A new empathy education programme developed at University of Galway is to be rolled out for Transition Year (TY) students in secondary schools nationwide.
‘Activating Social Empathy’ is a classroom resource designed for helping teachers to promote empathy skills and understanding amongst students.

The programme was developed by researchers at the UNESCO Child and Family Research Centre at University of Galway alongside colleagues in the University’s School of Education, working closely with a Youth Advisory Panel from Foróige.

His point reflects a deeper clinical truth: empathy only functions when both parties are psychologically invested in resolution.

This essay examines, through an academic lens, why empathy collapses in intimate relationships, with specific attention to gendered patterns in emotional communication, avoidant attachment dynamics, and the role of reciprocity.

I. Tactical Empathy: A Theoretical Overview
Tactical empathy is defined in negotiation literature as the process of accurately understanding and articulating the emotions, needs, and perspectives of another person to reduce defensiveness and facilitate cooperation (Voss & Raz, 2016).

A first-of-its-kind empathy education programme from the University of Galway is being rolled out to Transition Year students nationwide, aimed at boosting compassion and emotional skills in schools across the country. 

We discussed this with  Brendan Kelly, Professor of Psychiatry at Trinity College Dublin. 

Empathy has become a business competency, not a soft nice-to-have. With hybrid teams, rapid AI adoption, and a workforce increasingly vocal about identity and inclusion, companies are being pushed to rethink what effective leadership looks like right now. Research and workplace trend reports consistently show that employees who feel seen and supported are more engaged and more likely to stay—raising the stakes for leaders who are hiring, managing, and shaping culture in real time.

What does empathetic marketing really look like in practice—not just as a buzzword, but as a way of working and leading?

Cillian Murphy is a patron of the Unesco Child and Family Research Centre at University of Galway and a supporter of the empathy education initiatives.

The ‘Activating Social Empathy’ schools programme is supported by the Irish American Partnership and Lifes2good Foundation, and partners of the Unesco Child and Family Research Centre, Foróige and Penn State.

Dr Charlotte Silke, lead researcher with Unesco Child and Family Research Centre, said: “The core aim is to support young people in becoming more attuned to the feelings and perspectives of others, and more confident in expressing empathy across a variety of real-world contexts.” 

A closer look at the research on empathy and gender reveals a more nuanced story shaped by socialization and stereotypes rather than biology.

At a time when social trust feels increasingly fragile, leadership grounded in integrity, empathy, and consistency is critical. This webinar features leaders who have successfully built trust by prioritizing “learning from listening” and centering empathetic communication within their communities.

Join us for a conversation with leaders who are putting trust into practice. We’ll explore how they’ve built strong, credible reputations; how they foster trust at both individual and community levels; what larger institutions can learn from these grassroots strategies; and how locally grounded approaches can be adapted to strengthen trust at scale.

Moderator: Pearce Godwin, Founder, Listen First Project & Listen First Coalition; Senior Director, Urban Rural Action
 

Enter Empathetic AI Policy
Empathetic AI Policy—the emerging discipline that insists human impact must be designed, measured, and governed as rigorously as performance—exists precisely because of these failures. It’s not about making machines emotional, but about making human decision-makers accountable. It means recognizing that every model has moral weight, every dataset represents real lives, and every automated decision carries consequences that ripple through families, institutions, and society. In short, empathy is not a soft constraint—it’s the structure that keeps AI aligned with humanity.

The irony of modern AI is that it often reflects the very flaws it was meant to transcend: bias, carelessness, and moral blindness. The industry’s most infamous collapses—from racist chatbots to wrongful prosecutions and mass surveillance—share a single root cause: empathy was ignored, underestimated, or engineered out of the process. These are not merely “bugs in the system.” They are symptoms of a worldview that treats technology as neutral, when in reality, it always encodes human priorities.

Education today stands at a crossroads. As artificial intelligence transforms how we learn and live, the very essence of education is being reimagined. Are we preparing young people merely to compete, or to connect? To master technology, or to master themselves?

Educators and policymakers everywhere are rediscovering a timeless truth: intelligence opens doors, but empathy keeps them open. Emotional intelligence, the ability to understand and manage emotions, to lead with compassion, and to act with integrity is emerging as the most critical skill of the 21st century. It bridges knowledge and wisdom, between information and understanding, between success and significance.

Empathy is a crucial skill for public servants because they need to contextually understand who they are designing policies for, a researcher tells GN.

“Empathy can be used in decision making by understanding exactly how the program or policy will actually affect the person,” says Assel Mussagulova, from the School of Social and Political Sciences at the University of Sydney.

Applying empathy to policymaking can be achieved by collecting more data, engaging with the data “and empathetically trying to understand how the policy will affect different cohorts based on their individual circumstances”, says Mussagulova.

AI journaling app Rosebud attempted to quantify chatbots’ empathy by testing 25 popular models across various mental health-related scenarios, scoring them based on how well they could recognize a crisis, prevent harm, and intervene.

Why it's important: As machines and models take on more routine tasks, the human edge lies in collaboration, adaptability and compassion. Entrepreneurial leadership (Babson's specialty) helps leaders hone their head and heart alike.

"Active listening and empathy are essential for entrepreneurial leaders to identify starting points for creating viable business opportunities," Babson On-Demand™ co-director Philip Kim, who is also the school's Lewis Family Distinguished Professor in Social Innovation, said.

by Alison Jane Martingano 

Dozens of reliable and valid empathy measures exist, each designed to assess different components of empathy.

Self-report measures can capture momentary feelings and more habitual traits.

Performance-based measures assess how accurately people infer others’ emotions.

Observer ratings (from teachers, parents, patients, etc.) measure how empathic someone appears.

Many people assume empathy is too soft, too subjective, or too deeply personal to quantify. In our own survey, nearly half of the respondents agreed that “it is impossible to measure empathy.” This sentiment echoes a familiar cultural belief: that empathy is like love, beautiful precisely because it resists dissection. As one commentator put it, attempts to measure empathy require “stripping it of softness, feelings, and any sense that it’s a touchy-feely-can’t-exactly-measure-it” quality. And if you strip that away, she argued, “it’s no longer empathy.”

Empathy enables innovation, inclusion and the next-generation workforce
Innovation flourishes when diverse perspectives are valued and a culture of psychological safety is present. Most organizations today are composed of culturally diverse teams, each with distinct communication styles and perspectives on the world. Leaders who adapt their approach to meet the needs of different people open doors to authentic dialogue and deeper understanding.

How to Tap into Your Empathy for the Holidays | Bloom

Empathizing with another is perhaps the most human emotion of all and a long shot from the cold calculations of vectorized tokens that drive the inner workings of contemporary LLMs. This chapter looks beyond the questions of what to make of AI-generated “empathy” and instead asks whether AI can be used to develop our capacities for genuine human empathy.

Empathy is not a static trait, instead capable of growth and development, and this paper explores whether AI can and, more importantly, should be used to increase one’s empathy. Nothing in principle stands in the way of AI improving our empathy, but the possibility raises unanswered questions about whether such an approach would be effective or would backfire in unexpected ways, such as encouraging the commodification of empathy as a technological tool that can make companies money, rather than a fundamental part of the human experience.

Empathy Isn’t the Problem - Enmeshment Is
What the author called “empathy” is something very different, something psychologist Murray Bowen described decades ago as enmeshment.

Enmeshment is the emotional fusion that happens when two people lose sight of where one person’s emotional life ends and the other’s begins. It’s not connection—it’s collapse. The self collapses into the other. Boundaries disappear. The relationship starts operating from a rigid, unhealthy script: one person must feel a certain way, act a certain way, uphold a certain emotional role—for the sake of the other.

In a world that feels sharper and more self-centered than ever, empathy seems to be disappearing, especially online. Political turbulence, social media culture, and a growing focus on self-preservation have created an environment where kindness is scarce, and disagreement feels like a battle. I explore how this leads to nonproductive arguing, and why practicing empathy, even in small ways, is more important than ever. 

I can’t be the only one who’s noticed that the world feels a little meaner now than it did four or five years ago. Scrolling through the comment section of any news article feels like entering a battlefield of opposing opinions and people trying to one-up each other with the harshest take — a place where empathy rarely survives. Anyone who’s as chronically online as me has probably noticed how contrasting this feels compared to the online climate of 2020, when there seemed to be more openness and tolerance. Now, everyone feels more narcissistic, and it makes me wonder: What happened to empathy? Especially among young people? 

1. BRIDGE THE CULTURES—DON’T BULLDOZE THEM 
The first step was recognizing that we were merging two strong cultures, not replacing one with another. We approached it with humility and respect for the expertise already on the factory floor. We listened, observed, and spent time in each other’s spaces—our HQ team getting hands-on experience in the manufacturing environment, and our manufacturing team visiting HQ to see the broader mission in action. 

That physical time together mattered. Culture isn’t built over Zoom; it’s built through shared meals, laughter, and the simple act of showing up. 

Zero-positive empathy, according to Simon Baron-Cohen, is a structured empathy rooted in rules, not resonance. For autistic people, this framing has been both validating and limiting. Some have embraced the idea, finding clarity in the distinction between emotional intuition and ethical principle. Others feel flattened by it: misread, misunderstood, miscast. Many autistic individuals experience a deep, often overwhelming emotional attunement that defies diagnostic expectations.