 Your new post is loading...
 Your new post is loading...
Rockström, J., Kassam, A., Friedrich, T., Reicosky, D., Dumansky, J., Goddard, T. & Peiretti, R.A. 2026. Global Sustainability. 9. Article e11, pages 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2025.10045
Schiavo, J.A., Lopes, V.R., Araújo, A.R., Macedo, M.C.M.,Oliveira, N. de S., Coêlho, R. da S., Souza, C.B. da Silva, Farias, P.G. da Silva, Panachuki, E., Couto, A.M. & Oelbermann, M. 2025. Applied and Environmental Soil Science. 2025 (1). Article 8491885. https://doi.org/10.1155/aess/8491885
Yuan, C., Ma, Z., Liu, S., Nie, H., Feng, G., Wang, S. & Luo, S. 2025. Frontiers in Microbiology. 16. Article 173092. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1730920
Nthebere, K., Prakash, T.R., Bhimireddy, P., Chandran, L.P., Gudapati, J., Admala, M. & Prasad, K. 2025 Heliyon. 11 (1) Article e41196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41196
Attia, A., Woli, P., Long, C.R., Rouquette, F.M., Smith, G.R., Datta, A., Felke, T. & Rajan, N. 2025. Journal of Environmental Management. 391. Article 126352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126352
Fagodiya, R.K., Verma, K., Sharma, G., Rai, A.K., Prajapat, K., Singh, R., Sheoran, P., Basak, N., Chandra, P., Sharma, D.P., Yadav, R.K. & Biswas, A.K. 2025. Soil and Tillage Research. 254. Article 106697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2025.106697
Madzivanzira, T., Mvumi, B.M., Nazare, R.M., Nyakudya, E., Mtambanengwe, F. & Mapfumo, P. 2025.Advances in Agriculture. 1. Article 4837619. https://doi.org/10.1155/aia/4837619
Zhou, Y., Ferdinand, M.S., van Wesemael, J., Dvorakova, K., Baret, P.V., Van Oost, K. & van Wesemael, B. 2025. Remote Sensing of Environment. 328. Article 114858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2025.114858
Kim, D.H., Wade, T., Brym, Z., Ogisma, L., Bhattarai, R., Bai, X., Bhadha, J. & Her, Y. 2025. Journal of Environmental Management. 387. Article 125833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125833
|
Hasanain, Md., Singh, V.K., Rathore, S.S., Meena, V.S., Singh, R.K., et al., (9 more). Biomass and Bioenergy. 208. Article 108864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.108864
Jia, Y., Sun, Y., Zhang, D., Yang, W., Pang, J., Siddique, K.H.. & Qu, Z. 2025. Agronomy-Basel. 15 (5) Article 1007. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15051007
Khosa, M.K., Barik, K., Aksakal, E., Jahangir, Md MR., Didenko, N.O. & Islam, K.R. 2025. Plos One. 20 (5) Article e0322891. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0322891
|
This paper looks at adoption of agricultural technology rather than specifically CA, but their findings are relevant for CA as well. The contend that adoption of many seemingly beneficial technologies remain low. This study looks at various reasons that explain adoption from 367 regression models from published literature. They find that farmer education, household size, land size, access to credit, land tenure, access to extension services, and organization membership positively correlate with the adoption of many agricultural technologies. Improved varieties and chemical inputs are adopted more readily on larger farms, which casts doubt on the scale-neutrality of these technologies. Credit can positively influence adoption, but researchers should measure whether farmers are credit constrained, rather than simply whether or not they have access to credit. They conclude that efforts to promote agricultural technologies in the developing world must be adapted to suit local agricultural and cultural contexts.