Information and digital literacy in education via the digital path

We’ve Only Just Begun to Explore the Ways in Which Technology can be Used to Improve How we all Learn It is common knowledge that an array of technological advancements have made many medical miracles

When Used With Tact, These Techniques can Help to Make Your Presentations Fun and Engaging It'd easy to bash PowerPoint, especially given the poor uses we see

For the past half-century, and particularly since the 1983 “Nation at Risk” report, Americans have been heaving great sacks of money at schools. Federal spending alone has tripled since the 1970s. The New York Times calculates that the federal government now spends $107.6 billion on education yearly, which is layered over an estimated $524.7 billion spent by states and localities. (Source: National Center for Education Statistics.)

#ad#Reformers have urged — depending upon where they stand ideologically — smaller class sizes, more accountability, merit pay for teachers, and educational choice. Each year seems to bring a new fad: child-centered learning; new math; cooperative learning; and so forth. The No Child Left Behind reform focused on testing. There have been proposals to repeal teacher tenure and to provide every child with a laptop. And always there are fights over curriculum — the Common Core being the controversy du jour.

But perhaps the most promising thinking about education arises from the discovery of economist Erik Hanushek that the most important factor in student performance is the quality of the teacher. Not class size. Not spending per pupil. Not even curriculum.

Our system produces some great teachers, but only by luck. Each year, 400,000 new teachers enter American classrooms, many knowing little about the nuts and bolts of teaching. As Elizabeth Green argues in her new book, Building a Better Teacher: How Teaching Works (and How to Teach It to Everyone), our education schools do not teach the mechanics of teaching — how to control a classroom, how to engage students’ imaginations, how to check for understanding. They’ve been sidetracked by educational psychology and fads at the expense of teaching how to teach.

Green cites “education entrepreneurs” including Doug Lemov, author of Teach Like a Champion, and Deborah Loewenberg Ball, now dean of the University of Michigan’s school of education, who focus on helping ordinary teachers become great.

Lemov, an education reformer and consultant, was struck by something he found when he pored over statistics from the state of New York. While the correlation between zip codes and educational success was notable, there were always outliers — schools or classrooms in which even kids from impoverished backgrounds were doing well. Lemov zeroed in on those schools and those particular teachers.

The result is indicated in the subtitle of his book: “49 Techniques That Put Students on the Path to College.” Some of the techniques are inspired, others are quotidian but still important (like how not to waste time pleading for responses). The point is that teaching is a performance every day, which is not easy. Teachers must spark the interest and keep the attention of their students (who bring all kinds of troubles from home), encourage the weak ones along with the strong, maintain discipline, and build a sense of team spirit. Lemov doesn’t believe that anyone can be a great teacher, but he does think that with coaching and mentoring, good teachers can become great.

Some of Lemov’s proven techniques will not surprise educational traditionalists. He believes in drilling, though he calls it “muscle memory.” A great teacher will drill arithmetic skills, for example, until they are second nature, so that students needn’t stumble over the easy stuff when they get to algebra and geometry. (Education schools had disdained this as “drill and kill.”) Another technique Lemov suggests is “cold calls” — that is, having the teacher choose students randomly rather than just those who raise their hands. Each child, knowing he might be called upon, must be ready. (It works in law schools.) A companion technique is “no opt out.” If the child says he doesn’t know, the teacher asks a related question to another student to narrow down the possible right answer and returns to the first child for a second chance.

There are broad suggestions about classroom management and more subtle and difficult challenges such as maintaining “emotional constancy,” which is refraining from showing anger when a child gives the wrong answer. Anger will teach a child to try to hide his ignorance rather than accept it as a normal part of the learning enterprise.

Teaching is a craft. It may be among the hardest to master. Renewed attention to teaching teaching seems long overdue.

— Mona Charen is a nationally syndicated columnist and a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center. © 2014 Creators Syndicate, Inc.

Search literacy is an important element of the 21st century learning. The web is teeming with all kinds of information and part of this information  is nothing but junk. To let our students and kids surf this ocean of information without equipping them with the necessary gear is analogous to canoeing through turbulent waves, chances of staying afloat are next to impossible.

Sometimes you're just stuck in a creativity rut. Check out these 27 simple ideas to boost your creativity!

Students want to be engaged in class. They really do -- but sometimes other things get in the way of their natural instincts. A few changes to how a teacher runs a classroom can make a huge impact on

To learn and not to do is really not to learn. To know and not to do is really not to know. (Photo credit: planeta) By David Slocum For many leaders, the commitment to learning – both their own and that of their workers – is a given.

An informative title for an article or chapter maximizes the likelihood that your audience correctly remembers enough about your arguments to re-discover what they are looking for. Without embedded...

Share on FacebookTweet ThisGoogle+Pin ItLinkedIn There are, of course, just the two certainties in life – death and taxes and all that – but if there’s a third, then it’s that, at some point, we’ll have to take exams. So what’s the harm in a little nudge in the right direction? A little extra help? …

It may not be rocket science, but it sure is neuroscience: Happy learners are healthy learners.

While this may seem like (ahem) a no-brainer, there is a good amount of neurological evidence to promote the idea that if students do not feel comfortable in a classroom setting, they will not learn. Physiologically speaking, stressed brains are not able to form the necessary neural connections.

Want to give better presentations? Sound confident? Catch your breath when presenting? Check these tips to improve the presentation skills of PhD students.