Glossarissimo!

Fuentes de Información para Traducción e Interpretación:

• Asociaciones Profesionales
• Bases de datos
• Diccionarios y Glosarios
• Directorios de Traductotres
• Listas de Correo
• Revistas electrónicas

"Many of the posters held by the Art and Architecture Collection were the gift of Anna Palmer (Mrs. Henry) Draper, who was, until her death in 1914, an important donor and supporter of the Library. The sources for much of the rest of the collection are unclear, although identification on a number of posters points to the collection of Theodore J. Taylor as their source. The total number of posters is more than 1,200; over time the entire holding will appear in Digital Gallery. In the decades of the 1930s and 40s, Library staff mounted the posters on card stock and bound them into large volumes, alphabetically by artist."

"Free online tool to automatically summarize any text in a few clicks."

"The Bluebook. Few books cause law students as much dread, pain, anger, and frustration as The Bluebook.
The Bluebook, formally titled The Bluebook: A Uniform System of Citation, is the style manual for citing to legal documents within the United States. It is now in its 20th edition, more than an inch thick, and consists of over 500 pages of guidance on legal citation. Needless to say, it is large, a bit unwieldy, and challenging at first. However, it is an essential book that every lawyer should know how to use.
Most of The Bluebook, however, is irrelevant for many people who create legal documents. You can ignore more than two-thirds of the book if all you need to do is to cite cases and statutes -- which covers most of the first year of law school, and a lot of litigation. In fact, if you're dealing only with cases, litigation documents and laws, you might be able to find the answer to your question using the cheat sheet on the inside back cover."

"Machine translation (MT) with post-editing (PE) is fast becoming a standard practice in our industry. This means that organizations need to be able to easily identify, qualify, train and evaluate post-editors’ performances.
Today, there are many methodologies in use, resulting in a lack of cohesive standards as organizations take various approaches for evaluating performance. Some use final output quality evaluation or post-editor productivity as a standalone metric. Others analyze quality data such as “over-edit” or “under-edit” of the post-editor’s effort or evaluate the percentage of MT suggestions used versus MT suggestions that are discarded in the ..."