mg/dl, no. (%) 33 (26.9) 8 25 Serum urate ≥6 and <7 mg/dl, no. (%) 46 (34.3) 18 28 Serum urate ≥7 and <8 mg/dl, no. (%) 27 (20.2) 8 19 Serum urate ≥8 and <9 mg/dl, no. (%) 9 (6.7) 4 5 Serum urate ≥9 mg/dl, no. (%) 2 (1.5) 1 1 FEUA, mean ± SD % 5.3 ± 1.9 5.3 ± 1.7 5.3 ± 1.9 Father with gout, no. (%) 111 (84.7) 33 (84.6) 78 (84.8) a All participants with asymptomatic monosodium urate monohydrate (MSU) crystal deposition had first metatarsophalangeal joint involvement. IQR = interquartile range; eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate; FEUA = fractional excretion of uric acid. b Eleven participants were prescribed antihypertensive drugs; 1 received bendroflumethiazide. c Six participants were prescribed statins. d Both participants were prescribed oral hypoglycemic drugs. e P = 0.01 versus participants without asymptomatic MSU crystal deposition. MSU crystal deposition was found in 29.8% of the subjects, with involvement of the first MTP joint (Figure 1) observed in all subjects in whom asymptomatic MSU crystal deposition was present. MSU crystal deposition was not found in any participant with a serum urate level of ≤5 mg/dl. Among the 262 first MTP joints examined, intraarticular aggregates were numerically more common than double contour sign (Table 2). Only 1 participant had a double contour sign at the ankle, and MSU crystal deposits were not present at the other joints examined. MSU crystal deposition at the first MTP joint was associated with grade ≥2 effusion at the same joint (ORadj 9.44 [95% CI 3.62–24.63], ORadj 5.44 [95% CI 1.57–18.82] for the right and left sides, respectively). The power Doppler signal was grade ≥2 in only 1 first MTP joint. Asymptomatic MSU deposition in first MTP joints Present (n = 49) Absent (n = 213) First MTP joints Double contour sign 13 (5.0) – – Tophi 27 (10.3) – – Double contour sign and tophi 9 (3.4) – – Grade ≥2 effusion 56 (21.4) 26 30 Patellar tendon Hyperechoic deposits 19 (7.3) 11 8 Unilateral 13 7 6 Bilateral 3 2 1 Triceps tendon Hyperechoic deposits 15 (5.7) 8 7 Unilateral 13 6 7 Bilateral 1 1 0 a One participant had a double contour sign at 1 ankle; triangular fibrocartilage involvement was not observed in any participant. Values are the number (%) of joints/tendons. MSU = monosodium urate monohydrate; MTP = metatarsophalangeal. Hyperechoic aggregates were present in at least 1 tendon in 28 participants (21.4%). Sixteen participants (12.2%) had patellar tendon involvement, and 14 (10.7%) had triceps tendon involvement. Of the 28 participants with hyperechoic aggregates in at least 1 tendon, 14 had asymptomatic MSU crystal deposition at 1 or both first MTP joints. The presence of MSU crystal deposition at either first MTP joint was associated with the presence of hyperechoic aggregates in at least 1 tendon (OR 3.12 [95% CI 1.31–7.42]). This association was statistically significant after adjustment for covariates (ORadj 2.96 [95% CI 1.17–7.49]). Subjects with asymptomatic MSU crystal deposition had higher serum urate levels than those without (mean difference 0.54 mg/dl [95% CI 0.12–0.96]). The prevalence of asymptomatic MSU crystal deposition at either first MTP joint increased from 0% to 24.2%, 39.1%, 29.6%, 44.4%, and 50%, respectively, in participants with serum urate levels of <5, 5–5.99, 6–6.99, 7–7.99, 8–8.99, and ≥9 mg/dl (Table 1). Other disease, demographic, and laboratory parameters were comparable between the 2 groups (Table 1). MSU crystal deposition was associated with increasing serum urate level (OR 1.50 [95% CI 1.06–2.11], ORadj 1.61 [95% CI 1.10–2.36] for each 1‐mg/dl increase in serum urate). However, there was no association between MSU crystal deposition and uric acid underexcretion status (FEUA ≤6.6%) (OR 0.71 [95% CI 0.29–1.71], ORadj 0.78 [95% CI 0.31–1.98]). Among the 117 participants with serum urate levels of ≥5 mg/dl (the cutoff value above which MSU crystal deposits were found in this study), the prevalence of asymptomatic MSU crystal deposition was 33.33%, and this increased numerically from ages in the 20s to the 40s before stabilizing (see Supplementary Table 1, on the Arthritis & Rheumatology web site at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/art.40572/abstract). However, the increase was not statistically significant, and participants age >40 years were not significantly more likely to have asymptomatic MSU crystal deposition than those ≤40 years of age (OR 1.32 [95% CI 0.59–2.95], ORadj 1.69 [95% CI 0.34–8.47]). There was no association between hyperuricemia and tendon hyperechoic deposits, and, in those with serum urate levels ≥5 mg/dl, there was no association between increasing age and tendon hyperechoic deposits (Supplementary Tables 2 and 3, on the Arthritis & Rheumatology web site at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/art.40572/abstract). Self‐reported data on age at onset of gout were available for 60 parents. The median age at onset was 53 years. On univariate analysis, there was no association between parental gout onset at or before 53 years of age and asymptomatic MSU crystal deposition (with parental gout onset after the age of 53 years as the referent) (OR 2.64 [95% CI 0.79–8.87]). However, this approached significance after adjustment for covariates (ORadj 4.14 [95% CI 0.88–19.46], P = 0.07). Discussion This study demonstrates that the sons of patients with gout have a higher prevalence of hyperuricemia 11, uric acid underexcretion 8, and asymptomatic MSU crystal deposition than observed in previous studies in which participants were preselected according to their serum urate level 4-6. The results also raise the possibility that MSU crystal deposition occurs initially in the first MTP joints and in tendons before appearing in other joints such as the ankle and the knee. However, this observation is limited by the cross‐sectional study design. It was surprising that 1 in 5 subjects with serum urate levels between 5 and 6 mg/dl had ultrasonographic features of MSU crystal deposition at the first MTP joints. This observation must be interpreted with caution as it is based on a single serum urate measurement, and it is possible that serum urate levels in these participants were higher at a previous time. However, it raises the possibility that the threshold for MSU crystal deposition in vivo may be lower than that estimated from laboratory studies. This may be due to the fact that the saturation point of urate reduces from 6.75 mg/dl at 37°C to between 4.5 and 6 mg/dl at 30–35°C, the mean temperature of the human big toe in temperate climates 12, 13. While MSU crystals were present in subjects with serum urate levels of 5–6 mg/dl, we did not find ultrasonographic evidence of MSU crystal deposition in those with levels below 5 mg/dl. This raises the possibility that the target serum urate level for treat‐to‐target urate‐lowering therapy should be <5 mg/dl, at least in individuals who continue to have gout flares despite serum urate levels between 5 and 6 mg/dl. However, further prospective studies are needed before such a strategy can be recommended. A lower‐than‐expected serum urate level in sons of patients with gout might also be explained in part by inherited tissue factors (either an increase in promoters or decrease in inhibitors) that enhance MSU crystal deposition at relatively low serum urate levels. The present findings suggest that MSU crystal deposition begins early (in the third decade of life) and becomes more prevalent with increasing age. The reduction in prevalence of MSU crystal deposition in subjects older than 60 years could be due to the sampling for this study, as people older than 60 years with MSU crystal deposits are likely to have developed gout flares, which would have excluded them from the study population. We observed intratendinous hyperechoic deposits in 35.9% of participants with MSU crystal deposits elsewhere. This is consistent with previous reports of tendon involvement in gout 14, 15. As shown in Table 2, a substantial proportion of tendon hyperechoic deposits occurred in subjects without ultrasonographic features of MSU crystal deposition in the first MTP joints. Further research, e.g., using dual‐energy computed tomography, is therefore needed to confirm the composition of these tendinous deposits before their presence can be used to imply MSU crystal deposition in the absence of a double contour sign or intraarticular tophi in other joints. Our results indicate that ultrasonographic evaluation of both first MTP joints is sufficient to identify all individuals with MSU crystal deposition. Thus, men at a high risk of gout (e.g., those with a positive family history) could undergo serum urate measurement and ultrasonography of both first MTP joints to screen for MSU crystal deposition. While ultrasonographic examination of multiple peripheral joints is time consuming, assessment of both first MTP joints takes 10–15 minutes and may make it possible for asymptomatic MSU crystal deposits to be diagnosed, in turn allowing consideration of lifestyle changes to prevent development of symptomatic gout and associated consequences. Initiation of prophylactic pharmacologic urate‐lowering treatment at this early stage would be considered controversial given the absence of symptoms and the possibility that in many people with asymptomatic MSU crystal deposition, gout flares would not develop. Such a screening strategy would require ultrasonography of 3 individuals with a serum urate level of ≥5 mg/dl to detect 1 person with asymptomatic MSU crystal deposition. However, in the absence of prospective studies evaluating the relationship between asymptomatic MSU crystal deposition and symptomatic gout, the benefit from such a strategy remains unproven. Our data also suggest that parents with younger‐onset gout are more likely to pass on the trait to their sons, although this association was not statistically significant and requires further investigation in a study with a larger sample size. There are several caveats to this study. First, the response rate was low, and it is possible that patients with severe, troublesome gout were more likely to pass on the study packets to their sons, or that sons with lifestyle risk factors were more likely to agree to participate. This raises the possibility of selection and response bias. However, the mean ± SD age at gout onset in parents of sons who participated and for whom data on the age at gout onset were available (n = 60) was 52 ± 13.65 years, and they reported a mean ± SD of 1.33 ± 2.10 gout flares in the 12‐month period preceding their original research visit. These parents also had a low comorbidity burden, with a median of 1 cardiovascular or renal comorbidity (interquartile range 1–2). Second, we did not perform joint aspiration to confirm the validity of our findings. However, in subjects with hyperuricemia, ultrasonographic changes have 100% sensitivity and 88% specificity for MSU crystal deposition, compared to joint aspiration 5. Finally, we measured serum urate only on a single occasion. In conclusion, the results of this study demonstrate that asymptomatic sons of patients with gout frequently have hyperuricemia and uric acid underexcretion, and have a high prevalence of MSU crystal deposition. This suggests that screening of such individuals and discussion of early management, involving addressing modifiable risk factors (overweight, obesity, high fructose intake, etc.) in order to reduce their risk of developing symptomatic gout, should be considered. Acknowledgments The authors would like to acknowledge the study participants and their parents. Author Contributions All authors were involved in drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content, and all authors approved the final version to be published. Dr. Abhishek had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study conception and design Abhishek, Courtney, Jones, Zhang, Doherty. Acquisition of data Abhishek, Courtney, Jenkins. Analysis and interpretation of data Abhishek, Sandoval‐Plata. Supporting Information References Notes : Drs. Abhishek and Doherty's work was supported by an investigator‐initiated departmental research grant from AstraZeneca and Ironwood Pharmaceuticals. Ms Sandoval‐Plata's work was supported by a PhD scholarship from Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, Mexico. Dr. Abhishek has received speaking fees from Menarini (less than $10,000) and research grants from AstraZeneca and Oxford Immunotec. Dr. Zhang has received speaking fees and/or honoraria from AstraZeneca, Grünenthal, Bioiberica, and Hisun (less than $10,000 each). Dr. Doherty has received consulting fees and/or honoraria from AstraZeneca, Grünenthal, Mallinkrodt, and Roche (less than $10,000 each) and research grants from AstraZeneca and Oxford Immunotec. 3 All participants with asymptomatic monosodium urate monohydrate (MSU) crystal deposition had first metatarsophalangeal joint involvement. IQR = interquartile range; eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate; FEUA = fractional excretion of uric acid. 4 Eleven participants were prescribed antihypertensive drugs; 1 received bendroflumethiazide. 5 Six participants were prescribed statins. 6 Both participants were prescribed oral hypoglycemic drugs. 7 P = 0.01 versus participants without asymptomatic MSU crystal deposition. 8 One participant had a double contour sign at 1 ankle; triangular fibrocartilage involvement was not observed in any participant. Values are the number (%) of joints/tendons. MSU = monosodium urate monohydrate; MTP = metatarsophalangeal. Citing Literature Number of times cited: 1 Xiao Chen, Zhongqiu Wang, Na Duan, Wenjing Cui, Xiaoqiang Ding and Taiyi Jin, The benchmark dose estimation of reference levels of serum urate for gout, Clinical Rheumatology, 10.1007/s10067-018-4273-1, (2018). Crossref
|
Scooped by
Gilbert C FAURE
November 6, 2018 3:46 AM
|
Objectives Understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying human cartilage degeneration and regeneration is helpful for improving therapeutic strategies for treating osteoarthritis (OA). Here, we report the molecular programmes and lineage progression patterns controlling human OA pathogenesis using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq).
Methods We performed unbiased transcriptome-wide scRNA-seq analysis, computational analysis and histological assays on 1464 chondrocytes from 10 patients with OA undergoing knee arthroplasty surgery. We investigated the relationship between transcriptional programmes of the OA landscape and clinical outcome using severity index and correspondence analysis.
Results We identified seven molecularly defined populations of chondrocytes in the human OA cartilage, including three novel phenotypes with distinct functions. We presented gene expression profiles at different OA stages at single-cell resolution. We found a potential transition among proliferative chondrocytes, prehypertrophic chondrocytes and hypertrophic chondrocytes (HTCs) and defined a new subdivision within HTCs. We revealed novel markers for cartilage progenitor cells (CPCs) and demonstrated a relationship between CPCs and fibrocartilage chondrocytes using computational analysis. Notably, we derived predictive targets with respect to clinical outcomes and clarified the role of different cell types for the early diagnosis and treatment of OA.
Conclusions Our results provide new insights into chondrocyte taxonomy and present potential clues for effective and functional manipulation of human OA cartilage regeneration that could lead to improved health.
|
Scooped by
Gilbert C FAURE
April 28, 2017 1:21 PM
|
Objective Increasing evidence indicates that the risk of herpes zoster (HZ) is elevated in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Little is known about the epidemiology of HZ in patients with RA in Asia. The aim of this study was to determine the risk factors and outcomes of HZ among patients with RA. Design A case–control study. Setting A medical centre in Asia. Participants A total of 9025 newly diagnosed and eligible patients with RA (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes 714.0) during the period 2001–2014. Among them, 275 (3.05%) were newly diagnosed with HZ (ICD-9-CM code 053.0) after the RA identification. As the control group, patients with RA without HZ were matched for age, gender and RA disease duration at the time of HZ infection with the RA-HZ case group at a ratio of 4:1, and a total of 1100 control subjects were selected. Outcome measures We estimated ORs using conditional logistic regression to investigate the risk and severity of HZ among patients with RA receiving different immunosuppressive medications. Results Exposure to corticosteroids (≥10 mg/day adjusted OR (aOR)=2.30, 95% CI 1.25 to 4.22, p=0.01), anti-tumour necrosis factor biologicals (aOR=2.07, 95% CI 1.34 to 3.19, p=0.001) and conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (methotrexate (aOR=1.98, 95% CI 1.43 to 2.76, p<0.001) and hydroxychloroquine (aOR=1.95, 95% CI 1.39 to 2.73, p<0.001)) was associated with an increased HZ risk in patients with RA. The association between the use of corticosteroids and HZ risk was dose-dependent (ptrend<0.001). Time-to-HZ diagnosis among patients with RA receiving biological medications was significantly shorter than that in patients not receiving biological medications. A higher proportion of severe HZ and ophthalmic involvement was found in patients with RA receiving biologicals. Conclusions There was an increased risk of HZ in patients with RA taking specific immunosuppressive medication. Biologicals used were associated with severe HZ occurrence. Therefore, it is important to closely monitor and prevent severe HZ complications during specific immunosuppressive therapy.
|
Scooped by
Gilbert C FAURE
April 2, 2016 6:43 AM
|
The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons has adopted clinical practice guidelines that assign evidence-based ratings for common strategies used to diagnose
|
|
Scooped by
Gilbert C FAURE
January 4, 2020 2:15 AM
|
Objective To evaluate patterns of elevations of isotypes of rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti–citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) pre–rheumatoid arthritis (RA) diagnosis and post–RA diagnosis. M...
|
Scooped by
Gilbert C FAURE
October 10, 2019 12:46 PM
|
MRI of the sacroiliac joints is increasingly acknowledged as being indispensable in the early diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and as having a prominent role in the prognosis and classification of axSpA. Technological advances include improvements in the resolution of structural lesions and in methodologies for the quantification of lesions. Limited access and expertise in interpretation of MRI have led to a resurgence of interest in CT, especially the development of low radiation protocols for assessing the sacroiliac joints. Trials of TNF inhibitors in patients with non-radiographic axSpA have led to greater understanding of the role of MRI in selecting which patients might respond well to this therapy. The role of MRI features as target end points in treat-to-target strategies remains unclear because the effect of such targeting on structural damage parameters has only recently been explored. The relative importance of active and structural lesions for prognostic risk assessment and selection of appropriate treatment is also an area of current research. Given the increased capacity to visualize a broad array of lesions in both the sacroiliac joints and the spine using MRI and CT, these modalities will probably be increasingly employed for assessment of the disease-modifying activity of new therapies. Different imaging modalities, such as radiography, MRI and CT, have different advantages and can help the clinician with different aspects in assessing axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). This Review covers imaging aspects relating to the diagnosis, classification and management of axSpA.
|
Scooped by
Gilbert C FAURE
September 21, 2019 5:20 AM
|
Kim Kardashian West has written a candid essay about her struggle with psoriasis and being informed that she has developed psoriatic arthritis.
|
Scooped by
Gilbert C FAURE
May 16, 2019 2:41 PM
|
The HLA region is strongly associated with many rheumatic diseases, including inflammatory arthritis. In this Review, potential mechanisms underpinning these associations are discussed, as are the clinical implications of HLA associations for the diagnosis and treatment of these diseases.
|
Suggested by
LIGHTING
April 18, 2019 2:59 AM
|
diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis
|
Scooped by
Gilbert C FAURE
February 17, 2019 4:19 AM
|
Objective Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is postulated to originate at mucosal surfaces, particularly the airway mucosa. To investigate this hypothesis, we determined the association between RA and asthma, passive smoke exposure, and age of starting smoking. Methods This case‐control study identified 1,023 cases of RA (175 incident) within a single‐center biobank population using a rules‐based algorithm that combined self‐report with two diagnosis codes. Exposures were self‐reported on biobank questionnaires. Logistic regression models calculated the association of exposures with RA, adjusting for potential confounders. Results After adjusting for allergies, urban environment, and passive smoke exposure, asthma was associated with RA in the full cohort (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.58) but not the incident cohort (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.66 to 2.06). History of allergic disease was associated with RA in both the full (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.51) and incident cohorts (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.33), especially food allergy (OR 1.38, CI 1.08 to 1.75, and OR 1.83, 95% CI 0.97 to 3.45, respectively). Passive smoke exposure at home or work was not associated with RA. Finally, age of starting smoking was not associated with increased odds of developing RA in either the full (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.06) or incident cohorts (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.08). Conclusion Asthma and allergies may be associated with increased risk of RA. Passive smoke exposure and earlier age of starting smoking do not appear to influence risk of RA. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
|
Scooped by
Gilbert C FAURE
February 8, 2019 9:36 AM
|
Clinical question Do adults with atraumatic shoulder pain for more than 3 months diagnosed as subacromial pain syndrome (SAPS), also labelled as rotator cuff disease, benefit from subacromial decompression surgery? This guideline builds on to two recent high quality trials of shoulder surgery.
Current practice SAPS is the common diagnosis for shoulder pain with several first line treatment options, including analgesia, exercises, and injections. Surgeons frequently perform arthroscopic subacromial decompression for prolonged symptoms, with guidelines providing conflicting recommendations.
Recommendation The guideline panel makes a strong recommendation against surgery.
How this guideline was created A guideline panel including patients, clinicians, and methodologists produced this recommendation in adherence with standards for trustworthy guidelines and the GRADE system. The recommendation is based on two linked systematic reviews on ( a ) the benefits and harms of subacromial decompression surgery and ( b ) the minimally important differences for patient reported outcome measures. Recommendations are made actionable for clinicians and their patients through visual overviews. These provide the relative and absolute benefits and harms of surgery in multilayered evidence summaries and decision aids available in MAGIC ([www.magicapp.org][1]) to support shared decisions and adaptation.
The evidence Surgery did not provide important improvements in pain, function, or quality of life compared with placebo surgery or other options. Frozen shoulder may be more common with surgery.
Understanding the recommendation The panel concluded that almost all informed patients would choose to avoid surgery because there is no benefit but there are harms and it is burdensome. Subacromial decompression surgery should not be offered to patients with SAPS. However, there is substantial uncertainty in what alternative treatment is best.
[1]: http://www.magicapp.org
|
Suggested by
Société Francaise d'Immunologie
January 7, 2019 1:33 PM
|
Full text KEY WORDS Adult-onset Still’s disease, AOSD, macrophage activation syndrome, pulmonary involvement INTRODUCTION Adult-onset Still’s disease (AOSD) was first reported in 1971 by Eric Bywaters in 14 adult patients who failed to fulfill the criteria of classic rheumatoid arthritis.1 It is a rare systemic auto-inflammatory disorder with high spiking fever, evanescent skin rash, arthralgia/arthritis, neutrophilic leukocytosis and marked hyperferritinemia.2,3 Despite a usually favorable prognosis in AOSD, patients can experience disease flares which involve vital organs, or present specific clinical features, such as macrophage activation syndrome (MAS).4 Here, we report on an AOSD patient with MAS-related pulmonary parenchymal involvement who was successfully managed by high-dose corticosteroids and pulse cyclophosphamide therapy. CASE REPORT A 19-year-old Han Chinese female was presented with polyarthritis affecting her wrists, knees and ankles, and a recurrent maculopapular erythematous rash over her trunk and limbs during febrile spikes (above 390C). Laboratory tests revealed leukocytosis (10,600 to 15,800/µl) with dominant neutrophil classification (82 to 92%), elevated liver enzyme levels, absence of autoantibody profiles and negative microbiological examinations. One year later, she visited the outpatient rheumatology clinic with a series of clinical, laboratory and radiological surveys, leading to the diagnosis of AOSD by exclusion of infection, malignancy or other rheumatologic diseases. She was brought to the emergency department one month later due to a cough and dyspnea, where radiological images demonstrated diffuse peribronchovascular infiltrates, multiple ground-glass opacities and consolidations in her lower lungs without pleural effusion (figures 1A and B), as well as hepatosplenomegaly. Hemogram was hemoglobin = 8.0 g/dl, platelet count = 25,000/µl and leukocyte count = 9,300/µl (neutrophils 63%), and bone marrow examination revealed hemophagocytosis. She exhibited elevated levels of aspartate aminotransferase (1,115 U/l), alanine aminotransferase (311 U/l), ferritin (9,655 ng/mL), triglycerides (388 mg/dl) and impaired estimated glomerular filtration rate (22 ml/min/1.73 m2 ) with unremarkable urinalysis. Pathogenic microorganisms were not isolated despite extensive cultures. MAS complication was identified with the prescription of methylprednisolone 20 mg, every eight hours by injection. However, bloody sputum with a significant drop of hemoglobin led to a suspicion of diffuse alveolar hemorrhage. Multiple petechiae and hematuria with global coagulation tests fulfilled the disseminated intravascular coagulation criteria, followed by attacks of generalized tonic-clonic seizure; both are distinct AOSD-related MAS presentations.4 A monthly pulse cyclophosphamide 750 mg infusion was initiated due to progressive pulmonary infiltration (figure 1C) and persistent multi-organ abnormalities. The patient had a complete recovery of lung involvement (figure 1D) and other systemic dysfunction with daily corticosteroids replaced by weekly methotrexate therapy during outpatient follow-up. DISCUSSION Unlike other rheumatology disorders involving multiple organs with known respiratory abnormalities, little attention has been paid to lung involvement in AOSD.5 By excluding the infectious etiology, pulmonary infiltrates have been observed in fewer than one-tenth of AOSD patients, with its acute nature accompanied by pleural effusion during disease exacerbation and a fast response to corticosteroids usage.6 In a recent literature review including 18 AOSD cases with parenchymal lung involvement, two with MAS were successfully managed by corticosteroids alone.7 In another review with nine cases of corticosteroid-resistant AOSD-associated MAS significant responses were observed in all 5 patients receiving cyclophosphamide injection, despite no associated pulmonary parenchymal involvement.8 In the reported patient with progressive pulmonary infiltration under the high-dose corticosteroid therapy, adding cyclophosphamide resulted in complete recovery. Notably, biologics have proven to be safe and effective in the long-term management of AOSD, particularly in cases with systemic involvement.9 Since MAS is characterized by a cytokine storm with overproduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines, anti-cytokine agents are an attractive approach in treating this complication.10 Indeed, in young female victims, cytokine blockades as alternative therapeutics can avoid the well-known cyclophosphamide-related gonadal toxicity. DISCLOSURES All authors declare no conflict of interest. There was no funding or financial support in this report. REFERENCES Bywaters EG. Still’s disease in the adult. Ann Rheum Dis. 1971;30:121-33. Gerfaud-Valentin M, Jamilloux Y, Iwaz J, Sève P. Adult-onset Still’s disease. Autoimmun Rev. 2014;13:708-22. Meijvis SC, Endeman H, Geers AB, ter Borg EJ. Extremely high serum ferritin levels as diagnostic tool in adult-onset Still’s disease. Neth J Med. 2007;65:212-4. Efthimiou P, Kadavath S, Mehta B. Life-threatening complications of adult-onset Still’s disease. Clin Rheumatol. 2014;33:305-14. Cheema GS, Quismorio FP Jr. Pulmonary involvement in adult-onset Still’s disease. Curr Opin Pul Med. 1999;5:305-9. Reginato AJ, Schumacher HR, Baker DG, O’Connor CR, Ferreiros J. Adult onset Still’s disease: experience in 23 patients and literature review with emphasis on organ failure. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1987;17:39-57. Gerfaud-Valentin M, Cottin V, Jamilloux Y, et al. Parenchymal lung involvement in adult-onset Still disease: ASTROBE-compliant case series and literature review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95:e4258. Kumakura S, Murakawa Y. Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of autoimmune-associated hemophagocytic syndrome in adults. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66:2297-307. Cavalli G, Franchini S, Aiello P, et al. Efficacy and safety of biological agents in adult-onset Still’s disease. Scand J Rheumatol. 2015;44:309-14. Grom AA, Horne A, De Benedetti F. Macrophage activation syndrome in the era of biologic therapy. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2016;12:259-68.
|
Scooped by
Gilbert C FAURE
December 19, 2018 11:55 AM
|
Shoulder Screening Course In this course you will learn how to systematically work through a process of screening the patient for red flags, other causes of shoulder pain, obtaining appropriate diagnostic imaging, and then classifying shoulder pain into categories that guide management. Modules: Red Flags You will learn to screen for red flag indicators of potentially serious pathology and refer the patient for necessary evaluation within an appropriate time-frame. Click here to register Health Screening You will learn current health guidelines for alcohol, tobacco and physical activity, and how to screen for risk factors and atypical symptoms and signs of medical conditions that may present with shoulder symptoms. Click here to register Pain and Psychosocial Modifiers In this module you will learn the pathoaetiology and features of various pain states, including the mechanisms behind persistent pain. You will learn how to screen for and manage psychosocial factors and learn about their relationship to persistent pain. Click here to register Cervical Spine and Neurological Examination In this module you will learn about the difference between somatic and radicular pain and how to examine the cervical spine to identify local, or referred pain. You will learn the diagnostic features of cervical radiculopathy, how to perform an accurate and thorough neurological examination. Click here to register Shoulder Imaging In this module you will learn about the strengths and limitations of imaging modalities, indications for imaging, prevalence of imaged pathology and how to read and interpret basic shoulder x-ray views. Click here to register Diagnostic Classification of Shoulder Conditions This module defines “diagnosis”, highlights the importance of the diagnostic process, provides a brief overview of diagnostic accuracy and presents a clinical classification system for shoulder conditions that forms the basis of the modules in the “Diagnosis and Non-Surgical Management” Course. Click here to register Course Aim To produce practitioners who can: Accurately screen patients presenting with shoulder girdle symptoms for red flags, and other causes of symptoms that may require additional investigations or treatment in the primary contact setting. Read basic shoulder x-ray views and interpret findings in the context of patient symptoms. Classify patients with shoulder symptoms into diagnostic categories that help guide management. Learning Outcomes By the end of the course, the participant will be able to: Identify red flag indicators of serious pathology and refer appropriately. Undertake an efficient and effective health screen for lifestyle and health risk factors, and symptoms and signs of systemic medical conditions presenting with shoulder pain and refer appropriately. Describe the features of different pain states, the mechanisms underpinning persistent pain, and explain the relationship of psychosocial factors to persistent pain. Competently perform an examination of the cervical spine and neurological examination of the upper limb to identify pain referred from the cervical spine or evidence of neurological compromise. Appropriately refer for diagnostic imaging, and describe the strengths and limitations of basic shoulder x-ray views for identifying specific shoulder pathology. Describe the diagnostic classification of the main categories of shoulder conditions that can be identified clinically to guide management. Social Learning Online Forum Those enrolled in all modules in this course will be invited to attend the online forum led by Dr Angela Cadogan, The purpose of this informal online forum is to ask any questions you have from the online learning material and to discuss any patient cases. A link to the forum will be sent to all those enrolled the full course closer to the time. See the SMS website for online forum dates. Facebook Group Those who complete all modules in this course will be invited to join the “Stiff Shoulder” Facebook Group upon completion of the course. Membership to this Group is indefinite. This Group contains social learning units where latest research and updates are organised by topics that align with the modules in this course. You can check off the items you complete and use this for CPD purposes. Continuing Education Certificates After completion of the Course, you will receive a Certificate of Completion. If you score more than 75% in the quizzes, you will receive a Certificate of Achievement. Copyright Notice The materials provided in this course are protected by copyright and are to be used solely for educational purposes by students enrolled in Southern Musculoskeletal Seminars courses and its teachers. You may not sell, alter or further reproduce or distribute any part of this material to any other person. Where provided to you in electronic format, you may only print from it for your own private study and research. Failure to comply with the terms of this warning may expose you to legal action for copyright infringement. Before you begin It is recommended you follow SMS on Twitter or Facebook, or check the SMS website to receive notifications of new lessons, updates and clinical resources related to the Shoulder Course Series.
|
Scooped by
Gilbert C FAURE
November 13, 2018 9:02 AM
|
Objectives Autoantibodies against CD74 (anti‐CD74) are associated with ankylosing spondylitis. InterSpA is a multicenter study conducted to compare sensitivity and specificity of anti‐CD74 and HLA‐B27 in patients with non‐radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr‐axSpA). Methods Patients aged 18‐45 years with inflammatory back pain of ≤2 years duration and clinical suspicion of axSpA were recruited. HLA‐B27 genotyping and MRI of sacroiliac joints were performed in all patients. 149 patients with chronic back pain not caused by axSpA (CBP) served as controls, furthermore 50 patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and 100 blood donors were analyzed. Results 100 patients with IBP received the diagnosis of axSpA by the investigators and fulfilled the ASAS criteria. Their mean age was 29 years and the mean symptom duration 12.5 months. The sensitivity of IgA and IgG anti‐CD74 related to the 100 axSpA patients was 47% and 17%. The specificity, per definition, was 95.3%, respectively. The sensitivity of HLA‐B27 was 81%. The positive likelihood ratios (LR+) were 10.0 (IgA anti‐CD74), 3.6 (IgG anti‐CD74) and 8.1 (HLA‐B27). Assuming a 5% pretest probability of axSpA in CBP patients of 5%, the posttest probability after consideration of the respective positive test results was 33.3% for IgA, 15.3% for IgG antibodies against CD74 and 28.8% for HLA‐B27. Combination of IgA antibodies against CD74 and HLA‐B27 provides posttest probabilities of 80.2%. Conclusions IgA anti‐CD74 may be a useful tool for identifying axSpA. The diagnostic value of the test needs to be further proven in daily practice. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
|
Scooped by
Gilbert C FAURE
October 12, 2017 4:48 AM
|
October 11, 2017 A University of Birmingham academic has led the authorship of the UK’s first guideline on the care of adults with systemic lupus erythematosus (lupus). Published today in Rheumatology, the guideline has been created by the British Society of Rheumatology, and covers diagnosis, assessment, monitoring and treatment of patients with mild, moderate and […]
|
Scooped by
Gilbert C FAURE
December 29, 2016 1:25 PM
|
Rheumatology is a multidisciplinary branch of medicine that deals with the investigation, diagnosis and management of patients with arthritis and other musculoskeletal conditions
|