Rhode Island Lawyer, David Slepkow
3.0K views | +1 today
Follow
Rhode Island Lawyer, David Slepkow
RI Divorce, Family Law, Child Custody, Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyer
Curated by David Slepkow
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Rescooped by David Slepkow from California Car Accident and Injury Attorney News
Scoop.it!

California DMV Delays Setting New Rules for Driverless Cars Pending Further Input

California DMV Delays Setting New Rules for Driverless Cars Pending Further Input | Rhode Island Lawyer, David Slepkow | Scoop.it
The DMV will miss a New Year's deadline set by a state Senate bill to establish regulations for driverless cars.

Via Steven M. Sweat
David Slepkow's insight:

Google's prototype car will be cruising Northern California streets next year, according to an announcement this week on the Self-Driving Car Project's Google+ page. BMW and Mercedes-Benz have also developed similar vehicles.

Many transportation experts agree that autonomous cars should be safer than human drivers who are more prone to making mistakes because they have slower response times and become distracted by text messages, sports scores, and YouTube videos on their phones while driving.

"The car does not get distracted," said Mario Gerla, a UCLA computer science professor who researched driverless cars as part of a project studying traffic and air pollution. "Most of the accidents are caused by human error."

But one aspect that must be addressed, Gerla says, is the potential for malicious attacks on the vehicles' software system: Cars that drive without humans at the wheel would essentially be huge moving computers that rely on vehicle-to-vehicle communication to determine road conditions and movement, he said. Unless this information is securely transmitted, the system could be hacked, inaccurate information could be disseminated and large-scale accidents could occur, Gerla said.

That lack of control — and a reliance on a computer system instead of a human — could cause considerable anxiety about hopping into a driverless car, said Brian Taylor, director of UCLA's Institute of Transportation Studies.

There's also the fact that because of their precision driving and enhanced response times, autonomous cars could do something that causes passengers to grit their teeth and ball their fists in fear: tailgate.

Those shorter distances between cars traveling at relatively high velocity would take some getting used to, said Jim Moore, director of USC's Transportation Engineering Program.

Taylor emphasized that there would be many intermediate steps taken that will ease consumers into the idea of riding in vehicles that they are not driving themselves. Already, cars have some automated components such as antilock brakes, sensors for parallel parking and cruise control.

Though driverless cars are being tested now, the infrastructure needed to help autonomous cars interact with roads customized for them and realize the technology's full potential could be decades away, Taylor said.

important keywords:  Cars accident, Auto Accident in RI, Truck Accidents

Steven M. Sweat's curator insight, December 31, 2014 7:27 PM

The California Department of Motor Vehicles has established rules for the testing of driverless cars on CA roadways but, is delaying setting guidelines for consumer use of such vehicles.  A deadline of January 1, 2015 was set by the CA legislature for the implementation of such laws but, the DMV is delaying setting rules pending further research and input from technical experts and legal scholars.  As an auto accident attorney representing crash victims in the CA , I am curious to see how liability for any mishaps is dealt with in the California Vehicle Code and when such regulations may be set into place.

Rescooped by David Slepkow from California Motorcycle Accident Attorney News
Scoop.it!

California Highway Patrol Releases Endorsed Lane Splitting Guidelines

California Highway Patrol Releases Endorsed Lane Splitting Guidelines | Rhode Island Lawyer, David Slepkow | Scoop.it
CHP goes on record about lane filtering by motorcyclists. Learn more at CycleWorld.com.

Via Steven M. Sweat
David Slepkow's insight:

10 Tips to Motorcycle Safety Awareness in Massachusetts, Rhode Island,

 

The United States and in the UK- A comparative Analysis

Motorcycling is the most dangerous way to travel in the United States and on the roads in the UK, RI and MA. Every day, an average of 30 motorcyclists are killed or seriously injured in the UK in motor vehicle accidents, which means they are 75 times more likely than car drivers to sustain a serious or fatal personal injury when on the road.

 

While the number of accidents involving motorcyclists has fallen in England in recent years, it still remains a disproportionately dangerous way to get around. Other road users are  often found to be at fault in personal injury compensation claims involving motorcyclists, but there are still a number of things people can do to improve their safety and prevent accidents.

In the United States including Rhode Island and Massachusetts, “According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, helmets are estimated to prevent 37 percent of crash deaths among motorcycle riders and 41 percent of crash deaths for motorcycle passengers.” http://barrington.patch.com/articles/should-ri-re-think-its-motorcycle-helmet-laws

 

http://rhodeislandlawyer.wordpress.com/

Steven M. Sweat's curator insight, May 23, 2013 2:02 PM

As a motorcycle accident attorney in Los Angeles, I have mixed feelings about lane splitting. I think it is good that the California DMV has released these guidelines.  I have no issues with lane splitting at safe speeds and at certain times as I feel this is and should be one of the advantages of riding a bike especially in urban traffic.  However, lane splits become dangerous at higher rates of speed and the guidelines point that out.

Jens Ekke Bürger's curator insight, January 30, 2014 2:15 AM

Running Wiild!

Christopher Pearsall's comment, February 3, 2014 8:50 AM
As a motorcycle operator myself I don't care how long I have to wait... I'm smart enough to know that no matter where I may be going it's not worth violating the law by traveling in between cars, getting crushed in between vehicles that aren't looking an suddenly change lanes or someone who just has to open a door without looking to see what is holding up a traffic backup that they can't possibly change in putting me in a hospital, paralyzing me, or killing them. Why don't other people have similar common sense thoughts? Do they all think "I'm indestructible."