College and Career-Ready Standards for School Leaders
196.7K views | +17 today
College and Career-Ready Standards for School Leaders
Supporting school leaders in helping all students become college and career-ready and to succeed in post-secondary education and training
Curated by Mel Riddile
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Scooped by Mel Riddile
February 11, 2012 11:53 AM
Scoop.it!

Is only one iPad in a classroom worth it? Must have apps for MS and HS via Literacy Journal

Is only one iPad in a classroom worth it? Must have apps for MS and HS via Literacy Journal | College and Career-Ready Standards for School Leaders | Scoop.it

The answer is easy: YES, especially if the teacher has access to a Mac desktop or (preferably) laptop and a wifi network in the classroom.


It is an even larger YES if the Mac device has the most current operating system.


Having a computer to which the iPad can sync is not absolutely necessary, but it is a Best Idea.


Must-have apps for MS and HS...and then what to do with them.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Mel Riddile
February 11, 2012 10:23 AM
Scoop.it!

Common Core and You: Posters aligned with K-3 standards

Common Core and You: Posters aligned with K-3 standards | College and Career-Ready Standards for School Leaders | Scoop.it

These posters are aligned with the 1st grade Common Core, but can be used in K-3.


Punctuation is such a tough one. Kids are using periods on every other word, question marks where there should be exclamation points and sometimes there's...well....no punctuation at all.



I made these posters that I have in my classroom all year. At the beginning of the year, when I'm teaching about expression, I use the worksheets so that we can practice reading with expression in response to punctuation {just like the common core says I have to}.


No comment yet.
Scooped by Mel Riddile
February 10, 2012 10:13 AM
Scoop.it!

Writing to Learn: Deepening Understanding and Improving Retention of Content

Writing to Learn: Deepening Understanding and Improving Retention of Content | College and Career-Ready Standards for School Leaders | Scoop.it

Robert Marzano

Educational Leadership

Februrary 2012


"Writing to learn focuses on deepening understanding and improving retention of content."


Writing Across the Curriculum


The concept of writing across the curriculum is commonly credited to James Britton (1970, 1972).

  • Writing should be integral to instruction in all subject areas.
  • Writing is fundamentally a constructive process of encoding new information.
  • The act of translating experience into a personalized account aids and extends learning.
  • Writing to learn focuses on deepening understanding and improving retention of content. 

The writing activities, typically:

  • are short
  • informal
  • resemble an advanced form of note taking.

Five Phases for Understanding

  • Phase 1: Record - Here, students record their understanding of the content. 
  • Phase 2: Compare  - In this phase, students share what they've recorded with a partner, noting what's similar and different between their two recordings. 
  • Phase 3: Revise - This phase occurs right after the comparison phase, although a teacher might assign it as homework instead. 
  • Phase 4: Combine - Here, students combine the products of the R–C–R cycles they've completed and then generate and defend one or more generalizations. Students must support their generalizations using specific evidence. 
  • Phase 5: Review - This last phase always occurs before an assessment, although a teacher could request it at any time. 


Defined Instructional Practices Build Collective Capacity


The Common Core State Standards make school wide literacy a must do. School leaders are faced with the challenge of increasing the capacity of their entire instructional staff within a brief period of time. In order to raise the collective capacity of teachers, school must employ a locally agreed upon set of defined instructional practices in which all teachers engage in every classroom every day. Defined practices build collective capacity!

No comment yet.
Scooped by Mel Riddile
February 9, 2012 6:36 PM
Scoop.it!

Common Core's Focus on 'Close Reading': Changes how teachers teach

Common Core's Focus on 'Close Reading': Changes how teachers teach | College and Career-Ready Standards for School Leaders | Scoop.it

by Catherine Gewertz

February 8, 2012


*Excerpts are filtered for the benefit of busy school leaders.


Drawn together by the Aspen Institute, some chief academic officers hash out how to deliver a profound shift in reading instruction.


Essential Question


What would happen if English/language arts teachers revolutionized their instruction to focus intently—and exclusively—on the texts students are reading?


Close Reading: A Key Shift


Close reading represents a key shift in the Common Core State Standards:

Students are expected to engage in "close reading" of complex literary and informational texts.

  • In contrast to common practice, in which teachers explain reading passages and supply background information before students read, "close reading" confines initial study to the text itself.
  • Students make sense of it by probing its words and structure for information and evidence.
  • Through questions and class exercises, teachers guide students back through the reading in a hunt for answers and deeper understanding.


Changes H0w Teachers Teach


Close reading requires profound shifts:

  • in how teachers teach
  • how districts choose texts
  • how they test what students know
  • how they evaluate teachers.


Teachers Lack the Capacity


  • "I'm really worried that we haven't prepared our teachers for this," one chief academic officer said.
  • "The academic and cognitive demand [on teachers] is quite high."


One of the chief academic officers said that such a process represents a more significant change for teachers than they might realize.


Significant Professional Development


Moving teachers toward this way of working will require "some significant professional development:"

  • teachers must learn to refrain from providing quick answers
  • figure out instead how to formulate new kinds of questions that take them and their students back to the text repeatedly in their search for understanding.


Gradual Release


Close reading "moves students toward independence:"

  • by developing their abilities to build vocabulary
  • access a text's structure;
  • grasp a text's meaning and build arguments from it based on evidence in the text itself
  • eventually build the confidence to grapple with tough reading on their own.


Questions Left Unanswered


  • How, for instance, would they build skill among their educators to provide sufficient supports for struggling readers, special education students, and English-learners to tackle text this way?
  • How would teachers respond to a "sea change" that reframes their role from provider of information to facilitator of inquiry?
  • And where would they get deep, focused lessons for such instruction?


No comment yet.
Scooped by Mel Riddile
February 8, 2012 3:58 PM
Scoop.it!

Standards Mapping the Common Core to Everyday Instruction and Teaching | Moving at the Speed of Creativity

Standards Mapping the Common Core to Everyday Instruction and Teaching | Moving at the Speed of Creativity | College and Career-Ready Standards for School Leaders | Scoop.it

Wesley Fryer's notes from the Gary Sacket’s presentation, “Standards Mapping the Common Core to Everyday Instruction and Teaching” at the February 7, 2012 Oklahoma Technology Association / Encycl-Media Conference. He is with the Gary Sacket Aurora Learning Community Association (ALCA).

No comment yet.
Scooped by Mel Riddile
February 8, 2012 10:52 AM
Scoop.it!

"States have two years left to prepare.."

"States have two years left to prepare.." | College and Career-Ready Standards for School Leaders | Scoop.it

"States have two school years left to prepare their educators and learners for whichever assessment they have chosen.


While some states are still figuring out how they will overhaul lesson plans, redefine learning objectives and otherwise alter their educational experiences to correspond with Common Core, others are leading the way in early implementation of the standards. They plan to be ready when the new sets of tests are rolled out."


Kentucky - Full Scale Approach 


  • Kentucky undertook a voluntary initiative that saw 100 percent of its school districts commit to the standards at the beginning of the 2011-2012 school year. 
  • Kentucky was uniquely positioned to begin implementation early, Karen Kidwell, director of program standards at the Kentucky Department of Education, told Governing.
  • In 2009, the state legislature passed a bill that outlined an education reform agenda, including an overhaul of the state’s academic standards. That work easily segued into Common Core implementation after the state joined the initiative.
  • In 2010, the state started the process of preparing its 174 school districts for the new set of standards by holding workshops to train teachers on how to understand the standards and then translate them into tangible learning targets for students. Leadership teams, comprised of teachers and administrators, were established within each school and school district.
  • This year, Kentucky has moved beyond laying the foundation and into full-fledged implementation. The leadership teams met for two full days in the summer and continue to meet six times each month to outline and review strategies for applying the standards into everyday instruction. Learning exercises and lesson plans based on Common Core were developed and shared across classrooms and schools.
  • The state has also uploaded an online video introducing Common Core, produced by the School Improvement Network, which provides teachers with a broad overview of the standards.
  • Next year, Kidwell said, the focus will be on sustainability, ensuring that the use of the standards can continue for the indefinite future. As part of the 2009 legislation, new testing was also introduced, giving the state’s students a few extra years of practice before the official Common Core assessments are instituted.


No comment yet.
Scooped by Mel Riddile
February 7, 2012 3:57 PM
Scoop.it!

Common Core vs. Guided Reading: Rejecting Instructional Level Theory

Common Core vs. Guided Reading: Rejecting Instructional Level Theory | College and Career-Ready Standards for School Leaders | Scoop.it

by Tim Shanahan


Note to school leaders: In this article, Dr. Shanahan emphasizes the importance of highly trained and skilled teachers guiding literacy instruction across all content areas.


"The common core standards push back against the notion that students learn best when they receive the least teaching."


I have sought studies that would support the original contention that we could facilitate student learning by placing kids in the right levels of text.

  • Guided reading and leveled books are so widely used it would make sense that there would be lots of evidence as to their efficacy.
  • Except that there is not. I keep looking and I keep finding studies that suggest that kids can learn from text written at very different levels (like the studies cited below by Morgan and O’Connor).
  • How can that be? Well, basically, we have put way too much confidence in an unproven theory. The model of learning underlying that theory is too simplistic.

Learning to read is an interaction between a learner, a text, and a teacher.

  • Instructional level theory posits that the text difficulty level relative to the student reading level is the important factor in learning.
  • But that ignores the guidance, support, and scaffolding provided by the teacher.
  • If the teacher is doing little to support the students’ transactions with text, then I suspect more learning will accrue with somewhat easier texts.
  • However, if reasonable levels of instructional support are available, then students are likely to thrive when working with harder texts.
  • The problem with guided reading and similar schemes is that they are focused on helping kids to learn with minimal amounts of teaching (something Pinnell and Fountas have stated explicitly in at least some editions of their textbooks). But that switches the criterion.
  • Instead of trying to get kids to optimum levels, that is, the levels that would allow them to learn most, they have striven to get kids to levels where they will likely learn best with minimal teacher support.

Common Core Standards


"The common core standards push back against the notion that students learn best when they receive the least teaching."

  • The standards people want to know what it takes for kids to learn most, even if the teacher has to be deeply involved.
  • For them, challenging text is the right ground to maximize learning… but the only way that will work is if kids are getting substantial teaching support in the context of that hard text.


Teachers Make the Difference


"I suspect that if future studies go down this road, they will still find that the answer to that issue is variable; it will depend on the amount and quality of instructional support."

No comment yet.
Scooped by Mel Riddile
February 2, 2012 3:14 PM
Scoop.it!

Average Is Over

Average Is Over | College and Career-Ready Standards for School Leaders | Scoop.it

OP-ED COLUMNIST
By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN
Published: January 24, 2012


In the 21st-century economy, everyone is going to have to find a little something extra to stand out in their field of employment.


"There will always be change — new jobs, new products, new services. But the one thing we know for sure is that with each advance in globalization and the I.T. revolution, the best jobs will require workers to have more and better education to make themselves above average."


Story


The average (textile) mill has only two employees today, “a man and a dog. The man is there to feed the dog, and the dog is there to keep the man away from the machines.”


Unemployment


High unemployment persists because of the quantum advances in both globalization and the information technology revolution, which are more rapidly than ever replacing labor with machines or foreign workers.


Average is Offically Over


In the past, workers with average skills, doing an average job, could earn an average lifestyle. But, today, average is officially over. Being average just won’t earn you what it used to. It can’t when so many more employers have so much more access to so much more above average cheap foreign labor, cheap robotics, cheap software, cheap automation and cheap genius. Therefore, everyone needs to find their extra — their unique value contribution that makes them stand out in whatever is their field of employment. Average is over!




lelapin's comment February 2, 2012 3:51 PM
and you scoop it only today? ;-)
lelapin's comment February 2, 2012 3:55 PM
... Wait: I found an article mentioning Seth's post dated 19th of January [http://articles.businessinsider.com/2012-01-19/news/30642154_1_recession-millennials-change]
Mel Riddile's comment, February 3, 2012 12:34 PM
Keep me on my toes! Thanks for reading!
Scooped by Mel Riddile
February 2, 2012 10:06 AM
Scoop.it!

Using Digital Literacy as a bridge between teachers and students implementing the Common Core

Using Digital Literacy as a bridge between teachers and students implementing the Common Core | College and Career-Ready Standards for School Leaders | Scoop.it

Lydia Dobyns, President, New Tech Network


Common Core Implementation


To promote success (Common Core), we need to ensure that our teachers have a high degree of digital literacy, so they can communicate and work efficiently and effectively with their students. To accomplish this goal, it's important to establish professional development programs to help bridge the gap between students and teachers.


Engaging Students


To engage today's students, we must speak their language -- the digital language. As an example, a class at Tech Valley were asked to determine how to heat food without using fossil fuel. Of course, this was a wonderful environmental and biology lesson, but thanks to technology, these students were able to take this one step farther. They skyped to a village in Haiti to share with the villagers how to adapt a solar oven adding global awareness to an already rigorous biology project. How much more meaningful is that assignment when it is made useful and relevant through the use of digital technology?

No comment yet.
Scooped by Mel Riddile
January 31, 2012 2:24 PM
Scoop.it!

Kentucky Teachers Show Little Progress Under Common Core | Education News

Kentucky Teachers Show Little Progress Under Common Core | Education News | College and Career-Ready Standards for School Leaders | Scoop.it

A new report by the National Council on Teacher Quality has claimed that the state of Kentucky has failed to show considerable improvements in the two years since it implemented Common Core standards.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Mel Riddile
January 31, 2012 2:01 PM
Scoop.it!

Common-Core Work Must Include Teacher Development

Common-Core Work Must Include Teacher Development | College and Career-Ready Standards for School Leaders | Scoop.it

The following was excerpted from an Education Week Commentary by Stephanie Hirsh of the National Staff Development Council.


"What made you think you could transform teacher practice and student learning with traditional models of professional development?"--Gene Wilhoit, Executive Director of the Council of Chief State School Officers


The professional development needed to support teachers' part in the common-core standards has remained an afterthought, Stephanie Hirsh writes.


  • "A fundamental contradiction underlies the progress: While we are promoting radical change in creating a coherent national framework for what students should know and the way they learn, we have not yet committed to offering teachers the deep learning they will need to transform the way they work.
  • Too much of today's professional learning is not up to the task of supporting the substantive changes required of teachers to meet these new standards for English/language arts and mathematics—and too many plans for supporting the transition to the common core read more like communication plans than serious road maps for preparing educators to teach the standards.
  • For all the investment of time and resources in the common core, we will not achieve the outcomes we expect and need without comprehensive professional learning for educators that supports the new standards."


"Dramatic shift in teaching"


The dramatic shift in teaching prompted by the common core will require practical, intensive, and ongoing professional learning—not one-off "spray and pray" training that exposes everyone to the same material and hopes that some of it sticks.


School Improvement


They must infuse the new standards into existing school improvement processes.


New Standards = New Practices


Application of knowledge - Because the common core focuses on the application of knowledge in authentic situations, teachers will need to employ: 

  • instructional strategies that integrate critical and creative thinking
  • collaboration
  • problem-solving
  • research and inquiry
  • presentation
  • demonstration skills

Teachers will need:

  • subject-area expertise well beyond basic content knowledge
  • pedagogy to create dynamic, engaging, high-level learning experiences for students
  • greater data literacy
  • more granular ways of assessing student learning

School Leaders


School leaders "will need to champion professional learning in their buildings and back the teachers who coach and support each other."


High Quality Professional Learning


  • Collobartive Leadership - Administrators and teachers working together plan, execute, and assess professional learning
  • Data-Informed - driven by data that pinpoint what students need
  • Vertical and Horizontal Alignment  - withing and across the K-12 continuum
  • Defined Practices - collective and collaborative within and across buildings, so the quality of instruction improves consistently from classroom to classroom and from school to school
  • Time - includes time for teachers to learn from each other, examine research and effective practices, and problem-solve
  • Teacher Leadership - demands leadership from teachers as coaches and mentors, while continuing to tap the knowledge of outside experts and resources.


States


For the common core to be successful, states will have to be much more thoughtful about organizing, managing, implementing, and evaluating these tools and strategies. State leaders will have to work together, with consortia, and with K-20 systems to develop comprehensive programs that deeply immerse teachers in the common core, its related curriculum and assessment systems, and content-specific pedagogies—and then provide ongoing classroom support and feedback.


"To meet the end goal of graduating students who are competent in the common-core standards and college- and career-ready, states must create a culture that supports and accelerates change, not delays and diffuses it."


School Calendars


Education leaders must alter school calendars—both the yearly calendar and daily schedules—to provide dedicated time for professional learning and for teachers to collaborate on a continuing basis.


Literacy Enriched


"Organizing classwork around reading and writing in all subjects."


Implementation is the key


The common core will not be self-implementing—executing this overhaul of expectations for students and teachers represents a tremendous undertaking.



No comment yet.
Scooped by Mel Riddile
January 28, 2012 1:48 PM
Scoop.it!

Prepping kids for college - Elgin Courier News

ELGIN, IL — Allison Jones, vice president for postsecondary collaboration at the Partnership for the Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC), said he really believes “the stars are aligned.” And, Jones said, “We’re going to have systemic change...in K-12 and in higher education as a result. … I think it’s going to be successful. Those assessments will be ready for states to administer during the 2014-15 school year."


On Target Reports


The next year, Jones said, "PARCC plans to set scores on those assessments that will indicate whether a student is on track to be college-ready."


Technology Problems


James Palmer of the Illinois State Board of Education agreed that technology is “going to be a task here in Illinois.”


Infrastructure and Hardware - The district has worked to put the infrastructure — the fiber and cables — in place to support additional technology, and even has started piloting iPad textbooks in classrooms, Churchill said.


Misconception


One official was quoted as saying, "The standards, for instance, require all students to have had an “algebra experience” by eighth grade; currently, only 40 percent have in District 300."


Reality


Algabreic concepts are interwoven throughout the math standards. While there will be much more algebra in the 8th grade curriculum, there is not a requirement that all 8th graders complete Algebra I.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Mel Riddile
January 26, 2012 10:49 AM
Scoop.it!

Common Core Standards: What should your PLC be doing now? | AllThingsPLC

Common Core Standards: What should your PLC be doing now? | AllThingsPLC | College and Career-Ready Standards for School Leaders | Scoop.it

"Professional Learning Communities understand that the “L” in the title refers to both student and adult learning." - Chris Jakicic


Our state has adopted the Common Core State Standards. So we do we do now? We recommend that teams get started on the process now so that they are learning more about what they will need to do as a result. Beginning steps include:

  1. Begin with a review of the structure of the new standards—the idea of College and Career Readiness is an important thread beginning even in kindergarten. Read one standard all the way through from Kindergarten to 12th grade to understand how they build on each other.
  2. Become familiar with the Appendices for each set of standards. There are hidden gems in each one: Appendix A in ELA has some important vocabulary and discussion about text complexity and the structure of the standards, Appendix B in ELA provides samples pieces of text and ideas for assessment, Appendix C in ELA provides samples of student writing and scoring ideas which can lead to rubrics, and Appendix A in Math explains how the standards are structured for each grade level and the two different tracks for high school math.
  3. Identify the power or essential standards for your course or grade level. If you are an elementary school, choose one area (math or ELA) to begin with. Get good at the process, and the next subject will be much easier. Unwrap these standards into their learning targets. Don’t rush this step: getting clarity about the meaning of these standards will take some time. Talk about what your expectations for proficiency will be and what instructional strategies will be most effective to get students there. Look at the grade level before and after yours to assure your expectations are vertically aligned.
  4. Begin writing short common formative assessments for a small number of learning targets (1 to 3 maximum). Become confident writers of constructed response questions. Examine the student responses collaboratively to make sure you are all applying the rubric the same way.
No comment yet.
Scooped by Mel Riddile
February 11, 2012 11:06 AM
Scoop.it!

Students to See Big Changes in Standardized Tests: Assessment Questions re CCSS?

Students to See Big Changes in Standardized Tests: Assessment Questions re CCSS? | College and Career-Ready Standards for School Leaders | Scoop.it
The State Board of Education has adopted new standardized tests for South Carolina students that will be different from current ones and more challenging.


The standardized tests that South Carolina students take in math and English are likely to go through some major changes in the next few years. 


Old Assessments Don't Match Up

  • The state's old tests don't match up to the new standards, so the board agreed to use new tests being developed by the SMARTER Balanced Assessment Consortium.
  • "It's not going to be just one single test at the end of the year.
  • The SMARTER Balance testing consortia has tests throughout the year so you'll be able to judge progress throughout the entire year and actually adjust instruction to meet the needs of the students."

Technology-Based

  • The new tests will also be computerized rather than paper and pencil.
  • They'll be computer-adaptive, which means the more questions a student gets right, the harder the test becomes. If the student is missing questions, the computer moves back to easier ones.
  • Improved Instruction - "And that type of feedback is what really helps our teachers improve their instruction, when they know how their students are doing over a period of time rather than just one test at the end of a school year," Ragley says. "And so that'll lead to better instruction, which we believe will lead to better outcomes."
Reduced Costs
  • Being computer-based means a couple of other advantages as well. The new tests should save the state about $2 million a year in printing costs.

Online Means Improved Security

  • The new tests are more secure.
  • Since the questions change for each student based on his answers, a student can't try to copy off the student next to him, since that student will likely have a different question.
  • And since there's no hard copy of the test or answer sheets, teachers wouldn't be able to change wrong answers or give students test questions in advance, Ragley says.


No comment yet.
Scooped by Mel Riddile
February 10, 2012 3:24 PM
Scoop.it!

The Challenge of Teaching Higher-Order Skills

The Challenge of Teaching Higher-Order Skills | College and Career-Ready Standards for School Leaders | Scoop.it

Two recent reports have a lot to say about instructional quality—some of which seems frankly troubling.


Gates Foundation - Measures of Effective Teaching


No matter what framework was used, teachers got higher scores on procedural tasks:

  • planning
  • behavior management

relatively low scores on

  • "analysis and problem solving,"
  • "using investigation/problem-based approaches,"
  • student participation in making meaning and reasoning,"
  • "relevance to history and current events."

Consortium on Chicago School Research


A report on the implementation of the Danielson Framework for Teaching found similar results. Teachers generally scored lower on the following domains:

  •  "using questioning and discussion techniques"
  • "engaging students in learning" than on
  • higer on managing the classroom.

School Leaders

  • The Chicago study also found that principals were not much better at using these techniques than teachers.
  • They struggled to ask questions to elicit good information from teachers on their practice during the post-evaluation conferences.

Conclusions


The common-core state standards call for teachers to help students master precisely these kinds of higher-order reasoning and analytical skills in which they demonstrate consistent weaknesses in instruction and raise big question marks for teacher and leadership preparation.


No comment yet.
Scooped by Mel Riddile
February 10, 2012 8:56 AM
Scoop.it!

The Reading-Writing Connection: Writing Improves Reading

The Reading-Writing Connection: Writing Improves Reading | College and Career-Ready Standards for School Leaders | Scoop.it

When students receive writing instruction, their reading fluency and comprehension seem to improve.


In the Harvard Educational Review (Winter 2012), Steve Graham and Michael Hebert (Vanderbilt) report the results of a meta-analysis of 95 literacy studies, which confirmed the following:

  1. Writing about material enhance students' comprehension of text.
  2. Writing skills instruction strengthen students' reading skills?
  3. Increasing how much students write improve how well they read?
No comment yet.
Scooped by Mel Riddile
February 8, 2012 4:06 PM
Scoop.it!

Teacher Evaluation is a Moving Target: The collision of efficiency and fairness

Teacher Evaluation is a Moving Target: The collision of efficiency and fairness | College and Career-Ready Standards for School Leaders | Scoop.it
The values of efficiency and fairness collide head-on in New York’s Education Law §3012-c, passed as part of the state’s efforts to bolster its chances in the 2010 Race to the Top competition.
  • The law requires annual professional performance reviews (APPRs) that sort teachers into four categories — “highly effective,” “effective,” “developing” and “ineffective”— based on multiple measures of effectiveness, including student growth on state and locally selected assessments and a teacher’s performance according to a teacher practice rubric.
  • The fundamental problem is that it’s hard to assess the efficiency or fairness of an evaluation system that doesn’t exist yet.
  • There are too many unknowns to be able to judge, which is one of the arguments for piloting an evaluation system before bringing it to scale.


A Moving Target


The properties of the state tests that are to be used to assess teachers’ contributions to student learning are a moving target;

  • The tests have been changing in recent years in response to concerns about their difficulty, predictability and coverage of state curricular standards.
  • In a couple of years, those standards and assessments will change, as New York and many other states phase in the Common Core Standards and new assessments designed to measure mastery of them.
  • The models to estimate a teacher’s position relative to other teachers in contributing to students’ test performance are imprecise at the level of the individual teacher, and different models yield different results for a given teacher.


There’s been little to no discussion of how to incorporate this uncertainty into the single numerical score a teacher will receive.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Mel Riddile
February 8, 2012 2:50 PM
Scoop.it!

MD officials concerned about CCSS: "three different trains racing down the tracks"

MD officials concerned about CCSS: "three different trains racing down the tracks" | College and Career-Ready Standards for School Leaders | Scoop.it
The 2013-2014 school year may seem like a long way off, but state school officials are already fretting over a perfect storm of education reforms that could make today's extensive state testing regimen seem like a snap.


1. Technology Concerns


Maryland education leaders are worried that many schools may not have the technology available to make an immediate switch to online tests, and that teachers inundated by other changes may not be able to prepare students.


2. Overlap of Old and New Assessments



Betty Weller, vice president of the Maryland State Education Association, said teachers will have to juggle the old and new curriculum at the same time and prepare students to take the MSAs as well as the new tests.


3. New Teacher Evaluations


To make teachers even more anxious, they will begin to be judged for their performance that year under a new evaluation system that takes into account how much their students have learned — and for some, how well their students do on the tests.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Mel Riddile
February 8, 2012 10:24 AM
Scoop.it!

Common Core: Use of Argument in Writing

Common Core discussion, West Mecklenburg High School Charlotte NC Aug 2, 2011 9:00 AM 10:00 AM Teachers commited to the national common core discussed the use of argument across their content areas. - created at http://goanimate.com/

No comment yet.
Scooped by Mel Riddile
February 3, 2012 10:09 AM
Scoop.it!

Common Standards: SBAC 29, PARCC 23 +DC - Charters in "conundrum" | Ed Week

Common Standards: SBAC 29, PARCC 23 +DC - Charters in "conundrum" | Ed Week | College and Career-Ready Standards for School Leaders | Scoop.it

Assessment Consortia


According to my quick count, SMARTER Balanced now has 29 state members; PARCC has 23 plus the District of Columbia. (A handful are hedging their bets.)


Charters in Mutiple States


And therein lies the rub for Achievement First, which operates charter schools in both New York and Connecticut. Yes, indeed: the Empire State joined one assessment consortia, Connecticut joined the other.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Mel Riddile
February 2, 2012 10:51 AM
Scoop.it!

College and career-readiness: "This is a pipeline" | Nancy ZimpherGeneration SUNY Blog

College and career-readiness: "This is a pipeline" | Nancy ZimpherGeneration SUNY Blog | College and Career-Ready Standards for School Leaders | Scoop.it

“We have attrition in third and fourth grade. Even though third and fourth graders typically don’t physically walk out of school, they walk out of early math and early English instruction. And then they fail early on in the pipeline. Where we’re catching this is in the transition from high school to college, but trust me, it starts a long time before that.


“Rather than rewrite the law of who’s in charge of which grades, I have been a profound proponent of working collaboratively with early childhood educators, elementary and secondary educators, we at the college level, and even the workforce development people to say: This is a pipeline.

“SUNY is on record as trying to meld that pipeline into a more systematic way of educating our young people and it brings everybody to the table.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Mel Riddile
February 1, 2012 11:22 AM
Scoop.it!

Study: About half the students (51 percent) could read nearly all the college textbooks.

Study: About half the students (51 percent) could read nearly all the college textbooks. | College and Career-Ready Standards for School Leaders | Scoop.it

IES

The Regional Educational Laboratory Program (REL) 

How Prepared Are Subgroups of Texas Students for College-Level Reading?

January 2012

Results

  • About half the students (51 percent) could read nearly all the college textbooks.
  • Almost 3 in 10 students (29 percent) were somewhat prepared to read college textbooks.
  • One in five students (20 percent) was not prepared to read college textbooks.
No comment yet.
Scooped by Mel Riddile
January 31, 2012 2:20 PM
Scoop.it!

A Dose of Teaching Common Core - "teachers revolutionized their instruction" via EdWeek

A Dose of Teaching Common Core - "teachers revolutionized their instruction" via EdWeek | College and Career-Ready Standards for School Leaders | Scoop.it

by Catherine Gewertz


Brought together by the Aspen Institute, chief academic officers were introduced to strategies to teach reading from new perspectives.


What would happen if English/language arts teachers revolutionized their instruction to focus intently—and exclusively—on the texts students are reading?


Close Reading


Students are expected to engage in “close reading” of complex literary and informational texts.


Contrast to Common Practice

  • In contrast to common practice, in which teachers explain reading passages and supply background information before students read, “close reading:” confines initial study to the text itself
  • Students make sense of it by probing its words and structure for information and evidence.
  • Through questions and class exercises, teachers guide students back through the reading in a hunt for answers and deeper understanding.

Profound Shifts


That scenario, however, requires profound shifts not only in how teachers teach, but how districts choose texts, how they test what students know, and how they evaluate teachers.


"We haven't prepared our teachers for this."


“I’m really worried that we haven’t prepared our teachers for this,” one chief academic officer said. “The academic and cognitive demand [on teachers] is quite high.”


"such a process represents a more significant change for teachers than they might initially realize."


Significant Professional Development


Moving teachers toward this way of working will require “some significant professional development” as they learn to refrain from providing quick answers.


New Kinds of Questions


Teachers will have to "figure out instead how to formulate new kinds of questions that take them and their students back to the text repeatedly in their search for understanding."


Gradual Release


"this work “moves students toward independence” by developing their abilities to build vocabulary and access a text’s structure; grasp a text’s meaning and build arguments from it based on evidence in the text itself, and eventually build the confidence and stamina to grapple with tough reading on their own."


A "Sea of Change": Reframing the Role of the Teacher


"How would teachers respond to a “sea change” that reframes their role from provider of information to facilitator of a group inquiry? And where would they get deep, focused lessons and units for such instruction?


“The teachers themselves don’t know many of those concepts.”


Drive-By PD


"Some of the common core’s strongest proponents express skepticism that “drive-by” sessions can accomplish the change that is required by the new standards."

No comment yet.
Scooped by Mel Riddile
January 30, 2012 3:20 PM
Scoop.it!

How Does Inquiry Mesh with the Common Core State Standards? Link 2 Literacy

How Does Inquiry Mesh with the Common Core State Standards? Link 2 Literacy | College and Career-Ready Standards for School Leaders | Scoop.it

Utah's English/Language Arts Core consisted of three strands: Reading, Writing, and Inquiry. With the adoption of the the Common Core State Standards (CCSS), teachers may ask how inquiry fits into CCSS or how the CCSS incorporates inquiry into its objectives.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Mel Riddile
January 28, 2012 12:26 PM
Scoop.it!

MI and Many states behind schedule in implementation of the Common Core State Standards

MI and Many states behind schedule in implementation of the Common Core State Standards | College and Career-Ready Standards for School Leaders | Scoop.it

GRAND RAPIDS - Michigan is not among the seven states that have completely developed plans to bring the Common Core State Standards to classrooms, according to the study, "Preparing for Change," released this month.


Michigan is not alone. Implementation of Common Core State Standards in three key areas (1. teacher professional development, 2. curriculum and 3. teacher-evaluation systems) is behind schedule in all but 7 states (New York, North Carolina, West Virginia, Maryland, Massachusetts, Kentucky and Georgia). 


Keep in mind that the report issued recently by the Editorial Projects in Education Research Center relates to the mere existence of state plans, not actual implementation. 


Most states don't expect to implement the plans until 2014-15 the same year that the two assessment consortia, PARCC and SBAC, expect to begin formative and summative assessments.


In other words, schools in the standards-ready states will be assessed and judged on the basis of less than one year of implementation. 



No comment yet.