Rheumatology-Rhumatologie

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPICMonoclonal therapy for one inflammatory disease may paradoxically trigger another inflammatory disease.Recent case reports have implicated an association between anti-IL-5 (IL, interleukin) antibody therapy used to treat severe asthma and the development of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).WHAT THIS STUDY ADDSOut of 142 patients within our asthma service taking anti-IL-5 antibody therapy for at least 1 month, and with a mean duration of 3.5 years on therapy, only one developed RA suggesting that RA is a relatively uncommon complication in the short-medium term.HOW THIS STUDY MIGHT AFFECT RESEARCH, PRACTICE OR POLICYTreating clinicians should be mindful of the possibility of developing inflammatory arthritis following the initiation of anti-IL-5 therapy and ensure appropriate review and assessment should their patient develop arthralgia as, while uncommon, these could represent a significant source of morbidity.IntroductionThere has been a wide adoption of monoclonal antibody therapy in rheumatology, respiratory medicine, and an increasing number of specialties for the treatment of many inflammatory diseases. Of particular interest is that monoclonal therapy for one inflammatory disease may paradoxically trigger another inflammatory disease. Pertinent examples include tumour necrosis factor inhibitor therapy triggering multiple sclerosis,1 interleukin 17 (IL-17) therapy for psoriasis linked to inflammatory bowel disease2 and more recently IL-4/13 blockade used for atopic dermatitis being associated with de novo psoriasis and arthritis.3 4Arthralgias are a known adverse effect of anti-IL-5 biologics,5 6 however, a few recent case reports have found this association may extend to inflammatory arthritis such as RA.7 8 The prevalence of these findings across a wider cohort of patients remains relatively unknown. Here we present an audit from a large, single-centre’s severe asthma service which looks for the prevalence of RA across all patients being treated with mepolizumab and benralizumab, two commonly used anti-IL-5 therapies.MethodsAll patients with severe eosinophilic asthma across the Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust’s (LTHT) Respiratory Service, who had received at least 1 month of mepolizumab or benralizumab therapy, were included in this clinical audit.Each patient’s electronic records, including hospital records, clinic letters, general practitioner (GP) records and electronic pathology results were searched. We recorded whether patients had presented with any signs or symptoms of synovitis (eg, joint pain, swelling and tenderness) either prior- or post-commencing biologics, whether their serology (rheumatoid factor (RF) and/or anti-CCP antibody (ACPA)) and acute phase reactants (C- Reactive Protein (CRP) and/or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)) had been measured and the timing and duration of their symptoms. Using this information, we then calculated the number of points each patient with symptoms would score on the ACR/EULAR 2010 Rheumatoid Arthritis classification criteria.9 We also recorded the dose of routine steroids the patients were receiving prior to starting biologics, and whether they were weaned off steroids within 1 year of commencing biologics. Finally, we recorded whether the patients had been seen in our early arthritis clinic and received a formal diagnosis on an inflammatory arthritis.ResultsA total of 142 patients (57 males, 85 females and mean age 58.2 years old) were being treated with anti-IL-5 biologics under the LTHT’s severe asthma clinic, with a mean duration of 3.5 years on therapy. Eighty-nine were on mepolizumab and 53 on benralizumab. The mean daily dose of steroids prior to starting anti-IL-5 therapy was 6.0 mg prednisolone, reducing to 3.1 mg at 1 year post-therapy. Seventy-five patients were steroid-free after 1 year of therapy.Only one patient among 500 patient years of exposure to anti-IL-5 therapy received a formal diagnosis of RA suggesting an overall annual incidence of 20 cases per 10 000 patients (95% CI 2.8 to 142). This man in his 70s presented to our early arthritis clinic 18 months after having been started on mepolizumab for his severe eosinophilic asthma. Prior to starting biologics, his asthma had been poorly controlled with salbutamol, budesonide/formoterol combination inhaler, tiotropium inhalers and daily low-dose oral corticosteroids. Within weeks, he developed symmetrical arthralgia involving small joints, particularly his wrists and knuckles, as well as significant early morning stiffness lasting more than 1 hour. On examination, he had clinical synovitis in the wrists and metacarpophalangeal joints bilaterally, as well as right shoulder capsulitis with limiting range of motion.Blood tests revealed a raised CRP of 24 mg/L, White Cell Count (WCC) 8.77 10 × 9 /L, RF of 263.2 iu/mL (normal<14.0) and an ACPA of >300 U/mL (normal<2.99). Ultrasound imaging of the hands and wrists showed bilateral grade II grey scale with grade II power Doppler (figure 1) with bilateral wrist erosions. There was hypoechogenicity of the left extensor carpi ulnaris tendon with some associated grey scale and power Doppler. MRI of the left hand revealed extensive subchondral bone marrow oedema (figure 1) and multiple erosions across all carpal bones and carpometacarpal joints (figure 1).<img width="342" alt="Figure 1" height="440" class="highwire-fragment fragment-image" src="https://rmdopen.bmj.com/content/rmdopen/9/4/e003583/F1.medium.gif">Download figure Open in new tab Download powerpoint Figure 1 (A) Fat suppression MRI of the left wrist and MCPs showing extensive bone oedema (white arrows) and joint effusion (black asterisk). (B) T1-weighted MRI of the left wrist showing diffuse erosions of the left wrist (white arrows). (C) Longitudinal ultrasound image showing synovitis of the right wrist with grey scale (white asterisk) and power Doppler (white arrow).He was diagnosed with RA as per the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/EULAR classification criteria and started on prednisolone 10 mg daily to control the inflammation, followed by sulfasalazine 1 month later as the disease modifying agent. He was followed-up in rheumatology clinic 2 months later and showed significant improvements: the joint pain and swelling had settled, and while he still experienced early morning stiffness, this was less debilitating. His inflammatory markers had also resolved with CRP<5.0 mg/L and WCC 9.31 10 × 9 /L.Of the remaining 141 patients, 16 developed bilateral polyarthralgia of greater than 1 month duration (eight mepolizumab and eight benralizumab), with a median onset of 12 months after commencing a biological therapy. Of these patients 9/16 were tested for RF and ACPA and in all cases, their serology was negative; 15/16 patients had acute phase inflammatory markers measured and these were only elevated in three patients. All 16 of these patients were on a maintenance dose of prednisolone prior to starting the biologic (mean dose 10.1 mg/day), with 10 of them completely weaned off steroids within 12 months.Using the information available from the patient’s electronic records, the mean number of points scored on the ACR/EULAR RA criteria was 3.2 (range 1–6). The patient who scored six points was reviewed in the early arthritis clinic and the symptoms were felt to be more in keeping with osteoarthritis than an inflammatory arthritis. Similarly, none of the other patients had received a confirmed diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis by either their GP or by a rheumatologist.Only one other patient became newly RF positive (17.1 iu/mL), 1 month after commencing mepolizumab; however, this seemed to be an incidental finding as the patient had a broad set of bloods taken while admitted to the intensive care unit for a severe exacerbation of asthma, and at no point since has complained of rheumatological symptoms.We were unable to access the GP records for 37 patients and as such could not review whether they had presented to their GPs with new rheumatological symptoms. However, we were able to access their pathology test records electronically and found no evidence of positive RA serology in any of these patients and no rheumatological referrals to our centre that has a well-developed early RA network.DiscussionThere is an emerging interest in IL-5 blockade and the potential development of RA. We present a single-centre’s experience of 500 patient years on anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibody exposure therapy for severe asthma.As expected, arthralgias were a relatively common side-effect of anti-IL-5 therapy. As for progression to RA, we found only one convincing case. While relatively low, the implied annual incidence of 20 cases per 10 000 patients is several fold higher than the annual incidence of RA in the UK (1.5 per 10 000 men and 3.6 per 10 000 women).10 Given the wide CIs, however, no firm conclusions can be offered in relationship to our single case and to the relative risk of RA following anti-IL-5 therapy.A major confounding variable is the weaning of steroids in most patients started on biologics. This poses a challenge in associating the development of symptoms with the initiation of the anti-IL-5 therapy, as opposed to the withdrawal of steroids unmasking a pre-existing disease. Additionally, one must consider whether the risk of developing RA is modified by the underlying condition, and indeed there is some evidence to suggested that asthma may be positively associated with RA.11 However, these population-based studies look at asthma as a whole, rather than divided into its endotypes (eg, eosinophilic vs neutrophilic asthma) and as such these have not yet challenged the conventional belief that Th1 and Th2 diseases are inversely related.Emerging evidence has implicated a core role for regulatory eosinophils (rEos) in the resolution of RA.12 In murine models of RA, the expansion of rEos in the synovial fluid as a by-product of inducing eosinophilic asthma was sufficient in bringing about remission of arthritis, and inhibiting the IL-5 pathway would subsequently induce relapse of the arthritis.12 Further evidence supporting a role for rEos in RA can be found at a genetic level where Eotaxin-3, one of the main drivers of eosinophil recruitment, has single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with RA13 and from studying the role of IL-5 in Th2 responses to Helminth infections,14 with mouse models of RA also identifying Helminth infections as protective.15 Hence, the suggestion that the expansion of eosinophils in the synovium ‘regulate’ the proinflammatory Th1 pathways driving synovial inflammation.12 This invites the notion that in a patient with subclinical, yet endogenously controlled, synovial inflammation, removing rEos by administering anti-IL-5 therapeutics may tip the balance in favour of inflammation and permit symptomatic disease. However, if there is little proinflammatory Th1 synovial activity in the first place, then inhibiting rEos with anti-IL-5 biologics may be insufficient to precipitate an inflammatory arthritis.Interestingly, there is debate as to whether rEos are depleted to varying degrees depending on the anti-IL-5 biologic used. In mice, inflammatory eosinophils (iEos)—the primary targets of anti-IL-5 biologics in asthma—may be dependent on IL-5 for activity, whereas rEos may not be.16 This would suggest that benralizumab, a high-affinity IL-5 receptor antagonist,17 would deplete both iEos and rEos through NK-mediated killing, whereas mepolizumab, an anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibody,17 may deplete iEos but keep rEos intact. However, this idea has recently been challenged with evidence that anti-IL-5 treatment depletes all populations of eosinophils.18 Whether this distinction would result in a different pattern of adverse effects in patients remains unclear, notably as the patient who developed RA in this report was receiving mepolizumab.As an audit, this study serves to identify the prevalence of a relatively rare complication of anti-IL-5 therapy. We were unable to find clear evidence for a pattern of emergent RA nor other inflammatory arthritis in our cohort of 142 patients. Further studies may be required to characterise the nature and significance of these findings in clinical groups and to identify whether there is an actual association between novel anti-IL-5 biologics and RA.Data availability statementThe data that support the findings of this study are available upon reasonable request.Ethics statementsPatient consent for publicationConsent obtained directly from patient(s).Ethics approvalThis study was registered as a clinical audit and given the retrospective nature of the data collection process did not require formal ethical approval. In completing this audit, full ethical standards were upheld in accordance with the principles of clinical governance. From the one patient whose details were discussed in more detail we have gained full written consent.References↵Sicotte NL, Voskuhl RR. Onset of multiple sclerosis associated with anti-TNF therapy. Neurology 2001;57:1885–8. doi:10.1212/wnl.57.10.1885OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed↵Hohenberger M, Cardwell LA, Oussedik E, et al. Interleukin-17 inhibition: role in psoriasis and inflammatory bowel disease. J Dermatolog Treat 2018;29:13–8. doi:10.1080/09546634.2017.1329511OpenUrlPubMed↵Bridgewood C, Newton D, Bragazzi N, et al. Unexpected connections of the IL-23/IL-17 and IL-4/IL-13 cytokine axes in inflammatory arthritis and enthesitis. Semin Immunol 2021;58:101520. doi:10.1016/j.smim.2021.101520OpenUrl↵Bridgewood C, Wittmann M, Macleod T, et al. T helper 2 IL-4/IL-13 dual blockade with dupilumab is linked to some emergent T helper 17‒Type diseases, including seronegative arthritis and enthesitis/enthesopathy, but not to humoral autoimmune diseases. J Invest Dermatol 2022;142:2660–7. doi:10.1016/j.jid.2022.03.013OpenUrl↵Harrison T, Canonica GW, Chupp G, et al. Real-world Mepolizumab in the prospective severe asthma REALITI-A study: initial analysis. Eur Respir J 2020;56:2000151. doi:10.1183/13993003.00151-2020↵Liu W, Ma X, Zhou W. Adverse events of benralizumab in moderate to severe eosinophilic asthma: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019;98:e15868. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000015868↵Kawabata H, Satoh M, Yatera K. Development of rheumatoid arthritis during anti-Interleukin-5 therapy in a patient with refractory chronic eosinophilic pneumonia. J Asthma Allergy 2021;14:1425–30. doi:10.2147/JAA.S342993OpenUrl↵Dupin C, Morer L, Phillips Houlbracq M, et al. Arthritis, a new adverse effect of anti-Il5 Biologics in severe asthma patients. European Respiratory Journal 2022;60:2432. doi:10.1183/13993003.congress-2022.2432OpenUrlCrossRef↵Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, et al. 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American college of rheumatology/European League against rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum 2010;62:2569–81. doi:10.1002/art.27584OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science↵NICE guideline. Overview: rheumatoid arthritis in adults: management [Guidance, NICE]. 2018. Available: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng100 [Accessed 25 Sep 2023].↵Rolfes MC, Juhn YJ, Wi C-I, et al. Asthma and the risk of rheumatoid arthritis: an insight into the heterogeneity and phenotypes of asthma. Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul) 2017;80:113–35. doi:10.4046/trd.2017.80.2.113OpenUrl↵Andreev D, Liu M, Kachler K, et al. Regulatory eosinophils induce the resolution of experimental arthritis and appear in remission state of human rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2021;80:451–68. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218902OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵Guellec D, Milin M, Cornec D, et al. Eosinophilia predicts poor clinical outcomes in recent-onset arthritis: results from the ESPOIR cohort. RMD Open 2015;1:e000070. doi:10.1136/rmdopen-2015-000070↵Mishra PK, Palma M, Bleich D, et al. Systemic impact of intestinal helminth infections. Mucosal Immunol 2014;7:753–62. doi:10.1038/mi.2014.23OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed↵Osada Y, Shimizu S, Kumagai T, et al. Schistosoma Mansoni infection reduces severity of collagen-induced arthritis via down-regulation of pro-inflammatory mediators. Int J Parasitol 2009;39:457–64. doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2008.08.007OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed↵Mesnil C, Raulier S, Paulissen G, et al. Lung-resident eosinophils represent a distinct regulatory eosinophil subset. J Clin Invest 2016;126:3279–95. doi:10.1172/JCI85664OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed↵Caminati M, Menzella F, Guidolin L, et al. Targeting eosinophils: severe asthma and beyond. Drugs Context 2019;8:212587. doi:10.7573/dic.212587OpenUrl↵Dolitzky A, Grisaru-Tal S, Avlas S, et al. Mouse resident lung eosinophils are dependent on IL-5. Allergy 2022;77:2822–5. doi:10.1111/all.15362OpenUrl

Research ArticleAutoimmunity Free access | 10.1172/JCI93450 Two rheumatoid arthritis–specific autoantigens correlate microbial immunity with autoimmune responses in joints Annalisa Pianta,1 Sheila L. Arvikar,1 Klemen Strle,1 Elise E. Drouin,1 Qi Wang,2 Catherine E. Costello,2 and Allen C. Steere1 Published June 26, 2017 - More info View PDF Abstract In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), immunological triggers at mucosal sites, such as the gut microbiota, may promote autoimmunity that affects joints. Here, we used discovery-based proteomics to detect HLA-DR–presented peptides in synovia or peripheral blood mononuclear cells and identified 2 autoantigens, N-acetylglucosamine-6-sulfatase (GNS) and filamin A (FLNA), as targets of T and B cell responses in 52% and 56% of RA patients, respectively. Both GNS and FLNA were highly expressed in synovia. GNS appeared to be citrullinated, and GNS antibody values correlated with anti–citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) levels. FLNA did not show the same results. The HLA-DR–presented GNS peptide has marked sequence homology with epitopes from sulfatase proteins of the Prevotella sp. and Parabacteroides sp., whereas the HLA-DR–presented FLNA peptide has homology with epitopes from proteins of the Prevotella sp. and Butyricimonas sp., another gut commensal. Patients with T cell reactivity with each self-peptide also had responses to the corresponding microbial peptides, and the levels were directly correlated. Furthermore, HLA-DR molecules encoded by shared-epitope (SE) alleles were predicted to bind these self- and microbial peptides strongly, and these responses were more common in RA patients with SE alleles. Thus, sequence homology between T cell epitopes of 2 self-proteins and a related order of gut microbes may provide a link between mucosal and joint immunity in patients with RA. Introduction Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an HLA class II–associated autoimmune disease, in which arthritogenic T cells drive the progressive inflammation and destruction of synovial joints (1). Both genetic and environmental factors are thought to contribute to disease development and progression. The greatest genetic risk factor is HLA-DRB1–susceptibility alleles that share a 5–amino acid sequence in the B1 chain, termed the RA shared epitope (SE) (2). HLA-DRB1 SE alleles largely influence the development of seropositive RA, which is defined by positive tests for rheumatoid factor (RF) and/or anti–citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) (3), the latter being the only known specific autoantibodies for this disease (4–6). RF and/or ACPAs may develop years before the onset of clinical arthritis (7–9), suggesting that autoimmunity may be triggered at sites other than joints in patients with RA. Causative environmental factors are less well characterized. However, T cell epitope mimicry between microbial pathogens and self-proteins has been implicated as a possible factor in the induction or exacerbation of autoimmune disease (10–12). In addition, alteration of the oral or gut microbiota may affect mucosal immunity, inducing aberrant immune responses that affect joints in patients with RA (13, 14). Using high-throughput sequencing, Scher et al. showed that Prevotella species (spp.), including P. copri, in the gut microbiota were expanded in stool samples from patients with new-onset RA (NORA), suggesting that these organisms might have this role in RA pathogenesis (13). Moreover, a recent study in mice showed that gut dysbiosis contributes to arthritis development via the activation of autoreactive T cells in the intestine (15). Proposed mechanisms to link infection and autoimmunity include molecular mimicry between T cell microbial and host epitopes (16); infection-induced alteration and release of sequestered self-antigens (11); or nonspecific, infection-induced inflammatory responses that function as adjuvants in the induction of pathogenic autoimmunity (17, 18). The identification of disease-relevant infectious or self-antigens has been challenging in any autoimmune disease, but current discovery-based methods offer innovative approaches to this problem. We have developed an approach for antigen detection in chronic inflammatory arthritides, in which HLA-DR–presented peptides (T cell epitopes) are identified directly from patients’ inflamed synovial tissue, synovial fluid mononuclear cells (SFMCs), or peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and tested for immunogenicity using patients’ samples (19–24). With this approach, we recently identified an HLA-DR–presented peptide from a 27-kDa protein of P. copri (Pc-p27), which stimulated T and B cell responses in approximately 40% of patients with RA, but not in patients with other rheumatic diseases or in healthy controls (HCs) (25). Using the same methodology, we report here the identification of 2 previously unidentified autoantigens, N-acetylglucosamine-6-sulfatase (GNS) and filamin A (FLNA) that are targets of T and B cell responses and appear to be specific for RA. Both autoantigens are highly expressed in inflamed synovial tissue; they share homologous T cell epitopes with Prevotella and several other gut microbes, and they are targets of specific T and B cell responses in patients with RA, providing evidence that may link immune responses to microbial peptides from gut commensals and autoimmune responses affecting joints. Results Identification of naturally presented HLA-DR peptides (T cell epitopes). In a recent study (20), we identified HLA-DR–presented peptides in synovial tissue, SFMCs, and PBMCs from 5 patients with RA using LC-MS/MS, and the immunogenicity of the peptides was determined using patients’ samples in enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISpot) assays. The findings from 1 patient (referred to here as RA1) were of particular interest. She had classic, seropositive RA, with severe symmetrical polyarthritis, a positive test for ACPAs, and 2 copies of SE alleles (HLA-DRB1*0401 and *0101). In this patient, an immunogenic HLA-DR–presented peptide derived from a P. copri protein (Pc-p27) was identified from the patient’s PBMCs (25). We then showed that approximately 40% of patients with RA have T and/or B cell responses to Pc-p27 or to the whole P. copri organism (25). In patient RA1, 2 immunogenic HLA-DR–presented human self-peptides derived from GNS and FLNA were also identified from her synovial tissue, and the same FLNA peptide was also found in her PBMCs (20). The HLA-DR–presented peptide derived from GNS was predicted to be promiscuous, binding to 24 of the 25 HLA-DR molecules modeled in the program TEPITOPE (26), and the FLNA-derived peptide was predicted to bind 9 of the 25 HLA-DR molecules. With both peptides, this included binding by HLA-DR molecules encoded by SE alleles *0101, *0401, *0404, and *0405. Neither the GNS protein, nor the FLNA protein, nor the P. copri protein had previously been noted to be antigens in RA. T cell reactivity to GNS and FLNA peptides. To determine the immunogenicity of HLA-DR–presented peptides and their source proteins more broadly, we have developed a cohort of NORA patients seen prior to commencing therapy with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), which is a time when immune responses would be expected to be most robust. For comparison, we tested samples from patients with Lyme arthritis (LA) and from HC subjects. HLA-DR typing showed that 60% of the 40 RA patients had SE alleles, and 50% of the 10 LA patients and 42% of the 15 healthy subjects also had SE alleles. Nevertheless, since the patients and HCs had a range of different HLA-DR alleles, and since cell numbers are limited in human patients, our initial approach for determining T cell responses in multiple individuals consisted of pooling the original peptide with 3 additional peptides from the same protein that are predicted by the program TEPITOPE to be promiscuous HLA-DR binders (26). In addition, because of a limited number of cells, we did not include the testing of irrelevant control peptides in these experiments. However, we have previously shown that patients with RA do not have reactivity to peptides derived from endothelial cell growth factor (ECGF) or MMP-10 peptides (21, 23). These autoantigens in LA are irrelevant in RA. When PBMCs from 40 patients with NORA were stimulated with the GNS peptides, we found that 14 of the 40 patients (35%) secreted levels of IFN-γ that were greater than 3 SD above the mean value for HCs (P = 0.006), as determined by an IFN-γ/IL-17 double-color ELISpot assay (Figure 1A). In comparison, PBMCs from patients with LA lacked reactivity to these peptides (P = 0.005). When FLNA peptides were used to stimulate PBMCs from the same set of patients and control subjects, 17 of the 40 patients with NORA (42%) had IFN-γ levels that were greater than 3 SD above the mean value for HCs (P = 0.001) and for patients with LA (P = 0.0005) (Figure 1B). In patients with RA, the predominant response to stimulation with both peptide sets was a Th1-type response with IFN-γ secretion, whereas PBMCs from only 3 RA patients secreted IL-17 (data not shown). Altogether, 21 of the 40 patients (52%) had T cell reactivity to GNS and/or FLNA peptides, and 10 (25%) had reactivity to both. Figure 1 T cell reactivity to GNS and FLNA peptides in RA patients and comparison group subjects. In initial experiments, (A) PBMCs from patients with RA or LA or from HC subjects were stimulated with a pool of 4 peptides, including the single GNS HLA-DR–presented peptide isolated from the synovial tissue of patient RA1, and 3 predicted promiscuous HLA-DR–binding peptides from GNS (1 μM each). (B) PBMCs from patients and HCs were incubated with a pool of 4 peptides, including the single FLNA HLA-DR–presented peptide identified from the synovial tissue and PBMCs from patient RA1, and 3 predicted promiscuous HLA-DR–binding peptides from FLNA (1 μM each). In each assay, a positive control (phytohemagglutinin) and a negative control (no peptide) were included. The amount of IFN-γ secretion, as determined by an ELISpot assay, is shown. A positive response was defined as greater than 3 SD above the mean value for HCs (area above the shaded region). The values for patient RA1 are indicated with a star. Horizontal lines represent the mean values for each group. P values were determined by unpaired, 2-tailed t test with Welch’s correction. SFU, spot-forming units per million PBMCs. B cell reactivity to GNS and FLNA proteins. Since the role of CD4+ T cells would likely be to help B cells produce autoantibodies against GNS or FLNA, we examined IgG levels for these proteins in serum samples from patients with RA and control group subjects. Since sera (but not PBMCs) were also available from patients with chronic RA (CRA), testing was done in 48 NORA patients and 53 CRA patients. Because the results were similar in both groups, they are presented together here. Of the 101 patients with RA, 32 (32%) had IgG antibody responses against GNS that were greater than 3 SD above those in HCs (P < 0.0001) (Figure 2A). In contrast, none of the 106 patients with other diseases, including those with LA, spondyloarthropathy (SpA), or connective tissue diseases (CTD), and none of the 50 HC subjects had positive IgG antibody responses against the protein (in each instance, P < 0.0001). Similarly, 27 of the 101 (27%) patients with RA had levels of IgG antibodies against FLNA that were greater than 3 SD above those in HCs (P < 0.0001), whereas only 2 patients with CTD had borderline positive IgG antibody responses against FLNA, and none of the other control subjects had positive responses (Figure 2B). Altogether, 48 (48%) of the 101 RA patients had IgG autoantibodies against GNS and/or FLNA, and 10 (10%) had IgG reactivity against both proteins. Figure 2 IgG and IgA responses to GNS and FLNA in RA patients and comparison group subjects. Serum samples from 259 patients with RA, patients with other forms of chronic inflammatory arthritis, and HCs were tested by ELISA for autoantibodies. (A and C) Plates were coated with the GNS protein and incubated with serum from patients or HCs. All serum samples were tested in duplicate for anti-GNS IgG (A) or IgA (C) antibody responses. (B and D) Plates were coated with the FLNA protein and incubated with serum from patients or control subjects. All serum samples were tested in duplicate for anti-FLNA IgG (B) or IgA (D) antibody responses. For all analyses, positivity was defined as greater than 3 SD above the mean value for HCs (area above the shaded region). Symbols represent values in individual patients, and horizontal lines show the mean values. Values for patient RA1 are indicated with a star. Only significant P values, determined by unpaired, 2-tailed t test with Welch’s correction, are shown. Because autoimmune processes in RA may be triggered at mucosal sites, we also tested the levels of IgA antibodies against GNS and FLNA in serum samples from patients and control subjects. Of the 101 patients with RA, 16 (16%) had elevated IgA antibody responses against GNS that were greater than 3 SD above those in HCs (P < 0.0001) (Figure 2C). In contrast, of the 106 patients with other rheumatic diseases and the 50 HC subjects, only 1 patient with SpA had borderline positive IgA antibodies. Similarly, 15 (15%) of the 101 RA patients had FLNA IgA responses that were greater than 3 SD above those in HCs (P = 0.0002), whereas only 1 HC subject and 2 patients with LA had low-level positive responses (Figure 2D). Altogether, 21 (21%) of the 101 RA patients had IgA antibody responses against GNS and/or FLNA, and 10 (10%) had IgA antibody responses against both proteins. When IgG and IgA responses were considered together, 48 of the 101 patients with RA (48%) had IgG antibody responses against GNS and/or FLNA; 21 (21%) had IgA responses against 1 or both of the proteins; and 56 (55%) had IgG and/or IgA responses against the proteins. Of the 14 patients who had T cell responses to GNS peptides, 11 (79%) had IgG and/or IgA antibody responses against the GNS protein. Among the 17 patients who had T cell reactivity to the FLNA peptides, 6 (35%) had IgG and/or IgA antibody responses against the FLNA protein. Thus, T and B cell concordance was greater with GNS than with FLNA. Correlation of antibody responses against P. copri, GNS, and FLNA. Using these same serum samples (25), we have previously tested IgG and IgA antibody responses against 2 RA-associated bacteria, P. copri, a gut microbe, and Porphyromonas gingivalis, a periodontal pathogen (27). Antibody responses against P. copri were found in 32% of RA patients, but were absent in patients with other CTDs, SpA, or LA, as well as in healthy subjects (25). Therefore, using these data, we correlated IgG and IgA antibody responses against these 2 organisms with the GNS and FLNA antibody responses determined here. In patients with RA, the levels of anti-GNS IgG and IgA antibodies strongly correlated with P. copri antibody responses (P = 0.002 and P < 0.0001, respectively), and we found a similar correlation between anti-FLNA IgG and IgA antibody responses and P. copri antibodies (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001) (Figure 3A). In contrast, anti-GNS and anti-FLNA IgG or IgA levels did not correlate with P. gingivalis antibody responses (Figure 3B). Additionally, we observed no correlations among these parameters in healthy subjects. Thus, in RA patients, the higher the IgG or IgA antibody responses against P. copri, the greater the autoantibody responses against these autoantigens. Figure 3 Autoantibody correlations with P. copri and P. gingivalis antibodies. Correlations between anti-GNS or anti-FLNA antibodies (IgG or IgA) and antibodies against P. copri (A) or P. gingivalis (B) in 101 RA patients. The r and P values for the corresponding statistical comparisons were determined by Spearman’s correlation test. Testing of citrullinated GNS and FLNA proteins. Because citrullinated autoantigens are thought to play a central role in RA, particularly in patients with SE alleles, we investigated whether autoantibody responses against GNS or FLNA were greater when these proteins were citrullinated. For this purpose, the native proteins were citrullinated in vitro using recombinant human (rh) peptidylarginine deiminase 4 (PAD4) enzyme. Using samples from 46 RA patients in whom a sufficient amount of serum still remained, IgG antibody responses were higher against citrullinated GNS compared with responses against the uncitrullinated protein (P = 0.005), whereas the responses were negative against both forms of the protein in 15 HC subjects (Figure 4A). Moreover, the magnitude of anti–citrullinated GNS antibody responses correlated with ACPA levels in these patients (P = 0.03) (Figure 4B). In contrast, IgG antibody responses against citrullinated and uncitrullinated FLNA were not significantly different in the 46 patients (Figure 4C), and the levels of anti–citrullinated FLNA antibodies did not correlate with ACPA levels (Figure 4D). These results suggest that the GNS protein, but not the FLNA protein, may be citrullinated in vivo in patients with RA. Figure 4 Autoantibody responses to citrullinated GNS and FLNA, and correlations with ACPAs. Serum samples from 46 patients with RA and 15 healthy individuals were tested for IgG antibody responses against citrullinated versus uncitrullinated GNS or FLNA. Plates were coated with GNS (A) or FLNA (C), with or without citrullination, incubated with serum from patients or HC subjects, and tested in duplicate. Symbols represent values for individual patients, and horizontal lines indicate the mean values. In A and C, only significant P values, calculated by an unpaired, 2-tailed t test with Welch’s correction, are shown. (B) Correlation between IgG antibody responses against citrullinated GNS or citrullinated FLNA (D) and ACPA levels in the 46 patients with RA. The r and P values shown in B and D were determined by Spearman’s correlations. citGNS, citrullinated GNS; citFLNA, citrullinated FLNA. Utility of GNS and FLNA autoantibody evaluation in the diagnosis of RA. In our patient cohort, 70 (69%) of the 101 NORA and CRA patients were seropositive for ACPAs and/or RF, which are standard, commercially available autoantibody determinations for support of the diagnosis of RA. Among the 31 patients who did not have a positive test for ACPAs and/or RF, 13 had a positive test for IgG and/or IgA GNS autoantibodies and 9 had a positive test for IgG and/or IgA FLNA autoantibodies. Taken together, 17 of the 31 seronegative patients (55%) had such autoantibodies, 15 of whom could be identified with the IgG test alone. Overall, when autoantibody responses against GNS and FLNA were combined with standard autoantibody determinations, 87 (86%) of the 101 patients with RA had a positive test result for support of the diagnosis, and only 14 (14%) lacked a specific marker for RA. GNS and FLNA protein levels in serum and joints. For a self-protein to become the target of autoimmune responses in RA patients’ inflamed joints, one would predict that the protein would be present at high concentrations there. For this purpose, we measured GNS and FLNA protein concentrations in serum samples from the 101 patients with RA and in synovial fluid (SF) from 17 patients for whom such samples were available. The levels of GNS were higher in the serum of RA patients than were GNS levels in the control groups (P ≤ 0.002) (Figure 5A), and in RA patients, the levels of this protein tended to be higher in SF than in serum. Similarly, FLNA protein levels were significantly higher in the serum of RA patients than in HCs (P < 0.0001), but in RA patients, FLNA protein levels in SF and serum were similar (Figure 5B). Figure 5 GNS and FLNA protein levels in RA patients and comparison group subjects. GNS and FLNA protein concentrations were measured in serum and SF samples from patients with RA, serum samples from patients with CTD, SpA, or LA, and serum samples from HCs. (A) GNS protein concentrations and (B) FLNA protein concentrations are shown, as measured by ELISA assay. For both analyses, positivity was defined as greater than 3 SD above the mean value for HC subjects (area above the shaded region). Symbols represent values for individual patients, and horizontal lines indicate the mean values. The values for patient RA1 are indicated with a star. Only significant P values, determined by unpaired, 2-tailed t test with Welch’s correction, are shown. SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus. To gain further insight into the protein abundance and distribution, synovial tissues from 10 patients, 4 with RA and 3 each with LA or osteoarthritis (OA), were stained for expression of GNS and FLNA, using immunohistologic methods. GNS showed a fine, reticular pattern in and around endothelial cells in 3 of the 4 patients with RA, but not in those with LA or OA (Figure 6). We observed that FLNA was intensely expressed in the tunica muscularis around blood vessels and in large or elongated cells, presumably synoviocytes, and it was also faintly expressed in the extracellular matrix. We detected FLNA expression in all RA patients, lesser staining in 2 of the LA patients, but no staining in the OA patients (Figure 6). Thus, in RA, these 2 proteins were present in inflamed synovial tissue, particularly around blood vessels, where they could become targets of autoimmune responses. Figure 6 Immunohistochemical staining of synovial tissue for GNS and FLNA. Representative synovial tissue images from 1 patient with RA, 1 with LA, and 1 with OA are shown for expression of GNS or FLNA protein. Brown color indicates specific staining of GNS or FLNA self-proteins, and purple indicates hematoxylin staining. Images were taken at ×20 magnification, and ×40 magnification was used for the RA patient to highlight the staining around blood vessels. Sequence homology between T cell epitopes of microbial and self-peptides. In an effort to determine whether T cell epitope mimicry may play a role in linking Prevotella reactivity with GNS and FLNA autoimmune responses, the sequence of each of the 2 self-peptides isolated from patient RA1 was used first to search for regions of similarity with any microbial protein using the microbial protein database in BLASTP (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool, protein) (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). For both self-peptides, Prevotella spp. peptides were among the top sequences producing significant alignment, specifically in areas predicted to be in the HLA-DR–binding groove. Therefore, we refined the search for sequence similarity by screening only microbial sequences from Prevotellaceae (NCBI Entrez Genome taxid:171552). To evaluate sequence homology, self- and microbial peptides were aligned using the program Clustal Omega (28). The peptide derived from GNS had 67% sequence homology with a peptide from the Prevotella arylsulfatase protein (WP_062433009) (Figure 7A), which was predicted by CELLO software to have a periplasmic location (29). Importantly, the major area of homology for this microbial peptide was restricted to amino acids predicted to be in the HLA-DR–binding groove (Figure 7A). For the Prevotella peptide, 5 of the 9 amino acids were identical to one of the predicted binding registers (P1 = the first F) in the GNS peptide. Moreover, the peptides shared amino acid identity at the P1, P4, and P6 sites, which are critical for peptide binding, as well as in the flanking regions at each end of the peptide, which also influence peptide binding (Figure 7A). The FLNA peptide had 80% identity with a peptide derived from an uncharacterized Prevotella protein (WP_028897633) (Figure 7A), which was predicted to have an extracellular location (a secreted protein). Moreover, the major area of homology was again found in the HLA-DR–binding groove, where 7 of the 9 amino acids were identical in the Prevotella and FLNA peptides, and the remaining 2 amino acids had conserved properties (Figure 7A). Figure 7 Sequence homology between self- and microbial peptides. (A) Sequence alignment of the self- and corresponding microbial peptides is shown (Clustal Omega), and the predicted binding frames of the self-peptides are given for the HLA-DRB1*0101 and *0401 molecules. Red residues indicate the P1 position (TEPITOPE predicted 3 binding registers for GNS [both HLA-DRB1*0101 and *0401], 2 for FLNA [HLA-DRB1*0401], and 1 for FLNA [HLA-DR*0101]), and blue residues indicate positions P2 through P9. The line through the amino acid residues indicates that the peptide-binding register contains an amino acid with an R-group that may not interact favorably with one of the MHC-binding pockets. (B) PBMCs from 24 RA patients and 10 HCs were incubated with 1 of the 2 self-peptides (GNS or FLNA) or each of the 2 corresponding microbial peptides (1 μM each). In each assay, a positive control (phytohemagglutinin) and a negative control (no peptide) were included. The amount of IFN-γ secretion is shown, as determined by ELISpot assay. A positive response was defined as greater than 3 SD above the mean value for the HCs (area above the shaded region). Horizontal lines represent the mean values for each group. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.005, by unpaired, 2-tailed t test with Welch’s correction. (C) Correlations between the T cell reactivity to the GNS peptide and the 2 corresponding microbial peptides, 1 derived from the Prevotella arylsulfatase protein and the other from the Parabacteroides GNS protein. (D) Correlations between the T cell reactivity to the FLNA peptide and the 2 corresponding microbial peptides derived from 2 hypothetical proteins, 1 from the Prevotella sp. and the other from the Butyricimonas sp. P and r values shown in C and D were calculated using Spearman’s correlation test. For comparison, we analyzed the GNS and FLNA sequences for homology with P. gingivalis, a periodontal pathogen of interest in RA, using Porphyromonadaceae (taxid:171551) as the reference database in the BLASTP search. However, we found no homology between P. gingivalis and GNS or FLNA sequences. P. gingivalis also stimulates antibody responses in the subgroup of RA patients who have periodontal disease (27, 30), but there is little overlap between RA patients with P. gingivalis antibodies and those with P. copri antibodies (25). Instead, among the Porphyromonadaceae, the GNS epitope had partial sequence similarity with a peptide from the periplasmic protein N-acetylgalactosamine-6-sulfatase of the Parabacteroides sp. (WP_046148720) (Figure 7A). Thus, as with the homology between the GNS peptide and the peptide from the Prevotella arylsulfatase protein, the Parabacteroides protein was also a sulfatase. These enzymes are key in the adaptation and persistence of human commensal bacteria in the gut (31, 32). Moreover, the Parabacteroides peptide had 4 amino acids identical to the GNS peptide and 1 amino acid with conserved properties. These included amino acids with shared identity in the P1 through P4 and P6 sites. A similar evaluation of the FLNA peptide showed sequence homology with a predicted cytoplasmic uncharacterized protein of the Butyricimonas sp. (WP_065219401.1), another gut commensal. The Butyricimonas peptide shared identity with 6 of 9 amino acids in one of the predicted HLA-DR registers (P1 = F) of the FLNA peptide, and two of the three remaining amino acids had conserved properties (Figure 7A). Prevotella, Parabacteroides, and Butyricimonas are each members of the Bacteroidetes phylum, one of the two major phyla of gut commensal organisms. T cell responses to homologous microbial and self-peptides. To address whether patients had reactivity to these self-epitopes and the corresponding microbial epitopes, we performed ELISpot assays with each of these peptides using PBMCs from the 24 patients with NORA in whom sufficient numbers of cells remained and from 10 HCs. When cells were stimulated with the GNS peptide or each of the 2 corresponding microbial peptides (1 derived from Prevotella and the other from Parabacteroides), we found Th1 cell reactivity to all 3 peptides. Of the 24 RA patients, 8 (33%) had T cell reactivity to the GNS peptide, 9 (38%) showed responses to the Prevotella peptide, and 6 (25%) had reactivity to the Parabacteroides peptide, all of which were responses that were 3 SD or more above the mean values for HCs (Figure 7B). Of the 8 patients who had reactivity to the GNS peptide, 7 also had responses to the microbial peptides. When PBMCs were incubated with the FLNA peptide, 9 of the 24 patients with RA (38%) had T cell responses, 10 (42%) showed reactivity to the corresponding Prevotella peptide, and 7 (29%) had responses to the Butyricimonas peptide (Figure 7B). Furthermore, all 9 patients with reactivity to the FLNA peptide also had responses to the microbial peptides. Thus, except for 1 patient, the same patients who had reactivity to the GNS and/or FLNA peptides also had responses to the corresponding microbial peptides. Additionally, among the microbial peptides, we observed a trend toward a higher percentage of patients who had reactivity to the Prevotella peptides than to the other gut commensals. Moreover, when the magnitude of the T cell responses to each self-peptide was correlated with that of the corresponding microbial peptides, the responses to the GNS or FLNA peptide strongly correlated with reactivity to each of the 2 microbial peptides (in each instance, P < 0.0001) (Figure 7, C and D). Therefore, the stronger the response to the microbial peptides, the greater the response to the self-peptide. In contrast, PBMCs from 10 HC subjects did not show a correlation with any of the self- or microbial peptides (Figure 7, C and D). Of the 24 RA patients tested with the single peptides of GNS and FLNA (Figure 7), 17 were initially analyzed for T cell reactivity to pools of 4 peptides derived from these proteins (Figure 1). Only 4 of the 17 patients responded to the pool of peptides and not to the single peptide, suggesting that the majority of patients had reactivity to the single peptide epitope. Only 2 of the 17 patients responded to the single peptides, but failed to respond to the peptide pools. Using an in silico prediction method (Immune Epitope Database [IEDB] Analysis Resource tool; http://tools.immuneepitope.org/mhcii/), the GNS peptide and the corresponding microbial peptides were predicted to bind HLA-DR molecules encoded by SE alleles with significantly higher affinity than non-SE alleles (Figure 8A). In addition, there was a trend toward greater affinity of SE binding of the FLNA peptide and the corresponding microbial peptides (Figure 8B). Of the 24 patients with RA, 15 (62%) had SE alleles. Consistent with the IEDB binding predictions, 9 of 11 patients (82%) with self- and microbial T cell reactivity had SE alleles compared with 5 of 13 patients (38%) without T cell responses to these antigens (P = 0.05). Thus, patients who had reactivity to the self-peptides often responded to the corresponding microbial peptides; the magnitude of the self-responses showed a significant correlation with the microbial responses, and these were more frequent in patients with SE alleles. Figure 8 HLA-DR–binding prediction for self- and microbial peptides. Prediction analyses were performed using the IEDB Analysis Resource consensus tool. A low percentile rank indicates good peptide binders. (A) MHC class II–binding prediction of the GNS peptide and the corresponding microbial peptides. (B) MHC class II–binding prediction of the FLNA peptide and the corresponding microbial peptides. SE alleles: *0101, *0102, *0401, *0404, and *1001. Non-SE alleles: *0103, *0301, *0403, *0803, *1101, *1201, *1302, *1501, and *1601. Data represent median values with interquartile ranges. **P < 0.005, by Mann-Whitney U test. Discussion RA is an HLA class II–associated autoimmune disease in which mucosal immunity, often resulting from interaction with oral or gut microbes or from inhaled antigens in the lung, is hypothesized to cause autoimmune phenomena leading to joint inflammation and damage. However, the factors linking mucosal immunity to autoimmunity in joints have been unclear. In this study in which HLA-DR–presented peptides were identified directly from patients’ synovial tissue or PBMCs, 2 previously unidentified self-antigens, GNS and FLNA, were shown to be targets of T and B cell responses in 52% and 56% of RA patients, respectively. Importantly, the GNS and FLNA HLA-DR–presented T cell epitopes have considerable sequence homology with Prevotella epitopes and with similar epitopes from several related gut commensals belonging to the same order, particularly in areas predicted to be in the HLA-DR–binding groove. Moreover, T cell responses to the corresponding microbial and self-peptides were strongly correlated, suggesting that T cell epitope mimicry may provide a potential link between mucosal immunity and immune responses in affected joints. Moreover, GNS and FLNA autoantibodies correlated with P. copri antibody responses. This finding might also be due to cross-reactive Prevotella and host protein B cell epitopes, but we currently lack the recombinant microbial proteins to test this hypothesis directly. Alternatively, this correlation might simply be a reflection of T cell help resulting from T cell epitope mimicry. The presence of natural IgM, IgG, or IgA autoantibodies has been reported in the serum of normal control subjects and is characterized by broad reactivity to self- and microbial antigens (33, 34). However, our findings cannot be explained simply by nonspecific physiological responses. First, GNS and FLNA autoantibodies were increased specifically in a large subgroup of patients with RA, and not in patients with other rheumatic diseases or in HCs. Second, these self-autoantibodies correlated strongly with P. copri antibodies, but not with P. gingivalis antibodies. Third, patients with RA, but not healthy subjects, often had both T and B cell responses to these self-antigens. For control of the microbiota, the generation of specific, high-affinity IgA antibody responses requires T and B cell interactions (35), whereas the “natural” antibody pool consists primarily of low-affinity polyreactive IgA antibodies, whose production is independent of T cell help (36–38). Currently, the only known antibody responses that are specific for RA are directed against citrullinated proteins, in particular against enolase, vimentin, and fibronectin (39). Moreover, there is hypercitrullination of a range of proteins in the joints of many patients with RA (40). In our study, the GNS protein appeared to be citrullinated in vivo, and antibodies against it correlated with ACPA levels, whereas levels of antibodies against the FLNA protein, which did not appear to be citrullinated, did not correlate with ACPA levels. Moreover, HLA-DR molecules encoded by RA SE alleles bound the GNS peptide and, to a lesser degree, the FLNA peptide with higher affinity than did non-SE alleles, and SE alleles largely influence the generation of ACPAs (3). Both FLNA and GNS self-antigens, which are often highly expressed in RA synovial tissue, represent good autoimmune targets. GNS is an enzyme located in lysosomes and is involved in the degradation and recycling of different molecules, such as glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) (https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/gene/GNS), a major component of joint cartilage and other soft connective tissues (41). FLNA is a ubiquitous, fundamental protein for building the cell cytoskeleton and organizing the extracellular matrix (42). In addition, FLNA is required for cell-cell contact in vascular development (43). Consistent with its function, we found that FLNA protein was especially prominent in the tunica muscularis around blood vessels in RA synovial tissue and was also faintly expressed in the extracellular matrix. However, it is not yet clear why the GNS protein was seen only in a reticular pattern around blood vessels. Nevertheless, the important point is that both host proteins would be available for HLA-DR presentation in synovial tissue and both represent potential targets for autoimmune responses. High-throughput sequencing of stool samples in 2 studies of RA patients showed gut dysbiosis (13, 14), and 1 study reported overexpansion of Prevotella spp., particularly P. copri (13). However, little is known about potential bowel pathology in RA. The major limitation of our study is the lack of specific information about pathology or immune responses in the bowel. Our study of patients with NORA was originally intended as a study of mouth flora and periodontal disease (30), and, therefore, the collection of stool samples was not a part of our protocol. Nevertheless, the finding of gut dysbiosis favoring Prevotella (13), the identification of P. copri as an immune-relevant bacterium in RA (25), and the finding here of specific T and B cell responses to Prevotella and corresponding GNS and FLNA epitopes suggest that mucosal immune responses in the gut may be a part of the disease in a sizable subgroup of RA patients. Although DMARD therapy may resolve dysbiosis (14) and P. copri overexpansion (13), immune reactivity to the organism, once triggered, appeared to persist or even increase in patients with CRA who were taking these medications. In contrast, patients with SpA or postinfectious, antibiotic-refractory LA, which may also be treated with DMARDs, did not have reactivity to this organism (25). Taken together, our studies highlight a possible mechanism linking gut and joint inflammation. We hypothesize that dysbiosis or low-grade gut inflammation may compromise the mucosal barrier and result in leakage of commensal organisms, leading to activation of lymphocytes targeting microbial antigens. Here, we provide evidence that T cell epitopes of a related order of gut microbes, particularly Prevotella spp., may cross-react with self-epitopes of highly expressed proteins in joints, especially in patients with SE alleles. T cells activated by microbial peptides at the mucosal surface may then home to inflamed joints and cross-react with homologous self-antigens. In addition, as we have previously reported (25), commensal organisms or their remnants or microbe-activated antigen-presenting cells (APCs) may occasionally home to joints, where they further amplify joint inflammation and restimulate self-reactive T cells. Thus, an initial trigger in the gut mucosa may activate cross-reactive microbial immune responses that have the potential to shift to an autoimmune phenotype at sites where the homologous self-antigens are expressed. Even though proof of cross-reactivity will require the cloning of single T cells, the prominence of homologous epitopes among gut microbes and epitopes from 2 self-proteins in synovial tissue, the greater affinity of HLA-DR molecules encoded by SE alleles in binding these epitopes, and the demonstration that RA patients often have T cell responses to corresponding microbial and self-epitopes suggest the potential for these immune responses to have a role in RA pathogenesis. We do not think that these mechanisms are the entire explanation for the marked inflammatory and proliferative responses in the RA synovial lesion. Rather, we propose that these mechanisms play a role in linking gut and joint immune responses and in amplifying synovial inflammation in a large subgroup of RA patients. Although knowledge of bowel pathology is not yet clear in patients with RA, the identification of immune responses to P. copri, GNS, and FLNA has practical implications for the diagnosis and treatment of the disease. First, these immune responses appear to be specific for RA. As shown here, the addition of GNS and FLNA to standard autoantibody determinations (ACPAs and RF) increased the percentage of seropositive patients from 69% to 86%, thereby improving the diagnostic support for some patients with seronegative RA, who currently lack specific markers. Furthermore, the inclusion of citrullinated GNS in a test for ACPAs may increase the sensitivity of that test. These determinations have increased in importance, because earlier treatment with DMARDs may improve long-term outcomes, whereas a lack of diagnostic markers for seronegative patients may delay appropriate DMARD treatment, leading to less favorable clinical outcomes (44, 45). Finally, in addition to DMARDs, the identification of patients with these antibody responses may allow the testing and development of adjunctive forms of treatment, such as brief, targeted antibiotic regimens or diet alterations. Ultimately, the identification of pathogenic T cell epitopes in synovial tissue, as was done here, may make it possible to engineer blocking peptides, which would limit autoimmune stimulation and ameliorate these presumably disadvantageous autoimmune responses. Methods Patients and control subjects. The 101 patients in this study met the American College of Rheumatology and the European League Against Rheumatism Collaborative Initiative criteria for the diagnosis of RA (46). Of these 101 patients, 49 had NORA for 12 months or less and had not yet been treated with DMARDs. The remaining 52 patients had CRA of more than 1 year’s duration (usually for many years), often treated with DMARDs. For isolation of HLA-DR–presented peptides, synovial tissue and PBMCs were obtained from patient RA1, who was undergoing arthroscopic synovectomy. To test the implicated peptides and their source proteins for immunoreactivity in additional patients, PBMCs and serum samples were collected from patients with NORA, but only serum samples were available from patients with CRA. For other comparison groups, serum samples were collected from 28 patients with CTD, including systemic lupus, mixed CTD, scleroderma, and Sjögren’s syndrome; 28 patients with SpA; and 50 patients with LA. Additionally, serum samples and PBMCs were collected from 15 healthy hospital personnel who did not have a history of RA or other autoimmune diseases, and serum samples were obtained from 40 healthy blood bank donors. HLA-DR typing was performed on blood samples from all RA or LA patients and from healthy subjects at the American Red Cross Laboratory in Dedham, Massachusetts, USA. ELISpot T cell assay. A detailed description of the methods for the isolation and identification of HLA-DR–presented peptides is given in our previous publications (19, 20). In the current study, all nonredundant HLA-DR–presented peptides identified from patient RA1 were synthesized (Mimotopes) and tested for reactivity in sets of 3 (1 μM of each peptide) using the patient’s PBMCs in IFN-γ ELISpot assays. In this initial screen, 2 self-peptides derived from GNS and FLNA were implicated; the remaining 138 peptides showed no reactivity. For testing in larger numbers of patients and control subjects, who would have a range of HLA-DR genotypes, the original peptides identified from the patient (shown in bold) and 3 additional promiscuous peptides that were predicted to bind 16 or more HLA-DR molecules were synthesized and HPLC purified at the MGH Core Facility. The GNS peptide sequences were as follows: 47PNVVLLLTDDQDE59, 222FEPFFMMIATPAPH235, 451TYACVRTMSALWNLQ465, 504NYRLMMLQSCSGPTC518. The FLNA peptide sequences were as follows: 73DGLRLIALLEVLSQKK88, 118SIKLVSIDSKAIVDG132, 416VEVVIQDPMGQKG428, 2446NPAEFVVNTSNAGAG2460. To assess microbial sequence homology with the GNS peptide 222FEPFFMMIATPAPH235, the following microbial peptides were tested: 231KKPFFMMVAMNPPH245, which was derived from the arylsulfatase protein of the Prevotella spp. (WP_062433009.1) and 247DVPFFMMWTTPLPH261, derived from the GNS of the Parabacteroides sp. (WP_046148720.1). To evaluate the microbial sequence homology for the FLNA peptide 2446NPAEFVVNTSNAGAG2460, the following microbial peptides were tested: 133QGFVVKTANAGAL146, which was derived from an uncharacterized protein of the Prevotella sp. (WP_028897633.1) and 90ANFMINVSNAGAL103, derived from an uncharacterized protein of the Butyricimonas sp. (WP_065219401.1). The RA patients’ PBMCs were stimulated with the pool of peptides or single peptides and analyzed for reactivity to a human IFN-γ/IL-17 Double-Color ELISpot Kit (Cellular Technology Ltd.). All peptides (1 μM) were tested in duplicate wells, as were positive (phytohemagglutinin) and negative (no antigen) control samples. After 5 days, cells were transferred to ELISpot plates coated with IFN-γ/IL-17 antibodies and incubated overnight. Images of wells were captured using an ImmunoSpot Series 3B Analyzer (Cellular Technology Ltd.), and spots were counted using ImmunoSpot software. A positive T cell response was defined as 3 SD above the mean value for HC subjects. ELISA for serum IgG and IgA anti-GNS and anti-FLNA autoantibodies. ELISA plates were coated with 0.5 μg/ml rhGNS (Novoprotein) or rhFLNA (Novusbio) overnight at 4°C. Subsequent incubations and washes were performed at room temperature. After washing with PBS containing 0.05% Tween-20 (PBST), the plates were blocked with blocking buffer (5% nonfat dry milk in PBST) for 1 hour. Afterwards, 100 μl of each patient’s serum sample (diluted 50-fold) was added in duplicate wells for 1.5 hours, followed by HRP-conjugated goat anti-human IgG (sc-2453; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.) or HRP-conjugated goat anti-human IgA (STAR141P; Bio-Rad), and then tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) substrate (BD). For interplate standardization, 2 control samples were included with each assay. In vitro citrullination assay. rhGNS (2 μg) or rhFLNA (2 μg) was incubated with rhPAD4 (400 ng), which was provided by Maximilian Koenig from the laboratory of Felipe Andrade (Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA) in 1 M Tris (pH 7.6) in the presence of 200 mM CaCl2. A negative control reaction was performed, substituting 200 mM CaCl2 with 200 mM EDTA. Incubation was performed at 37°C for 3 hours. Protein citrullination was determined by anti–modified citrulline immunoblotting, according to the manufacturer’s recommendations (EMD Millipore). Quantification of GNS and FLNA protein levels in serum and joint fluid. ELISA plates were coated with 5 μg/ml capture antibody (sc-161669 for GNS and sc-58764 for FLNA; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.) overnight at 4°C. Plates were then washed with PBS and blocked with PBST containing 5% milk (blocking buffer) for 1 hour. Afterwards, serum or joint fluid samples (diluted 1:10 in blocking buffer) were added in duplicate and incubated for 2 hours at room temperature. Next, a detection antibody (5 μg/ml) (SAB1410557 for GNS from Sigma-Aldrich; sc-28284 for FLNA from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.) was added for 2 hours. The plates were then incubated with goat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP (sc-2030; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.), followed by TMB substrate. For interplate standardization, 2 control samples were included on each plate. Immunohistochemistry. Fresh-frozen synovial tissue samples were stained for GNS and FLNA proteins. After blocking, the sections were incubated with a rabbit polyclonal antibody against GNS (SAB1410557; Sigma-Aldrich) and a mouse monoclonal antibody against FLNA (sc-17749; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.) at 4°C overnight. For negative controls, nonspecific rabbit or mouse IgG antibodies (Sigma-Aldrich) were used. The following day, the sections were incubated with a biotinylated anti-rabbit (HK336-5R; Biogenex) or anti-mouse (HK335-5M; Biogenex) secondary antibody, peroxidase-streptavidin, and then a diaminobenzidine substrate. The slides were counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin and mounted with Permount Mounting Medium (Fisher Scientific). Microscopic images were obtained with a Zeiss widefield microscope. In silico determinations of HLA-DR–binding affinity. The affinity of HLA-DR binding of the GNS, FLNA, and related microbial peptides was determined using the T cell epitope – MHC class II molecules binding prediction tool from the IEDB Analysis Resource. This tool uses different methods to predict MHC class II epitopes, including a consensus approach that combines NN-align, SMM-align, and combinatorial library methods. For the analysis, all HLA-DR alleles found in the RA cohort were analyzed, including 5 SE alleles and 9 non-SE alleles. Statistics. Categorical data were analyzed by Fisher’s exact test, and quantitative data were analyzed using an unpaired, 2-tailed t test with Welch’s correction. Correlations were determined using Spearman’s correlation test. All analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 6 (GraphPad Software). All P values are 2-tailed. P values of 0.05 or less were considered statistically significant. Study approval. The present study was reviewed and approved by the Human Investigations Committee at MGH (2008 to 2014). All patients and control subjects provided written informed consent prior to their participation in the study. Author contributions AP designed and performed the experiments and analyzed the data. SLA and ACS enrolled and cared for patients in the study, handled clinical data collection, and performed clinical correlations. QW and CEC performed mass spectrometric analyses. EED, KS, and ACS provided advice and data analysis interpretation. All authors contributed to the preparation of the manuscript. Acknowledgments We thank Deborah Collier and Marcy Bolster (MGH, Boston, MA) for help with patient care; Maximilian Koenig and Felipe Andrade (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD) for providing the human PAD4 enzyme for citrullination assays; Gunnlaugur Petur Nielsen (MGH, Boston, MA) for help with the description of synovial immunohistology; Dennis Burke (MGH, Boston, MA) and John Aversa (Yale University, New Haven, CT) for help with obtaining synovial tissue; Mandakolathur Murali (MGH, Boston, MA) for RF and ACPA analyses; the American Red Cross laboratory for HLA-DR typing of patients; and Katherine Sulka (MGH, Boston, MA) for help with the preparation of samples for HLA-DR typing. This work was supported by grants from the American College of Rheumatology Innovative Grant Program “Within our Reach, Finding a Cure for RA;” the Ounsworth-Fitzgerald Foundation; the Mathers Foundation; the English, Bonter, Mitchell Foundation; the Littauer Foundation; the Lillian B. Davey Foundation; the Eshe Fund (to ACS); and the NIH (P41 GM104603, S10 RR020946, and S10 OD010724, to CEC). SLA received support from a Scientist Development Award from the Rheumatology Research Foundation. Footnotes EED’s present address is: Agenus Inc, Lexington, Massachusetts, USA. QW’s present address is: Waters Corporation, Milford, Massachusetts, USA. Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists. Reference information: J Clin Invest. 2017;127(8):2946–2956.https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI93450. References Li Y, et al. Deficient activity of the nuclease MRE11A induces T cell aging and promotes arthritogenic effector functions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Immunity. 2016;45(4):903–916. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Gregersen PK, Silver J, Winchester RJ. The shared epitope hypothesis. An approach to understanding the molecular genetics of susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1987;30(11):1205–1213. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar McInnes IB, Schett G. The pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(23):2205–2219. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Nishimura K, et al. Meta-analysis: diagnostic accuracy of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody and rheumatoid factor for rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146(11):797–808. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Schellekens GA, de Jong BA, van den Hoogen FH, van de Putte LB, van Venrooij WJ. Citrulline is an essential constituent of antigenic determinants recognized by rheumatoid arthritis-specific autoantibodies. J Clin Invest. 1998;101(1):273–281. View this article via: JCI PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Suzuki K, et al. High diagnostic performance of ELISA detection of antibodies to citrullinated antigens in rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol. 2003;32(4):197–204. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar del Puente A, Knowler WC, Pettitt DJ, Bennett PH. The incidence of rheumatoid arthritis is predicted by rheumatoid factor titer in a longitudinal population study. Arthritis Rheum. 1988;31(10):1239–1244. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Majka DS, et al. Duration of preclinical rheumatoid arthritis-related autoantibody positivity increases in subjects with older age at time of disease diagnosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67(6):801–807. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Nielen MM, et al. Specific autoantibodies precede the symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis: a study of serial measurements in blood donors. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50(2):380–386. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Bachmaier K, Neu N, de la Maza LM, Pal S, Hessel A, Penninger JM. Chlamydia infections and heart disease linked through antigenic mimicry. Science. 1999;283(5406):1335–1339. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Miller SD, et al. Persistent infection with Theiler’s virus leads to CNS autoimmunity via epitope spreading. Nat Med. 1997;3(10):1133–1136. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Zhao ZS, Granucci F, Yeh L, Schaffer PA, Cantor H. Molecular mimicry by herpes simplex virus-type 1: autoimmune disease after viral infection. Science. 1998;279(5355):1344–1347. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Scher JU, et al. Expansion of intestinal Prevotella copri correlates with enhanced susceptibility to arthritis. Elife. 2013;2:e01202. View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar Zhang X, et al. The oral and gut microbiomes are perturbed in rheumatoid arthritis and partly normalized after treatment. Nat Med. 2015;21(8):895–905. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Maeda Y, et al. Dysbiosis contributes to arthritis development via activation of autoreactive T cells in the intestine. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68(11):2646–2661. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Hemmer B, et al. Predictable TCR antigen recognition based on peptide scans leads to the identification of agonist ligands with no sequence homology. J Immunol. 1998;160(8):3631–3636. View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar Horwitz MS, Bradley LM, Harbertson J, Krahl T, Lee J, Sarvetnick N. Diabetes induced by Coxsackie virus: initiation by bystander damage and not molecular mimicry. Nat Med. 1998;4(7):781–785. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Ehl S, et al. Viral and bacterial infections interfere with peripheral tolerance induction and activate CD8+ T cells to cause immunopathology. J Exp Med. 1998;187(5):763–774. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Seward RJ, Drouin EE, Steere AC, Costello CE. Peptides presented by HLA-DR molecules in synovia of patients with rheumatoid arthritis or antibiotic-refractory Lyme arthritis. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2011;10(3):M110.002477. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Wang Q, et al. Immunogenic HLA-DR-presented self-peptides identified directly from clinical samples of synovial tissue, synovial fluid, or peripheral blood in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or Lyme arthritis. J Proteome Res. 2017;16(1):122–136. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Drouin EE, et al. A novel human autoantigen, endothelial cell growth factor, is a target of T and B cell responses in patients with Lyme disease. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65(1):186–196. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Crowley JT, et al. A highly expressed human protein, apolipoprotein B-100, serves as an autoantigen in a subgroup of patients with Lyme disease. J Infect Dis. 2015;212(11):1841–1850. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Crowley JT, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-10 is a target of T and B cell responses that correlate with synovial pathology in patients with antibiotic-refractory Lyme arthritis. J Autoimmun. 2016;69:24–37. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Pianta A, et al. Annexin A2 is a target of autoimmune T and B cell responses associated with synovial fibroblast proliferation in patients with antibiotic-refractory Lyme arthritis. Clin Immunol. 2015;160(2):336–341. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Pianta A, et al. Evidence for immune relevance of Prevotella copri, a gut microbe, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017;69(5):964–975. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Sturniolo T, et al. Generation of tissue-specific and promiscuous HLA ligand databases using DNA microarrays and virtual HLA class II matrices. Nat Biotechnol. 1999;17(6):555–561. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Mikuls TR, et al. Periodontitis and Porphyromonas gingivalis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66(5):1090–1100. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Sievers F, et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol Syst Biol. 2011;7:539. View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar Yu CS, Lin CJ, Hwang JK. Predicting subcellular localization of proteins for Gram-negative bacteria by support vector machines based on n-peptide compositions. Protein Sci. 2004;13(5):1402–1406. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Arvikar SL, et al. Clinical correlations with Porphyromonas gingivalis antibody responses in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2013;15(5):R109. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Benjdia A, Martens EC, Gordon JI, Berteau O. Sulfatases and a radical S-adenosyl-L-methionine (AdoMet) enzyme are key for mucosal foraging and fitness of the prominent human gut symbiont, Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(29):25973–25982. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Ulmer JE, et al. Characterization of glycosaminoglycan (GAG) sulfatases from the human gut symbiont Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron reveals the first GAG-specific bacterial endosulfatase. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(35):24289–24303. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Coutinho A, Kazatchkine MD, Avrameas S. Natural autoantibodies. Curr Opin Immunol. 1995;7(6):812–818. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Dighiero G. Natural autoantibodies, tolerance, and autoimmunity. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1997;815:182–192. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Kroese FG, Butcher EC, Stall AM, Lalor PA, Adams S, Herzenberg LA. Many of the IgA producing plasma cells in murine gut are derived from self-replenishing precursors in the peritoneal cavity. Int Immunol. 1989;1(1):75–84. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Macpherson AJ, Gatto D, Sainsbury E,

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPICPatients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can be divided into seropositive and seronegative subgroups. The presence of antibodies against post-translationally modified (PTM) proteins such as citrullinated proteins is nowadays used as a diagnostic and prognostic marker in RA. Antibodies directed against carbamylated proteins have more recently been shown to be present in a subset of the seronegative patients and are associated with bone erosions in that group.WHAT THIS STUDY ADDSIn this study, two different anti-PTM antibodies are investigated: anti-advanced glycation end-product modified protein antibodies (anti-AGE) and anti-malondialdehyde-acetaldehyde adduct modified protein antibodies (anti-MAA). These antibodies can be detected in several forms of inflammatory arthritis. Within seronegative RA (negative for rheumatoid factor, anti-citrullinated protein antibodies and anti-carbamylated protein antibodies), 16.9% of patients are positive for anti-MAA and/or anti-AGE antibodies. This subgroup is characterised by an association with HLA-DRB1*03, increased radiographic joint damage and (for anti-MAA) inflammation.HOW THIS STUDY MIGHT AFFECT RESEARCH, PRACTICE OR POLICYThe presence of anti-PTM antibodies like anti-AGE and anti-MAA in patients with RA and other patients with inflammatory arthritis previously considered to be seronegative, may not only serve as a prognostic marker, but importantly may contribute to understanding the pathogenesis of these conditions, including a subset of RA.IntroductionIn rheumatoid arthritis (RA) around two-thirds of patients are autoantibody positive for rheumatoid factor (RF), anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) and/or anti-carbamylated protein (anti-CarP) antibodies.1 The remaining seronegative subgroup of RA is clinically heterogeneous and thus far no reliable biomarkers are available to identify these patients or predict their disease course.1ACPA and anti-CarP are antibodies that recognise proteins that have undergone post-translational modification (PTM), citrullination of arginine and carbamylation of lysine respectively.2 3 However, many other types of PTMs exist.4 Two examples of PTMs that are found to associate with disease are advanced glycation end-products (AGE) and malondialdehyde-acetaldehyde adducts (MAA). AGEs are a result of oxidative stress and tissue damage5 and are, for example, present in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2.6 Interestingly, in these patients also antibodies directed against this PTM were observed.6 MAA modifications are a result of reactive oxygen species that are formed during inflammation and oxidative stress.7 Both MAA-modified proteins and anti-MAA antibodies are found in patients with RA, as well as in other diseases.7 AGE and MAA are both highly immunogenic PTMs.8 9 Therefore, it is plausible that antibodies against AGE and MAA are also present in patients with arthritis.Seronegative RA is associated with HLA-DRB1*03, suggesting a role for immunopathology driven by, for example, B cell immunity.10 Indeed, within the ACPA-negative patients, the presence of anti-CarP was associated with HLA-DRB1*03.11 12 However, it did not yet explain the full HLA-DRB1*03 association, raising the possibility that other anti-PTM responses may be present in ‘seronegative’ RA that are present in the remainder of the HLA-DRB1*03 positive individuals.13 14 On top of this haplotype association, within these patients with ACPA-negative RA, anti-CarP was found to associate with a more severe radiological progression.3 Patients with seronegative RA are a diverse group of patients that in many ways resemble undifferentiated arthritis. Presence of antibodies, like anti-PTM antibodies, might help to better understand and characterise subgroups that possibly belong to this so-called seronegative RA.We therefore investigated whether anti-AGE and anti-MAA antibodies are present in patients with RA and other forms of arthritis, and whether they could potentially close the so-called serological gap1 in seronegative RA.MethodsPatientsOne thousand one hundred eighty-six patients with arthritis of at least one joint and a symptom duration of less than 2 years were included in the Leiden Early Arthritis Clinic (EAC) cohort.15 Data were collected at baseline and follow-up (4, 12 months and yearly thereafter). Patients were being followed as long as the patient remained being seen clinically by the rheumatologist. RA was classified based on the 1987 American College of Rheumatology criteria (n=648).16 Definitive diagnoses other than RA (n=538) were made by the treating physician after 1 year of follow-up and were predominantly psoriatic arthritis (PsA) (n=100), inflammatory osteoarthritis (n=95) and gout (n=93) besides other more rare forms of arthritis. For this manuscript, the following diagnoses were termed autoimmune (AI): RA, PsA, spondyloarthritis, sarcoidosis, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and paraneoplastic arthritis. The diagnoses termed as non-autoimmune (non-AI) were: gout, pseudogout and septic arthritis. Clinical and demographic patient characteristics were collected as described previously.17Genotyping, radiological progression and remissionFrom all patients, HLA genotypes were established as described previously.18 The alleles that were marked as shared epitope-encoding HLA (HLA-SE) positive were: HLA-DRB1*01:01, 01:02, 04:01, 04:04, 04:05, 04:08, 10:01 and 14:02. For the radiological progression analyses, 2853 X-ray sets of the hands and feet of 635 patients with RA were scored as described previously using the Sharp-van der Heijde score (SHS).19 20 Sustained drug-free remission (SDFR) was defined as the absence of clinical synovitis after discontinuation of disease-modifying antirheumatic drug treatment, that persisted for the entire follow-up, being at least 1 year.21Anti-AGE and anti-MAA measurementsAnti-AGE and anti-MAA antibodies were detected using an in-house ELISA based on modified fetal calf serum (FCS) as described previously.22 Briefly, modified and non-modified FCS were coated to a Nunc Maxisorp ELISA plate (430341, Thermofisher). In between each sequential step, plates were washed three times using phosphate buffered saline (PBS)/0.05%Tween (Sigma, P1379). After blocking (PBS/1%bovine serum albumin) for 6 hours at 4°C plates were incubated overnight at 4°C with 1/100 or 1/1000 diluted serum for anti-AGE and anti-MAA, respectively. Each plate contained a standard of anti-PTM positive serum to calculate arbitrary units. After incubation, IgG levels were detected using Rabbit-anti-Human IgG-HRP (Dako, P0214). Plates were developed by incubating with 2,2'-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS)/0.015% H2O2 (A1888 and 7722-84-1, both from Merck) and absorbance at 415 nm was measured using a microplate reader (Bio-Rad iMark). The cut-off for positivity was set as the mean arbitrary units plus two times the SD of 80 healthy controls, excluding values higher than 10× the mean.Statistical analysisIndependent samples t-test and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to analyse the baseline characteristics. The association of HLA-DRB1*03 with autoantibodies was assessed with logistic regression, and stratified for anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide 2 (anti-CCP2) and anti-CarP if relevant. Correlations between anti-PTM antibodies and inflammatory markers were calculated using Spearman’s rank correlation. For the radiological progression analyses, a multivariate normal regression model for longitudinal data was used with SHS as response variable. The model controlled for the age, sex and inclusion year of the patients.19 SDFR development until follow-up was calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox’s regression. All statistical analysis were performed using SPSS statistics V.25 (IBM).ResultsAnti-AGE and anti-MAA in patients with arthritisBaseline characteristics are described in table 1. Anti-PTM antibody levels were measured in RA and non-RA arthritis patients and compared with healthy controls (figure 1A,B and online supplemental table 1). The non-RA arthritis group was divided into subgroups and separately depicted based as AI arthritis (without RA) including PsA, paraneoplastic arthritis, SLE, sarcoidosis and spondyloarthritis and as non-AI arthritis including septic arthritis, gout and pseudogout.Supplemental material[rmdopen-2023-003480supp001.pdf]View inline View popup Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the rheumatoid arthritis (RA), non-RA, autoimmune no RA and non-autoimmune group<img class="highwire-fragment fragment-image" height="440" src="https://rmdopen.bmj.com/content/rmdopen/9/4/e003480/F1.medium.gif"; width="315" alt="Figure 1">Download figure Open in new tab Download powerpoint Figure 1 Anti-AGE and anti-MAA show higher levels in RA and occur in a subgroup of patients with anti-CarP anti-CCP2 negative RA. IgG antibody levels of anti-AGE (A) and anti-MAA (B) in patients with (n=648) and without (n=538) RA. Early patients with arthritis were separately depicted as groups: AI without RA (including psoriatic arthritis, paraneoplastic arthritis, SLE, sarcoidosis and spondyloarthritis) and non-AI (including septic arthritis, gout, pseudogout). (C) Upset plots of groups of patients with RA (n=499*) positive for anti-PTM combinations; anti-AGE, anti-MAA, anti-CarP, anti-CCP2 and RF. *Data for anti-CarP was missing for 149 patients with RA. AGE, advanced glycation end-product; AI, autoimmune; aU/mL, arbitrary units per mL; CarP, carbamylated protein; CCP2, citrullinated cyclic peptide 2; MAA, malondialdehyde acetaldehyde adduct; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; RF, rheumatoid factor.Compared with healthy controls, anti-AGE and anti-MAA were most prevalent in RA (anti-AGE: 7.5% in HC vs 44.6% in RA and anti-MAA: 3.8% in HC vs 46.1% in RA) but were also present in other types of early arthritis. Within patients without RA, anti-AGE and anti-MAA were present in 32.9% and 30.3%, respectively and in non-RA AI arthritis anti-AGE and anti-MAA were found in 38.5% and 41.5%, respectively. These data indicate that the presence of anti-PTM antibodies is not specific for RA. When analysing combinations of autoantibodies, the largest subgroup of patients with RA (n=99) had all four anti-PTM antibodies (anti-AGE, anti-MAA, anti-CarP, anti-CCP2) as well as RF, after which the second largest group (n=63) was characterised by the combination of RF, anti-CCP2 and anti-CarP (figure 1C).Interestingly, 67 (34.0%) and 57 (28.9%) of patients with seronegative (RF negative, ACPA negative and anti-CarP negative) RA were positive for anti-AGE and anti-MAA, respectively. Moreover, 40 (20.3%) of these patients with seronegative RA were positive for both anti-AGE and anti-MAA. These anti-PTM responses may identify a new subgroup in the patients with otherwise seronegative RA.HLA-DRB1*03 associates with anti-AGE and anti-MAA independently of anti-CarP in patients with anti-CCP2-negative RASince HLA class II alleles are known to associate with autoantibody positivity in RA, we sought to investigate the presence of HLA-SE and its association with anti-AGE and anti-MAA antibodies. Of all patients with RA, 63.3% were HLA-SE+ (table 1). Based on the well-known association between HLA-SE and RA, the HLA-SE alleles were assessed and were significantly more prevalent in all RA subgroups compared with healthy controls. In the anti-AGE-positive group, as compared with patients with anti-AGE-negative RA however, the prevalence of HLA-SE alleles was similar (table 2). The same was true for anti-MAA; therefore, both anti-AGE and anti-MAA antibodies were not associated with HLA-SE.View inline View popup Table 2 Association between anti-AGE and anti-MAA antibodies and HLA-SE and HLA-DRB1*03 presence in RA and HLA-DRB1*03 presence in non-RA patients from the Leiden EAC cohortSince HLA-DRB1*03 is associated with seronegative RA and anti-CarP antibodies in this disease subset, we sought to investigate the association of HLA-DRB1*03 with anti-AGE and anti-MAA. In patients with RA, HLA-DRB1*03 was more prevalent in anti-AGE-positive and anti-MAA-positive patients as compared with healthy controls with OR values of 1.34 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.78, p=0.05) and 1.29 (95% CI 0.96 to 1.73, p=0.09), although this did not achieve statistical significance compared with anti-AGE-negative or anti-MAA-negative patients, respectively (table 2, part I). To investigate whether HLA-DRB1*03 is associated with anti-MAA and anti-AGE in anti-CCP2-negative RA, we focused on this subset and stratified the analysis for anti-CarP. Within the patients with anti-CCP2 negative RA, anti-AGE and anti-MAA antibodies were associated with HLA-DRB1*03 compared with healthy controls (OR: 1.98, 95% CI 1.27 to 3.07, p=0.003, and OR: 2.37, 95% CI 1.50 to 3.74, p<0.001, respectively). Anti-MAA was associated with HLA-DRB1*03 in the anti-CCP2 negative stratum independent of anti-CarP (OR: 1.91, 95% CI 1.11 to 3.30, p=0.02) (table 2, part II). In this stratified analysis, anti-AGE showed the same trend for association but did not reach significance (OR: 1.48, 95% CI 0.86 to 2.52, p=0.16). Since anti-AGE and anti-MAA often co-occur, we next stratified the association analysis for these autoantibodies, to dissect whether the observed association to HLA-DRB1*03 could be attributed to one of them in particular. After stratification for anti-AGE or anti-MAA, only patients with double positive RA showed a significant association with HLA-DRB1*03 compared with healthy controls (online supplemental table 2, part I). Since some controversy exists on the association of HLA-DRB1*03 in patients with anti-CCP2 negative RA, we investigated the association between anti-AGE and anti-MAA with HLA-DRB1*03 within patients with HLA-SE negative RA. In both HLA-SE negative and anti-CCP2 negative stratum, we find similar associations with anti-AGE/-MAA and HLA-DR1*03 (table 2, part III).In non-RA arthritis patients, both anti-AGE and anti-MAA showed a similar association with HLA-DRB1*03 with OR values of 2.34 (95% CI 1.58 to 3.47, p<0.001) and 1.94 (95% CI 1.29 to 2.92, p=0.002) compared with healthy controls (table 2, part I). In a comparison within the non-RA arthritis patients, HLA DRB1*03 remained significantly associated with anti-AGE-positive compared with anti-AGE-negative patients (OR: 2.22, 95% CI 1.28 to 3.84, p=0.01), while the association with anti-MAA did not remain significant. To disentangle the effects of anti-AGE and anti-MAA, analyses were again stratified, after which only the presence of anti-AGE in patients with anti-MAA-negative without RA remained significantly associated with HLA-DRB1*03 (online supplemental table 2, part II).Taken together, these data indicate that anti-AGE and anti-MAA associate with HLA-DRB1*03 in RA and non-RA arthritis patients, and that this association (which cannot be ascribed to anti-AGE or anti-MAA in particular) is mainly present in patients with anti-CCP2 negative RA. Similar associations were observed in patients with HLA-SE negative RA.Inflammation markers associate with anti-MAA positivity in RA and non-RA arthritisNext, we sought to investigate whether anti-PTM antibodies correlate with inflammation markers erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C reactive protein (CRP) (table 3). Higher inflammation parameters in anti-AGE- and anti-MAA-positive individuals were observed in RA and non-RA arthritis patients, and in both the autoimmune and non-autoimmune subgroups of patients with arthritis. To investigate whether both anti-MAA and anti-AGE were associated with acute phase reactants in RA independently, anti-AGE and anti-MAA were stratified for each other. After this stratification, anti-AGE was no longer associated with either CRP or ESR whereas the association of anti-MAA with these inflammation markers remained significant (online supplemental table 3). These data indicate that anti-PTM responses, especially anti-MAA, is associated with markers of inflammation in early arthritis in both RA and non-RA arthritis patients.View inline View popup Table 3 Association between anti-AGE and anti-MAA antibin RA and non-RA arthritis patientsodies and ESR and CRP levelsAnti-AGE and anti-MAA associate with radiological progression in patients with anti-CCP2-negative RAWe next analysed if the presence of anti-AGE and anti-MAA is associated with radiological progression in RA. Anti-AGE-positive patients displayed more radiographic damage per year than anti-AGE-negative patients (p<0.001) (figure 2A). Data were then stratified for anti-CCP2, which revealed that this association was mainly present in the anti-CCP2-negative subgroup (figure 2B). When anti-CCP2 negative patients were further stratified for anti-CarP, the association between anti-AGE and radiographic progression remained significant (figure 2C). This indicates that in patients with anti-CCP2 negative RA, anti-AGE is associated with radiological progression independent of anti-CarP, suggesting that this anti-PTM antibody could discriminate a different subgroup. Anti-MAA positivity was also associated with radiological progression (p=0.002) (figure 2D). This effect was also observed in the anti-CCP2-negative stratum (figure 2E), although no longer significant after stratifying for anti-CCP2. The latter could be a consequence of power as the effect size (beta) which decreased only slightly to 1.03/year, p=0.16 (figure 2E).<img width="393" alt="Figure 2" height="440" class="highwire-fragment fragment-image" src="https://rmdopen.bmj.com/content/rmdopen/9/4/e003480/F2.medium.gif">Download figure Open in new tab Download powerpoint Figure 2 Anti-AGE and anti-MAA associate with radiological progression in patients with RA (n=600). (A) Radiological progression in anti-AGE positive and negative RA. (B) Data stratified for CCP2. (C) Data stratified for anti-CarP in anti-CCP2-negative stratum. (D) Radiological progression in anti-MAA positive and negative RA. (E) Data stratified for CCP2. Data presented as estimate (95% CI), p value. AGE, advanced glycation end-product; CarP, carbamylated protein; CCP2, citrullinated cyclic peptide 2; MAA, malondialdehyde acetaldehyde adduct.Presence of anti-MAA or anti-AGE is not associated with SDFR in RANext, we sought to investigate whether anti-AGE and anti-MAA were associated with SDFR over time (online supplemental figure 3). Anti-AGE was not associated with SDFR, HR 0.93 (95% CI 0.66 to 1.30; p=0.66) which did not differ after adjusting for CCP2 status (HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.61, p=0.46). Anti-MAA-positive patients were less likely to achieve SDFR, compared with anti-MAA-negative patients, HR 0.72 (95% CI 0.51 to 1.00, p=0.053). After adjusting for CCP2 status, there was no longer an association between anti-MAA and SDFR, HR 1.05 (95% CI 0.74 to 1.50, p=0.80).DiscussionIn this study, we demonstrated that anti-AGE and anti-MAA are present in patients with RA, and interestingly also in a substantial part of patients with otherwise seronegative RA. This is not specific for RA, as anti-AGE and anti-MAA antibodies were also present in other forms of early arthritis. Both anti-AGE and anti-MAA are associated with HLA-DRB1*03 in RA, and anti-AGE is also associated with HLA-DR1*03in non-RA arthritis patients. Anti-AGE and anti-MAA are associated with a distinct clinical phenotype: anti-AGE associates with radiological progression in RA whereas anti-MAA only showed a trend with radiological progression but associated with increased inflammatory parameters in both RA and non-RA arthritis.Associations with particular HLA class II alleles have been described to occur in many seropositive AI diseases.13 14 More specifically, HLA-DRB1*03, initially reported to be associated with anti-CCP2 negative RA, was later associated with the presence of anti-CarP, although not all HLA-DRB1*03-positive patients were anti-CarP-positive.10 12 In this study, we observed that HLA-DRB1*03 was associated with anti-AGE and anti-MAA in patients with anti-CCP2 negative RA which was independent of anti-CarP, thereby identifying another subgroup of anti-CCP2 negative RA that is associated with HLA-DRB1*03. In addition, anti-AGE associated with HLA-DRB1*03 in non-RA confirming the robustness of this finding. Together, these observations provide additional insight into the association of HLA-DBR1*03 with (rheumatoid) arthritis; although these alleles are not associated with the presence of ACPA, they do appear to predispose to the formation of other autoantibodies (anti-CarP, anti-AGE and anti-MAA) in a process in which HLA class II-associated T-cell-dependent immune responses are likely to be involved.Interestingly, in RA, anti-AGE associated with radiological progression independent of anti-CCP2 and anti-CarP suggesting an additive value of anti-AGE in determining disease evolution as it could define a new subgroup of patients with RA. Strikingly, anti-AGE was not associated with SDFR. In RA and non-RA, a subgroup of patients is characterised by more extensive inflammation and the presence of anti-MAA antibodies, while a subgroup of patients with CCP2-negative RA is characterised by radiological progression and presence of anti-AGE antibodies. Based on these results, distinct subgroups within RA and non-RA can be delineated based on their specific clinical phenotype.The presence of AGE-modified proteins and anti-AGE antibodies has been observed in diabetes and hypertension.6 23 Also, in synovial tissue and sera of patients with RA, AGE-modified proteins have been detected.24–26 In addition, MAA-modified proteins have been observed before in RA tissue7 and it is clear that both modifications can be induced by inflammation and oxidative stress in the inflamed joint.5 7 Our study now adds that in a subset of the patients with RA antibodies against these PTMs are present. Additionally, anti-AGE and anti-MAA have been found to be associated with ESR in previous studies in RA and SLE.22 PTMs and anti-PTMs such as anti-AGE and anti-MAA add to the understanding that the combined presence of the antigen and the antibody could trigger effector mechanisms and contribute to the overall process of arthritis and joint damage, in RA and also in non-RA. It would therefore be interesting to investigate whether next to carbamylated proteins27 also the modifications AGE and MAA are present in cartilage and synovium. Additionally, experimental pathogenicity studies on anti-AGE and anti-MAA specifically should be performed to elucidate on the contribution of these anti-PTM antibodies to pathogenesis.There are some limitations to our study. Data on anti-CarP antibody levels were missing for 149 patients with RA; therefore, analysis using stratification including anti-CarP could only be performed in a subgroup of all patients with RA. However, this group still consists of 499 patients with RA and therefore still appears a good representation of the RA population. Radiological progression was assessed in 635 patients with RA included before 2006. Thereafter, radiographs have not been scored since radiographic damage has become rare/nearly non-existent with current treatment strategies. This effectively enabled us to detect differences in the, earlier, informative part of the cohort. When stratifying radiological progression data, groups became small and therefore could suffer from insufficient power implicating that significance could not always be reached. It is therefore important to verify associations using different and/or bigger cohorts to be able to generalise findings to the whole RA population. Additionally, in order to verify the results obtained in this study, a replication cohort is needed. In such a study, IgA and IgM responses could be included to elaborate on the full anti-PTM antibody responses in patients with (rheumatoid) arthritis.28 29 One of the strengths of this study is that the EAC is a well-defined cohort containing RA and non-RA early arthritis patients with extensive information on the HLA haplotype and radiological progression for patients with RA.15 Second, antibody responses have been investigated on the PTM-modified proteins and their control proteins. All PTMs were created on the same antigen backbone and reactivity against FCS itself was subtracted from the results. This results in reliable measurements that capture truly PTM-specific signals and decreases the chance of false observations.30 Additionally, correlation analyses were performed (data not shown) and data were stratified for the other investigated anti-PTM and to verify that anti-AGE and anti-MAA are solely responsible for the observed result and not cross-reactive.In conclusion, anti-AGE and anti-MAA antibodies are both prevalent in patients with RA, and other inflammatory rheumatic conditions, and although not specific for RA they each correlate with specific parameters. Anti-MAA associates with HLA-DRB1*03 in CCP2-negative (RA) patients independent of anti-CarP and associates with inflammation. Anti-AGE associates with HLA-DRB1*03 in patients with CCP2-negative RA and is associated with a worse radiological progression especially in patients with anti-CCP2-negative and anti-CarP-negative RA. With this study, we have now characterised a seropositive subgroup within the heterogeneous group of patients with RA that have been thus far been considered seronegative.Data availability statementData are available upon reasonable request. Requests can be sent to l.a.trouw@lumc.nl.Ethics statementsPatient consent for publicationNot applicable.Ethics approvalThe Leiden Early Arthritis Clinic (EAC) cohort was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee Leiden The Hague Delft under reference number: B19.008. For the current study, measurement of anti-PTM antibodies in serum from the EAC cohort is approved under reference number B15.003. Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part.AcknowledgmentsWe thank Marloes Verstappen and Bianca M. Boxma-de Klerk for their assistance regarding the remission analysis on EAC cohort data.References↵Trouw LA, Mahler M. Closing the serological gap: promising novel biomarkers for the early diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Autoimmun Rev 2012;12:318–22. doi:10.1016/j.autrev.2012.05.007OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed↵Schellekens GA, de Jong BA, van den Hoogen FH, et al. Citrulline is an essential constituent of antigenic determinants recognized by rheumatoid arthritis-specific autoantibodies. J Clin Invest 1998;101:273–81. doi:10.1172/JCI1316OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science↵Shi J, Knevel R, Suwannalai P, et al. Autoantibodies recognizing carbamylated proteins are present in sera of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and predict joint damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011;108:17372–7. doi:10.1073/pnas.1114465108OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵Xu H, Wang Y, Lin S, et al. PTMD: a database of human disease-associated post-translational modifications. Genom Proteom Bioinform 2018;16:244–51. doi:10.1016/j.gpb.2018.06.004OpenUrl↵Schmidt AM, Yan SD, Yan SF, et al. The multiligand receptor RAGE as a progression factor amplifying immune and inflammatory responses. J Clin Invest 2001;108:949–55. doi:10.1172/JCI14002OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science↵Nikolov A, Blazhev A, Tzekova M, et al. Serum levels of antibodies to advanced glycation end products in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Folia Med (Plovdiv) 2020;62:295–301. doi:10.3897/folmed.62.e47788OpenUrl↵Thiele GM, Duryee MJ, Anderson DR, et al. Malondialdehyde-acetaldehyde adducts and anti-malondialdehyde-acetaldehyde antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2015;67:645–55. doi:10.1002/art.38969OpenUrl↵Buongiorno AM, Morelli S, Sagratella E, et al. Immunogenicity of advanced glycation end products in diabetic patients and in nephropathic non-diabetic patients on hemodialysis or after renal transplantation. J Endocrinol Invest 2008;31:558–62. doi:10.1007/BF03346408OpenUrlPubMed↵Thiele GM, Tuma DJ, Willis MS, et al. Soluble proteins modified with acetaldehyde and malondialdehyde are Immunogenic in the absence of adjuvant. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1998;22:1731–9.OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed↵Verpoort KN, van Gaalen FA, van der Helm-van Mil AHM, et al. Association of HLA-DR3 with anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody-negative rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2005;52:3058–62. doi:10.1002/art.21302OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science↵Regueiro C, Rodriguez-Rodriguez L, Triguero-Martinez A, et al. Specific association of HLA-Drb1*03 with anti-carbamylated protein antibodies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2019;71:331–9. doi:10.1002/art.40738OpenUrl↵Jiang X, Trouw LA, van Wesemael TJ, et al. Anti-carp antibodies in two large cohorts of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and their relationship to genetic risk factors, cigarette smoking and other autoantibodies. Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:1761–8. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-205109OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵Kirino Y, Remmers EF. Genetic architectures of seropositive and seronegative rheumatic diseases. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2015;11:401–14. doi:10.1038/nrrheum.2015.41OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed↵Cruz-Tapias P, Pérez-Fernández OM, Rojas-Villarraga A, et al. Shared HLA class II in six autoimmune diseases in Latin America: a meta-analysis. Autoimmune Dis 2012;2012:569728. doi:10.1155/2012/569728↵de Rooy DPC, van der Linden MPM, Knevel R, et al. Predicting arthritis outcomes--what can be learned from the Leiden early arthritis clinic Rheumatology (Oxford) 2011;50:93–100. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keq230OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science↵Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, et al. The American rheumatism association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1988;31:315–24. doi:10.1002/art.1780310302OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science↵van Aken J, van Bilsen JH, Allaart CF, et al. The leiden early arthritis clinic. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2003;21:S100–5.OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science↵Huizinga TWJ, Amos CI, van der Helm-van Mil AHM, et al. Refining the complex rheumatoid arthritis phenotype based on specificity of the HLA-DRB1 shared EPITOPE for antibodies to citrullinated proteins. Arthritis Rheum 2005;52:3433–8. doi:10.1002/art.21385OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science↵Knevel R, Krabben A, Brouwer E, et al. Genetic variants in Il15 associate with progression of joint destruction in rheumatoid arthritis: a multicohort study. Ann Rheum Dis 2012;71:1651–7. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-200724OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵van der Heijde D. How to read radiographs according to the sharp/Van der heijde method. J Rheumatol 2000;27:261–3.OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science↵Verstappen M, van Steenbergen HW, de Jong PHP, et al. Unraveling heterogeneity within ACPA-negative rheumatoid arthritis: the subgroup of patients with a strong clinical and serological response to initiation of DMARD treatment favor disease resolution. Arthritis Res Ther 2022;24:4. doi:10.1186/s13075-021-02671-z↵Monahan RC, van den Beukel MD, Borggreven NV, et al. Autoantibodies against specific post-translationally modified proteins are present in patients with lupus and associate with major neuropsychiatric manifestations. RMD Open 2022;8:e002079. doi:10.1136/rmdopen-2021-002079↵Aso Y, Inukai T, Tayama K, et al. Serum concentrations of advanced glycation endproducts are associated with the development of atherosclerosis as well as diabetic microangiopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes. Acta Diabetol 2000;37:87–92. doi:10.1007/s005920070025OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science↵Drinda S, Franke S, Canet CC, et al. Identification of the advanced glycation end products N(Epsilon)-carboxymethyllysine in the synovial tissue of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2002;61:488–92. doi:10.1136/ard.61.6.488OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text↵de Groot L, Hinkema H, Westra J, et al. Advanced glycation endproducts are increased in rheumatoid arthritis patients with controlled disease. Arthritis Res Ther 2011;13:R205. doi:10.1186/ar3538↵Ligier S, Fortin PR, Newkirk MM. A new antibody in rheumatoid arthritis targeting glycated IgG: Igm anti-IgG-AGE. Br J Rheumatol 1998;37:1307–14. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/37.12.1307OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed↵Verheul MK, Janssen GMC, de Ru A, et al. Mass-spectrometric identification of carbamylated proteins present in the joints of rheumatoid arthritis patients and controls. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2021;39:570–7. doi:10.55563/clinexprheumatol/0ms5pkOpenUrlPubMed↵van Delft MAM, van der Woude D, Toes REM, et al. Secretory form of rheumatoid arthritis-associated autoantibodies in serum are mainly of the Igm Isotype, suggesting a continuous reactivation of autoantibody responses at mucosal surfaces. Ann Rheum Dis 2019;78:146–8. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213724OpenUrlFREE Full Text↵Mikuls TR, Duryee MJ, England BR, et al. Malondialdehyde-acetaldehyde antibody concentrations in rheumatoid arthritis and other rheumatic conditions. Int Immunopharmacol 2018;56:113–8. doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2018.01.022OpenUrl↵Åhlin E, Elshafie AI, Nur MAM, et al. Anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies in sudanese patients with leishmania donovani infection exhibit reactivity not dependent on citrullination. Scand J Immunol 2015;81:201–8. doi:10.1111/sji.12265OpenUrl

Audio Rheum Editor’s Picks Dr. Earl D. Silverman, MD, shares his monthly Editor’s Picks and their relevance in current clinical practice: June 2023 Featured articles:​ Kiltz, et al: Clinimetric Validation of the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society Health Index in Patients With Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis in Ixekizumab Trials Alduraibi, et al: Clustering Patients With Gout Based on Comorbidities and Biomarkers: A Cross-Sectional Study Primeau, et al: Responders to Medial Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy for Knee Osteoarthritis Kumthekar, et al: Physical Activity Habits Among Older Adults Living With Rheumatic Disease Wohlfahrt, et al: Pain Mechanisms Associated With Disease Activity in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated With Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs: A Regression Tree Analysis May 2023 Featured articles:​ Cook, et al: Comparative Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 Vaccines Against COVID-19 Infection Among Patients With Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases on Immunomodulatory Medications Chen, et al: Validation of the Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody Renal Risk Score and Modification of the Score in a Chinese Cohort With a Majority of Myeloperoxidase-Positive Patients Gorzewski, et al: Predicting Disease Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis With the Fibromyalgia Survey Questionnaire: Does the Severity of Fibromyalgia Symptoms Matter? Oguro, et al: Effect of Communicative and Critical Health Literacy on Trust in Physicians Among Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE): The TRUMP2-SLE Project Barber, et al: Investigating Associations Between Access to Rheumatology Care, Treatment, Continuous Care, and Healthcare Utilization and Costs Among Older Individuals With Rheumatoid Arthritis April 2023 Featured articles:​ Coates, et al: Sex-Specific Differences in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis: A Systematic Review Johnson, et al: Evaluating the Threshold Score for Classification of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Using the EULAR/ACR Criteria Gong, et al: The Association Between Quadriceps Strength and Synovitis in Knee Osteoarthritis: An Exploratory Study From the Osteoarthritis Initiative Jatuworapruk, et al: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Gout Flare in Patients Hospitalized for PCR-Confirmed COVID-19: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study Bosch, et al: Etanercept Withdrawal and Retreatment in Nonradiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis: Results of RE-EMBARK, an Open-Label Phase IV Trial March 2023 Featured articles:​ Takanashi, et al: Effects of Aging on Rheumatoid Factor and Anticyclic Citrullinated Peptide Antibody Positivity in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Kiltz, et al: Clinically Relevant Deficits in Performance Tests in Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis Schletzbaum, et al: Age-Stratified 30-day Rehospitalization and Mortality and Predictors of Rehospitalization Among Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Medicare Cohort Study Berard, et al: Canadian Rheumatology Association Recommendations for the Screening, Monitoring, and Treatment of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis-Associated Uveitis Schultz, et al: B Cell Reconstitution is Associated With COVID-19 Booster Vaccine Responsiveness in Patients Previously Seronegative Treated With Rituximab February 2023 Featured articles:​ Macfarlane, et al: Inflammatory Bowel Disease Risk in Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis Treated With Biologic Agents Determined Using the BSRBR-AS and a MetaAnalysis Gossec, et al: Women With Psoriatic Arthritis Experience Higher Disease Burden Than Men: Findings From a Real-World Survey in the United States and Europe Davis, et al: The Effect of Psychiatric Comorbidity on Healthcare Utilization for Youth With Newly Diagnosed Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Pyo, et al: The Reclassification of Patients With Previously Diagnosed Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis Based on the 2022 ACR/EULAR Criteria for Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody–Associated Vasculitis Weng, et al: Adult-Onset Still Disease After ChAdOx1 nCOV-19 Vaccination Mitchell, et al: How to Provide Sexual and Reproductive Health Care to Patients: Focus Groups With Rheumatologists and Rheumatology Advanced Practice Providers January 2023 Featured articles:​ Kodishala, et al: Risk Factors for Dementia in Patients With Incident Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Population-Based Cohort Study Beauvais, et al: Development and Validation of a Self-Administered Questionnaire Measuring Essential Knowledge in Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis Orbai, et al: Impact of Physician-Defined Flares on Quality of Life and Work Impairment: An International Survey of 2238 Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis Smitherman, et al: Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Transition-Age Young Adults With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis in the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Registry Stull, et al: Cutaneous Involvement in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Review for the Rheumatologist Masi, et al: Reflections for the 50th Anniversary of The Journal of Rheumatology: The Past, Present, and Future of Rheumatology Santos, et al: A Rare Case of Subcutaneous Sarcoidosis in Patient With Psoriatic Arthritis Garg, et al: Timing and Predictors of Incident Cardiovascular Disease in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Risk Occurs Early and Highlights Racial Disparities December 2022 Featured articles:​ Koo, et al: Relationship Between Inflammation and Radiographic Progression in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis Attaining a BASDAI of Less Than 4 During Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Treatment Sun, et al: Development and Initial Validation of a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus–Specific Measure of the Extent of and Reasons for Medication Nonadherence Patterson, et al: Physical Activity Associates With Lower Systemic Inflammatory Gene Expression in Rheumatoid Arthritis Coleman, et al: Long-Term Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Allopurinol Dose Escalation to Achieve Target Serum Urate in People With Gout Smith: Rusty and Wooden Tanomogi, et al: Extravascular Necrotizing Granuloma: A Diagnostic Clue for Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis Isnardi, et al: Immune Response to SARS-CoV-2 Third Vaccine in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Had No Seroconversion After Primary 2-Dose Regimen With Inactivated or Vector-Based Vaccines November 2022 Featured articles:​ Nelson, et al: Narrative Review of Machine Learning in Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases for Clinicians and Researchers: Biases, Goals, and Future Directions Hermans, et al: Are All Routine Spondyloarthritis Outpatient Visits Considered Useful by Rheumatologists? An Exploratory Clinical Practice Study Kallas, et al: Trajectory of Damage Accrual in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Based on Ethnicity and Socioeconomic Factors Nozawa, et al: Early Abnormal Nailfold Capillary Changes Are Predictive of Calcinosis Development in Juvenile Dermatomyositis Chevet, et al: COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake Among Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in the American Midwest: The Lupus Midwest Network (LUMEN) Remize, et al: Melorheostosis or “Dripping Candle Wax” Bone Disease Bermas: The Unintended Consequence of the Overturn of Roe v Wade: Restrictions on Methotrexate Use October 2022 Featured articles:​ Hazlewood, et al: Canadian Rheumatology Association Living Guidelines for the Pharmacological Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis With Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs Schneeberger, et al: Simplified Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (SASDAS) Versus ASDAS: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial Kasiem, et al: A Practical Guide for Assessment of Skin Burden in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis Tollisen, et al: Personally Generated Quality of Life Outcomes in Adults With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Glintborg, et al: Long-term Behavioral Changes During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Impact of Vaccination in Patients With Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases September 2022 Featured articles:​ Cagnotto, et al: Male Sex Predicts a Favorable Outcome in Early ACPA-Negative Rheumatoid Arthritis: Data From an Observational Study Hazlewood, et al: Frequency of Symptomatic Adverse Events in Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Exploratory Online Survey John M. Davis III: The Patient Experience of Drug Side Effects in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Intriguing Data From an Exploratory Online Survey Venkatachalam, et al: Taking the Long View: Patients Perceive Benefits and Risks of Treatment as Multidimensional Wallace, et al: The Association of Illness-related Uncertainty With Mental Health in Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases August 2022 Featured articles:​ Verweij, et al: Whole-Body Macrophage Positron Emission Tomography Imaging for Disease Activity Assessment in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Nguyen, et al: Secukinumab in United States Biologic-Naïve Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis: Results From the Randomized, Placebo-Controlled CHOICE Study Le Ralle, et al: Patient Acceptable Symptom State for Burden From Appearance Changes in People With Systemic Sclerosis: A Cross-sectional Survey Baggett, et al: Incidence Rates of Psoriasis in Children With Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Juvenile Arthritis Treated With Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors and Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs Carluzzo, et al: Patient Empowerment Among Adults With Arthritis: The Case for Emotional Support July 2022 Featured articles:​ Kelty, et al: Mortality Rates in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis With and Without Extraarticular Manifestations and Comorbidities: A Retrospective Cohort Study Mease, et al: Baseline Disease Activity Predicts Achievement of cDAPSA Treatment Targets With Apremilast: Phase III Results in DMARD-naïve Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis Kuwana, et al: Tacrolimus in Patients With Interstitial Pneumonia Associated With Polymyositis or Dermatomyositis: Interim Report of Postmarketing Surveillance in Japan Kiadaliri, et al: Gout and Hospital Admission for Ambulatory Care–Sensitive Conditions: Risks and Trajectories McDermott, et al: Demographic, Lifestyle, and Serologic Risk Factors for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)–associated Bronchiectasis: Role of RA-related Autoantibodies June 2022 Featured articles:​ Darabian, et al: Using FibroScan to Assess for the Development of Liver Fibrosis in Patients With Arthritis on Methotrexate: A Single-center Experience Maguire, et al: Central Obesity in Axial Spondyloarthritis: The Missing Link to Understanding Worse Outcomes in Women? Miloslavsky, et al: The Challenge of Addressing the Rheumatology Workforce Shortage Maheswaranathan, et al: Association of Health Literacy and Numeracy With Lupus Knowledge and the Creation of the Lupus Knowledge Assessment Test Emad, et al: Why Do Patients With Gout Not Take Allopurinol? May 2022 Featured articles:​ Movahedi, et al: Physician- and Patient-reported Effectiveness Are Similar for Tofacitinib and TNFi in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Data From a Rheumatoid Arthritis Registry El Tal, et al: Consensus Approach to a Treat-to-target Strategy in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Care: Report From the 2020 PR-COIN Consensus Conference Thompson, et al: Modifiable Factors and Incident Gout Across Ethnicity Within a Large Multiethnic Cohort of Older Adults Widdifield, et al: COVID-19 Vaccination Uptake Among Individuals With Immune-mediated Inflammatory Diseases in Ontario, Canada, Between December 2020 and October 2021: A Population-based Analysis Van Praet, et al: Acute Perimyocarditis in a Case of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Adults Chang, et al: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Increases the Risk of Gestational Diabetes: Truth or Illusion? McCormick and Choi: Racial Disparities in the Modern Gout Epidemic ​ April 2022 Featured articles:​ Exarchou, et al: Lifestyle Factors and Disease Activity Over Time in Early Axial Spondyloarthritis: The SPondyloArthritis Caught Early (SPACE) Cohort - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.210046 van Vollenhoven, et al: Efficacy and Safety of Ustekinumab in Patients With Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Results of a Phase II Open-label Extension Study - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.210805 Giancane, et al: Anakinra in Patients With Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Long-term Safety From the Pharmachild Registry - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.210563 Barber, et al: Best Practices for Virtual Care: A Consensus Statement From the Canadian Rheumatology Association - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.211017 Zickuhr and Mandell: Rheumatology Education Needs a Splash of Color - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.211233 Li, et al: Brain Abscess Due to Nocardia in a Patient With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus- https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.210971 ​ March 2022 Featured articles:​ te Kampe, et al: Outcomes of Care Among Patients With Gout in Europe: A Cross-sectional Survey - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.210009 Stransky, et al: Exploring Family Planning, Parenting, and Sexual and Reproductive Health Care Experiences of Men With Rheumatic Diseases - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.210785 Beckers, et al: Performance of 3 Composite Measures for Disease Activity in Peripheral Spondyloarthritis - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.210075 Sun, et al: Long-term Risk of Heart Failure and Other Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes in Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis: A Nationwide Cohort Study - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.210677 Curtis, et al: Characteristics, Comorbidities, and Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Patients With Autoimmune Conditions Treated With Systemic Therapies: A Population-based Study - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.210888 Gunasuntharam: Why Should It Be Different From the Other Side? A Parent and Pediatrician’s Perspective of a Child With Kawasaki Disease - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.211159 Lazarou, et al: Adult-onset Acute Calcific Discitis - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.210838 Khanna: Remission in Gout: Concepts From a Patient Perspective - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.211285 Coates and Tillett: How Should We Measure Peripheral Spondyloarthritis? - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.211043 ​February 2022 Featured articles:​ Rosenbaum, et al: The Interplay Between COVID-19 and Spondyloarthritis or Its Treatment - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.210742 van der Heijde, et al: Radiographic Progression of Structural Joint Damage Over 5 Years of Baricitinib Treatment in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results From RA-BEYOND - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.210346 van der Meer, et al: Extraskeletal Manifestations in Axial Spondyloarthritis Are Associated With Worse Clinical Outcomes Despite the Use of Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Therapy - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.210308 Haddad, et al: The Association of Psoriatic Arthritis With All-cause Mortality and Leading Causes of Death in Psoriatic Arthritis - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.210159 Yazdanyar, et al: Risk of 30-day Readmission After Knee or Hip Replacement in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Osteoarthritis by Non-Medicare and Medicare Payer Status - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.201370 Perez Acosta et al: Cystic Ganglionosis in a 3-year-old Mimicking Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.210558 Leung: Is Psoriatic Arthritis Associated With Higher Risk of Mortality? - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.210963 January 2022 Featured articles:​ Bermas, et al: COVID-19 in Pregnant Women With Rheumatic Disease: Data From the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.210480 Hazlewood, et al: Heterogeneity in Patient Characteristics and Differences in Treatment Across 4 Canadian Rheumatoid Arthritis Cohorts - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.201688 Panopoulos, et al: Anti-interleukin 6 Therapy Effect for Refractory Joint and Skin Involvement in Systemic Sclerosis: A Real-world, Single-center Experience - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.210273 Lieber, et al: Evaluation of a Patient-reported Frailty Tool in Women With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.201466 Philpott, et al: Synovitis Is Associated With Constant Pain in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Cross-sectional Study of OMERACT Knee Ultrasound Scores - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.210285 Fernandes, et al: Tuberculosis Presenting as an Inflammatory Pseudotumor of the Sciatic Nerve in a Rheumatoid Arthritis Patient Taking Etanercept - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.210540 Sammaritano: The Effect of COVID-19 Illness on Pregnant Patients With Rheumatic Disease: Early Reassuring Data - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.211050 December 2021 Featured articles:​ Kremer, et al: The Clinical Disease Activity Index and the Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 for Achievement of Treatment Strategies - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.200692 Müskens, et al: Does Etanercept Biosimilar Prescription in a Rheumatology Center Bend the Medication Cost Curve? - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.200565 Gladman, et al: Oligoarticular vs Polyarticular Psoriatic Arthritis: A Longitudinal Study Showing Similar Characteristics - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.210434 Showalter, et al: Esophageal Dilation and Other Clinical Factors Associated With Pulmonary Function Decline in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.210533 Holyer, et al: What Represents Treatment Efficacy in Long-term Studies of Gout Flare Prevention? An Interview Study of People With Gout - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.210476 Tam et al: My Hips Hurt: An Unusual Presentation of Bilateral Groin Pain in an Adolescent Boy - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.210362 Ferreira, et al: Definition of Treatment Targets in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Is It Time for Reappraisal? - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.210050 Jacobs, et al: Unravelling the Cost of Biological Strategies in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Kaleidoscope of Methodologies, Interpretations, and Interests - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.201510 ​ November 2021 Featured articles:​ Colantonio, et al: Higher Serum Urate Levels Are Associated With an Increased Risk for Sudden Cardiac Death - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.210139 Ochi, et al: Similarity of Response to Biologics Between Elderly-onset Rheumatoid Arthritis (EORA) and Non-EORA Elderly Patients: From the FIRST Registry - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.201135 Tanaka, et al: Effects of Denosumab in Japanese Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated With Conventional Antirheumatic Drugs: 36-month Extension of a Phase III Study - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.201376 Ye, et al: Measuring Physical Function in Psoriatic Arthritis: Comparing the Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire to the Health Assessment Questionnaire–Disability Index - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.200927 Concha, et al: Changes in Treatments and Outcomes After Implementation of a National Universal Access Program for Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.210011 Meara, et al: A Case of Chilblains-like Lesions Post SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine? - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.210226 Liu: Serum Uric Acid: A Murderer or Bystander for Cardiac-related Mortality? - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.210695 Berard and Batthish: Addressing Healthcare Quality in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis With a Universal Access Program - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.210658 October 2021 Featured articles:​ Safy-Khan, et al: Current Smoking Negatively Affects the Response to Methotrexate in Rheumatoid Arthritis in a Dose-responsive Way, Independently of Concomitant Prednisone Use - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.200213 Mease, et al: Comparison of Men and Women With Axial Spondyloarthritis in the US-based Corrona Psoriatic Arthritis/Spondyloarthritis Registry - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.201549 Feher, et al: Impaired Myocardial Flow Reserve on 82Rubidium Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.210040 Mohajer, et al: Metabolic Syndrome and Osteoarthritis Distribution in the Hand Joints: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis From the Osteoarthritis Initiative - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.210189 Fernández-Ávila, et al: Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Rheumatology Practice in Latin America - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.201623https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.201623 Gilvaz et al: A Case of Disseminated Cutaneous Mycobacterium chelonae Infection During Treatment With Tofacitinib - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.200730 Jansen, et al: Smoking and Methotrexate Inefficacy in Rheumatoid Arthritis: What About Underlying Molecular Mechanisms? - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.210217 Leung: Gender Differences in Disease Activity and Impact in Axial Spondyloarthritis - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.210564​ September 2021 Featured articles:​ Myasoedova, et al: Improved Incidence of Cardiovascular Disease in Patients With Incident Rheumatoid Arthritis in the 2000s: A Population-based Cohort Study - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.200842 Karmacharya, et al: Diagnostic Delay in Psoriatic Arthritis: A Population-based Study - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.201199 Clément, et al: Real-world Risk of Relapse of Giant Cell Arteritis Treated With Tocilizumab: A Retrospective Analysis of 43 Patients - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.200595 Master, et al: Joint Association of Moderate-to-vigorous Intensity Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior With Incident Functional Limitation: Data From the Osteoarthritis Initiative - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.201250 Sheth et al: Improving Pneumococcal Vaccination Rates in Rheumatology Patients by Using Best Practice Alerts in the Electronic Health Records - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.200806 Bathon: Is the Gap in Incidence of Cardiovascular Events in Rheumatoid Arthritis Really Closing? - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.210366 Villiger: Giant Cell Arteritis: Real-life Experience - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.210334 Gazitt, et al: Spinal Stenosis Caused by Calcinosis in a Patient With Systemic Sclerosis - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.201389 De Boer and Goekoop: Posttraumatic Chylous Knee Effusion - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.191050 August 2021 Featured articles:​ Vu, et al: Impact of Comorbid Conditions on Healthcare Expenditure and Work-related Outcomes in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.200231 Taylor, et al: A Phase III Randomized Study of Apremilast, an Oral Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitor, for Active Ankylosing Spondylitis - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.201088 Falasinnu, et al: The Problem of Pain in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: An Explication of the Role of Biopsychosocial Mechanisms - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.200595 Hazlewood, et al: Canadian Rheumatology Association Recommendation for the Use of COVID-19 Vaccination for Patients With Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.210288 Aljaberi et al: Maintaining Hepatitis B Protection in Immunocompromised Pediatric Rheumatology and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.200283 Bechman, et al: The COVID-19 Vaccine Landscape: What a Rheumatologist Needs to Know - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.210106 Rahman: Why Do Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Suffer Pain? - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.210057 Awqati, et al: Ulcerative Paraneoplastic Dermatomyositis in the Setting of Positive Transcriptional Intermediary Factor 1-γ Antibody - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.200399 Shinoda, et al: Widespread Mechanic’s Hands in Antisynthetase Syndrome With Anti-OJ Antibody - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.201043 July 2021 Featured articles:​ Pathi, et al: The Rheumatoid Arthritis Gene Expression Signature Among Women Who Improve or Worsen During Pregnancy: A Pilot Study - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.201128 Stovall, et al: Relation of NSAIDs, DMARDs, and TNF Inhibitors for Ankylosing Spondylitis and Psoriatic Arthritis to Risk of Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.200453 Mehta, et al: Giant Cell Arteritis and COVID-19: Similarities and Discriminators. A Systematic Literature Review - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.200766 Widdifield, et al: Feminization of the Rheumatology Workforce: A Longitudinal Evaluation of Patient Volumes, Practice Sizes, and Physician Remuneration - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.201166 Bachiller-Corral et al: Risk of Severe COVID-19 Infection in Patients With Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.200755 Ornetti, et al: Perforating Rheumatoid Nodule Mimicking Malignant Soft-tissue Mass of the Forearm - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.201290 Guillaune-Czitrom, et al: A Recurrent Central Band Keratopathy in a Child - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.200462 June 2021 Featured articles:​ Xie, et al: Benefits of Methotrexate Use on Cardiovascular Disease Risk Among Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Initiating Biologic Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.191326 Jørgensen, et al: Relation Between Fatigue and ACR Response in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis Treated With Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Therapy: A Population-based Cohort Study - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.191107 Dominguez, et al: Relationship Between Genetic Risk and Age of Diagnosis in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.200002 Coffey, et al: Hospitalization Rates Are Highest in the First 5 Years of Systemic Sclerosis: Results From a Population-based Cohort (1980–2016) - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.200737 Singh and Cleveland: Hospitalized Infections in People With Osteoarthritis: A National US Study - https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.191383 May 2021 Featured articles:​ Ozen, et al: The Risk of Cardiovascular Events Associated With Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Rheumatoid Arthritis - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.200265 Ogdie, et al: Descriptive Comparisons of the Effect of Apremilast and Methotrexate Monotherapy in Oligoarticular Psoriatic Arthritis: The Corrona Psoriatic Arthritis/Spondyloarthritis Registry Results - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.191209 Kim, et al: Lupus Low Disease Activity State Achievement Is Important for Reducing Adverse Outcomes in Pregnant Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.200802 Mossel, et al: Clinical Phenotyping of Primary Sjögren Syndrome Patients Using Salivary Gland Ultrasonography: Data From the RESULT Cohort - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.200482 Panwar et al: Whole-body MRI Quantification for Assessment of Bone Lesions in Chronic Nonbacterial Osteomyelitis Patients Treated With Pamidronate: A Prevalence, Reproducibility, and Responsiveness Study - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.200329 April 2021 Featured articles:​ Barber, et al: Evaluating Quality of Care for Rheumatoid Arthritis for the Population of Alberta Using System-level Performance Measures - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.200420 Liu, et al: Physical Activity and Attitudes Toward Exercise in People With Axial and Peripheral Spondyloarthritis - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.200354 Harkey, et al: A Decline in Walking Speed Is Associated With Incident Knee Replacement in Adults With and at Risk for Knee Osteoarthritis - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.200176 Mendel, et al: CanVasc Consensus Recommendations for the Management of Antineutrophil Cytoplasm Antibody-associated Vasculitis: 2020 Update - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.200721 Gkrouzman, et al: Antiphospholipid Antibody Profile Stability Over Time: Prospective Results From the APS ACTION Clinical Database and Repository - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.200513 March 2021 Featured articles:​ Almaghlouth, et al: Propensity Score Methods in Rare Disease: A Demonstration Using Observational Data in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.200254 Faye, et al: Risk of Adverse Outcomes in Hospitalized Patients With Autoimmune Disease and COVID-19: A Matched Cohort Study From New York City - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.200989 Grosse, et al: Evaluation of Bone Erosions in Rheumatoid Arthritis: The Ultrasound Score for Erosions Versus the Modified Sharp/van der Heijde Score for Erosions - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.200286 Liew, et al: Cardiovascular Risk Scores in Axial Spondyloarthritis Versus the General Population: A Cross-sectional Study - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.200188 van Leeuwen, et al: Association Between Centromere- and Topoisomerase-specific Immune Responses and the Degree of Microangiopathy in Systemic Sclerosis - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.191331 February 2021 Featured articles:​ Kiltz, et al: Ixekizumab Improves Functioning and Health in the Treatment of Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis: Week 52 Results from 2 Pivotal Studies - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.200093 Sarabia, et al: The Pattern of Musculoskeletal Complaints in Patients With Suspected Psoriatic Arthritis and Their Correlation With Physical Examination and Ultrasound - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.190857 te Kampe, et al: Sex Differences in the Clinical Profile Among Patients With Gout: Cross-sectional Analyses of an Observational Study - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.200113 Walscheid, et al: Enthesitis-related Arthritis: Prevalence and Complications of Associated Uveitis in Children and Adolescents From a Population-based Nationwide Study in Germany - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.191085 Master, et al: Does the 1-year Decline in Walking Speed Predict Mortality Risk Beyond Current Walking Speed in Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis? - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.200259 January 2021 Featured articles:​ Fisher, et al: Tofacitinib Persistence in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Retrospective Cohort Study - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.191252 Thomas, et al: Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Monotherapy Versus Combination Therapy for the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis: Combined Analysis of European Biologics Databases - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.190815 Blaja, et al: The Challenge of Very Early Systemic Sclerosis: A Combination of Mild and Early Disease? - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.190976 Zhai, et al: Phenylalanine Is a Novel Marker for Radiographic Knee Osteoarthritis Progression: The MOST Study - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.200054 Koppikar, et al: Improving Hydroxychloroquine Dosing and Toxicity Screening at a Tertiary Care Ambulatory Center: A Quality Improvement Initiative - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.191265 December 2020 Featured articles:​ Foers, et al: Circulating Small Noncoding RNA Biomarkers of Response to Triple Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drug Therapy in White Women With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.191012 Wade, et al: Serum MicroRNA Signature as a Diagnostic and Therapeutic Marker in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.190602 Schwartz, et al: Utility of the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire to Monitor Patient Beliefs in Systemic Vasculitis - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.190828 Correll, et al: Identifying Research Priorities among Patients and Families of Children with Rheumatic Diseases Living in the United States - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.190934 Bitar, et al: Five-year Evolution Patterns of Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in Patients with Lower-limb Osteoarthritis and Their Sociodemographic and Clinical Correlates - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.190854 November 2020 Featured articles:​ Cañete, et al: Expert Consensus on a Set of Outcomes to Assess the Effectiveness of Biologic Treatment in Psoriatic Arthritis: The MERECES Study - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.191056 Aguirre, et al: Using Process Improvement and Systems Redesign to Improve Rheumatology Care Quality in a Safety Net Clinic - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.190472 Stern, et al: Analysis of Anti-RNA Polymerase III Antibody-positive Systemic Sclerosis and Altered GPATCH2L and CTNND2 Expression in Scleroderma Renal Crisis - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.190945 Langlois, et al: Rituximab and Cyclophosphamide in Antisynthetase Syndrome–related Interstitial Lung Disease: An Observational Retrospective Study - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.190505 Moore, et al: Role of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Regarding Patients at Risk of Increased Disease Activity and Cardiovascular Comorbidity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.190875 October 2020 Featured articles:​ Pappas, et al: Effectiveness of Tocilizumab in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Is Unaffected by Comorbidity Burden or Obesity: Data from a US Registry - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.190282 van Bentum, et al: The Ankylosing Spondylitis Performance Index: Reliability and Feasibility of an Objective Test for Physical Functioning - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.191063 Walsh, et al: Measuring Outcomes in Psoriatic Arthritis: Comparing Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data and Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.190219 Liang, et al: Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis: Prevalence, Risk Factors, Outcome, and Outcome-related Factors in Adult Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.190542 Kelly, et al: Scope of Outcomes in Trials and Observational Studies of Interventions Targeting Medication Adherence in Rheumatic Conditions: A Systematic Review - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.190726 September 2020 Featured articles:​ Kuettel, et al: Pain and Self-reported Swollen Joints Are Main Drivers of Patient-reported Flares in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results from a 12-month Observational Study - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.190760 Ben-Shabat, et al: Mortality among Patients with Giant Cell Arteritis: A Large-scale Population-based Cohort Study - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.190927 Tselios, et al: Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease in Lupus Nephritis: Is Dialysis Inevitable? - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.191064 Putman, et al: The Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials in High-impact Rheumatology Journals, 1998–2018 - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.191306 Loef, et al: Health-related Quality of Life in Patients with Hand Osteoarthritis from the General Population and the Outpatient Clinic - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.190781 July 2020 Featured articles:​ Harrold, et al: Longterm, Real-world Safety of Adalimumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Analysis of a Prospective US-based Registry - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.190260 Bakewell,et al: Imaging Techniques: Options for the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Treatment of Enthesitis in Psoriatic Arthritis - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.190512 Hoge, et al: Association of Poverty Income Ratio with Physical Functioning in a Cohort of Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.190991 Dai, et al: Sleep Quality Is Related to Worsening Knee Pain in Those with Widespread Pain: The Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.181365 Aydin, etla: The Relationship Between Physical Examination and Ultrasonography of Large Entheses of the Achilles Tendon and Patellar Tendon Origin - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.190169 back to top June 2020 Featured articles:​ Sepriano, et al: Adherence to Treat-to-target Management in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Associated Factors: Data from the International RA BIODAM Cohort - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.190303 Zardin-Moraes, et al: Prevalence of Psoriatic Arthritis Patients Achieving Minimal Disease Activity in Real-world Studies and Randomized Clinical Trials: Systematic Review with Metaanalysis - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.190677 Desbois, et al: Rituximab-associated Vasculitis Flare: Incidence, Predictors, and Outcome - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.190076 Bollhalder, et al: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Followup of Temporomandibular Joint Inflammation, Deformation, and Mandibular Growth in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Patients Receiving Systemic Treatment - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.190168 Colaco, et al: Predictive Utility of Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Algorithms in Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases: A Systematic Review - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.190261 May 2020 Featured articles:​ Skougaard, et al: ELECTOR: eHealth in rheumatology - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.181362 Lee, et al: Cesarean births in AS - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.190754 Quinn, et al: Exercise echocardiography in SSc - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.190226 Gibson, et al: FM assessment screenting tool - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.190277 Qendro, et al: Immunization in rheumatic diseases - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.181376 April 2020 Featured articles:​ Keystone, et al: Primary/secondary nonresponse to anti-TNF - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.190102 Singh and Cleveland: Insurance, income, and TSA outcomes - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.190287 Mukwikwi, et al: SLE retinal complications - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.181102 Rosato, et al: SSc renal parenchymal thickness - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.190165 Elfishawi, et al: Changes in incident gout - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.190346 Cron and Chatham: The Rheumatologist’s Role in COVID-19 - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.200334 Peschken: Possible Consequences of a Shortage of Hydroxychloroquine for Lupus Patients Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.200395 Putman and Ruderman: Learning from Adversity: Lessons from the COVID-19 Crisis - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.200411 March 2020 Featured articles:​ Agca, et al: CV risk in RA - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.180726 Perruccio, et al: PASDAS and MDA in PsA - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.181472 Bruschi, et al: NET in SLE/lupus nephritis - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.181232 Cook, et al: Statins and revision arthroplasty - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.180574 Singh, et al: Effectiveness of allopurinol in gout - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.190522 February 2020 Featured articles:​ Jamal, et al: Adverse events and cancer immunotherapy - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.190084 Ormseth, et al: Plasma miRNA RA panel - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.181029 Rostami, et al: AS risk prediction - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.181209 de Vries-Bouwstra, et al: Recommendation agreement in SSc - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.181173 Bowes, et al: Automated cartilage segmentation - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.180541 back to top January 2020 Featured articles:​ Bechman, et al: Placebo response in RA - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.190008 Yusuf: Editorial - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.190900 Walsh, et al: axSpA identification methods - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.181005 Urowitz, et al: AVE in SLE in decades - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.180986 Ying, et al: VA SSc stroke risk - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.181311 Mills, et al: Rheumatic diseases and pregnancy - doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.181067 Author Interviews Q & A: Catherine Bakewell, MD, Sibel Zehra Aydin, MD, Lihi Eder, MD, PhD, and Gurjit S. Kaeley, MBBS, MRCP, RhMSUS Editor-in-Chief Dr. Earl Silverman speaks with Dr. Catherine Bakewell from the Intermountain Healthcare Medical Group Salt Lake Clinic, Dr. Sibel Zehra Aydin from the University of Ottawa, Dr. Lihi Eder at the Women’s College Hospital, and Dr. Gurjit S. Kaeley from the University of Florida about their and their co-authors' review article "Imaging Techniques: Options for the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Treatment of Enthesitis in Psoriatic Arthritis". For the full article: Imaging Techniques: Options for the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Treatment of Enthesitis in Psoriatic Arthritis by Catherine Bakewell, Sibel Zehra Aydin, Veena K. Ranganath, Lihi Eder and Gurjit S. Kaeley. [Read the full transcript.] For the video interview: Viewing Rheum Q & A: Daniel K. White, PT, ScD, MSc Editor-in-Chief Dr. Earl Silverman speaks with Dr. Daniel K. White from the University of Delaware about his and his co-authors' editorial "Walk At Least 10 Minutes a Day for Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis: Recommendation for Minimal Activity During the COVID-19 Pandemic". For the full article: Walk At Least 10 Minutes a Day for Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis: Recommendation for Minimal Activity During the COVID-19 Pandemic by Jason T. Jakiela, Esther J. Waugh, and Daniel K. White. [Read the full transcript.] For the video interview: Viewing Rheum Q & A: Dr. Roberto Caricchio, MD Editor-in-Chief Dr. Earl Silverman speaks with Dr. Roberto Caricchio from Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University about his and his co-author's letter Rheumatologists and Pulmonologists at Temple University Weather the COVID-19 Storm Together. For the full article: Rheumatologists and Pulmonologists at Temple University Weather the COVID-19 Storm Together by Roberto Caricchio and Gerard J. Criner. [Read the full transcript.] For the video interview: Viewing Rheum Q & A: Drs. Michael S. Putman, MD, and Eric M. Ruderman, MD Editor-in-Chief Dr. Earl Silverman speaks with Drs. Michael S. Putman and Eric M. Ruderman from Northwestern University about their editorial Learning from Adversity: Lessons from the COVID-19 Crisis. For the full article: Learning from Adversity: Lessons from the COVID-19 Crisis by Michael S. Putman and Eric M. Ruderman. [Read the full transcript.] For the video interview: Viewing Rheum Q & A: Drs. Rosie Scuccimarri, MD, Evelyn Sutton, MD, and Mary-Ann Fitzcharles, MB, ChB Editor-in-Chief Dr. Earl Silverman speaks with Drs. Rosie Scuccimarri from McGill University, Evelyn Sutton from Dalhousie University, and Mary-Ann Fitzcharles from McGill University about their editorial Hydroxychloroquine: A Potential Ethical Dilemma for Rheumatologists during the COVID-19 Pandemic. For the full article: Hydroxychloroquine: A Potential Ethical Dilemma for Rheumatologists during the COVID-19 Pandemic by Rosie Scuccimarri, Evelyn Sutton, and Mary-Ann Fitzcharles. [Read the full transcript.] For the video interview: Viewing Rheum back to top Audio Abstracts Dr. James T. Rosenbaum For the full article: The Effect of HLA-B27 on Susceptibility and Severity of Covid-19 by James T. Rosenbaum, Hedley Hamilton, Michael H. Weisman, John D. Reveille, Kevin L. Winthrop, and Dongseok Choi. [Read the full transcript.] Dr. Niv Ben-Shabat, BMSc For the full article: Mortality among Patients with Giant Cell Arteritis: A Large-scale Population-based Cohort Study by Niv Ben-Shabat, Shmuel Tiosano, Ora Shovman, Doron Comaneshter, Yehuda Shoenfeld, Arnon D. Cohen and Howard Amital Dr. Gisele Vajgel, MD For the full article: Effect of a Single Apolipoprotein L1 Gene Nephropathy Variant on the Risk of Advanced Lupus Nephritis in Brazilians by Gisele Vajgel, Suelen Cristina Lima, Diego Jeronimo S. Santana, Camila B.L. Oliveira, Denise Maria N. Costa, Pamela J. Hicks, Maria Alina G.M. Cavalcante, Carl D. Langefeld, Lucila Maria Valente, Sergio Crovella, Gianna Mastroianni Kirsztajn, Barry I. Freedman and Paula Sandrin-Garcia Dr. Paula Muilu, MD For the full article: Opioid Use among Patients with Early Inflammatory Arthritides Compared to the General Population by Paula Muilu, Vappu Rantalaiho, Hannu Kautiainen, Lauri Juhani Virta and Kari Puolakka. [Read the full transcript.] Dr. Marie Skougaard, MD For the full article: Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Acquire Sustainable Skills for Home Monitoring: A Prospective Dual-country Cohort Study (ELECTOR Clinical Trial I) by Marie Skougaard, Henning Bliddal, Robin Christensen, Karen Ellegaard, Sabrina M. Nielsen, Jakub Zavada, Sabina Oreska, Niels S. Krogh, Christian C. Holm, Merete L. Hetland, Jiri Vencovsky, Henrik Røgind, Peter C. Taylor and Henrik Gudbergsen. [Read the full transcript.] back to top Techniques Dr. Edward C. Keystone, MD, FRCP(C) For the full article: The Dorsal 4-finger Technique: A Novel Method to Examine Metacarpophalangeal Joints in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis by Mohammed A. Omair, Pooneh Akhavan, Ali Naraghi, Shikha Mittoo, Juan Xiong, Deborah Weber, Daming Lin, Melissa Weber, and Edward C. Keystone. [Read the full transcript.] back to top Contents Author Interviews Audio Abstracts Techniques Editor's Picks Archives Author Interviews Audio Abstracts Editor's Picks 2019 Editor's Picks 2018

In the last of our series showcasing our Best Practice Award winners, we talk to the rheumatology team at North Bristol NHS Trust, who developed an education programme to help support arthritis patients. The rheumatology team at North Bristol NHS Trust won their Best Practice Award for their Living Well Pathway, developed to help patients living with inflammatory arthritis. The course was designed to support both physical and psychological wellbeing, empowering patients to feel more in control of their health. The project The project was set up to incorporate NICE guidelines, which state that patients should be offered education and self-management within one month of diagnosis and should be helped to adjust to their condition. The pathway is split into two parts; a Living Well event for newly diagnosed patients and a Living Well course for people who have been diagnosed for a year or more. Clinical psychologist Kate Druett, who helped set the programme up, said: “We wanted to make sure all our patients were aware of the different services available within our team to support them. We also wanted to be holistic and supportive in terms of both physical and emotional wellbeing.” The Living Well event has seen 77 patients attend since it began in March 2017: It's signposting and information session giving patients the opportunity to meet the rheumatology team and other patients with inflammatory arthritis During a series of interactive talks, patients can ask questions and find out what support is available, as well as what might help with managing their condition These run for 2.5 hours every other month and alternate between a morning or evening slot so it’s accessible for people who work. Attendees have found the inclusion of a talk by a patient volunteer particularly valuable; this provides a picture of their own experience, a talk about what they have found helpful in learning to live with the condition, and offers hope for the future. The Living Well course was completed by 56 patients between October 2017-September 2019. It: Is aimed at helping patients who are at least one-year post diagnosis cope with their symptoms Weekly course, seven sessions of 2.5 hours each Includes a two-month 'reunion' follow-up Covers issues like fatigue, stress, keeping active, and goal-setting. Kate explains: “We interchange who runs the course amongst the team, but we have representatives from Specialist Nursing, Occupational Therapy and Psychology.” Another key element is the social aspect and patients supporting each other in the community once the course comes to an end. Kate says: “Patients are encouraged to meet informally amongst themselves to help keep the momentum going and put what they've learnt into practice.” Following the course, many patients have reported an increase in confidence in knowing where to get help with their condition and have seen improvements in their mood. Kate says: “One of the key benefits we’ve seen is that people report a lift in their confidence. Before the course patients may have been struggling with fatigue or pain for some time and lost a lot of their confidence. They often tell us they feel low and isolated, finding day-to-day activities difficult, and often feel quite stuck.” She continues: “It’s been rewarding to hear how people have really valued the opportunity to meet and learn from others. Patients have often made many changes, such as taking regular time for themselves to swim or get back to day-to-day activities they used to enjoy, such as cooking. Others made changes at work so that it's more manageable, or made plans to return to work.” The team use an active and supportive group of volunteers to help them run the signposting event. Feedback and discussion with previous participants help with continued reviewing of the course content Kate explains: “They've contributed to the content based on their experience of what would have been helpful to them when they were diagnosed. We know people find strength and encouragement from hearing from other patients who have been through similar circumstances.”  What happens next? Post-pandemic, the team will restart the courses and will look at putting some of the content online. Kate says: “We’ve recorded some short films with our participants so that they can be used on our website to encourage other patients to get involved. Plus, we want to get some of the other useful information online.”. What did the judges say? The judges commended the team for helping patients take control of their health and have better outcomes. BSR’s Chief Executive, Ali Rivett, says: “I was particularly impressed by how patient-focused this initiative was. Patients are involved in the design and delivery of the programme, alongside their AHP team. Participant feedback is positive, with reported increases in patient activation measures alongside other key metrics.” Congratulations to all our winners, who are working hard to improve the lives of patients. Best Practice Awards

We've published an updated guideline on the treatment of giant cell arteritis (GCA), a condition diagnosed in around 2,500 people in the UK every year. It’s a serious, autoimmune condition in which blood vessels become inflamed and can restrict blood flow. We spoke to guideline co-lead, Dr Sarah Mackie, about what's changed and how the guideline improves care for patients across the UK. GCA affects the blood supply to the scalp, jaw muscles or the back of the eye and is treated with high-dose glucocorticoids (steroids). If left untreated, it can lead to blindness or stroke. Fortunately, in most cases GCA is caught in time, but it's thought that up to one in five patients may experience a degree of permanent loss of vision from the disease. This means early diagnosis and prompt treatment is essential. Our updated guideline aims to ensure clinicians have the latest information about the diagnosis and treatment of the condition. It brings the latest peer-reviewed evidence up-to-date and supports clinicians in providing the best treatment for people with GCA. Dr Sarah Mackie, Associate Clinical Professor in Vascular Rheumatology at the University of Leeds, co-led the development of the guideline, working with over 35 national and international experts in the field, including rheumatologists, GPs, ophthalmologists and patients. It involved a rigorous process using a framework for evidence appraisal called GRADE, coupled with BSR's guidelines protocol, which is endorsed by NICE. Dr Mackie says: “The way patients with suspected GCA have been assessed and treated is variable across the UK. Giant cell arteritis is time-critical; a delay in starting high-dose steroid treatment can cause blindness, but this same treatment can cause serious side-effects, so this is not a matter to be taken lightly. We recommend all patients are referred to a specialist who can see them promptly – on the same working day if possible and in all cases within three working days.” There have been major developments in the treatment of giant cell arteritis since the last guideline was produced in 2010, particularly with imaging and biologic therapy. Dr Mackie continues: “This guideline provides a coherent statement of what is the latest best practice. It also means that care can be standardised for all patients.” The two major new areas of evidence are: Diagnostic imaging: The guideline recommends a sequence of tests, including if possible, the use of vascular ultrasound before a temporal artery biopsy for a faster, accurate diagnosis. It can often be useful to do both an ultrasound and a temporal artery biopsy; the guidelines explain when to do this. Ultrasound for diagnosis for GCA is quite a new test and not all hospitals have access to this yet. Biologic therapy: Since the previous guidelines, the drug tocilizumab has been licensed for GCA, prescribed alongside steroids for patients who have relapsed, as well as for the small minority who do not respond to initial steroid treatment. Trials suggest adding tocilizumab can reduce the risk of further relapse and so lessen patients’ overall exposure to steroids. The guideline reviews this latest evidence. The guideline also includes practical information for clinicians including what symptoms to check, what tests to do, steroid dosing and care pathways. Charities such as PMRGCA UK, which was involved in the development of the updated guideline, welcomes this development. Humphrey Hodgson, Chair of Trustees for PMRGCA UK, says it's vital the guideline is rolled out across the UK: “These new guidelines have the power, if implemented fully, to transform the diagnosis and treatment of giant cell arteritis. Too often our charity learns of cases of people losing all or some of their sight needlessly because diagnosis was delayed, or the wrong treatment given. People with GCA have the right to fast-track treatment to save their sight just as fast-track treatment has transformed outcomes for those who have strokes.” Dr Mackie concludes: “These guidelines help clinicians who are trying to improve their local service for patients with suspected GCA. The standardised approach to care outlined in the guidelines supports clinicians in conversations with their managers about developing business cases for investment in this area. By talking about the guideline and using it, we'll help raise the profile of this condition and drive forward best practice.”