A section of oil pipeline was confirmed to have been damaged and moved more than 100 feet along the ocean floor, another indication that a ship’s anchor may have caused the oil spill in Huntington Beach.
Scooped by Lewis Adnan |
Get Started for FREE
Sign up with Facebook Sign up with X
I don't have a Facebook or a X account
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Brennan LaMont's comment,
October 7, 2021 1:56 PM
Lewis, Based on what I've heard, this seems to be due to the overwhelming back-up of ships waiting to drop goods off in Southern California. While we have long had a dependance on East Asian markets, we have historically only looked at the economic loss to US companies when work is sent abroad. Hopefully this oil spill will make it clear that our absolute reliance on East Asia for the goods we purchase and have manufactured has an environmental impact as well. And now that cost has shown to expand beyond moving things literally across an ocean, but damage to infrastructure, such as this oil pipeline, with an increase in transatlantic trade.
Sign up to comment
PIRatE Lab's curator insight,
December 1, 2013 1:23 AM
What seemed impossible just a few years ago is turning into reality. The Gulf of Mexico is once again one of the top oil-producing regions in the United States. Good for big oil and short term profits...bad for our coastal ecosystems. |
Christopher Michael Homokay's comment,
October 13, 2016 4:11 PM
Surfrider chapters support CA prop 67 can ban bags entirely. A Yes vote on 67 approves the bag ban that was approved by voters in 2014. I've talked to Trader Joe's, Sprouts, and Lassen's, they don't charge for paper bags and give incentives for customers to bring reusable bags. The paper bag is reusable. Look on Pinterest for making shirts into tote bags. I'm voting yes on 67 and No on 65. Proposition 65 puts a fee on bags. Do not be confused that there are two bag propositions on ballot.
PIRatE Lab's curator insight,
February 28, 2014 10:16 PM
The feed supply here is something of a (pardon the pun) red herring.
Salmon have been raised on a vegan diet (research done at Hubbs SeaWorld's Research Arm) now, so the dependency on fish meal/fish oil is in theory not a limiting factor per se.
The bigger issue is simply the space and associated potential environmental impacts. We could do large scale farming totally in artificial mariculture facilities and have effectively zero pollution or other potential impacts. The issue is cost.
More importantly, the issue of a limited absolute quantity of a finite substance (i.e. oil) can't compare to an actual living and reproducing resrouce like a fish, assuming we protect the environment and habitat of that fish so that these organisms can live.
|