Curation Revolution
55.0K views | +0 today
Follow
Curation Revolution
Curation the next web revolution.
Your new post is loading...
Rescooped by Martin (Marty) Smith from digital marketing strategy
Scoop.it!

7 SEO Common and Dangerous Misconceptions Put Right [+ @ScentTrail Notes]

7 SEO Common and Dangerous Misconceptions Put Right [+ @ScentTrail Notes] | Curation Revolution | Scoop.it
Here are 7 common misconceptions some have about search engine optimization.

Via malek
Martin (Marty) Smith's insight:

Excellent Post, My Notes:

1. SEO is about more than keywords! Agree
 Hummingbird's ability to handle multi-word queries is setting the stage for semantic web when search engine spiders understand context, nuance and sarcasm. Keywords are important, but the "social vitality" of your content CONFIRMS your keyword-based claims.

2. Bing Doesn't Matter. Agree
When I went to work, I "retired" last week to start my 5th company, I set up my work PC to be all BINGED up. There is enough difference between Google and Bing that I wanted to know what the other guy was thinking (and how). Bing is NOT as fast as Google and they don't understand the content as well, but unimportant they aren't.

3. Google's Hide Of Keywords Kills SEO
No death here, just have to be more intelligent about modeling our content, understanding what (in the content) is creating conversion and doing analysis BEFORE we write to know the most important keywords. If "writers" gets 3x the traffic of "contributors" then use writers.

4. Good inbound links from comments (don't be absurd, Panda helped Google SEE into all of that kind of BS so stop trying to game and create great, highly viral content instead). Comments links, almost without exception, are no follow links. If you drive links to yourself that math will stick out like the SPAM sore thumb it is.

 

5. Subheads don't matter much (this was new to me and disappointing, I still like subheads for engagement and formatting though).

6. Don't mistake serendipitous conditions for meaningful patterns - this is a general truth and one blown up for +1s. Pages that receive a lot of +1s are also receiving other kinds of benefits, accolades and links. MOZ pointed out that just because two things happen together doesn't mean there is a cause and effect relationship and good idea to remember at all times and in all things Internet marketing.

7. No higher rank from authorship....yet. Not sure my friend Mark Traphagen would agree, but not important enough to get all bent out of shape over in an excellent post.

 

More on Gplus
https://plus.google.com/102639884404823294558/posts/2iFLkcgSkAT

malek's curator insight, December 11, 2013 9:13 AM

 Rather than chasing Google+1s of content, your time is much better spent making great content."

Scooped by Martin (Marty) Smith
Scoop.it!

Prepare for AuthorRank, Get the Jump on Google

Prepare for AuthorRank, Get the Jump on Google | Curation Revolution | Scoop.it

If you're like me and you have your finger on Google’s pulse on a daily basis, you’ve undoubtedly heard of AuthorRank.

Marty Note
Author rank is going to be huge because...

* People can't steal your copy anymore.

* Since they can't steal SEO is protected (don't bleed PageRank).

* Great way to increase Klout score.

* Great way to organize all the content you create across the web.

* Great way to see what you are creating (and how much).

* See trends faster so tune creation better.


If you don't know about author rank you should. I was at a presentation last week about Google Plus and Author Rank is going to be HUGE.  

Martin (Marty) Smith's comment, September 23, 2012 4:52 PM
Thanks for the Rescoop on AuthorRank Jeff. Marty
Scooped by Martin (Marty) Smith
Scoop.it!

Google Authorship MATTERS new Study Proves [@jeffalytics Study]

Google Authorship MATTERS new Study Proves [@jeffalytics Study] | Curation Revolution | Scoop.it
Google Plus impacts search and Google Authorship Sweetens the deal. Learn how it all works in this comprehensive 3 week study that isolates the impact of G+
Martin (Marty) Smith's insight:

Impact of Google Authorship Study
Amazing, comprehensive study from @Jeffalytics on the impact of Google authorship. Their conclusions that YOU are becoming more important than any single website you contribute to is one important conclusion. There are many more including if you aren't using Google Authorship tags expect to be beaten to a pulp.

Another implication is BRAND your writers in addition to your website. The value of branded writers is you can apply their author rank anywhere and at any time for an immediate impact on SEO.  

Great conclusions at the bottom.
http://www.jeffalytics.com/google-plus-search-authorship/  

I followed up this Scoop with a brief post on ScentTrail Marketing sharing my best resource to LEARN about Google authorship and a handful of content strategy implications:
http://scenttrail.blogspot.com/2013/04/google-authorship-matters-jeffalytics.html 

Also wrote about the study on Google Plus and received one comment about the study's flaws. The study may have flaws, but it is helpful to do what I need to do - get the tags added. The over, what we stand to gain, is so much greater than the under, the cost of tagging, you would think adding authorship tags is a no brainer. Not so much as it turns out (lol).

Here is the Google Plus conversation:
https://plus.google.com/102639884404823294558/posts/45ZBpspdjK

No comment yet.