 Your new post is loading...
 Your new post is loading...
Anil, A.S., Sharma, V.K., Jimenez-Ballesta, R., Parihar, C.M., Datta, S.P., Barman, M., Chobhe, K.A., Kumawat, C., Patra, A. & Jatav, S.S. 2022. Land. 11 (9). Article number 1488 https://doi.org/10.3390/land11091488
Bai, L., Kong, X., Li, H., Zhu, H., Wang, C. & Ma, S. 2022. Agriculture. 12 (9). Article number 1449. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12091449
Dey, A., Patel, S. & Singh, H.P. 2022. Pages 204-218. In. Kumar, P., Pandey, S.K., Singh, S.K., Singh, S.S. & Singh, V.K. (Eds.) Sustainable Agriculture Systems and Technologies. John Wiley & Sons. Chichester, UK. 376 pages. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119808565.ch9
Kaduwal, S., Karki, T.B., Neupane, R., Bhattarai, R.K., Chaulagain, B., Ghimire, P., Gyawaly, P. & Das, S.K. 2022. Agronomy Journal of Nepal. 6 (1) 119-131. https://doi.org/10.3126/ajn.v6i1.47953
Kassam, A., Saharawat, Y.S. & Abrol, I.P. 2022. In. Sharma, A.R. (Ed.) Conservation Agriculture in India: A Paradigm Shift for Sustainable Production. 17 pages. Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003292487-2
Harish, M.N., Choudhary, A.K., Kumar, S., Dass, A., Singh, V.K., et.al., 2022. Scientific Reports. 12. Article number 3161. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07148-w
|
Pu, C., Chen, J-S., Wang, H-D., Virk, A.L., Zhao, X. & Zhang, H-L. 2022. Science of the Total Environment. 819. Article number 153089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153089
Kader, M.A., Jahangir, M.M.R., Islam, M.R., Begum, R., Nasreen, S.S., Islam, Md.R., Mahmud, A.Al., Haque, M.E., Bell, R.W., & Jahiruddin, M. 2022. Field Crops Research. 287. Article number 108636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108636
Lin, H., He, J., Li, H., Li, H., Wang, Q., Lu., C., Li, Y. & Jiang, S. 2022. Agriculture. 12 (9) Article number 1311. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12091311
Amadori, C., Conceicao, P.C., Casali, C.A., dos SantosCanalli, L.B., Calegari, A. & Dieckow, J. 2022. Bragantia: Soil and Plant Nutrition article. 81. Article number e3622. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.20210352
Navarro-Noya, Y.E., Chavez-Romero, Y., Hereira-Pacheco, S., Lorenzana, A.S de L., Govaerts, B., Verhulst, N. & Dendooven, L. 2022. Microbiology Spectrum. 10 (2) Article number 01834 https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01834-21
Gupta, R.K., Abrol, I.P. & Sharma, A.R. 2022. 11 pages. In. Sharma, A.R. (Ed). Conservation Agriculture in India: A Paradigm Shift for Sustainable Production. Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003292487-21
Parwada, C., Chipomho, J., Mandumbu, R. 2022. In. Mupambwa, H.A., Nciizah, A.D., Nyambo, P., Muchara, B. & Gabriel, N.N (Eds.) Food Security for African Smallholder Farmers. Springer, Singapore. Pages 281-294. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6771-8_17
|
This article applies an endogenous switching regression model to a case study of 2296 wheat fields in Morocco, to provide evidence on the socio-economic impacts of residue retention. 30% and 60% plus of crop residues were retained respectively on 35% and 14% of wheat fields. These levels of residue retention led to 22% and 29% more yields, 25% and 32% higher gross margins and 22% and 25% more consumption of wheat, respectively. Residue retention is economically and biophysically beneficial even for owners of livestock as the monetary value of the additional grain yield more than offsets the cost of purchasing an equivalent amount of feed from the market—all providing good economic justification for residue retention. Development and/or import of alternative feed sources, introducing crop insurance, and raising the awareness of the economic, biophysical and environmental benefits of residue retention among farmers are needed.