Didactics and Technology in Education

A pesar de las ideas simplistas atribuidas a Bloom, así como la asociación equivocada que se le hizo a su taxonomía con el conductismo, esta sigue teniendo tanta validez hoy en día que recientemente se le han hecho dos actualizaciones. Consulte aquí tanto la taxonomía original, como sus actualizaciones; una de ellas, adaptada a la era digital.

http://eductechalogy.org/swfapp/blooms/wheel/engage.swf

Interactive animation that breaks down the 'wheel' - includes suggested 'tools' that could be used for different related activities.

A tad skeuomorphic for my tastes but the thinking behind it, is great…

Para el diseño de actividades y determinación de RED.

I'm on a personal campaign to add 2 levels above Creating to Bloom's Cognitive Taxonomy (don't forget he wrote about 3 domains of learning...Cognitive, Affective, and Psychomotor). I believe our field tends to overemphasize the Cognitive domain at the expense of the other 2, and to the detriment of learners.

Anyhow, the 2 levels above Creating that I'm concerned about are: Reflecting and Sharing. My reasoning goes like this:

Reflecting - Once we go through all 6 levels (and they are not hierarchical, a learning sequence can start or end with any of them), if we want students to enhance their metacognition, it is important for us to build in reflective experiences. Such experiences enhance students' abilities to be more self-aware of how they learn and the strategies that do or don't work well for them.

Sharing - We teachers often remark that our knowledge of a particular topic solidifies when we teach it to someone else...the act of sharing brings out our awareness of nuances, relationships, perceptions, modes of expression/communication, and our interpersonal skills of working with others; all things that are very important to people's success in our current era. Our students deserve to become proficient in sharing effectively.

My 2 cents.