E-Learning-Inclusivo (Mashup)
1.1M views | +27 today
Follow
E-Learning-Inclusivo (Mashup)
Aprendizaje con TIC basado en los aprendices.
Curated by juandoming
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Rescooped by juandoming from Networked Learning - MOOCs and more
Scoop.it!

Investigating MOOCs through blog mining | Yong Chen | The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning

Investigating MOOCs through blog mining | Yong Chen | The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning | E-Learning-Inclusivo (Mashup) | Scoop.it

Abstract: MOOCs (massive open online course) is a disruptive innovation and a current buzzword in higher education. However, the discussion of MOOCs is disparate, fragmented, and distributed among different outlets. Systematic, extensively published research on MOOCs is unavailable. This paper adopts a novel method called blog mining to analyze MOOCs. The findings indicate, while MOOCs have benefitted learners, providers, and faculty who develop and teach MOOCs, challenges still exist, such as questionable course quality, high dropout rate, unavailable course credits, ineffective assessments, complex copyright, and limited hardware. Future research should explore the position of MOOCs and how it can be sustained.


Via Peter B. Sloep
Peter B. Sloep's curator insight, May 2, 2014 8:53 AM

The introduction to the article sometimes paints perhaps too simplistic a picture (such as that the xMOOCs and cMOOCs exhaust the universe of possible MOOCs; cf my recent scoop in early March: http://sco.lt/8FAEJl) or a somewhat trite one (“MOOCs represents an emerging methodology of online teaching and an important development in open education.”). Still the article is an interesting contribution to  MOOC research for the methodology it employs: text mining and analysis of blogs on MOOCs. Language technologies - in this case concept analysis and mapping using leximancer - are a powerful means to crunch large amounts of textual data, often revealing patters that are not immediately apparent to the naked eye. The value of the article therefore does not lie in its introduction, but in the results and ensuing discussion. 

 

Chen summarises the results under the headings of benefits for learners, benefits for providers, and trends, concluding with a discussion of the limitations of his study. His conclusions are not earth shattering, but how could they? After all, this is a mere summary of what he came across in the 360 blog posts he analysed with the help of leximancer; it is not a position paper in any sense, at best it is a kind of meta-analysis. To put it differently, tongue in cheek, there’s no need to go through the 431 scoops I collected on these pages to get an impression of what has been discussed about MOOCs in blogs over the last 4 odd years. Read the article and you have a fair idea. And then you should go to individual blog posts to collect opinions. @pbsloep

Rescooped by juandoming from Interactive News - Noticias interactivas
Scoop.it!

A pedagogical framework for mobile learning

A pedagogical framework for mobile learning | E-Learning-Inclusivo (Mashup) | Scoop.it
A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types...

 

IRRODL "The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning"


Via Gust MEES, Ana Loução, EduClick_España
No comment yet.
Rescooped by juandoming from gpmt
Scoop.it!

The architecture of productive learning networks | Terry Anderson | The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning

[…] the authors set forth an initial set of architectural entities that describe and define a network of individuals associated together in order to collectively achieve some goal. As the title implies, these associations are focused on learning but in a very broad sense that includes formal education, informal and professional learning, and social action. The structures that we devise and sustain to support this learning are referred to as networks – aggregations based upon connections of people and resources, that in this context are focused on learning – and of course doing so productively.


Via Peter B. Sloep, michel verstrepen
Peter B. Sloep's curator insight, May 1, 2014 3:21 PM

The scooped article reviews a book edited by Lucila Carvalho and Peter Goodyear. It contains a collection of stories on networked learning that share the intention to look at learning networks as designed entities. As one of the contributors to the book I should say no more about it and let Terry Anderson’s review speak for itself. However, if his review does wet your appetite I should perhaps confess that I myself am quite enamoured with the collection of articles that has emerged. I genuinely belief this book, to which I only made a very small contribution, marks an important step in the efforts to come up with a theoretical foundation for networked learning. @pbsloep

 

Rose Heaney's curator insight, May 2, 2014 1:10 PM

Terry Anderson is always worth a read. Productive learning networks seem to be very relevant to our current interactions on ocTEL

Steven Verjans's comment, May 5, 2014 6:34 AM
This is Terry Anderson's review of the recent book by Carvallo & Goodyear, to which I contributed a chapter together with my OUNL colleagues"