Get Started for FREE
Sign up with Facebook Sign up with X
I don't have a Facebook or a X account
 Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Scoop.it!
Special interests push educators to "teach the controversy" where no scientific controversy exists. 
No comment yet.
Sign up to comment
Scoop.it!
When it comes to climate change, open-mindedness is the wrong approach. Consider for a moment the case against tobacco. There too scientists were nearly unanimous in their conclusion, based on research, that tobacco use had serious health consequences. Meanwhile, the tobacco industry tried to play the role of defense attorney, offering up denials and dodges and pseudo-scientific studies denying a link between smoking and lung cancer. So how did Americans decide whom to believe?
|
Scoop.it!
Leading experts lend support to Freedom of Information request concerning climate sceptic foundation chaired by Lord Lawson (RT @sandyd68: Climate scientists back call for sceptic thinktank to reveal backers
|
