Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight
445.0K views | +10 today
Follow
Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight
Social marketing, PR insight & thought leadership - from The PR Coach
Curated by Jeff Domansky
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
August 29, 2017 2:24 AM
Scoop.it!

12 Free Social Media and Brand Monitoring Tools We Love (and Why)

12 Free Social Media and Brand Monitoring Tools We Love (and Why) | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

Reputation is everything. And on the internet, that couldn't be more true.It's important to always know what people are saying about you -- whether it's your customers, your competitors, or the press. And on any given day, it can be tricky to keep up with what your audience is sharing across a variety of social media platforms.

 

So, we've rounded up some of the best free social media and brand monitoring tools from around the vast web of social networks.

 

Nearly all of these tools are free, but some offer paid versions with more features and capabilities. Let's dive into each one -- and see if you want to test them out today....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

Check out these free social media and brand monitoring tools to take your social game to the next level.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
May 8, 2017 11:32 AM
Scoop.it!

Will bad PR lead Uber to destruction?

Will bad PR lead Uber to destruction? | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

Could bad PR pose an existential threat to one of tech's highest-flying companies?


If Lyft's fortunes are any indication, Uber might have reason to worry.


While Uber has been dealing with bad headline after bad headline, Lyft has been courting riders and polishing its image. For example, when Uber was facing a #DeleteUber campaign over CEO Kalanick's participation in a business advisory council for US President Donald Trump, Lyft was responding to Trump's temporary travel ban targeting seven Muslim countries by announcing that it would be donating $1m to the American Civil Liberties Union.


Is Lyft's cleaner image winning over consumers?According to Bloomberg, Lyft's ridership and bookings "surged" in the first quarter of the year and according to fundraising documents Bloomberg obtained, the company is beating its internal targets. The documents revealed that Lyft's gross bookings in Q1 grew to $800m, more than double what they were in Q1 2016, and total ridership in February was 137% higher than February 2016....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

There is such a thing as "bad PR" and Uber is seeing the consequences.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
April 27, 2017 9:25 AM
Scoop.it!

The Most and Least Trusted Brands Among Small-Business Owners

The Most and Least Trusted Brands Among Small-Business Owners | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

From United Airlines to Uber, we’ve seen a number of scandals unfold this year that have changed our feelings about a brand. And whatever size the business, its reputation and customers are key to its success.


Taking into account data from more than 23,000 small-business owners, Alignable revealed in its Q1 2017 SMB Brand Trust Index Report the most and least trusted brands. In the report, small-business owners were asked how likely they were to recommend a major brand to another business owner. Unsurprisingly, many of the brands we’ve seen in the news such as Uber, Wells Fargo and United Airlines had poor reputations among business owners.


However, people are very trusting toward tech companies such as Amazon, Wordpress and Google -- in fact, these brands have stayed in the top three positions for most trusted brands for two straight quarters. And whatever Amazon’s doing, it’s doing it right: The ecommerce giant has held first place for three consecutive quarters. For the first time ever, Apple and FedEx made their way to the the top five slots this quarter....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

Trust is vital to the success of any company -- big or small. And 56% of small biz didn't trust the majority of these big brands.

OLOPHA STEPHEN's curator insight, April 27, 2017 6:23 PM

Integrity in Business will keep you flying high.

Scooped by Jeff Domansky
April 17, 2017 12:41 PM
Scoop.it!

8 Types of Corporate Apologies

8 Types of Corporate Apologies | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

When last month’s “Communicator of the Year” can turn into this month’s PR disaster, there’s a lesson for any brand on the perils of flubbing a corporate apology. Any brand can go from hero to zero.

Much has been written in the last week about the missteps of United and its CEO. Given that it was PRWeek that so recently awarded Oscar Munoz as “Communicator of the Year”, I thought the PRWeek postmortem was particularly interesting:

“No company or brand can rest on its laurels when it comes to its reputation. Protecting and enhancing it is a 24/7, 365 days a year undertaking....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

Tom Fishburne nails the state of corporate apologies!

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
March 19, 2017 10:48 AM
Scoop.it!

When an Employee or Spokesperson Criticizes Your Company

When an Employee or Spokesperson Criticizes Your Company | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

Last month three of Under Armour’s celebrity endorsers — Stephen Curry, Misty Copeland, and Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson — publicly criticized the company’s CEO, Kevin Plank, for making a favorable statement about President Trump. This was an unusual PR challenge. Normally, executives worry about their endorsers behaving in ways that reflect poorly on their companies, such as getting in trouble with the law. They don’t expect to be reprimanded by the very people they’re paying to market their products.


In today’s hyperpartisan environment, companies are facing backlash from in-house employees, too. As detailed in this report, one Oracle staffer posted a letter explaining that he had quit his job because the company’s co-CEO, Safra Catz, joined Trump’s transition team. And after IBM chief Ginni Rometty congratulated Trump on his election win, staffers circulated an online petition asking her to allow them to refuse to participate in projects that violate civil and constitutional liberties. It now has more than 2,000 signatures.


What should companies do when insiders publicly condemn them? Based on my experience training communication executives on how to handle such situations, here’s what I recommend....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

Smart advice for navigating a contentious climate.

Vanessa Ong Li Wen's curator insight, March 19, 2017 11:11 AM

This article writes about the increasingly outspoken and bold generation that we have in society today. In today’s hyperpartisan environment, companies are facing backlash from in-house employees too. While I myself believe in freedom and speech and the determination to stand up for what you believe in, I do agree that companies need to watch whatever they advocate for, either directly or indirectly. Now that both adolescents and adults alike are becoming more direct and accusatory in their statements, it is important to communicate your values to your subordinates and external clients. In addition, as leaders of their respective companies, their employees will be looking at them for guidance and a figure that they should strive to emulate. Hence, to avoid any misunderstandings and backlash from the public and internally, companies need to think before they openly express their views on contentious issues, now more than ever.

Scooped by Jeff Domansky
February 27, 2017 4:06 PM
Scoop.it!

And the Oscar for best apology goes to . . . PriceWaterhouseCoopers - without bullshit

And the Oscar for best apology goes to . . . PriceWaterhouseCoopers - without bullshit | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

Perhaps you noticed that there was a screwup at the Oscars last night. Faye Dunaway and Warren Beatty announced that “La La Land” had won the Academy Award for Best Picture . . . and then had to backtrack, because there was a mistake. “Moonlight” was the actual winner.

After the mistake, many people behaved graciously. In what has to be the most heartbreaking moment of his career, “La La Land” producer Jordan Horowitz realized he didn’t receive his first Oscar, and then beckoned the producers of “Moonlight” to come on stage. Warren Beatty explained why he’d made the mistake — he’d gotten the wrong envelope.

But who was responsible for the screwup? It was PriceWaterhouseCoopers, the accounting firm that counts the votes and determines the winners.

PriceWaterhouseCooper’s statement is a model apology. Here’s PwC’s statement just after the event...

Jeff Domansky's insight:

PwC mistake taints the Oscars evening. Josh Bernoff says PwC made a "model apology" but the fact remains, it was a monumental screwup. 

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
February 22, 2017 10:12 AM
Scoop.it!

What Should Marketers Do When The President Tweets About Them? Nothing

What Should Marketers Do When The President Tweets About Them? Nothing | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

Marketers may find themselves faced with a timely dilemma: What to do when the leader of the free world calls out your brand—or even your CEO—by name in a tweet? A year ago, the mere suggestion of that would be preposterous. Today, that’s not something outside of the realm of possibility.

 

The question is: How political do brands need to get in 2017? While the retail world may be the current battleground between the White House and the private sector, consumer packaged goods, tech and business-to-business leaders could be next. This is a new day in American politics, and we are just one month into the Trump presidency. Brands must ask themselves, where do we take a stand, why and to what end? And if I do take a stand, what risk do I take on with angering possibly half of my consumers?

 

While there are perhaps no easy answers, and the rule book has yet to be written, there are a few suggestions:

Jeff Domansky's insight:

In this hyper-politicized time, the best course of action for brands may be to stick to the course you are on and not respond.. Great debate, and IMHO you might have to prepare a response just in case.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
February 21, 2017 11:50 PM
Scoop.it!

Here's Why The World's Biggest Brands Are Blacklisting Breitbart

Here's Why The World's Biggest Brands Are Blacklisting Breitbart | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it
“Many of our global clients have already requested that we block this site on our activity.”


An employee for the agency described it to BuzzFeed News as a “preventative measure”, as online advertising is assigned to websites algorithmically.
Omnicom handpicks the sites their clients’ ads run on, which is known as a whitelist, whereas ad exchanges or networks such as Google’s typically work on a blacklist where brands specify which sites not to run on.


The email from management added: “If you are running activity through ad networks such as MediaIQ/Regital, Quantcast & RocketFuel it is worth reaching out to your rep and making sure Breitbart is blacklisted and request a URL level site report over the past 30 days which all should be able to provide.”...

Jeff Domansky's insight:

Many global advertisers have blacklisted Breitbart News. Some clicks can hurt your reputation.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
January 30, 2017 11:27 PM
Scoop.it!

Intentionally or Not, Big Brands Help Fund Fake News

Intentionally or Not, Big Brands Help Fund Fake News | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

Wittingly or not, major global corporations are helping fund sites that traffic in fake news by advertising on them.

Take, for instance, a story that falsely claimed former President Barack Obama had banned Christmas cards to overseas military personnel. Despite debunking by The Associated Press and other fact-checking outlets, that article lives on at "Fox News The FB Page," which has no connection to the news channel although its bears a replica of its logo.

And until recently, the story was often flanked by ads from big brands such as the insurer Geico, the business-news outlet Financial Times, and the beauty-products maker Revlon.

This situation isn't remotely an isolated case, although major companies generally say they have no intention of bankrolling purveyors of fake news with their ad dollars. Because many of their ads are placed on websites by computer algorithms, it's not always easy for these companies to steer them away from sites they find objectionable....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

Fake news is a big marketing challenge for the biggest advertisers. Remaining apolitical and protecting your reputation is paramount and difficult in the digital world.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
December 12, 2016 2:21 AM
Scoop.it!

How To Handle Your Favorite Brand's Bad PR

How To Handle Your Favorite Brand's Bad PR | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

Like our favorite celebrities, brands aren’t perfect.  Bad PR is a part of life because people aren’t perfect and the companies they run follow suit.  Recently New Balance became the first company to publicly back Donald Trump, a very divisive figure for reasons you would have to be sleeping under a rock to not know already.  


Priding themselves on being a brand that develops their products on American soil, New Balance saw Trump’s election as an opportunity for business growth and one that would bring more jobs to Americans.  However, that is their opinion and not some universal truth.


Politics is a tricky place for a brand to choose sides when there are so many issues that people take seriously.  Thousands of sneakerheads were outraged at New Balance’s political stance. So outraged that they denounced their love for the brand all over social media by literally posting pictures of them throwing the sneakers away and burning them.  Things really spiraled out of control when neo-nazis procclaimed the sneaker to be the official sneaker of white people.  Yes, that really happened.  


Obviously publicly backing a divisive president-elect has some serious downsides with the public, so what do we do as consumers after our favorite brands choose to do something against our personal values?...

Jeff Domansky's insight:

The election of Donald Trump has shown that politics and brand marketing are bad bedfellows.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
November 17, 2016 2:46 AM
Scoop.it!

Trump supporters call to boycott Pepsi over comments the CEO never made

Trump supporters call to boycott Pepsi over comments the CEO never made | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

The President-elect's supporters are threatening to boycott Pepsi (PEP) over fabricated statements circulating on social media. Twitter users, many citing debunked news articles, claim PepsiCo (PEP) CEO Indra Nooyi told Trump fans to "take their business elsewhere.

 

"Sites designed to trick people, including Truthfeed and Gateway Pundit, published the fake quote while encouraging readers to stop buying Pepsi's products. Gateway Pundit also incorrectly claimed PepsiCo's stock plunged 5% because of the comment that Nooyi never actually made.

 

Nooyi never told Trump's supporters that Pepsi doesn't want their business and she even congratulated the president-elect on his victory. But she condemned the ugly rhetoric of the campaign....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

Donald Trump's supporters are threatening to boycott Pepsi after fake comments from the CEO circulated on social media. More pain from the toxic brew when politics and marketing mix.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
October 17, 2016 1:35 PM
Scoop.it!

Spinning a PR Crisis

Spinning a PR Crisis | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

The Samsung Galaxy Note 7 debacle is a master class in how not to handle a crisis. Much will be investigated in the months ahead. But what I find particularly interesting is how Samsung communicated what was happening at each stage of the crisis.

This weekend, the US DOT banned the Galaxy Note 7 on all US flights, categorizing the phones as “forbidden hazardous material.” It doesn’t get much clearer than that. Yet, just a few days earlier, Samsung portrayed the situation as “temporarily adjusting the production schedule to ensure quality and safety matters.”

The gap between “forbidden hazardous material” and “temporarily adjusting the production schedule” is a massive chasm. A few weeks earlier, Samsung similarly described a “global product recall” as an “exchange program.”...

Jeff Domansky's insight:

Tom Fishburne's cartoon says it all. PR people need to give advice on how to close the gap between reality and crisis weasel words.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
October 12, 2016 2:38 AM
Scoop.it!

Repairing a Damaged Reputation Online

Repairing a Damaged Reputation Online | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

No matter how secure and well-placed a brand appears to be, the danger of an online reputation crisis is always lurking. The open nature of modern day communication channels, like blogs, social networks and review sites, means that one bad customer experience or a small lapse in service standards can quickly damage a brand’s reputation.

 

Negative experiences shared more often

 

Research shows that consumers are much more likely to share negative experiences on social networks and other public platforms.

 

A damaged online image can have severe effects on a brand’s value and business performance. A study by Deloitte shows that nearly 41% of companies that experience a negative reputation event reported loss of brand value and revenue....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

Here's how to repair a damaged online reputation.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
May 16, 2017 10:19 AM
Scoop.it!

One on One: Hootsuite's Ryan Holmes on Why CEOs should Get Savvy with Social

One on One: Hootsuite's Ryan Holmes on Why CEOs should Get Savvy with Social | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

Hootsuite founder and CEO, Ryan Holmes, dishes on why social media is not just important for brands, but for the heads of the brands as well.


When it comes to marketing, social media is often discussed as a channel directive. It is a channel marketers need to cultivate an audience on, and can be used to humanize their brand to an extent. Social—especially in the age of Trump—is now often a medium where brands must defend themselves against major scandals.


But we rarely bring CEOs into the marketing/social media mix.Ryan Holmes, founder and CEO of Hootsuite, spoke with us in the latest DMN One on One podcast. We caught up with Holmes a few days before the release of his latest book, "The 4 Billion Dollar Tweet." Here's our conversation on how CEOs can, and why they should, get savvy with social media....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

Hootsuite founder and CEO, Ryan Holmes, dishes on why social media is not just important for brands, but for the heads of the brands as well. PS, it's not just because POTUS does it. Badly, LOL.

Barbara Jean Garza's comment, May 30, 2019 2:46 AM
As a new CEO with social media management experience, and entering a very antiquated world of chambers! I've found so much value in tapping into my knowledge of social media management and how it has impacted our work and reach.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
April 27, 2017 11:51 PM
Scoop.it!

United Airlines Reaches Settlement With Passenger Who Was Dragged Off Plane

United Airlines Reaches Settlement With Passenger Who Was Dragged Off Plane | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

David Dao, the doctor who was seen being dragged off a United Airlines jet this month in videos that sparked widespread outrage, has reached a settlement with the airline for an undisclosed amount, his lawyers said on Thursday.

The April 9 episode had stoked the fears and frustrations of airplane passengers everywhere and became a public relations nightmare for United.

On Thursday, both sides welcomed what they hoped would be the end of the ordeal.

“Mr. Munoz said he was going to do the right thing, and he has,” Thomas A. Demetrio, one of Dr. Dao’s lawyers, said of Oscar Munoz, United’s chief executive. “In addition, United has taken full responsibility for what happened on Flight 3411, without attempting to blame others, including the City of Chicago. For this acceptance of corporate accountability, United is to be applauded.”

Jeff Domansky's insight:

Some think United Airlines should be applauded for taking responsibility but they should have been managing better in the first place. Regardless, it's an expensive mistake.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
April 25, 2017 11:33 AM
Scoop.it!

Does Anyone Even Care About #BrandFails?

Does Anyone Even Care About #BrandFails? | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

The recent United and Pepsi social media firestorms are still captivating the media's undivided attention. It’s no surprise that the online perpetuation of these real-life events is the prime topic of conversation for marketers across all industries (not just airlines and soft drinks). 


Both brand blunders have sparked a burning question that’s occupying my mindspace, and it doesn’t have to do with brand reputation. “Does anyone even care?”


Brands have one purpose, selling products and services to the consumers of the world. So unless social backlash and media scrutiny are causing a serious decline in sales numbers, are there any actual consequences?...

Jeff Domansky's insight:

So United Airlines and Pepsi weren't hurt by recent controversies? Interesting proposition but I'm not sure I buy it.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
April 13, 2017 1:41 AM
Scoop.it!

Best Trolls By Brands and the Internet in Response to United Airlines - DesignTAXI.com

Best Trolls By Brands and the Internet in Response to United Airlines - DesignTAXI.com | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

United Airlines made headlines this week after airport police forcibly removed a passenger from one of its flightSuch unfavorable occurrence is not the first for United. Several weeks ago, the airline disallowed two girls from boarding a flight as they were wearing leggings and were “not properly clothed via [its] Contract of Carriage.” 


It comes with no surprise that the incident has ignited a wave of responses online. While United Airlines attempts to clean up this unsavory fracas, here is a compilation of the best trolls by brands and netizens in response to the brouhaha, with some referencing Pepsi’s recent infamous ad....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

Smug United Airlines gets bad PR and trolls.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
March 9, 2017 10:06 AM
Scoop.it!

The Public Apology Letter: 6 Brands That Nailed It | HubSpot

The Public Apology Letter: 6 Brands That Nailed It | HubSpot | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

But to little old me, a sincere apology goes a long way. When I sense genuine remorse, it means a lot to me -- perhaps because it's so rare, at least in my experience. Combined with my nerdy affection for all things marketing, that sentiment applies to brand apologies, too. It's not so much that I think, "Wow, that means a lot to me," but more like, "Wow, that company really nailed saying, 'Sorry.'"


So, who's done it best? We rounded up some of our favorite brand apologies to inspire you next time you make a mistake -- and need to admit your wrongdoing....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

HubSpot suggests six brands that have mastered the art of the apology, and admitting when they're wrong. Useful lessons for reputation management.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
February 22, 2017 4:21 PM
Scoop.it!

Analysis | Trump’s 3,000 websites — and what they say about his rise to power

Analysis | Trump’s 3,000 websites — and what they say about his rise to power | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

In Trump We Trust — .com, that is.

Not your politics? Maybe check out ThrowOutTrump.com.

Actually, they're both empty websites, what you call parked domain names: bought and paid for, but not used.

More interesting is that they both belong to the same guy — Donald J. Trump.

A big hat tip to CNN, which had the idea to search for all websites registered by the Trump Organization and came back with a list of more than 3,000 — all the way back to the original DonaldJTrump.com, registered in 1997....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

Managing your reputation online is partly about securing domains either positive or potentially negative. And the Trump organization has 3000 domains in its orbit. That's a lot of reputation management.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
February 21, 2017 11:58 PM
Scoop.it!

KPMGVoice: Upping The Scheduling Game For Professional Sports

KPMGVoice: Upping The Scheduling Game For Professional Sports | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

If there is one entrepreneur who knows the real value of building social relationships, and how they can extend into the world of social media, it’s health and fitness mogul Andy Frisella: founder of Supplement Superstores, Paradise Distribution, and the renowned fitness brand 1st Phorm International. These brands, among others, bring in more than $100 million a year.

How?

He has built a true community....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

Finding truth, telling stories and building community are great recipes for success like Andy Frisella.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
February 20, 2017 10:08 AM
Scoop.it!

What CEOs Should Know About Speaking Up on Political Issues

What CEOs Should Know About Speaking Up on Political Issues | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

Should executives respond when a tweet or unexpected event touches their business or rouses their employees and customers? There are risks and rewards to CEO activism. Weber Shandwick, where I serve as chief reputation officer, and KRC Research surveyed 1,050 senior executives and 2,100 consumers across 21 markets worldwide to find out what people expect from corporate brands.

 

Our research shows that the two biggest factors that influence respondents’ opinions about companies are what customers say about them (88%) and how they react in crisis (85%). In fact, how a company responds to a controversy, including how quickly, is more important in driving public perception about the company than what is said about that company in the media (76%), by employees (76%), on the company’s website (68%), by spokespeople (61%), or in the company’s advertising (61%)....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

Bigly current issue and sage advice. Be ready to respond.

Emmanuel Mauricio's curator insight, February 20, 2017 2:31 PM

This was a very interesting article because it speaks about the way CEO's speak on behalf of major political issues on their companies and whether they should respond or not so they don’t stir up any controversy or any kind of other issues that would jeopardize their company. The article gives its opinion on whether or not they should respond when there company is the one being involved. It gives info on how some companies customers make for 88% of their respondents. It shares as well how important it is for a company to share their opinion because it comments and keep the opinion preserved and well rounded. Of the executives they reviewed a lot of them said they prefer when someone speaks up for the company and shares a public opinion.

Scooped by Jeff Domansky
January 12, 2017 1:17 AM
Scoop.it!

Lessons From Three of 2016's Biggest PR Fails

Lessons From Three of 2016's Biggest PR Fails | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it
2016 saw its fair share of corporate public-relations mishaps, but some were more cringeworthy than others. To be sure, the PR crises in certain cases weren't all that bad compared with the serious business missteps that precipitated a few of them, but the fact remains that there is always a better and a worse way to talk to customers and the public when something's gone wrong. These were three of the year's most egregious gaffes, and what companies can learn from them heading into 2017
Jeff Domansky's insight:

Some PR mishaps are simply ill-advised tweets, while others are huge corporate scandals. Here's what Cheerios, Wells Fargo and Samsung taught us.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
November 18, 2016 11:29 PM
Scoop.it!

A Cautionary Tale of Customers in the "Red Zone" Part 1

A Cautionary Tale of Customers in the "Red Zone" Part 1 | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

Customer service today means serving customers "in the red zone." Besides my former beloved 1986 red Honda Prelude, most red things for me fall into a negative category. Think sunburn, red alert, STOP sign, SOS.

The red zone is different for different people and different every time. And that’s the whole point. Sometimes it’s because expectations are set so high with a direct line and then fall short and disappoint, as in my London business travel experience. And sometimes it’s because the bar is set so low and a brand still fails to make the cut, like the slow moving lines at the Post Office and just as you’re the next person (and of course pressed for time), the next open window closes so the agent can take a break... But it’s always in-the-moment and real for the customer.

In other words, customers are normal, garden-variety social, emotional creatures that now have a bullhorn to broadcast their (dis)pleasures with your brand. Humans have always been social, emotional creatures so there’s nothing new here. What is new are the channels and media we have access to at any given point on any given day and the larger pool of connections we can stay in touch with via our social networks/communities. And still there are so many brands that fail to incorporate this new reality into strategy, operations and customer service. In the latest study conducted by Twitter, they found that by responding to customers on Twitter, customers are 44% more likely to share their experience, 30% more likely to recommend the brand, and the responsiveness will positively increase CSAT by 1 point....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

Can you meet customer expectations when they enter the "Red Zone." It's a great question for every company with direct customer interactions.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
October 20, 2016 12:45 AM
Scoop.it!

I Trust You, I Trust You Not: Different Sides of Organization-Public Relationships | Institute for Public Relations

I Trust You, I Trust You Not: Different Sides of Organization-Public Relationships | Institute for Public Relations | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

Scholars in public relations have contended that organization-public relationship (OPR) quality has multiple dimensions, including the oft-cited list of trust, satisfaction, control mutuality, and commitment. The concept of OPR quality is assumed to be positive (Heath, 2013), which nevertheless does not describe relational problems in reality. In this blog post, I introduce an additional side of OPR quality—distrust, and how it differs from trust.

 

Distrust is often considered as simply the opposite of trust by organizational researchers and excluded as a component of OPR quality in the public relations literature. However, distrust is not the absence of trust. For example, an employee may have both low levels of trust and distrust in his or her colleagues who resemble casual acquaintances in the organization. They only occasionally cross paths with these coworkers. They are not confident in or very watchful of these relational partners. Also likely the employee could feel both high levels of trust and distrust in his or her superiors. They trust the management, as representatives of the organization, in some aspects but distrust in other aspects.

 

In an employee survey (N=583), I tested distrust as a new dimension of OPR quality (Shen, in press). I found that both distrust and trust were distinct from each other. The study suggested that OPR quality is not inherently positive. Employees may perceive sinister intentions of the organization’s conduct. Even those who highly trust their employing organizations do not necessarily perceive low distrust, and vice versa. Employees could feel confident about the organization’s capabilities—trust, while at the same time they are skeptical about whether the organization keep employees’ interests in mind when making decisions—distrust....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

IPR research paper looks at how distrust impacts organizational relationships

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
October 12, 2016 10:45 AM
Scoop.it!

Five Essential Reputation Management Tools

Five Essential Reputation Management Tools | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

IAn instant is all it takes to threaten your business's sterling reputation online. You might have had an off day or the misfortune of dealing with an ornery customer, but it's almost inevitable that you'll come face to face with a negative online review at some point in your career.

 

But, as Adrienne Weissman, CMO at G2 Crowd, recently pointed out, negative reviews aren't all bad. Some 70% of Americans read reviews before making a purchase, and those who seek out negative reviews tend to be more engaged and are 67% more likely to make a purchase. Plus, 68% of people trust a company more when their reviews are a mix of good and bad.

 

Of course, the key to making the best of a bad review lies largely in your response. That means you need to be able to find reviews (both good and bad) as they pop up. That's definitely more social media monitoring than one person can handle...

 

And that's where reputation management tools come in. The following five reputation management tools are some of the best on the market for tracking mentions, discovering influencers, and managing online reviews as they happen....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

Good reputation management tools if you have a budget, though several offer freemium versions

No comment yet.