 Your new post is loading...
 Your new post is loading...
Anil, A.S., Sharma, V.K., Jimenez-Ballesta, R., Parihar, C.M., Datta, S.P., Barman, M., Chobhe, K.A., Kumawat, C., Patra, A. & Jatav, S.S. 2022. Land. 11 (9). Article number 1488 https://doi.org/10.3390/land11091488
Bai, L., Kong, X., Li, H., Zhu, H., Wang, C. & Ma, S. 2022. Agriculture. 12 (9). Article number 1449. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12091449
Dey, A., Patel, S. & Singh, H.P. 2022. Pages 204-218. In. Kumar, P., Pandey, S.K., Singh, S.K., Singh, S.S. & Singh, V.K. (Eds.) Sustainable Agriculture Systems and Technologies. John Wiley & Sons. Chichester, UK. 376 pages. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119808565.ch9
Kaduwal, S., Karki, T.B., Neupane, R., Bhattarai, R.K., Chaulagain, B., Ghimire, P., Gyawaly, P. & Das, S.K. 2022. Agronomy Journal of Nepal. 6 (1) 119-131. https://doi.org/10.3126/ajn.v6i1.47953
Kassam, A., Saharawat, Y.S. & Abrol, I.P. 2022. In. Sharma, A.R. (Ed.) Conservation Agriculture in India: A Paradigm Shift for Sustainable Production. 17 pages. Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003292487-2
Harish, M.N., Choudhary, A.K., Kumar, S., Dass, A., Singh, V.K., et.al., 2022. Scientific Reports. 12. Article number 3161. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07148-w
|
Pu, C., Chen, J-S., Wang, H-D., Virk, A.L., Zhao, X. & Zhang, H-L. 2022. Science of the Total Environment. 819. Article number 153089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153089
Kader, M.A., Jahangir, M.M.R., Islam, M.R., Begum, R., Nasreen, S.S., Islam, Md.R., Mahmud, A.Al., Haque, M.E., Bell, R.W., & Jahiruddin, M. 2022. Field Crops Research. 287. Article number 108636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108636
Lin, H., He, J., Li, H., Li, H., Wang, Q., Lu., C., Li, Y. & Jiang, S. 2022. Agriculture. 12 (9) Article number 1311. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12091311
Amadori, C., Conceicao, P.C., Casali, C.A., dos SantosCanalli, L.B., Calegari, A. & Dieckow, J. 2022. Bragantia: Soil and Plant Nutrition article. 81. Article number e3622. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.20210352
Navarro-Noya, Y.E., Chavez-Romero, Y., Hereira-Pacheco, S., Lorenzana, A.S de L., Govaerts, B., Verhulst, N. & Dendooven, L. 2022. Microbiology Spectrum. 10 (2) Article number 01834 https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01834-21
Gupta, R.K., Abrol, I.P. & Sharma, A.R. 2022. 11 pages. In. Sharma, A.R. (Ed). Conservation Agriculture in India: A Paradigm Shift for Sustainable Production. Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003292487-21
Parwada, C., Chipomho, J., Mandumbu, R. 2022. In. Mupambwa, H.A., Nciizah, A.D., Nyambo, P., Muchara, B. & Gabriel, N.N (Eds.) Food Security for African Smallholder Farmers. Springer, Singapore. Pages 281-294. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6771-8_17
|
This paper reports on the residue dynamics in a 12-year experiment (2007–2018) in the Wheatbelt of Western Australia, comparing rotations that included: cereal (cereal/cereal/cereal); diverse (wheat/legume/canola); farmer (wheat/barley/break – legume or fallow); and wheat monoculture. Crop residue was either spread behind the harvester (retain) or windrowed at harvest and burnt before seeding (windrow burn). Within rotations, residue quantity was highest with retained residue in the cereal rotation and wheat monoculture, averaging 5.0 t ha−1 prior to seeding, which could present management problems at seeding time in some years. Residue quantity was reduced to optimal levels by including legume crops or canola in the rotation, as these residues were more rapidly broken down than cereal residues, whilst maintaining residue retention practices.