Rheumatology-Rhumatologie
10.3K views | +0 today
Follow
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Rescooped by Gilbert C FAURE from Top Selling Monoclonal Antibodies
March 15, 2015 2:02 PM
Scoop.it!

Differential expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-15Ralpha, IL-15, IL-6 and TNFalpha in synovial fluid from Rheumatoid arthritis patients

Differential expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-15Ralpha, IL-15, IL-6 and TNFalpha in synovial fluid from Rheumatoid arthritis patients | Rheumatology-Rhumatologie | Scoop.it
Pro-inflammatory cytokines are directly implicated in the pathogenesis of Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Variable clinical response to cytokine targeted therapies as TNFalpha and IL-6, strongly highlights the heterogeneity of inflammatory process in RA.

 

Results

We found higher and significant levels of TNFalpha, IL-6 and IL-15Ralpha but not of IL-15 in RA compared with the OA group. Additionally, a high inter-individual variability in the levels of these 4 cytokines was observed in RA, although we identified 4 patients’ subgroups by cluster analysis of cytokines concentration in SF. We also found a positive correlation between IL-15Ralpha-IL-6 and IL-15Ralpha-IL-15, but not for other pairs of cytokines in RA. In addition we found correlation between the value of IL-15Ralpha in SF and disease activity score, DAS28.

Conclusions

In our current work we found a high inter-individual variability in the levels of TNFalpha, IL-6, IL-15 and IL-15Ralpha in SF of RA patients and were identified four principal clusters of cytokines concentration in SF, suggesting the importance of identifying disease subset of patients for personalized treatment. Finally, we found a correlation between IL-15Ralpha-IL-6, IL-15Ralpha-IL-15, but we did not find any correlation between other pairs of studied cytokines in SF.


Via Krishan Maggon
Krishan Maggon 's curator insight, March 15, 2015 1:48 PM

Research article

Differential expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-15Ralpha, IL-15, IL-6 and TNFalpha in synovial fluid from Rheumatoid arthritis patients

Alicia Santos Savio1*, Ana Cecilia Machado Diaz1, Araceli Chico Capote2, Jamilet Miranda Navarro3, Yunier Rodríguez Alvarez1, Ricardo Bringas Pérez3, Miguel Estévez del Toro2and Gerardo E Guillen Nieto1

*Corresponding author: Alicia Santos Savio alicia.santos@cigb.edu.cu

Author Affiliations

1Pharmaceutical Division, Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Havana CP 10600, Cuba

2Rheumatology Department, H. Ameijeiras Hospital, San Lazaro 701, Havana, Cuba

3Bioinformatics Department, Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Havana CP 10600, Cuba

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2015, 16:51  doi:10.1186/s12891-015-0516-3

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/16/51

Rescooped by Gilbert C FAURE from Top Selling Monoclonal Antibodies
August 16, 2014 11:59 AM
Scoop.it!

Sarilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against IL-6Rα in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: efficacy and safety results from the randomised SARIL-R...

Sarilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against IL-6Rα in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: efficacy and safety results from the randomised SARIL-R... | Rheumatology-Rhumatologie | Scoop.it

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate safety and efficacy of weekly (qw) and every other week (q2w) dosing of sarilumab, a fully human anti-interleukin 6 receptor α (anti-IL-6Rα) monoclonal antibody, for moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods In this dose-ranging study, patients (n=306) with active RA, despite methotrexate, were randomly assigned to placebo or one of five subcutaneous doses/regimens of sarilumab: 100 mg q2w, 150 mg q2w, 100 mg qw, 200 mg q2w, 150 mg qw for 12 weeks, plus methotrexate. The primary end point was ACR20 at Week 12. Secondary endpoints included ACR50, ACR70, Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (C reactive protein). Safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and efficacy in population subgroups were assessed.

Results The proportion of patients achieving an ACR20 response compared with placebo was significantly higher for sarilumab 150 mg qw (72.0% vs 46.2%, multiplicity adjusted p=0.0203). Higher ACR20 responses were also attained with 150 mg q2w (67%; unadjusted (nominal) p=0.0363) and 200 mg q2w (65%; unadjusted p=0.0426) versus placebo. Sarilumab ≥150 mg q2w reduced C reactive protein, which did not return to baseline between dosing intervals. Infections were the most common adverse event; none were serious. Changes in laboratory values (neutropenia, transaminases and lipids) were consistent with reports with other IL-6Rα inhibitors.

Conclusions Sarilumab improved signs and symptoms of RA over 12 weeks in patients with moderate-to-severe RA with a safety profile similar to reports with other IL-6 inhibitors. Sarilumab 150 mg and sarilumab 200 mg q2w had the most favourable efficacy, safety and dosing convenience and are being further evaluated in Phase III.


Via Krishan Maggon
Krishan Maggon 's curator insight, August 8, 2014 9:51 PM

open access full text

 

Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:1626-1634 doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204405

Clinical and epidemiological researchExtended reportSarilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against IL-6Rα in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: efficacy and safety results from the randomised SARIL-RA-MOBILITY Part A trialTom W J Huizinga1, Roy M Fleischmann2, Martine Jasson3, Allen R Radin4,Janet van Adelsberg4, Stefano Fiore5, Xiaohong Huang5, George D Yancopoulos4,Neil Stahl4, Mark C Genovese6

+Author Affiliations

1Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands2Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Metroplex Clinical Research Center, Dallas, Texas, USA3Department of Research and Development, Sanofi, Paris, France4Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, New York, USA5Department of Research and Development, Sanofi, Bridgewater, New Jersey, USA6Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California, USACorrespondence toDr TWJ Huizinga, Chairman, Department of Rheumatology, C1-41 Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, PO Box 9600, Leiden 2300RC, The Netherlands;T.W.J.Huizinga@lumc.nlReceived 6 August 2013Revised 23 October 2013Accepted 24 October 2013Published Online First 2 December 2013
Rescooped by Gilbert C FAURE from Top Selling Monoclonal Antibodies
August 16, 2014 11:59 AM
Scoop.it!

IL-6 targeting mabs vs TNF targeting in rheumatoid arthritis: olokizumab, sarilumab, sirukumab -- Tanaka and Martin Mola 73 (9): 1595 -- Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

IL-6 targeting mabs vs TNF targeting in rheumatoid arthritis: olokizumab, sarilumab, sirukumab -- Tanaka and Martin Mola 73 (9): 1595 -- Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases | Rheumatology-Rhumatologie | Scoop.it

The safety and efficacy profiles in clinical trials of olokizumab, sarilumab and sirukumab are similar and are consistent with those observed in RA patients treated with tocilizumab. Furthermore, the clinical efficacy of these IL-6 inhibitors is similar to that of TNF inhibitors in patients with MTX-IR and TNF-IR. Screening of biomarkers or genetics in each RA patient, for instance, baseline serum levels of TNF and/or soluble IL-6R, may help to predict the efficacy of each drug and to select patients for cytokine-oriented targeted therapies.33 However, better strategies are warranted for selecting and identifying appropriate patients earlier once bDMARDs targeting IL-6 are launched in the near future. We also need to determine whether there are important differences between the many IL-6 inhibitors and which are suitable for particular patients, otherwise companies may waste time and money in development.


Via Krishan Maggon
Krishan Maggon 's curator insight, August 8, 2014 7:03 PM

open access full text

 

RA  patients not responding to TNF inhibitors benefit from treatment with IL6 targeting mabs and show regression of RA disease.

 

 

Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:1595-1597 doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-205002

EditorialIL-6 targeting compared to TNF targeting in rheumatoid arthritis: studies of olokizumab, sarilumab and sirukumabYoshiya Tanaka1, Emilio Martin Mola2

+Author Affiliations

1The First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan2Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Paseo de la Castellana 261, Madrid, SpainCorrespondence toProfessor Yoshiya Tanaka, The First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Yahatanishi, Kitakyushu 807-8555, Japan; tanaka@med.uoeh-u.ac.jpReceived 31 January 2014Revised 23 April 2014Accepted 1 May 2014Published Online First 15 May 2014
Rescooped by Gilbert C FAURE from Top Selling Monoclonal Antibodies
October 30, 2014 11:40 AM
Scoop.it!

An evaluation of risk factors for major adverse cardiovascular events during tocilizumab therapy - Rao - Arthritis & Rheumatology - Wiley Online Library

An evaluation of risk factors for major adverse cardiovascular events during tocilizumab therapy - Rao - Arthritis & Rheumatology - Wiley Online Library | Rheumatology-Rhumatologie | Scoop.it
An evaluation of risk factors for major adverse #cardiovascular events during #tocilizumab therapy http://t.co/EymLTiXiv1 #rheum

 

Abstract

Objective. To explore associations of baseline and on-treatment lipid levels, inflammation, and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity with risk for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in tocilizumab-treated RA patients.

Methods. In retrospective post hoc analyses, data were pooled from 3986 adults with moderate to severe RA administered ≥1 dose of tocilizumab 4 or 8 mg/kg intravenously every 4 weeks in randomized controlled trials and extension studies. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to evaluate associations among baseline characteristics and posttreatment initiation variables (week 24) and change from baseline to week 24 disease activity and laboratory values, with risk for future MACE during extended follow-up.

Results. There were 50 independently adjudicated cases of MACE during 14,683 patient-years (PY) of follow-up (0.34 MACE/100 PY). At baseline, age, history of cardiac disorders, disease activity score using 28 joints (DAS28), and total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein ratio were independently (P<0.05 for all) associated with MACE in multivariable models. On treatment, higher DAS28 scores and swollen and tender joint counts at week 24 were associated with future MACE. In separate models, greater reductions in DAS28 score and joint counts from baseline to week 24 were inversely associated with future MACE; changes in lipid parameters were not statistically significantly associated with risk for MACE.

Conclusion. As in the general population, an association was observed between baseline total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein ratio and increased risk for MACE. Risk for on-treatment MACE, however, was found to be associated with control of disease activity but not lipid changes. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings. © 2014 American College of Rheumatology.


Via Krishan Maggon
Krishan Maggon 's curator insight, October 28, 2014 2:46 AM
An evaluation of risk factors for major adverse cardiovascular events during tocilizumab therapyVijay U. Rao MD, PhD1,†, Andrey Pavlov PhD2, Micki Klearman MD1,*, David Musselman MD1, Jon T. Giles MD, MPH3,Joan M. Bathon MD3, Naveed Sattar FRCPath, PhD4 andJanet S. Lee PhD5,‡

DOI: 10.1002/art.38920

Copyright © 2014 American College of Rheumatology

Issue

Arthritis & Rheumatology

Accepted Article (Accepted, unedited articles published online and citable. The final edited and typeset version of record will appear in future.)

Rescooped by Gilbert C FAURE from Top Selling Monoclonal Antibodies
August 23, 2014 2:41 AM
Scoop.it!

Sirukumab, a human anti-interleukin-6 monoclonal antibody: a randomised, 2-part (proof-of-concept and dose-finding), phase II study in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate...

Sirukumab, a human anti-interleukin-6 monoclonal antibody: a randomised, 2-part (proof-of-concept and dose-finding), phase II study in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate... | Rheumatology-Rhumatologie | Scoop.it

Abstract

Objectives The safety and efficacy of sirukumab, an anti-interleukin-6 (IL-6) monoclonal antibody, were evaluated in a 2-part, placebo-controlled phase II study of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite methotrexate therapy.

Methods In Part A (proof-of-concept), 36 patients were randomised to placebo or sirukumab 100 mg every 2 weeks (q2w) through week 10, with crossover treatment during weeks 12–22. In Part B (dose finding), 151 patients were randomised to sirukumab (100 mg q2w, 100 mg q4w, 50 mg q4w, or 25 mg q4w) through week 24, or placebo through week 10 with crossover to sirukumab 100 mg q2w (weeks 12–24). The proportion of patients with an American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) response and the change from baseline in the 28-joint count disease activity score using C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) were determined. Safety was evaluated through week 38 in both parts.

Results The primary endpoint (ACR50 at week 12 in Part B) was achieved only with sirukumab 100 mg q2w versus placebo (26.7% vs 3.3%; p=0.026). Greater improvements in mean DAS28-CRP at week 12 were observed with sirukumab 100 mg q2w versus placebo in Parts A (2.1 vs 0.6, p<0.001) and B (2.2 vs 1.1; p<0.001). The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was similar for sirukumab-treated and placebo-treated patients through week 12 in Part A (70.6% and 63.2%, respectively) and B (67.8% and 66.7%, respectively). Infections were the most common type of AE; one death occurred (Part B, sirukumab 100 mg q2w, brain aneurysm).

Conclusions Sirukumab-treated patients experienced improvements in the signs/symptoms of RA. Safety results through 38 weeks were consistent with other IL-6 inhibitors.

Trial registration number NCT00718718.


Via Krishan Maggon
Krishan Maggon 's curator insight, August 8, 2014 9:43 PM

open access

 

Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:1616-1625 doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-205137

Clinical and epidemiological researchExtended reportSirukumab, a human anti-interleukin-6 monoclonal antibody: a randomised, 2-part (proof-of-concept and dose-finding), phase II study in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate therapyJosef S Smolen1,2, Michael E Weinblatt3, Shihong Sheng4, Yanli Zhuang5, Benjamin Hsu6

+Author Affiliations

1Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria2Department of Medicine, Hietzing Hospital, Vienna, Austria3Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA4Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Quantitative Sciences, Spring House, Pennsylvania, USA5Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Biologics Clinical Pharmacology, Spring House, Pennsylvania, USA6Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Immunology, Spring House, Pennsylvania, USACorrespondence toProfessor Josef S Smolen, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna and 2nd Department of Medicine, Hietzing Hospital, Waehringer Guertel 18–20, Vienna A-1090, Austria; josef.smolen@wienkav.atReceived 23 December 2013Revised 3 March 2014Accepted 6 March 2014Published Online First 3 April 2014