|
|
Scooped by
Guillaume Decugis
onto Content marketing automation April 29, 2015 6:53 AM
|
“Things looked bleak for the Angels when they trailed by two runs in the ninth inning, but Los Angeles recovered thanks to a key single from Vladimir Guerrero to pull out a 7-6 victory over the Boston Red Sox at Fenway Park on Sunday.”
Nice bit of reporting, right? You'd be forgiven for thinking it was the lede of a beat writer's game recap in the Los Angeles Times.
It wasn't.
A computer wrote it.
Guillaume Decugis's insight:
As robots start to write content in a way that's hard to distinguish from human-created content, one might wonder as Dennis Shiao: will Content Marketing also be done by robots?
He asked me to contribute to this post along with other Content Marketers such as Barry Feldman and I'm really glad he did as I have a strong opinion on that topic. As I presented at data week, I've had several experiences as an engineer and an entrepreneur trying to assist human judgement with automation.
My take away from failures and successes?
Both automation and human judgement are needed. A concept we've even defined a term for: humanrithm.
While I'm a big believer of leveraging technology and automation (again, I'm an engineer by training), I've also found that more often than not, human judgement adds a lot of value and bypassing it leads to mistakes or incomprehensions.
With regards to content marketing specifically, the biggest issue is trust. Content marketing is about trust. But we humans don't trust computers yet. We trust other humans who educate, entertain or inspire us.
So while it would inefficient to not leverage automation to source content (as the Scoop.it suggestion engine does) or to program it over multiple channels (as Scoop.it Content Director does), applying human judgement in content creation, curation and editing remains key.

Your new post is loading...
https://cialisprezzo.com https://steroidify.shop/ https://coldfirecartss.com/