Journalism ethicsPress freedomMedia accountability

Jean-Michel Dumay

Press review powered by #PRESSCOUNCILS.EU

An ethics-first press watcher who treated journalism as a public trust under pressure.

248posts
1topics
1languages
The curator

A press watcher with an ethics compass

Jean-Michel Dumay built a focused English-language press review on journalism ethics and accountability, powered by #PRESSCOUNCILS.EU. Across 248 posts, the work connected newsroom practice, media self-regulation, disinformation, AI and the political pressures placed on reporters around the world.

A standards-minded reader

His selections favoured the institutions that keep journalism answerable: press councils, mediation systems, ethics awards and professional standards. The recurring concern was not only what journalists publish, but how they justify it.

Press freedom in practice

The archive placed legal threats, political pressure and reporter safety beside questions of newsroom craft. It made press freedom feel operational: access to records, protection of sources, and the right to investigate without intimidation.

Technology under ethical scrutiny

When the topic turned to AI, platforms and disinformation, it did so through the lens of responsibility. The thread was clear: new tools matter, but credibility depends on governance, disclosure and editorial judgment.

What defines this selection

A compact ethics archive

The topic gathered 248 posts around journalism ethics, accountability and press freedom. It read like a monitoring desk for the pressures facing newsrooms rather than a simple media-news feed.

Sources with newsroom weight

The selection drew from GIJN, Nieman Journalism Lab, Poynter, CPJ, Reuters Institute, EDMO, ICIJ, press councils and major international outlets. That mix gave the archive both professional depth and public-policy range.

International field of view

Although written in English, the topic moved across Europe, the United States, Africa, Australia, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Kyrgyzstan and Latin America. It followed press freedom as a global condition with local consequences.

A finished press-climate file

Opened in 2023, the account built an audience of more than 14,000 views overall. Its last analysed post appeared in May 2025, so the page now stands as a past body of work rather than an active feed.

Topics

Deep dives

Disinformation as an institutional test

This topic treated disinformation less as a passing newsroom beat than as a democratic stress test. Jean-Michel Dumay selected pieces that asked what falsehoods do to public life, how platforms reshape evidence, and why simple fact-checking rarely settles the problem.

The archive also caught a turning point in the platform debate. Posts on OpenAI, Meta and anti-disinformation policy showed a clear concern for the systems that now sit between publics and reliable information.

The emphasis was not alarm for its own sake. The recurring question was institutional: what happens when governments, platforms or newsrooms step back from the work of verification?

The working conditions of accountability

A second strand followed the craft of accountability reporting. The topic returned to tools, methods and access laws, especially when they helped reporters investigate power across borders.

The selection also paid attention to the vulnerable mechanics behind public-interest journalism: leaks, source protection, legal risk and the everyday protocols that make investigations possible.

Press freedom appeared here as a practical condition, not an abstract slogan. Posts on threatened reporters and repressive regimes placed newsroom ethics inside a wider fight over safety and access to truth.

Standards in a changing profession

The archive repeatedly returned to standards: awards, councils, mediation, definitions of journalism and the line between public service and influence. Its centre of gravity was the belief that journalism needs visible rules if it wants public trust.

That standards question widened as influencers, platforms and new formats blurred the old boundaries of the profession. Dumay’s selections gave weight to debates about who counts as a journalist and what obligations come with that role.

AI entered the topic as both a tool and an ethical pressure point. The posts suggested interest in how newsrooms could use new systems without losing transparency, responsibility or editorial judgment.

Selected posts