Newsletter navale
831.6K views | +7 today
Newsletter navale
Your new post is loading...
Scooped by Patrick H.!

Marine canadienne : réduction du programme de patrouilleurs arctiques en vue et réévaluation de la stratégie bâtiments de soutien

Marine canadienne : réduction du programme de patrouilleurs arctiques en vue et réévaluation de la stratégie bâtiments de soutien | Newsletter navale |

The federal government is trimming its expected order of Arctic patrol ships and evaluating a set of unsolicited proposals to convert civilian cargo ships for use by the Royal Canadian Navy, The Canadian Press has learned.

Both steps are a sign that more modest expectations have been set for the government's national shipbuilding strategy, which has yet to deliver a single vessel some three years after the shipyards were chosen in 2011.

The navy is set to retire its two replenishment ships, HMCS Preserver and the fire-damaged HMCS Protecteur, without having any replacements ready to sail, despite a decade-long replacement program.

New joint support ships are only slated to begin construction in late 2016, with an in-service target of 2019-2020, but the government has yet to sign a construction deal with the designated shipyard, Seaspan of Vancouver.

Officials insisted last year that Canada could rely on its allies to refuel and rearm its warships in the meantime, but a series of government and defence sources say a newer proposal from the Quebec-based Davie Shipyard would provide beefed-up civilian ships under a five-year lease.

There is "growing interest" in the plan as a stopgap until the new supply ships arrive, said one defence source, speaking on condition of anonymity because the person was not authorized to speak to the media.

Questions involving price, timeline and the general viability of the proposal are still being explored, a second industry source confirmed.

At the same time, negotiations with Halifax-based Irving Shipbuilding for the construction of new Arctic offshore patrol ships have seen the government scale back its original plan to buy between six and eight of the vessels to enforce sovereignty in the North.

The new plan is to buy five light icebreakers, with an option for a sixth.

1 ship per year

Sources also say the proposed contract calls for the delivery of only one ship per year because that's all the government can afford.

The deadline to sign a deal is the end of the year and there is intense political pressure to see "steel being cut" in time for next year's federal election.

The Arctic ships, a pet project of the Conservatives, have had their capabilities repeatedly watered down on the drawing board in order to keep costs down.

The original plan included three heavy military icebreakers; what is being proposed now is a ship that can cut through only one-year old ice and with limited armaments.

Phil Lagasse, a defence expert at the University of Ottawa, said the back-room maneuverings only confirm that money remains the biggest problem for the strategy and that the government is prepared to wait and accept fewer ships.

That could be bad news for communities like Halifax, which were counting on building everything the government promised.

"Politically, it was oversold. I think we can agree on that," said Lagasse, who added that the national shipbuilding procurement strategy, as it's known, was only intended to set up a framework for building ships in Canada.

"[The strategy] doesn't magically solve your planning problem. It doesn't solve your defence inflation problem. None of that is solved just because you successfully selected two yards."

Concern around leasing

Sahir Khan, a former official at the parliamentary budget office who studied the joint support ship program, said Canada — like its allies — has yet to be able to balance the kind of warships it wants and needs with the amount of money it's willing to spend.

"No matter how long we delay having such an open and transparent debate in Canada, it is highly unlikely that our path will diverge from that of our peers," said Khan, who is now at the University of Ottawa.

Both Khan and Lagasse expressed concern about a lease of temporary supply ships, saying the government may end up paying through the nose, depending upon how it's structured.

Eric Lerhe, a retired commodore, said the stopgap measure for the supply ships isn't a surprise because of the retirement of the existing vessels, which — although long past their shelf life — were not due to leave the service for another couple of years.

There were published reports Canada was considering a deal to acquire mothballed U.S. Navy replenishment ships. That plan was dismissed, partly because the American ships were costly to operate and required a crew complement twice that of the Canadian navy.

Producing only one Arctic ship a year is not a bad thing because it allows for a smooth introduction to service, said Lehre, who's now an adjunct professor at Dalhousie University in Halifax.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Patrick H.!

La Marine canadienne envisage la location d'un navire de commerce comme bâtiment de soutien provisoire en attendant les JSS

La Marine canadienne envisage la location d'un navire de commerce comme bâtiment de soutien provisoire en attendant les JSS | Newsletter navale |

Canada’s navy is looking at acquiring a commercial vessel as a stop-gap measure to supply its warships while they are at sea, says the country’s top sailor.

Vice-Admiral Mark Norman, the head of the Royal Canadian Navy, said the service has received a number of proposals from companies, offering commercial ships to deal with the gap created by the retirement of the service’s supply vessels.

Norman announced several weeks ago that HMCS Preserver and HMCS Protecteur would be decommissioned.

But since replacement vessels will not be available until at least 2019 or 2020, the Royal Canadian Navy will be left without the ability to transfer fuel and others supplies to its warships while they are on missions.

“There have been a small number of proposals to potentially modify some commercial vessels to provide an interim capability,” Norman confirmed Tuesday.

“We’re in the process of evaluating the viability of those proposals and the potential for those proposals to be recommended, or not, in fairly short order.”

There has also been suggestions the Canadian navy would purchase two surplus U.S. supply ships. But Norman ruled that out.

He noted that the lease of U.S. supply ships is being looked at but suggested that proposal might not move ahead. “We’re unlikely to see a dedicated short- to medium-term capability through a lease but we haven’t ruled it out yet,” Norman said. “Those discussions are happening. I should know more in the next week or two.”

Canadian military sources say the navy will most likely deal with the gap by better co-ordination of its ship deployments to coincide with the availability of U.S. supply vessels.

The navy made the decision to retire HMCS Protecteur and HMCS Preserver after reviewing the status of the aging ships and examining how much money would be needed to repair them.

HMCS Protecteur was seriously damaged in a fire earlier this year off the coast of Hawaii.

The navy says HMCS Preserver was rapidly approaching the end of its operational life, which was planned for 2016. Engineering surveys conducted in recent months identified levels of corrosion in HMCS Preserver that have degraded the structural integrity of the ship below acceptable limits, the navy added.

Those ships will eventually be replaced by two Joint Support Ships. But construction of those vessels has yet to begin.

The navy has been trying for more than a decade to acquire new supply ships. First announced in 2004 by the Liberals, then re-announced in 2006 by the Conservatives, the supply ship project has had more than its share of problems. Bids were cancelled in 2008 and the project had to be restarted. The navy expects the ships to be ready by 2020.

Concerns have also been raised about the level of funding set aside for the Joint Support Ships. In 2013, the office of the parliamentary budget officer noted the project would cost $4.13 billion, far more than the $2.6 billion budgeted by the Conservative government.

Patrick H. 's insight:

Rappelons que c'est TKMS Canada qui a été choisi pour la conception de ces navires de soutien canadiens :

No comment yet.