Our knowledge sharing institutions of today are beginning to “humanize,” to focus more of their resources on creating readable, shareable media than on reporting cold, hard facts, simply to stay relevant and on top of peoples’ online radars. To make facts more palatable, many medias will interpret ideas with respect to their own unique brand Point-of-View, one only has to consider CNN versus FOX news here in the USA. But, do institutions who stand and a major knowledge source for world readers have a responsibility to keep bias out of their findings?
|
|
Scooped by
Guillaume Decugis
onto Content curation trends November 25, 2013 10:46 AM
|

Your new post is loading...
As social media is quickly becoming the most important distribution channel for information, @theclairbyrd observes that editors and writers are adapting by making their content more viral and engaging but also less objective.
I wanted to elaborate on her post to reflect on whether content curators were also adding to that trend.
Is Content Curation biased?
At first look it seems that yes. As content curators, we're humans and we all have an agenda - consciously or not. And the very nature of curation implies editing, enriching and spinning content in a different light for our own audience. When we edit a title, when we add an insight, we bring value and meaning but this is not neutral.
But on the other hand, while we can't escape our human conditions and the biases that come with it, we content curators can also play an important role to turn information into objective knowledge. By linking to sources, by publishing several pieces of content on the same topic, by giving voice to various opinions, we can give a more complete picture than a single point of view. And because we don't create the content we curate, we don't have the bias of ownership but can show other conflicting sources to let our readers make up their minds from a plurality of opinions.
Have you tried that with your own curated content? Do you use content curation as a way to show multiple points of views on the topic you curate?