Peter Preston could have quoted Eli Pariser in this article as what he describes is in essence the filter bubble.
His point is that print gave us exposure to much more content than what we wanted; and that was good. It helped us discover and not just search. It confronted us to new thoughts and content we appreciated even though we weren't looking for it.
Though I agree with the risks described, Preston seems to think digital is to blame for that and that print is the only alternative. I beg to differ. There are many opportunities for discovery that already exist in the digital space and much more to develop. Social curation, in particular, has a great role to play to break the self-fulfilling prophecies of filtering algorithms.
To be wished for a great digital 2012?

Your new post is loading...